Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 1852 - 1862 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5755 İndeks Tarihi: 18-01-2024

Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study

Öz:
Background/aim: The aim of this study was to develop a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale (GEDRISK). Materials and methods: This methodological study included 652 pregnant women who presented to six public health institutions in İstanbul between September 2021 and February 2022. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index, while construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Item discrimination was examined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, Spearman–Brown and Guttman coefficients, item–total correlation tests, and 27% lower and upper quartile t tests. Reliability was determined through test–retest analysis methods. Results: The scale-level content validity index demonstrated strong coherence at 0.83, confirming its robustness. In the EFA, the scale, comprising 18 items and 5 subdimensions, accounted for 57.48% of the variance (n = 652). The results of the confirmatory factor analysis were as follows: χ2/df = 2.28; RMR = 0.01; CFI, GFI, and IFI = 0.95; AGFI = 0.93; NFI = 0.92; RFI = 0.90; and RMSEA = 0.04. The Spearman–Brown and Guttman split-half coefficient equal length analysis produced a result of 0.826, Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.756, and the temporal consistency of the scale was evaluated with the test–retest method (p = 0.184). The structure of the scale was evaluated with a validity and reliability analysis and was found to have acceptable, valid, and reliable properties. The mean total GEDRISK score of the pregnant women participating in the study was 33.57 ± 4.71. It was observed that the GEDRISK scale identified 51% of the respondents diagnosed with diabetes through an oral glucose tolerance test. Conclusion: The GEDRISK scale was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of gestational diabetes risk in a sample of the Turkish population.
Anahtar Kelime: Gestational diabetes mellitus risk assessment scale development validity and reliability

