Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1169 - 1185 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747 İndeks Tarihi: 08-11-2023

THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS

Öz:
Public diplomacy refers to the methods and tools states and non-state entities use to comprehend cultures, attitudes, and conduct; establish and oversee connections; and influence opinions and behaviors to promote their interests. Each country has its public diplomacy strategy. China, which stands out as a global power, is among the countries that attach importance to public diplomacy. China, which has been identified with the concept of sharp power, also faces accusations from US politicians. Recently, claims from the United States that China-based social media platform TikTok has been carrying out sharp power activities have come to the fore. TikTok is considered to be a major tool for China as it has over one billion active users around the world. However, there are debates as to whether China manipulates the public of other countries through this practice. Censorship and manipulation, the two main concepts of sharp power, are used in TikTok or does TikTok exist independently? This article aims to explore whether the TikTok platform, one of China's important public diplomacy tools, is perceived as a threat by American politicians. For this purpose, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew’s US Congress testimony was analyzed by content analysis method. As a result, it has been confirmed that American politicians perceive TikTok as a sharp power instrument of the Chinese Communist Party. It has been observed that concerns have been expressed about the concepts of censorship, manipulation, propaganda, control, and influence, which are the five elements of sharp power. It has been found that the TikTok platform is perceived as a propaganda device, a psychological warfare weapon, and not a public diplomacy tool or soft power element.
Anahtar Kelime: Sharp power TikTok China’s public diplomacy China-USA relations

TiKTOK PLATFORMUNUN ABD SiYASETINDE ÇiN’iN KESKiN GÜÇ UNSURU OLARAK ALGILANMASI

Öz:
Kamu diplomasisi, devletlerin ve devlet dışı kuruluşların kültürleri, tutumları ve davranışları anlamak; bağlantılar kurmak ve yürütmek; çıkarlarını desteklemek için fikirleri ve davranışları etkilemek için kullandıkları yöntem ve araçları ifade eder. Her ülkenin kendine has bir kamu diplomasisi stratejisi bulunmaktadır. Küresel bir güç olarak öne çıkan Çin de kamu diplomasisine önem veren ülkeler arasındadır.. Keskin güç kavramıyla anılan Çin, ABD'li siyasetçilerin de suçlamalarıyla karşılaşmaktadır. Son zamanlarda ABD'den Çin merkezli sosyal medya platformu TikTok'un keskin güç faaliyetleri yürüttüğü iddiaları gündeme gelmiştir. TikTok, dünya genelinde bir milyardan fazla aktif kullanıcısı olması sebebiyle Çin için önemli bir araç olarak kabul ediliyor. Ancak Çin'in bu uygulamayla diğer ülke halklarını manipüle edip etmediği konusunda tartışmalar bulunmaktadır. Keskin gücün iki ana kavramı olan sansür ve manipülasyon TikTok'ta kullanılıyor mu yoksa TikTok bağımsız olarak mı var oluyor? Bu makalenin amacı, Çin'in önemli kamu diplomasisi araçlarından biri olan TikTok platformunun Amerikalı politikacılar tarafından bir tehdit olarak algılanıp algılanmadığını araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla TikTok CEO'su Shou Zi Chew'in ABD Kongresi'ndeki ifadesi içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak Amerikalı politikacıların TikTok'u Çin Komünist Partisi'nin keskin güç aracı olarak algıladıkları doğrulanmıştır. Keskin gücün beş unsuru olan sansür, manipülasyon, propaganda, kontrol ve etkileme kavramlarına yönelik kaygıların dile getirildiği görülmüştür. TikTok platformunun bir kamu diplomasisi aracı veya yumuşak güç unsuru olarak değil, propaganda aracı, psikolojik savaş silahı olarak algılandığı tespit edildi.
Anahtar Kelime: Keskin güç TikTok Çin'in kamu diplomasisi Çin-ABD ilişkileri

