EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL

Taştan, Emine; karaman, emel; GÜLER, EDA

EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL

Emel Karaman, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)

Eda Guler, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)

Emine Tastan

Clinical Dentistry and Research

3 0

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 62 - 70 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 27-12-2023

EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL

Öz:

Background and Aims: Fissure sealing is an important and effective procedure for preventing caries on occlusal surfaces and the retention of fissure sealants plays a key role in the success of treatment. The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical study was to evaluate the performance of a universal adhesive system applied in etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system on fissure sealant retention over 24 months. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-four sealants were placed on the permanent premolars and molars of 13 participants. The teeth were divided into three groups: SB2 (control): Adper Single Bond 2, SBU-ER: Single Bond Universal/ etch-and-rinse, and SBU-SE: Single Bond Universal/self-etch. After the adhesive procedures, Fissurit FX was applied and light-cured. Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and at 1-week and 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month recalls. A visual examination was performed during every visit for evaluation of the sealants. The scoring in the evaluation was as follows: 1= completely retained; 2= partial loss; 3= total loss. Pearson’s chisquared test was used for each evaluation period. Results: At the 24-month recall, 94 sealants of the 13 patients were completely retained. Complete retention rates were 95.45% for SB2, 95.7% for SBU-ER, and 60% for SBUSE. Retention rates in the SBU-SE group were significantly different in all periods of evaluation (p= 0.019). No new caries formation was detected during the observation period. Conclusion: Fissure sealants applied in etch-and-rinse mode showed better retention rates than those applied with the selfetch technique.

