Yıl: 2024 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 12 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 08-05-2024

Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube

Öz:
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, and adequacy of YouTube videos on maxillofacial trauma. Methods: A search for "Maxillofacial trauma" was conducted on YouTube with, a selection of two hundred videos. Out of these, 108 videos were considered eligible for the assessment of quality and adequacy. These videos were then evaluated for quality and adequacy using established assessment tools: the Information Quality Index (VIQI) and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Subsequently, the videos were classified into low or high-content groups, based on a 16-point scoring system. Results: Most videos (55.6%) were uploaded by healthcare professionals. 81.5% were classified as low content and 18.5% as high content. The main topics covered included anatomical structures (43.5%), trauma area (40.7%), treatment procedure (32.4%), intraoral complications (31.5%), and maxillofacial trauma definition (30.6%). Fewer videos discussed post-operative prognosis and survival (13.9% and 17.6%, respectively). High-content videos had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores, with strong correlations between content scores, VIQI, and GQS. Conclusions: The study shows a need for higher quality, accurate YouTube content on maxillofacial trauma, especially for non-medical audiences. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, commercial entities, laypersons, and YouTube could enhance reliable educational content, making YouTube a more valuable resource for patient education and awareness.
Anahtar Kelime: Maxillofacial Trauma Patient Information YouTube GQS VIQI.

YouTube'daki Maksillofasiyal Travma Videolarının İçeriğinin, Kalitesinin ve Yeterliliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışma, YouTube'daki “Maksillofasiyal travma” videolarının içeriğini, kalitesini ve yeterliliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: YouTube'da "Maksillofasiyal travma" araması yapıldı ve 200 video seçildi. Bu videolardan 108'i, kalite ve yeterlilik değerlendirmesi için uygun bulundu. Videolar, Bilgi Kalite İndeksi (VIQI) ve Global Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) kullanılarak kalite ve yeterlilik açısından değerlendirildi. Daha sonra, videolar, 16 puanlık bir değerlendirme sistemi temel alınarak düşük veya yüksek içerikli gruplara ayrıldı. Bulgular: Videoların çoğu (%55,6) sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından yüklenmiştir. Videoların %81,5'i düşük içerikli ve %18,5'i yüksek içerikli olarak sınıflandırıldı. En çok ele alınan konular arasında anatomik yapılar (%43,5), travma alanı (%40,7), tedavi prosedürü (%32,4), intraoral komplikasyonlar (%31,5) ve maksillofasiyal travma tanımı (%30,6) bulunuyor. Daha az video, post-operatif prognoz ve hayatta kalma oranlarını (%13,9 ve %17,6, sırasıyla) tartıştı. Yüksek içerikli videoların GQS ve VIQI puanları anlamlı derecede yüksekti ve içerik puanları, VIQI ve GQS arasında güçlü korelasyonlar bulundu. Sonuçlar: Çalışma, özellikle profesyonel olmayan izleyiciler için YouTube'daki maksillofasiyal travma içeriklerinin kalitesinin ve doğruluğunun arttırılması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Sağlık profesyonelleri, ticari kuruluşlar, meslek ile alakası olmayan kişiler ve YouTube arasındaki iş birliği, güvenilir eğitim içeriğinin geliştirilmesine yardımcı olabilir, böylece YouTube, hastaların eğitimi ve maksillofasiyal travma yönetimi ve tedavisi hakkındaki farkındalığı için daha değerli bir kaynak haline gelebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: Maksillofasiyal Travma Hasta Bilgilendirmesi YouTube GQS VIQI.