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adeduntan, R. I., & Omiyefa, O. (2022). Exploring the Values of Transformative Curriculum for Nation-Building: The Challenge of Curriculum Enactment in Citizenship Education., Journal of Education and Vocational Research,13 (1), 33-40.
  • Analysis of the perception of the EU and of EU’s policies abroad. (2015). European Commission’s Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI).
  • Aras, İ. (2022). Understanding China Through Sharp Power: Dragon's Teeth? . İçtimaiyat , 6 (2) , 623-635.
  • Akçadağ, E. (2010) Yükselen Çin’in Kamu Diplomasisi, Türk Asya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, https://tasam.org/tr-TR/Icerik/1285/yukselen_cinin_kamu_diplomasisi
  • Bilener, T. (2019). Dış Politika Analizinde Yumuşak Güç - Keskin Güç Karşılaştırması: Çin Örneği . The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations , 50 , 241-257 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tyir/issue/60713/897955.
  • Chen, W. (2014). Foreign-Oriented Political Discourse in Contemporary China: Construction Model and Social Change. Australian Journal of Linguistics.
  • Çatal, S. (2019). Kuşak ve Yol İnisiyatifi’nin Türkiye’nin Ekonomi Güvenliğine Etkileri . Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , Cilt: 19 Sayı: 15 Temmuz Özel Sayısı , 101-124.
  • Dasgupta, S. (2021, November 2), Çin'in "şaşırtıcı" derecede hızlı askeri atılımı ABD'yi alarma geçirdi. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://l24.im/w0li
  • Dethlefsen, K. (2004). China’s Foreign Policy in Transition. FES Briefing Paper.
  • Ekowati, V. I., Nurhayati, E., Suwarna, S., & Saputri, I. I. (2023). Program for International Student Assessment- Based Analysis for Javanese Test. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (Ijere).
  • Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77.
  • Hayden, C. (2017) Scope, mechanism, and outcome: arguing soft power in the context of public diplomacy. Journal of International Relataions and Development, 20, 331–357.
  • Hendrix, J. (2023, Mart 24). Transcript: TikTok CEO Testifies to Congress. Tech Policy Press. https://techpolicy.press/transcript-tiktok-ceo-testifies-to-congress/
  • Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2022). An intermestic Approach to China’s Public Diplomacy: A Case Study of Beijing’s COVID-19 Communication in the Early Stages. Journal of Communication Management.
  • Iqbal, M. (2022,August 3). TikTok Revenue and Usage Statistics Business of Apps, Retrieved From https://uploads2.craft.co/uploads/operating_source/document/982548/57cb7f410c237c8e.pdf
  • Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229–253.
  • Lin, J. (2020). One App, Two Versions: Tiktok And The Platformization From China. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2020.
  • Makhmud A.K. (2020) Sharp power. The effort of Western authors to divide soft power on “our” and “theirs”. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series "Political Science. History. International Relations". (4/2):186-202.
  • Matosian A.E. (2021) The Key Components of South Korea’s Soft Power: Challenges and Trends // RUDN Journal of Political Science. 23(2),279-286.
  • Melin, E. (2021). China’s sharp power through TikTok: A case study of how China can use sharp power through TikTok. Independent thesis Advanced level [Student thesis]. DiVA. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-101079
  • Miao, W., Huang, D., & Huang, Y. (2023). More than business: The de-politicisation and re-politicisation of TikTok in the media discourses of China, America and India (2017–2020). Media International Australia, 186(1), 97–114.
  • Myles, D. (2023). Shaping App Data Publics As A National Security Issue: A Comparative Analysis Of The Cfius- Grindr And Cfius-Tiktok Rulings. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2022.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2023, March 22), Çin, ABD’nin yerini mi almaya çalışıyor [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://fikirturu.com/jeo-strateji/cin-abdnin-yerini-mi-almaya-calisiyor/
  • Nye, Jr. J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
  • Nye, J. S.& Winkler, Jr. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. International Journal Canada S Journal of Global Policy Analysis.
  • Pahlavi, P. (2007). Evaluating Public Diplomacy Programmes. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(3), 255-281.
  • Palmer, L., & Mirehie, M. (2022). Investigating Collegiate Athletes’ Wellbeing During the Travel Season. Events and Tourism Review, 5(2), Article 2.
  • Poon, J.(2022) Sino-Cal realism: TikTok as a medium between new market dynamics. Digi War 3, 107–112
  • Pradt, T. (2016). Conclusion: China’s New Foreign Policy. In China’s New Foreign Policy (pp. 197–204). Springer International Publishing.
  • Richter, A. (2022). A Theoretical Framework and Constructed Model for Sharp Power. Open Journal of Political Science, 12, 652-669.
  • Rosmalina, A. (2023). Lecturers' Perspective of E-Counseling Service During Online Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. 15 (1). 1111-1118.
  • Sak, E. (2014). Kamu Diplomasisi ve Çin . Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi , 2 (1) , 9-25 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yalovabaccd/issue/21779/234042
  • Sandıklı, A. (2009). Geleceğin Süper Gücü Çin. Bilge Strateji , 1 (1) , 40-50 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bs/issue/3809/510661.
