Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 66 - 73 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure

Öz:
AMAÇ: Beyin-omurilik şant disfonksiyonu, çocukluk çağında halen önemli bir sorundur. Bu prospektif çalışma şant disfonksiyonunun semptom ve nedenleri üzerine odaklanmıştır. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇ: Bu çalışmada, Ocak 2001, Aralık 2005 tarihleri arasında şant disfonksiyonu nedeniyle opere edilen hastaların disfonksiyon nedenleri ve semptomları incelenmiştir. Tüm preoperatif ve operatif veriler prospektif olarak toplanmıştır. Bu veriler Fisher exact test ve ki-kare testleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. BULGULAR: Yüzonbir hasta ve 153 cerrahi prosedürün değerlendirilmesi sonucunda majör semptomlar kusma (69 hasta, %62,16), uykuya meyil (66 hasta, %59,45) ve baş ağrısı (54 hasta, %48,64) olarak tespit edilmiştir.Sekiz hastada ender görülen birtakım semptomlara rastlanmıştır. Bunlar amnezi, spastik monoparazi, ani körlük, ataksi, bradikinezi, disfaji ve üriner inkontinansdır. Şant revizyonlarının çoğunda (115 operasyon, %75,2) bir veya daha fazla mekanik sorunla karşılaşılmıştır. Bu mekanik sorunların çoğu tıkanma şeklindedir. Ayrıca abdominal pseudokist 12 revizyonda (% 7,8) karşımıza çıkmıştır. SONUÇ: Şant disfonksiyonları bazen çok alışılmadık semptomlarla ortaya çıkabilir. Ayrıca muhtemel şantla ilgili yapısal sorunlar, şant disfonksiyonu açısından hasta karakteristiklerinden daha önemli bir etken gibi görünmektedir. Bu nedenlerle şant disfonksiyonu şüphesinde tüm sistemi gözden geçirecek kranial bilgisayarlı tomografi, şant serisi direkt grafileri, batın ultrasonografisi gibi testlerin her hastaya uygulanması önemlidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Beyin-omurilik şant revizyonları, semptomların ve şantın mekanik yapısının önemi

Öz:
AIm: CSF shunt failure is still a frequent problem in children. This prospective study was designed for focusing symptoms and reasons of shunt failure. We also especially focused on the mechanical reasons of shunt failure. Ma terIal and Methods: We focused on the causes of shunt failures, and the symptoms and signs in patients who were operated for shunt malfunction between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2005 in the neurosurgery department. All examination and operative data were collected prospectively. Evaluation of these data was with the chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Results: After the evaluation of data on 111 patients and 153 revision procedures, the major symptoms in this group were vomiting (62.16%), somnolence (59.45%) and headache (48.64%). In the majority of the shunt revisions (115 operations, 75.2% of the all 153 procedures), one or more mechanical problems of the shunt systems were identified in surgery. ConclusIon: Shunt failures in children sometimes appear with very unusual symptoms. Also, probable structural problems of the shunt systems seem very important for shunt failure according to patient characteristics and etiology of the hydrocephalus. A systematic approach including CT, shunt series and abdominal ultrasound is needed to rule out shunt malfunction.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Agha FP, Amendola MA, Shirazi KK, Amendola BE, Chandler WF: Abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts with emphasis on the role of imaging methods. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156: 473-478, 1983
  • 2. Albright AL, Haines SJ, Taylor FH: Function of parietal and frontal shunts in childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 69:883-886, 1988
  • 3. Ames, RH: Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts in the management of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 27: 525-529, 1967
  • 4. Ashkenazi E, Umansky F, Constantini S, et al: Fever as the initial sign of malfunction in non infected ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir 114:131-134, 1992
  • 5. Benzel EC, Mirfakhraee M, Hadden TA: Evaluation of CSF shunt function: Value of functional examination with contrast material. AJNR 12:143-147, 1991
  • 6. Besson R, Hladky JP, Dhellemmes P, Debeugny P: Peritoneal pseudocyst: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications. Eur J Pediatr Surg 5: 195-197, 1995
  • 7. Bierbrauer KS, Storrs BB, McLone DG, Tomita T, Dauser R: A prospective, randomized study of shunt function and infections as a function of shunt placement. Pediatr Neurosurg 16: 287-291, 1990
  • 8. Constantini S, Umansky F, Nesher R, Shalit M. Transient blindness following intracranial pressure changes in a hydrocephalic child with a V-P shunt. Childs Nerv Syst 3(6):379-381, 1987
  • 9. Davidson RI, Lingley J: Intraperitoneal pseudocyst: Treatment by aspiration. Surg Neurol 4: 33-36, 1975