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • 1. Goodisson D, MacFarlane M, Snape L, Darwish B. Head injury and associated maxillofacial injuries. N Z Med J. 2004;117.
  • 2. Down KE, Boot DA, Gorman DF. Maxillofacial and associated injuries in severely traumatized patients: implications of a regional survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24:409-12.
  • 3. Imahara SD, Hopper RA, Wang J, Rivara FP, Klein MB. Patterns and outcomes of pediatric facial fractures in the United States: a survey of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:710- 6.
  • 4. Oikarinen KS. Clinical management of injuries to the maxilla, mandible, and alveolus. Dent Clin North Am. 1995;39:113-31.
  • 5. Rankin M, Borah GL. Perceived functional impact of abnormal facial appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:2140-6.
  • 6. Klenk G, Kovacs A. Etiology and patterns of facial fractures in the United Arab Emirates. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:78-84.
  • 7. Rallis G, Stathopoulos P, Igoumenakis D, Krasadakis C, Mourouzis C, Mezitis M. Treating maxillofacial trauma for over half a century: how can we interpret the changing patterns in etiology and management? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119:614-8.
  • 8. World Internet Users Statistics and 2023 World Population Stats. Date of access: 1/5/2023, https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.ht m
  • 9. YouTube Statistics 2022 [Users by Country + Demographics]. Official GMI Blog. Date of access: 22/5/2023, https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/y outube-users-statistics.
  • 10. Langford A, Loeb S. Perceived patientprovider communication quality and sociodemographic factors associated with watching health-related videos on YouTube: a cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:13512.
  • 11. Chou WYS, Oh A, Klein WMP. Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. JAMA. 2018;320:2417-8.
  • 12. Wong K, Doong J, Trang T, Joo S, Chien AL. YouTube videos on botulinum toxin a for wrinkles: a useful resource for patient education. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43:1466- 73.
  • 13. Lim K, Kilpatrick C, Storr J, Seale H. Exploring the use of entertainmenteducation YouTube videos focused on infection prevention and control. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:1218-23.
  • 14. Loeb S, Sengupta S, Butaney M, et al. Dissemination of misinformative and biased information about prostate cancer on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2019;75:564-7.
  • 15. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online Curves: A quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1857-61.
  • 16. Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A Quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:799- 804.
  • 17. Samuel N, Alotaibi NM, Lozano AM. YouTube as a source of information on neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:394-8.
  • 18. Rodriguez HA, Young MT, Jackson HT, Oelschlager BK, Wright AS. Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education? Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1724-8.
  • 19. Sezici YL, Gediz M, Dindaroğlu F. Is YouTube an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:72-9.
  • 20. Jansen BJ, Spink A. An analysis of web documents retrieved and viewed. In: International Conference on Internet Computing. 2003:65-9.
  • 21. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22:202- 8.
  • 22. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:208-14.
  • 23. Basch CH, Ethan D, MacLean SA, Fera J, Garcia P, Basch CE. Readability of prostate cancer information online: a cross-sectional study. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:1665-9.
  • 24. Hong YA, Cho J. Has the digital health divide widened? Trends of health-related internet use among older adults from 2003 to 2011. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72:856-63.
  • 25. Gupte CM, Hassan ANA, McDermott ID, Thomas RD. The internet–friend or foe? A questionnaire study of orthopaedic outpatients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:187.
  • 26. Pehora C, Gajaria N, Stoute M, Fracassa S, Serebale-O’Sullivan R, Matava CT. Are parents getting it right? A survey of parents’ internet use for children’s health care information. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4:3790.
  • 27. Abdelmseih M. Evaluation and reliability of YouTube videos for age-related macular degeneration (amd)-a warning sign. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;7:595.
  • 28. Ruppert L, Køster B, Siegert AM, et al. YouTube as a source of health information: analysis of sun protection and skin cancer prevention related issues. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23:1.
  • 29. Gill P, Arlitt M, Li Z, Mahanti A. Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement. 2007:15-28.
  • 30. Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2:2465.
  • 31. Kusanale A. Surgical Anatomy of the Face. In: Singh AK, Sharma NK, eds. Maxillofacial Trauma: A Clinical Guide. Springer Singapore; 2021:11-9.
  • 32. 3. Gupta S, Kar R, Gupta H. Rehabilitation. In: Singh AK, Sharma NK, eds. Maxillofacial Trauma: A Clinical Guide. Springer Singapore; 2021:445-67.
  • 33. Gassner R, Tuli T, Hächl O, Rudisch A, Ulmer H. Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9543 cases with 21 067 injuries. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:51-61.
  • 34. Yavan MA, Gökçe G. YouTube as a source of information on adult orthodontics: a video analysis study. J World Fed Orthod. 2022;11:41-6.
  • 35. Ozdede M, Peker I. Analysis of dentistry YouTube videos related to COVID-19. Braz Dent J. 2020;31:392-8.
  • 36. An update to dislikes on YouTube. blog.youtube. Date of access: 23/05/2023, https://blog.youtube/news-andevents/update-to-youtube/
  • 37. Jung SG, Salminen J, J. Jansen B. The Effect of Hiding Dislikes on the Use of YouTube’s Like and Dislike Features. In: 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022. 2022:202-7.
  • 38. Pokharel PK, Baliga M, Amirthraj A, Mehar H. Assessing psychological consequences following maxillofacial trauma using DASS scale–our experience. Asian J Med Sci. 2016;7:85-9.
  • 39. Parashar A, Sharma RK. Unfavourable outcomes in maxillofacial injuries: How to avoid and manage. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46:221.
  • 40. Panigrahi B, Subudhi SK, Biswas SL. Acute Management of maxillofacial trauma: A review of literature. Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 2020;14:8791-7.
  • 41. Tuckett JW, Lynham A, Lee GA, Perry M. Maxillofacial trauma in the emergency department: a review. Surgeon. 2014;12:106-14.
  • 42. Bernstein MP. The imaging of maxillofacial trauma 2017. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28:509-24.
APA TEKİN A, Temel A, Erdem Hepsenoglu y (2024). Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. , 1 - 12.
Chicago TEKİN Alperen,Temel Ayse Nur,Erdem Hepsenoglu yelda Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. (2024): 1 - 12.
MLA TEKİN Alperen,Temel Ayse Nur,Erdem Hepsenoglu yelda Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. , 2024, ss.1 - 12.
AMA TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. . 2024; 1 - 12.
Vancouver TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. . 2024; 1 - 12.
IEEE TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y "Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube." , ss.1 - 12, 2024.
ISNAD TEKİN, Alperen vd. "Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube". (2024), 1-12.
APA TEKİN A, Temel A, Erdem Hepsenoglu y (2024). Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online), 6(1), 1 - 12.
Chicago TEKİN Alperen,Temel Ayse Nur,Erdem Hepsenoglu yelda Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online) 6, no.1 (2024): 1 - 12.
MLA TEKİN Alperen,Temel Ayse Nur,Erdem Hepsenoglu yelda Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online), vol.6, no.1, 2024, ss.1 - 12.
AMA TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online). 2024; 6(1): 1 - 12.
Vancouver TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online). 2024; 6(1): 1 - 12.
IEEE TEKİN A,Temel A,Erdem Hepsenoglu y "Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube." Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online), 6, ss.1 - 12, 2024.
ISNAD TEKİN, Alperen vd. "Evaluating Content, Quality, and Adequacy of Maxillofacial Trauma Videos on YouTube". Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği dergisi (Online) 6/1 (2024), 1-12.