  • Soebagyo, J., Purwanto, S. E., Ibrahim, A., Purnama, D., Akbari, H., Suryoputro, G., Bandarsyah, D., Maarif, S., Ernawati, I. R., Setyaningsih, M., Kusdiwelirawan, A., Hutari, A., Awaludin, S., Laksanawati, W. D., Anugrah, D., Tsurayya, A., Mayarni, M., Miatun, A., Soro, S., Kartikawati, E. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Resilience Through Google Classroom-Based Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA, 3-4 Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia.
  • Sørensen, C. T. N. (2019). That Is Not Intervention; That Is Interference With Chinese Characteristics: New Concepts, Distinctions and Approaches Developing in the Chinese Debate and Foreign and Security Policy Practice. The China Quarterly.
  • Su, C. (2023). Contingency, Precarity and Short-Video Creativity: Platformization Based Analysis of Chinese Online Screen Industry. Television & New Media, 24(2), 173–189.
  • Süleymanoğlu Kürüm, R. (2020, May 3), “Kamu diplomasisi üzerine bir inceleme: Denizaşırı gönüller ve akıllar kazanma”. Küresel Çalışmalar. https://kureselcalismalar.com/kamu-diplomasisi-uzerine-bir-inceleme- denizasiri-gonuller-ve-akillar-kazanma/Skoneczny, Ł., & Cacko, B. (2021). Sharp power – Introduction to the Issue. Przegląd Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego. 25(13). 325-340.
  • Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating With the World: U.S. Public Diplomacy Overseas, New York St. Martin's Press.
  • Varral, M. (2020, January 10) Behind the News: Inside China Global Television Network, Lowy Institute. Retrieved From https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/behind-news-inside-china-global-television- networkVijay, D., & Gekker, A. (2021). Playing Politics: How Sabarimala Played Out on TikTok. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(5), 712–734.
  • Walker, C. (2018). What Is “Sharp Power”?. Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 9-23.
  • Walker, C., & Ludwig, J. (2017). The sharp power of authoritarian states. National Endowment for Democracy.
  • Wang, Y. (2008). Public Diplomacy and the Rise of Chinese Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
  • Wei, C. (2020). Public Diplomacy: Functions, Functional Boundaries and Measurement Methods. IntechOpen.
  • Wheeler, A. (2014). Cultural Diplomacy, Language Planning, and the Case of the University of Nairobi Confucius Institute. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(1), 49–63.
  • White, M.D., & Marsh, E.E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends 55(1), 22-45.
  • Yağmurlu, A. (2007). “Halkla İlişkiler Yöntemi Olarak Kamu Diplomasisi”, İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1): 9-38. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12575/63042
  • Yang, Y. (2020). Looking Inward: How Does Chinese Public Diplomacy Work at Home? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
  • Zheng, Y., & Lye, L. F. (2015). China’s Foreign Policy: The Unveiling of President Xi Jinping’s Grand Strategy. East Asian Policy, 07(01), 62–82.
  • Zubair, B., & Hussain, N. (2020). China's Public Diplomacy and Communication Strategy in The Us: Lessons For Pakistan. Margalla Papers, 24(2), 57-70.
APA GOKSUN Y, Samuk D (2023). THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. , 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
Chicago GOKSUN YENAL,Samuk Deniz THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. (2023): 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
MLA GOKSUN YENAL,Samuk Deniz THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. , 2023, ss.1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
AMA GOKSUN Y,Samuk D THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. . 2023; 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
Vancouver GOKSUN Y,Samuk D THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. . 2023; 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
IEEE GOKSUN Y,Samuk D "THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS." , ss.1169 - 1185, 2023. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
ISNAD GOKSUN, YENAL - Samuk, Deniz. "THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS". (2023), 1169-1185. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
APA GOKSUN Y, Samuk D (2023). THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
Chicago GOKSUN YENAL,Samuk Deniz THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no.4 (2023): 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
MLA GOKSUN YENAL,Samuk Deniz THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.16, no.4, 2023, ss.1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
AMA GOKSUN Y,Samuk D THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 16(4): 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
Vancouver GOKSUN Y,Samuk D THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 16(4): 1169 - 1185. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
IEEE GOKSUN Y,Samuk D "THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS." Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, ss.1169 - 1185, 2023. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747
ISNAD GOKSUN, YENAL - Samuk, Deniz. "THE PERCEPTION OF THE TIKTOK PLATFORM AS CHINA’S SHARP POWER INSTRUMENT IN US POLITICS". Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16/4 (2023), 1169-1185. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1342747