Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 255 - 260 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 İndeks Tarihi: 05-01-2024
Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques
Öz: Objectives: To prevent the negative effects of brushing on the microhardness of the acrylic resin, different polymerization techniques may be taken into consideration while choosing the denture base material. This study's objective was to assess how brushing affected the Vickers microhardness of acrylic denture base resins polymerized using various methods. Materials and Methods: From each acrylic resin (Integra and FuturaJet), 100 disk-shaped specimens (15 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were created. A total of five distinct polymerization processes—the traditional water-bath method, short and long autoclave polymerization, injection-molding polymerization, and auto-polymerization—were examined (n=20). An automatic brushing machine was used to imitate brushing on half of the specimens, applying 54 000 brush strokes each specimen. All specimens were then subjected to a Vickers hardness test with a 300-g force for 15 s. Data analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post-hoc test; statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: In all polymerization methods, a statistically significant difference was seen between the control and brushing groups. The autopolymerized acrylic resin group substantially had lower microhardness values than the control and brushing groups' short, long autoclave, and water bath-polymerized resins. Conclusions: The microhardness of acrylic denture base resins should be taken into consideration when considering polymerization procedures because the autopolymerization method may have certain drawbacks in terms of preventing negative effects of brushing on the microhardness.
Anahtar Kelime: Farklı Tekniklerle Polimerize Edilen Akrilik Protez Kaide Rezinlerinin Vickers Mikrosertliğine Fırçalamanın Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi
Öz: maç: Protez kaide materyali seçiminde, fırçalamanın akrilik rezinin mikrosertliği üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinden kaçınmak için farklı polimerizasyon teknikleri dikkate alınabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı tekniklerle polimerize edilen akrilik protez kaide rezinlerinin Vickers mikrosertliği üzerindeki fırçalama etkisinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Her bir akrilik rezinden (Integra ve FuturaJet) 100 adet disk şeklinde örnek (15 mm çap ve 2 mm kalınlık) üretildi. Geleneksel su banyosu polimerizasyonu, kısa ve uzun otoklav polimerizasyonu, enjeksiyon kalıplama polimerizasyonu ve oto-polimerizasyon olmak üzere 5 farklı polimerizasyon tekniği test edildi (n=20). Örneklerin yarısı, her numune için 54 000 fırça darbesi kullanılarak otomatik bir fırçalama makinesinde simüle edilmiş fırçalamaya tabi tutuldu. Tüm örnekler daha sonra 15 saniye boyunca 300 g yük ile Vickers sertlik testine tabi tutuldu. Sertlik verilerinin analizi için Mann-Whitney U testi ve Kruskal-Wallis testi ve ardından Dunn's post-hoc testi uygulandı, sonuçlar p<0,05 için istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı. Bulgular: Tüm polimerizasyon tekniklerinde kontrol ve fırçalama grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulundu. Otopolimerize akrilik rezin grubu, kontrol ve fırçalama gruplarında su banyosu, kısa ve uzun otoklav polimerize rezin gruplarına göre anlamlı derecede daha düşük mikrosertlik değerleri gösterdi. Sonuçlar: Otopolimerizasyon tekniği, fırçalamanın mikrosertlik üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinden kaçınmak için bazı dezavantajlara sahip olabilir, bu nedenle polimerizasyon teknikleri belirlenirken, akrilik protez kaide rezinlerinin mikrosertliği açısından düşünülmelidir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Salles AE, Macedo LD, Fernandes RA, Silva-Lovato CH, Paranhos Hde F. Comparative analysis of biofilm levels in complete upper and lower dentures after brushing associated with specific denture paste and neutral soap. Gerodontology 2007;24:217-223.
- 2. Gornitsky M, Paradis I, Landaverde G, Mallo AM, Velly AM. A clinical and microbiological evaluation of denture cleansers for geriatric patients in long term care institutions. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68:39-45.
- 3. Paranhos HFO, Silva-Lovato CH, Souza RF, Cruz PC, Freitas KM, Peracini A. Effects of mechanical and chemical methods on denture biofilm accumulation. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:606-612.
- 4. Dhir G, Berzins DW, Dhuru VB, Periaathamby AR, Dentino A. Physical properties of denture base resins potentially resistant to Candida adhesion. J Prosthodont 2007;16:465-472.
- 5. Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont 2011;20:S1-S12.
- 6. de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H, Lovato da Silva CH, Abu-Naba'a L, Fedorowicz Z, Gurgan CA. Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD007395.
- 7. Panzeri H, Lara EH, Paranhos HFO, Silva-Lovato CH, Souza RF, de Souza Gugelmin MC, et al. In vitro and clinical evaluation of specific dentifrices for complete denture hygiene. Gerodontology 2009;26:26-33.
- 8. de Freitas Pontes KM, de Holanda JC, Fonteles CS, Pontes Cde B, Lovato da Silva CH, Paranhos Hde F. Effect of toothbrushes and denture brushes on heat-polymerized acrylic resins. Gen Dent 2016;64:49-53.
- 9. Richmond R, Macfarlane TV, McCord JF. An evaluation of the surface changes in PMMA biomaterial formulations as a result of toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion. Dent Mater 2004;20:124-132.
- 10. Farina AP, Cecchin D, Soares RG, Botelho AL, Takahashi JM, Mazzetto MO, Mesquita MF. Evaluation of Vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement. Gerodontology 2012;29:155-160.