  • 10. Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F: A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Cooperative survey of the 1991– 1992 Education Committee of the ISPN. Childs Nerv Syst 10: 321-327, 1994
  • 11. Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J Jr, Haines S, Schiff SJ, Cochrane DD, Steinbok P, MacNeil N: Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 43: 294–303; discussion 303-305, 1998
  • 12. Egelhoff J, Babcock DS, McLaurin R: Cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts: Sonographic appearance and clinical management. Pediatr Neurosci 12: 80-86, 1986
  • 13. Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Tekeli G: Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts. Childs Nerv Syst 12: 755-758, 1996
  • 14. Faillace WJ, Canady AI: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction signaled by new or recurrent seizures. Childs Nerv Syst 6: 37–40, 1990
  • 15. Fouyas IP, Casey ATH, Thompson D, et al: Use of intracranial pressure monitoring in the management of childhood hydrocephalus and shunt-related problems. Neurosurgery 38: 726–732, 1996
  • 16. Garton HJ, Kestle JR, Drake JM: Predicting shunt failure on the basis of clinical symptoms and signs in children. J Neurosurg 94(2):202-210, 2001
  • 17. Gaskill SJ, Marlin AE: Pseudocysts of the abdomen associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: A report of twelve cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosci 15: 23-27, 1989
  • 18. Griebel R, Khan M, Tan L: CSF shunt complications: An analysis of contributory factors. Childs Nerv Syst 1:77–80, 1985
  • 19. Grosfeld JL, Cooney DR, Smith J, Campbell RL: Intra-abdominal complications following ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures. Pediatrics 54: 791-796, 1974
  • 20. Gutierrez, FA, Raimondi AJ: Peritoneal cysts: A complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Surgery 79: 188-192, 1976
  • 21. Hahn YS, Engelhard H, McLone DG: Abdominal CSF pseudocyst: Clinical features and surgical management. Pediatr Neurosci 12: 75-79, 1986
  • 22. Ignelzi RJ, Kirsch WM: Follow-up analysis of ventriculoperitoneal and ventriculoatrial shunts for hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 42:679-682, 1975
  • 23. Jamjoom AHB, Wilson PJE: Misleading clinical syndromes of CSF shunt malfunction. Br J Neurosurg 2:391-394, 1988
  • 24. Johnson DL, Conry J, O’Donnell R: Epileptic seizure as a sign of cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction. Pediatr Neurosurg 24: 223-228, 1996
  • 25. Kirkpatrick M, Engleman H, Minns RA: Symptoms and signs of progressive hydrocephalus. Arch Dis Child 64:124-128, 1989
  • 26. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Lamberti-Pasculli M: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: A prospective study of risk factors. J Neurosurg 94: 195-201, 2001
  • 27. Liptak GS, McDonald JV: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children: Factors affecting shunt survival. Pediatr Neurosci 12:289-293, 1985
  • 28. McGirt MJ, Leveque JC, Wellons JC 3rd, Villavicencio AT, Hopkins JS, Fuchs HE, George TM. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival and etiology of failures: A seven-year institutional experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 36(5):248-255, 2002
  • 29. Mirfakhraee M, Benzel EC, Crofford MJ, et al: Metrizamide shuntography for evaluation of shunt malfunction in hydrocephalus. AJNR 6:815-822, 1985
  • 30. Mobley LW 3rd, Doran SE, Hellbusch LC: Abdominal pseudocyst: predisposing factors and treatment algorithm. Pediatr Neurosurg 41(2):77-83, 2005
  • 31. Morgan MK, Johnston IH, Spittaler PJ: A ventricular infusion technique for the evaluation of treated and untreated hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 29:832-836, 1991
  • 32. Naradzay JF, Browne BJ, Rolnick MA, Doherty RJ: Cerebral ventricular shunts . J Emerg Med 17(2):311-322, 1999
  • 33. Noetzel MJ, Baker RP: Shunt fluid examination: Risks and benefits in the evaluation of shunt malfunction and infection. J Neurosurg 61:328-332, 1984
  • 34. Nulsen FE, Spitz EB: Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vein. Surg Forum 2:399-403, 1952
  • 35. Olsen L, Frykberg T: Complications in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. A comparison of ventriculoatrial and ventriculoperitoneal shunts in a 20-year material. Acta Paediatr Scand 72:385–390, 1983
  • 36. Piatt JH Jr, Carlson CV: A search for determinants of cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival: Retrospective analysis of a 14-year institutional experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 19: 233-241; discussion 242, 1993
  • 37. Piatt JH Jr: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt failure: Late is different from early. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:133-139, 1995