Anahtar Kelime: Clinical Trial Fissure Sealant Universal Adhesive

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Macek MD, Beltran-Aguilar ED, Lockwood SA, Malvitz DM. Updated comparison of the caries susceptibility of various morphological types of permanent teeth. J Public Health Dent 2003; 63: 174-182.
2. Ripa L, LW R. Occlusal Sealants: Rationale And Review Of Clinical Trials. Int Dent J 1980 Jun; 30: 127-139.
3. Simonsen RJJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 393-414.
4. Matalon S, Slutzky H, Mazor Y, Weiss EI. Surface antibacterial properties of fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 43-48.
5. Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C et al. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 2012; 143: 115-122.
6. Feigal R, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling JJJoDR. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1850-1856.
7. Pérez-Lajarín L, Cortés-Lillo O, García-Ballesta C, Cózar- Hidalgo AJJodfc. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study. J Dent Child(Chic) 2003; 70: 24-28.
8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
9. Perdigao J, Swift E, Walter RJSsA, Dentistry SoO. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. 2014: 114-140.
10. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DSJJoAD. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4.
11. Tay FR, Pashley DH, King N, Carvalho R, Tsai J, Lai S et al. Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 309-316.
12. Powers JM, Farah JWJCoceid. Technique sensitivity in bonding to enamel and dentin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010; 31: 1-8; quiz 9.
13. Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 757-761.
14. Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, Shimatani Y, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci 2019: 18- 0433.
15. Saito T, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Hirokane E, Barkmeier W et al. Influence of application time on dentin bond performance in different etching modes of universal adhesives. Oper Dent 2020; 45: 183-195.
16. Diniz AC, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, Dos Santosh Almeida Jr L, Torres CR, Borges AH et al. Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bond Strength to Enamel using Universal Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17: 820-825.
17. Jacker-Guhr S, Sander J, Luehrs A-KJJAD. How “universal” is adhesion? Shear bond strength of multi-mode adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 87-95.
18. Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan SJJoAOS. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL–arandomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2019; 27: e20180358.
19. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu C-C, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JOJJod. Twoyear clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015; 43: 1229- 1234.
20. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher DJT. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010; 11: 1-8.
21. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux P, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 28-55.
22. Carvalho JC, Dige I, Machiulskiene V, Qvist V, Bakhshandeh A, Fatturi-Parolo C et al. Occlusal caries: biological approach for its diagnosis and management. Caries Res 2016; 50: 527-542.
23. Bhushan U, Goswami MJJoc, dentistry e. Evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in 6-8 year old children–An in vivo study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: e211.
24. Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NJDj. The use of pit and fissure sealants—A literature review. Dent J (Basel) 2017; 5: 34.
25. Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38: 282-308.
26. Griffin SO, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BFJTJotADA. Caries risk in formerly sealed teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 415-423.
27. Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, Donly K, Feigal R, Gooch B et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pitand- fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 257-268.
28. Swift EJ Jr. Preventive resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1987 Jun; 114: 819-821.
29. Gwinnett A, Matsui AJAoOB. A study of enamel adhesives: the physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12: 1615-IN46.
30. McLean D, Meyers E, Guillory V, Vandewalle KJOd. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 410-417.
31. de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MSJJAD. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 243-250.
32. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Tsuchiya K, Erickson RL et al. Influence of pre-etching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 501-511.
33. Feigal RJ, Quelhas IJAjod. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 249-251.
34. Burbridge L, Nugent Z, Deery CJEAoPD. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one-step conditioning agent in fissure sealant placement: 12 month results. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2007; 8: 49-54.
35. Venker DJ, Kuthy RA, Qian F, Kanellis MJJJophd. Twelve-month sealant retention in a school-based program using a self-etching primer/adhesive. J Public Health Dent 2004; 64: 191-197.
36. Mitra SB, Lee C-Y, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RPJDM. Longterm adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resinmodified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 459-466.
37. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 709-714.
38. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1861-1867.
39. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T et al. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 3187-3195.
40. Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Liang B, Tang T, Fu B et al. The contribution of chemical bonding to the short-and long-term enamel bond strengths. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 103-112.
41. Kodaka T, Nakajima F, Kuroiwa MJTBoTDC. Distribution patterns of the surface” prismless” enamel in human deciduous incisors. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1989; 30: 9-19.
42. Perdıgao J, Geraldeli SJJoe, dentistry r. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 32-42.
43. Burrow M, Makinson OJAjodfc. Pits and fissures: remnant organic debris after acid-etching. ASDC J Dent Child 1990; 57: 348-351.
44. Perdigao J, Fundingsland J, Duarte Jr S, Lopes MJIjopd. Microtensile adhesion of sealants to intact enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005; 15: 342-348.
45. Messer LB, Calache H, Morgan MVJAdj. The retention of pit and fissure sealants placed in primary school children by Dentl Health Services, Victoria. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 233-239.
46. Yazici AR, Kiremitçi A, Dayangaç BJTJotADA. A two-year clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in teenagers. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1401-1405.
47. Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006; 34: 321-336

APA	karaman e, GÜLER E, Taştan E (2023). EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. , 62 - 70.
Chicago	karaman emel,GÜLER EDA,Taştan Emine EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. (2023): 62 - 70.
MLA	karaman emel,GÜLER EDA,Taştan Emine EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. , 2023, ss.62 - 70.
AMA	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. . 2023; 62 - 70.
Vancouver	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. . 2023; 62 - 70.
IEEE	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E "EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL." , ss.62 - 70, 2023.
ISNAD	karaman, emel vd. "EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL". (2023), 62-70.

APA	karaman e, GÜLER E, Taştan E (2023). EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 47(3), 62 - 70.
Chicago	karaman emel,GÜLER EDA,Taştan Emine EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. Clinical Dentistry and Research 47, no.3 (2023): 62 - 70.
MLA	karaman emel,GÜLER EDA,Taştan Emine EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol.47, no.3, 2023, ss.62 - 70.
AMA	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2023; 47(3): 62 - 70.
Vancouver	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2023; 47(3): 62 - 70.
IEEE	karaman e,GÜLER E,Taştan E "EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL." Clinical Dentistry and Research, 47, ss.62 - 70, 2023.
ISNAD	karaman, emel vd. "EFFECT OF SELF-ETCH AND ETCH-AND-RINSE MODES USING UNIVERSAL AND CONVENTIONAL ADHESIVES ON FISSURE SEALANT RETENTION: A 24-MONTH CLINICAL TRIAL". Clinical Dentistry and Research 47/3 (2023), 62-70.