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2019. Diabetes Care 2019; 42 (Supp. 1): S13-S28. https://doi. org/10.2337/dc19-S002
  • 2. Mack LR, Tomich PG. Gestational diabetes: Diagnosis, classification, and clinical care. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North Osman AO. Type 2 diabetic awareness in university students and type 2 diabetic risk, behavioral and family risk factors. MS, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey, 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 3. Osman AO. Type 2 diabetic awareness in university students and type 2 diabetic risk, behavioral and family risk factors. MS, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey, 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 4. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2019. 8th ed. Belgium, Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2019.
  • 5. Melchior H, Kurch-Bek D, Mund M. The prevalence of gestational diabetes. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2017; 114: 412-418. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0412
  • 6. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği. TEMD- Diabetes Mellitus ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi ve İzlem Kılavuzu 2022. 15. baskı Ankara, Türkiye: Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği; 2022 (in Turkish).
  • 7. Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B et al. Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 159 (2): 123-129. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003- 4819-159-2-201307160-00661
  • 8. Topuz İ, Gözüm S. Prediabetes risk and diagnostic methods in the community: A review of current measuring models. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 2021; 11: 214-224 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2021.11298
  • 9. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Balkau B, Colagiuri S, Zimmet PZ et al. Ausdrisk: An Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures. Medical Journal of Australia 2010; 192: 197-202. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03507.x
  • 10. Glümer C, Carstensen B, Sandbæk A, Lauritzen T, Jørgensen T et al. A Danish diabetes risk score for targeted screening. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 727-733. https://doi.org/10.2337/ diacare.27.3.727
  • 11. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Linseisen J, Rohrmann S et al. An accurate risk score based on anthropometric, dietary, and lifestyle factors to predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 510-515. https://doi. org/10.2337/dc06-2089
  • 12. Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian diabetes risk score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. Journal of the Association Physicians of India 2005; 53: 759-763. PMID: 16334618
  • 13. Aekplakorn W, Bunnag P, Woodward M, Sritara P, Cheepudomwit S et al. A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1872- 1877. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc05-2141
  • 14. Tarı Selçuk K. Determining risk of type 2 diabetes in population aged 45–74 in Bigadiç. PhD, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey, 2013 (in Turkish).
  • 15. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2014; 13(40): 39-49 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.228738
  • 16. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli Istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi; 2012 (in Turkish).
  • 17. Esin N. Veri Toplama Yöntem ve Araçları & Veri Toplama Araçlarının Güvenirlik ve Geçerliği. İçinde: Hemşirelikte Araştırma. İstanbul, Türkiye: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2014 (in Turkish).
  • 18. Tavşancıl E. Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara, Türkiye: Nobel Yayıncılık; 2014 (in Turkish).
  • 19. Baltacı A. A conceptual review of sampling methods and sample size problems in qualitative research. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences 2018; 7 (1): 231-274 (in Turkish).
  • 20. Erkuş A. Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme-I Temel Kavramlar ve İşlemler. 4. baskı Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık; 2019 (in Turkish).
  • 21. Karakaş Çeli̇k S, Yamak AS. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in gestational diabetes. Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity 2018; 1: 9-15 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/ 10.25048/ tjdo.2018.23
  • 22. Karaçam Z, Çelik D. The prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Turkey: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Medicine 2019; 34 (8): 1331-1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/147 67058.2019.1635109
  • 23. Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, Yee A, Hoo FK et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18 (1): 494. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884- 018-2131-4
  • 24. Şimşek Çetinkaya Ş. Evaluation of the efficiency of the web- based nursing counseling service provided to gestational diabetic women. PhD, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, 2018 (in Turkish).
  • 25. Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan L, Godbout A, Kader T et al. Diabetes and pregnancy. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2018; 42: 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.038
  • 26. Mishra S, Shetty A, Rao CR, Nayak S, Kamath A. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective case-control study from coastal Karnataka. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 2020; 8 (4): 1082-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cegh.2020.03.024
  • 27. Olgun N, Yalın H, Gülyüz Demir H. Diagnosis and risk determination of diabetes dealing with diabetes. The Journal of Turkish Family Physician 2011; 2 (2): 41-49 (in Turkish).
  • 28. Öztürk FY, Altuntaş Y. Gestational diabetes mellitus. The Medical Bulletin of Şişli Etfal Hospital 2015; 1-10 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.5350/SEMB.20150317014238
  • 29. Şahin M, Kahraman BY, Bekar M. Gestasyonel diyabette hemşirenin prenatal bakımdaki rolü. Hastane Öncesi Dergisi 2019; 4 (1): 23-32 (in Turkish).
  • 30. Schaefer KK, Xiao W, Chen Q, He J, Lu J et al. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study, China. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2018; 143 (2): 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12627
  • 31. İlgen N, Koçak Yüksel D. Current approach in diagnosis of gestational diabetes, healthy lifestyle behaviors for pregnant women and role of nurse. Ordu University Journal of Nursing Studies 2019; 2(3): 181-193 (in Turkish).
  • 32. Azal Ö, Başkal N, Çorakçı A, Salman S, Deyneli O et al. Temd Diabetes Mellitus ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi ve İzlem Kılavuzu – 2018. Ankara, Türkiye: Miki Matbaacılık; 2018 (in Turkish).
  • 33. Seçer İ. SPSS ve LISREL ile Pratik Veri Analizi. 4. baskı. Ankara, Türkiye: Anı Yayıncılık; 2015 (in Turkish).
  • 34. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 1975; 28 (4): 563-575. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  • 35. Alpar R. Uygulamalı Istatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. 6. baskı. Ankara, Türkiye: Detay Yayıncılık; 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 36. Jafarov Ünsal G. A scale development study on nurses’ perception of discrimination. PhD, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Graduate Education Institute, İstanbul, Turkey, 2021 (in Turkish).
  • 37. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY, London: The Guilford Press; 2015.
  • 38. Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşire ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2014; 17 (3): 196-205 (in Turkish).
  • 39. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation Counselling and Development 2014; 47 (1): 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
  • 40. Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2010; 8: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.8.3.93
  • 41. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin N. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2020 (in Turkish).
  • 42. Akbulut O, Capik C. Multivariate statistical analysis and required sample size. Journal of Nursology 2022; 25 (2): 111- 116 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.5152/JANHS.2022.970637
  • 43. Özdamar K. Paket Programlar ile Istatistiksel Veri Analizi-II, (Çok Değişkenli Yöntemler). 9. baskı. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi; 2013 (in Turkish).
  • 44. Pituch KA, Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015.
  • 45. Aksu G, Eser MT, Güzeller CO. Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Uygulamaları. 1. baskı. Ankara, Türkiye: Detay Yayıncılık; 2017 (in Turkish).
  • 46. Yaşlıoğlu MM. Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business 2017; 46: 74-85 (in Turkish).
  • 47. Osborne JW, Costello AB, Kellow JT. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis. In: Osborne, J (editor). Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. SAGE Publications; 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627
  • 48. Erkorkmaz Ü, Etikan İ, Demir O, Özdamar K, Sani̇soğlu SY. Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: Review. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences 2013; 33 (1): 210-223 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-26747
  • 49. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
  • 50. Karadaş A. Nurse managers’ perceived sources of power: A scale development study. PhD, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2018 (in Turkish).
  • 51. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. 23. baskı. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi; 2017 (in Turkish).
  • 52. Sarıoğlu Kemer A. Development of the innovative leadership scale in nursing. PhD, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey, 2017 (in Turkish).
APA dağcı s, Ören B (2023). Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. , 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
Chicago dağcı selma,Ören Besey Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. (2023): 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
MLA dağcı selma,Ören Besey Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. , 2023, ss.1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
AMA dağcı s,Ören B Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. . 2023; 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
Vancouver dağcı s,Ören B Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. . 2023; 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
IEEE dağcı s,Ören B "Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study." , ss.1852 - 1862, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
ISNAD dağcı, selma - Ören, Besey. "Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study". (2023), 1852-1862. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5755
APA dağcı s, Ören B (2023). Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(6), 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
Chicago dağcı selma,Ören Besey Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53, no.6 (2023): 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
MLA dağcı selma,Ören Besey Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.53, no.6, 2023, ss.1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
AMA dağcı s,Ören B Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(6): 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
Vancouver dağcı s,Ören B Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(6): 1852 - 1862. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
IEEE dağcı s,Ören B "Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53, ss.1852 - 1862, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5755
ISNAD dağcı, selma - Ören, Besey. "Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53/6 (2023), 1852-1862. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5755