  • 38. Piatt JH Jr: Physical examination of patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts: Is there useful information in pumping the shunt? Pediatrics 89:470-473, 1992
  • 39. Piatt JH Jr: Pumping the shunt revisited. A longitudinal study. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:73-77, 1996
  • 40. Pollack IF, Albright AL, Adelson PD: A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos Investigator Group. Neurosurgery 45: 1399-1408; discussion 1408-1411, 1999
  • 41. Pople IK: Doppler flow velocities in children with controlled hydrocephalus: Reference values for the diagnosis of blocked cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Childs Nerv Syst 8:124–125, 1992
  • 42. Rainov N, Schobess A, Heidecke V, Burkert W: Abdominal CSF pseudocysts in patients with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Report of fourteen cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir 127: 73–78., 1994
  • 43. Robertson JS, Maraqa MI, Jennett B: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting for hydrocephalus. Br Med J ii:289-292, 1973
  • 44. Roitberg BZ, Tomita T, McLone DG: Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst: A complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 29: 267-273, 1998
  • 45. Rush DS, Walsh JW, Belin RP, Pulito AR: Ventricular sepsis and abdominally related complications in children with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Surgery 97: 420-427, 1985
  • 46. Sainte-Rose C, Piatt JH, Renier D, Pierre- Kahn A, Hirsch JF, Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP, Hendrick EB: Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 17:2-9, 1991
  • 47. Sainte-Rose C: Shunt obstruction: A preventable complication? Pediatr Neurosurg 19: 156-164, 1993
  • 48. Sekhar LN, Moossy J, Guthkelch AN: Malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Clinical and pathological features. J Neurosurg 56:411-416, 1982
  • 49. Serlo W, von Wendt L, Heikkinen ES, Heikkinen ER: Ball and spring or slit and core valve for hydrocephalus shunting? Ann Clin Res 18(suppl 47):103-106, 1986
  • 50. Sood S, Kim S, Ham SD, et al: Useful components of the shunt tap test for evaluation of shunt malfunction. Childs Nerv Syst 9: 157-162, 1993
  • 51. Uvebrant P, Sixt R, Bjure J, et al: Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt function in hydrocephalic children using 99mTc-DTPA. Childs Nerv Syst 8:76-80, 1992
  • 52. Vernet O, Farmer JP, Lambert R, et al: Radionuclide shuntogram: Adjunct to manage hydrocephalic patients. J Nucl Med 37: 406-410, 1996
  • 53. Watkins L, Hayward R, Andar U, et al: The diagnosis of blocked cerebrospinal fluid shunts: a prospective study of referral to a paediatric neurosurgical unit. Childs Nerv Syst 10: 87-90, 1994
  • 54. White B, Kropp K, Rayport M: Abdominal cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst: Occurrence after intraperitoneal urological surgery in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Urol 146: 583-587, 1991
APA Turhan T, ERŞAHİN Y, DİNÇ M, MUTLUER S (2011). Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. , 66 - 73.
Chicago Turhan Tuncer,ERŞAHİN Yusuf,DİNÇ Muhammet,MUTLUER Saffet Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. (2011): 66 - 73.
MLA Turhan Tuncer,ERŞAHİN Yusuf,DİNÇ Muhammet,MUTLUER Saffet Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. , 2011, ss.66 - 73.
AMA Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. . 2011; 66 - 73.
Vancouver Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. . 2011; 66 - 73.
IEEE Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S "Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure." , ss.66 - 73, 2011.
ISNAD Turhan, Tuncer vd. "Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure". (2011), 66-73.
APA Turhan T, ERŞAHİN Y, DİNÇ M, MUTLUER S (2011). Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turkish Neurosurgery, 21(1), 66 - 73.
Chicago Turhan Tuncer,ERŞAHİN Yusuf,DİNÇ Muhammet,MUTLUER Saffet Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turkish Neurosurgery 21, no.1 (2011): 66 - 73.
MLA Turhan Tuncer,ERŞAHİN Yusuf,DİNÇ Muhammet,MUTLUER Saffet Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turkish Neurosurgery, vol.21, no.1, 2011, ss.66 - 73.
AMA Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2011; 21(1): 66 - 73.
Vancouver Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2011; 21(1): 66 - 73.
IEEE Turhan T,ERŞAHİN Y,DİNÇ M,MUTLUER S "Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure." Turkish Neurosurgery, 21, ss.66 - 73, 2011.
ISNAD Turhan, Tuncer vd. "Cerebro-spinal fluid shunt revisions, importance of the symptoms and shunt structure". Turkish Neurosurgery 21/1 (2011), 66-73.