Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites

Gökçen, Gizem; hubbezoglu, ihsan

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1409127

Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites

Gizem Gokcen Yildirimoglu, (Sakarya Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Hastanesi, Sakarya, Türkiye)

Ihsan Hubbezoglu (Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

1 0

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 417 - 425 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.1409127 İndeks Tarihi: 04-01-2024

Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites

Öz:

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of three different types of highly esthetic composite resin, which will be used for aesthetic purposes in the anterior region, on the surface roughness and microhardness by the application of three different finishing and polishing systems, with three-dimensional Optical Profilometer, Vickers microhardness device and SEM analysis. Materials and methods: Three different composite resins were used in the study; supra-nanofil(Tokuyama Estelite Asteria), supra-nano spherical(Tokuyama Omnichroma), nanohybrid(Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) were used. 40 samples of each composite resin were prepared, 120 in total. After the polymerization and correction processes, ten samples from each group that did not undergo any polishing process were separated as the control group. Then, they were randomly divided into three groups for the polishing process: 4-stage aluminum oxide coated disc(3M Sof-lex disc), beige and pink 2-step spiral rubber consisting of aluminum oxide-containing diamond particles(3M Sof-lex spiral), polyurethane, diamond granules. containing light blue rubber and spiral rubber(Ivoclar Vivadent OptraGloss). Surface roughness(Ra) was measured on all samples with a conventional profilometer device. Then, one sample surface from each group was examined with the Optical Profilometer device and the Scanning Electron Microscope, and all samples were subjected to microhardness testing with the Vickers Microhardness Tester. Results: As a result of our study, the lowest roughness values were observed in the control group, while the highest roughness values were observed in the Ivoclar Optragloss group. The groups studied with Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic composite showed higher roughness values compared to other composite groups, but no statistically significant difference was found with other composite groups(p>0.05). In our study, the lowest microhardness values were observed in the control group, while the highest microhardness values were observed in the Sof-Lex Disk group. The difference between the groups treated with Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic composite and the other composite groups was found to be statistically significant(p

Anahtar Kelime: aesthetic composite surface roughness microhardness

Farklı Bitirme ve Polisaj Sistemlerinin Yüksek Estetiğe Sahip Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ve Mikrosertliği Üzerine Etkinliği

Öz:

Amaç: Çalışmamızda amaç; anterior bölgede estetik amaçla kullanılacak üç farklı tipteki yüksek estetiğe sahip kompozit rezine, üç farklı bitirme ve polisaj sistemlerinin uygulanmasıyla, yüzey pürüzlülüğüne ve mikrosertliğine etkisini üç boyutlu Optik Profilometre, Vickers mikrosertlik cihazı ve SEM analizleri ile incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada 3 farklı kompozit rezin; supra-nanofil (Tokuyama Estelite Asteria), supra-nano sferikal (Tokuyama Omnichroma), nanohibrit (Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) kullanıldı. Toplam 120 adet olmak üzere her bir kompozit rezinden 40’ar adet örnek hazırlandı. Polimerizasyon ve düzeltme işlemlerinden sonra, her gruptan herhangi bir polisaj işlemi uygulanmamış on örnek, kontrol grubu olarak ayrıldı. Daha sonra polisaj işlemi için rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı: 4 aşamalı alüminyum oksit kaplı disk (3M Sof-lex disk), alüminyum oksit içerikli elmas parçacıklardan oluşan bej ve pembe renkli 2 adımlı spiral lastik (3M Sof-lex spiral), poliüretan, elmas granüller içeren açık mavi lastik ve spiral lastik (İvoclar Vivadent OptraGloss).Yüzey pürüzlülüğü (Ra) konvansiyonel profilometre cihazı ile tüm numuneler üzerinde ölçüm yapıldı. Daha sonra Optik Profilometre cihazıyla ve Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobuyla tüm gruplardan birer adet örnek yüzeyi incelendi ve tüm örnekler Vickers Mikrosertlik Test Cihazıyla mikrosertlik testine tabi tutuldu. Bulgular: Çalışmamızın sonucunda en düşük pürüzlülük değerleri kontrol grubunda gözlenirken, en yüksek pürüzlülük değerleri ise İvoclar Optragloss grubunda gözlenmiştir. Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic kompozit ile çalışılan gruplar, diğer kompozit gruplarına göre yüksek pürüzlülük değerleri göstermiş ancak diğer kompozit gruplarıyla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır (p>0,05). Çalışmamızda en düşük mikrosertlik değerleri ise kontrol grubunda gözlenirken, en yüksek mikrosertlik değerleri ise Sof-Lex Disk grubunda gözlenmiştir. En düşük mikrosertlik değerleri Kuraray Clearfil Majesty Esthetic kompozitle çalışılan gruplarda gözlenmiştir. Sonuçlar: Kullanılan polisaj sistemlerinin, farklı içerikli restoratif matertaller üzerinde etkinliğinin farklı olduğu, Sof-Lex çok aşamalı disk ile Sof-Lex iki aşamalı spiral lastik sistemlerinin, İvoclar Optragloss sistemine göre daha başarılı olduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelime: Estetik Kompozit Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Mikrosertlik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Qualtrough A, Burke F. A look at dental esthetics, Quintessence Int, 25(1), 1994.
2. Papadogiannis Y, Lakes R, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu- Antoniades M, Papadogiannis D. Fatigue of packable dental composites, Dental Materials, 2007, 23(2):235-242.
3. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam N. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials, Brazilian Oral Research, 2012, 28(1):87-101.
4. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2003, 134(10):1382-1390.
5. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. Journal of dental research, 2010,89(6):549-560.
6. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Operative dentistry,1996, 21(2):73-80.
7. Jung M, Bruegger H, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(6):816-824.
8. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of materials science Materials in medicine, 2007, 18(1):155-163.
9. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 1999, 15(2):79-86.
10. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2000, 15(3):331-344.
11. Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Operative dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
12. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2000, 27(3):205-210.
13. Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri R. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins, Journal of International Oral Health, 2015, 7(7):63.
14. Lainović T, Blažić L, Kukuruzović D, Vilotić M, Ivanišević A, Kakaš D. Effect of diamond paste finishing on surface topography and roughness of dental nanohybrid composites–AFM analysis, Procedia Engineering, 2014, 69:945-951.
15. Rocha RS, Oliveira AC, Caneppele TMF, Bresciani E. Effect of artificial aging protocols on surface gloss of resin composites, International Journal of Dent, 2017.
16. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite J. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals, Dental Materials, 2013, 29(9):e213-e217.
17. Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso P. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations, Dental Materials, 2004, 20(8):726-32.
18. Leal A, Paula A, Ramalho A, Esteves M, Ferreira MM, Carrilho E, et al. Roughness and microhardness of composites after different bleaching techniques, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, 2015, 13(4):381-388.
19. Quirynen M, Bollen C. The influence of surface roughness and surface free energy on supra and subgingival plaque formation in man: A review of the literature, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1995, 22(1):1-14.
20. Hondrum SO, Fernandez Jr R. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials, Operative Dentistry, 1997, 22(1):30-36.
21. Roeder L, Tate W, Powers J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites, Operative Dentistry, 2000, 25(6):534-43.
22. Turkun L, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials, Operative Dentistry, 2004, 29(2):203-11.
23. Yamanel K. Farklı Profilaktik Parlatma İşlemlerinin Mikrohibrit ve Nanohibrit Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 2018, 21(2):85-92.
24. Daud A, Adams AJ, Shawkat A, Gray G, Wilson NHF, Lynch CD, et al. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures, Journal of Dentistry, 2020, 99:103376.
25. Gordan VV, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite, Operative Dentistry, 2003, 28(5):560-567.
26. Onur U, Gökay O, Müjdeci A. Siloran bazlı bir kompozit rezinin yüzey sertliği üzerine bitirme ve cila işlemlerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi, A.ü Diş. Hek. Fak. Dergi, 2008, 35:5-9.
27. Gökay O, Özyurt P, Seçkin B. Farklı bitirme ve cila yöntemleri uygulanmış bir kompozit rezinin çeşitli likitler karşısında gösterdiği yüzey sertlik değerlerinin karşılaştırılması, Klin Diş Hek Bil, 1998, 4:55-60.
28. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. European journal of dentistry, 2012, 6(2):198-205.
29. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Operative dentistry, 2006, 31(1):11-17.
30. Özgünaltay G, Yazici A, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth coloured restoratives, Jounal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2003, 30(2):218-224.
31. Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MFdL, Nunes O. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins, Brazilian Dental Journal, 2005,16:39-44.
32. Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Öcal İ. Farkli cila sistemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin yüzey pürüzlülükleri üzerine etkisi, Yeditepe J. Dent, 2020,16(2):147-153.
33. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one- step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Operative dentistry, 2008, 33(1):44-50.
34. Dursun MN, Atalay C. Farkli Polisaj Sistemlerinin Posterior Bölgede Kullanilan Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi, J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni, 2021, 31(3):373-8.
35. Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composite and Enamel: An In vitro Profilometric and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. International journal of applied & basic medical research, 2019, 9(3):154-8.
36. Ersöz E, & Erkli, H. Farklı Cila Materyallerinin Bir Kompozit Rezin Materyalin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisi. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2012, 18(2).
37. Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: a review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry, 2004, 16(1):19-31.
38. Göztaş Z, Tosun G, Yıldız E, Kahraman K. Nanodoldurucu içeren beş farklı kompozitin yüzey sertliği ve pürüzlülüğü açısından değerlendirilmesi, Selcuk Dental Journal, 2014, 1(2):43-48.

APA	Gökçen G, hubbezoglu i (2023). Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. , 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Chicago	Gökçen Gizem,hubbezoglu ihsan Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. (2023): 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
MLA	Gökçen Gizem,hubbezoglu ihsan Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. , 2023, ss.417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
AMA	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. . 2023; 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Vancouver	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. . 2023; 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
IEEE	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i "Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites." , ss.417 - 425, 2023. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
ISNAD	Gökçen, Gizem - hubbezoglu, ihsan. "Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites". (2023), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409127

APA	Gökçen G, hubbezoglu i (2023). Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 26(4), 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Chicago	Gökçen Gizem,hubbezoglu ihsan Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26, no.4 (2023): 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
MLA	Gökçen Gizem,hubbezoglu ihsan Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.26, no.4, 2023, ss.417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
AMA	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2023; 26(4): 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
Vancouver	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2023; 26(4): 417 - 425. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
IEEE	Gökçen G,hubbezoglu i "Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 26, ss.417 - 425, 2023. 10.7126/cumudj.1409127
ISNAD	Gökçen, Gizem - hubbezoglu, ihsan. "Efficacy of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Highly Aesthetic Composites". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26/4 (2023), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1409127