- 11. Khan AA, Fareed MA, Alshehri AH, Aldegheishem A, Alharthi R, Saadaldin SA, et al. Mechanical Properties of the Modified Denture Base Materials and Polymerization Methods: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:5737.
- 12. Ayaz EA, Durkan R, Koroglu A, Bagis B. Comparative effect of different polymerization techniques on residual monomer and hardness properties of PMMA-based denture resins. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014;12:228-233.
- 13. Gay WD, King GR. An evaluation of the cure of acrylic resins used in dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:437–440.
- 14. Gharechahi J, Asadzadeh N, Shahabian F, Gharechahi M. Dimensional changes of acrylic resin denture bases: conventional versus injection-molding technique. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:398-405.
- 15. Pinto LR, Acosta EJTR, Ta´vora FFF, Silva PMB, Carvalho V. Effect of repeated cycles of chemical disinfection on the roughness and hardness of hard reline acrylic resins. Gerodontology 2010;27:147-153.
- 16. Peutzfeldt A, Garcia-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 1997;10:15-17.
- 17. Wojda SM, Sajewicz E. Influence of dental materials on hardness and Young's modulus of the surface layers of tooth enamel formed as a result of friction. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2019;21:129-139.
- 18. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2003. p.33-47.
- 19. Prakki A, Cilli R, de Araújo PA, Navarro MF, Mondelli J, Mondelli RF. Effect of toothbrushing abrasion on weight and surface roughness of pH-cycled resin cements and indirect restorative materials. Quintessence Int 2007;38:544-554.
- 20. Çakmak G, Donmez MB, Akay C, Abou-Ayash S, Schimmel M, Yilmaz B. Effect of Thermal Cycling on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of New-Generation Denture Base Materials. J Prosthodont 2023;32:81-86.
- 21. Ayaz EA, Bağış B, Turgut S. Effects of thermal cycling on surface roughness, hardness and flexural strength of polymethylmethacrylate and polyamide denture base resins. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015;13:e280-286.
- 22. International Organization for Standardization. Technical Specification 14569-1. Dental Materials – Guidance on testing of wear resistance – Part 1: Wear by tooth brushing. Geneva, ISO;1999.
- 23. Batisse C, Nicolas E. Comparison of CAD/CAM and conventional denture base resins: A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:5990.
- 24. Perea-Lowery L, Gibreel M, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. 3D-Printed vs. Heat-Polymerizing and Autopolymerizing Denture Base Acrylic Resins. Materials 2021;14:5781.
- 25. Bahrani F, Safari A, Vojdani M, Karampoor G, Patil SJWJD. Comparison of hardness and surface roughness of two denture bases polymerized by different methods. World Journal of Dentistry 2012;3:171-175.
- 26. Abdulwahhab SS. High impact strength acrylic denture base material processed by autoclave. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:288 293.
- 27. Gad MM, Rahoma A, Al-Thobity AM. Effect of polymerization technique and glass fiber addition on the surface roughness and hardness of PMMA denture base material. Dent Mater J 2018;37:746-753.
- 28. Axe AS, Varghese R, Bosma M, Kitson N, Bradshaw DJ. Dental health professional recommendation and consumer habits in denture cleansing. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:183-188.
- 29. Jagger R. Lack of evidence about the effectiveness of the different denture cleaning methods. Evid Based Dent 2009;10:109.
- 30. Meng TR, Latta MA. Physical properties of four acrylic denture base resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:93-100.
- 31. Freitas-Pontes KM, Silva-Lovato CH, Paranhos HF. Mass loss of four commercially available heat-polymerized acrylic resins after toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:116-121.
| APA | Gökçimen G, DESTE GOKAY G, oyar p, DURKAN R, Rona N (2023). Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. , 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| Chicago | Gökçimen Gülsüm,DESTE GOKAY Gonca,oyar perihan,DURKAN RUKIYE,Rona Nergiz Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. (2023): 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| MLA | Gökçimen Gülsüm,DESTE GOKAY Gonca,oyar perihan,DURKAN RUKIYE,Rona Nergiz Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. , 2023, ss.255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| AMA | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. . 2023; 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| Vancouver | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. . 2023; 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| IEEE | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N "Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques." , ss.255 - 260, 2023. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| ISNAD | Gökçimen, Gülsüm vd. "Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques". (2023), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| APA | Gökçimen G, DESTE GOKAY G, oyar p, DURKAN R, Rona N (2023). Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 26(3), 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| Chicago | Gökçimen Gülsüm,DESTE GOKAY Gonca,oyar perihan,DURKAN RUKIYE,Rona Nergiz Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26, no.3 (2023): 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| MLA | Gökçimen Gülsüm,DESTE GOKAY Gonca,oyar perihan,DURKAN RUKIYE,Rona Nergiz Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.26, no.3, 2023, ss.255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| AMA | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2023; 26(3): 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| Vancouver | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2023; 26(3): 255 - 260. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| IEEE | Gökçimen G,DESTE GOKAY G,oyar p,DURKAN R,Rona N "Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 26, ss.255 - 260, 2023. 10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
| ISNAD | Gökçimen, Gülsüm vd. "Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing on Vickers Microhardness of Acrylic Denture Base Resins Polymerized by Different Techniques". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26/3 (2023), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1257234 |
