Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler

DİNÇ, Cengiz

Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler

Cengiz DİNÇ (Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

6 1

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 201 - 233 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler

Öz:

Bu çalışmada, AB’nin beşinci genişlemesi üzerine yoğunlaşarak temel dinamikler, önem verilen konular, boyutlar ve faktörler; eski üyeler ve adaylar açısından genişlemenin beklenen en önemli etkileri, genel hatlarıyla incelenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Mevcut üyeler için, genişleme, daha büyük bir pazar, yatırım fırsatları ve istihdam anlamına geliyordu. Genişleme, dönüşümün esas yükünün adaylara bırakıldığı sancılı ve aşağılayıcı bir süreç olarak gizli tehditler içeriyordu. Adaptasyon sürecini başaramayanlar ‘Avrupalı değil’ diye tanımlanabilecekti. Genişlemenin teorik ve tarihsel arka planı, genişlemenin belirgin özellikleri; tarihsel ve duygusal boyutlar kısaca açıklanmıştır. Beşinci genişlemenin arz ve talep yönüne bakılmış, AB’nin temel amaçları konusunda kesin bir fikrinin oluşmamış olmasının olumsuz etkileri irdelenmiştir. Beşinci genişleme sürecinde eski üyeler genişleme taraftarı olanlar ve gönülsüzler olarak ikiye ayrılmışlardır. Genişlemenin mekanizması sıkı ve katı bir şekilde şarta bağlılık ilkesine dayanmıştır. Mevcut üyelerce, genişlemeye “hayır” demenin maliyeti de değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

The fifth enlargement of the European Union: Major themes and factors

Öz:

While focusing on the fifth enlargement, this study tries to analyze the main dynamics, important issues, dimensions and factors in the process; the most important effects, expected by the current members and candidates, from the enlargement process are also analyzed. For the current members, the enlargement meant access to a larger market, investment opportunities and employment. The Enlargement, as a painful and humiliating process wherein the burden of transformation left to the candidates, contained implied threats. Those who did not accomplish the compliance faced with the possibility of being labeled as ‘non‐Europe’. The theoretical and historical background of the enlargement, the dominant characteristics and historical and emotional factors are explained in brief. The supply and demand side of the enlargement and the negative effects of EU’s not having a clear perspective about its objective are analyzed. In the fifth enlargement process the members were initially divided as drivers and brakemen. The mechanism of the enlargement was fairly strictly based on conditionality. The members also evaluated the possible repercussions of saying “no” to the enlargement.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Avrupa Komisyonu (2009), “Views on European Union Enlargement” Flash Eurobarometer 257.
Avrupa Komisyonu (2010), “Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010‐ 2011”, COM(2010) 660
Arnason, J. P. (2000), “Communism and Modernity” Daedalus, 129 (1), 61‐90.
Avery, G. vd (ed) (2009), Enlarging the European Union: Effects on the new member states and the EU Brüksel, Trans European Policy Studies Association
Avrupa Komisyonu (2005), “2005 Enlargement Strategy Paper” COM (2005) 561 final
Avrupa Komisyonu, (2006), “Enlargement, two years after: an economic evaluation” (2006) European Commıssıon Directorate‐General For Economic And Financial Affairs Occasıonal Papers 24 (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/index_en.htm).
Barysch, K. (2006), “Is Enlargement Doomed?,” Public Policy Research, 13 (2), 78‐85.
Blokker, P. (2008), “From a Central European Identity to Post‐Nationality?”, European Journal of Social Theory, 11(2), 257–274.
Boyka, S. (2005), “The European Union as a Security Actor” , World Affairs, 168 (2), 51‐66.
Davies, N. (1996), Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Neve, Jan‐Emmanuel (2007), “The European Onion? How Differentiated Integration is Reshaping the EU”, Journal of European Integration, 29 (4), 503‐ 521.
EB 64 TR (2006), “Eurobarometer 64: AB Kamuoyu Araştırması: Türkiye”) (Eurobarometer araştırmalarına http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm adresinden ulaşılabilir).
EB 67 ( 2007) Eurobarometer 67, Public Opinion In The European Union First Results.
EB 251 (2006) Special Eurobarometer 251, “Future of Europe”.
Font, N. (2006) “Why the European Union Gave Turkey the Green Light”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 14 (2), 197–212.
Further Enlargement, 2006 Evidence given to the House of Lords EU Select Committee, ‘The further enlargement of the EU: threat or opportunity?’ www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/273/273.pdf
Fukuyama, F. (1989), "The End of History", National Interest, 16 (Yaz), 3‐ 18.
Collard‐Wexler, Simon (2006), “Integration Under Anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union”, European Journal of International Relations, 12, 397‐432.
Delhey, J. (2007) “Do Enlargements Make the European Union Less Cohesive? An Analysis of Trust between EU Nationalities”, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 253–279.
Gilbert, M. (2008), “Narrating the Process: Questioning the Progressive Story of European Integration” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (3) 641–662.
Hain, P. (2003), “Why Bigger is Better: Enlargement and the Future of Europe”, New Economy, 10 (2), 95‐100.
Hettne, B. (2002), “The Europeanisation of Europe: Endogenous and Exogenous Dimensions”, Journal of European Integration, 24 (4), 325‐340.
Higashino, A. (2004), “For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in the European Enlargement Eastwards”, Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 39 (4), 347–368.
Hooghe, L. ve Marks, G. (2008), “European Union?”, West European Politics, 31 (1), 108‐ 129.
House of Commons (2007), “EU Enlargement: the Western Balkans” Research Paper 07/27 14.03.2007.
Ibryamova N. (2005), “The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: Interests, Power and Norms”, Mami Universitesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
İçener, E.vd. (2010), “Continuity and change in the European Union’s approach to enlargement Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe compared”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10 (2), 207–223.
Karabeshkin, L. A. ve Spechler, D. R. (2007), “EU and NATO Enlargement: Russia's Expectations, Responses and Options for the Future”, European Security,16 (3),307‐328.
Karp J. A. ve Bowler, S. (2006), “Broadening and deepening or broadening versus deepening:The question of enlargement and Europe’s ‘hesitant Europeans’” European Journal of Political Research 45: 369–390,
Kavalalı M. (2005), Avrupa Birliği’nin Genişleme Süreci: AB’nin Merkezi Doğu Avrupa ve Batı Balkan Ülkeleri İle İlişkileri, Ankara: DPT Müsteşarlığı.
Kok, W. (2003), “Avrupa Birliği’nin Genişlemesi: Başarılar ve Zorluklar”, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/enlargement_process/past_enlar gements/communication_strategy/report_kok_tr.pdf (erişim, 11. 08. 2010).
Kopenhag (1993), “Zirve Sonuç Bildirgesi” (www.consilium.europa.eu/ ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72921.pdf).
Kornai J. (2006), “The great transformation of Central Eastern Europe Success and disappointment”, Economics of Transition, 14 (2), 207–244.
Lane, D. (2007), “Post‐Communist States and the European Union” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23 (4), 461–477.
Mattli, W. ve Plümper, T. (2002), “The demand‐side politics of EU enlargement: Democracy and the application for EU membership”, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (4), 550‐574.
Mayer, H. (2008), “The Long Legacy of Dorian Gray: Why the European Union Needs to Redefine its Role in Global Affairs”, Journal of European Integration, 30 (1), 7‐25.
Mayhew, A. (2007), Enlargement Of The European Union: An Analysis Of The Negotiations For Countries Of The Western Balkans, Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development, Sigma Paper NO. 37 2007.
McKay, D. (1996) Rush to Union: Understanding the European Federal Bargain, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Missiroli, A.(2003), “EU Enlargement and CFSP/ESDP”, Journal of European Integration, 25 (1): 1‐16.
Moravcsik, A.ve Vachudova, M. A. (2003), “National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement Perspectives” East European Politics and Societies, 17 (1), 42–57.
O’Brennan, John (2006), “Bringing Geopolitics Back In’: Exploring the Security Dimension of the 2004 Eastern Enlargement of the European Union”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19 (1), 155‐169.
Panagiotou, R. (2008), “FYROM's transition: on the road to Europe?”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 10 (1), 47‐ 64.
Pavlovaite, I. (2003), “Being European by Joining Europe: Accession and identity politics in Lithuania” Cambridge Review of International Affairs,16 (2), 239‐255.
Pridham G. (2006), “European Union Accession Dynamics and Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Future Perspectives”, Government and Opposition, 41 ( 3), 373–400.
Pridham G. (2007a), “Change and Continuity in the European Union's Political Conditionality: Aims, Approach, and Priorities”, Democratization, 14 (3), 446 – 471.
Pridham G. (2007b) “Political Elites, Domestic Politics and Democratic Convergence with the European Union: The Case of Romania during Accession”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23 (4), 525 – 547.
Pollack, M. A. (2009) “Europe united? The impact of the EU’s eastern enlargement, five years on” European View (2009) 8:239–254
Rehn, O. ”Europe's Next Frontiers” Helsinki, 27.10. 2006 Lecture at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, SPEECH/08/184 http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/06/654&form at=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
Ross, G. (2008), “What do ‘Europeans’ Think? Analyses of the European Union's Current Crisis by European Elites”, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (2) , 389–412
Schimmelfennig, F. (1999), “The Double Puzzle of EU Enlargement Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Decision to Expand to the East”, ARENA Working Papers WP 99/15
Schmidt, V. A. (2007), “Trapped by their ideas: French lites' discourses of European integration and globalization” Journal of European Public Policy, 14 (7), 992 – 1009.
Schimmelfennig, F. ve Sedelmeier, U. (2002), “Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research Focus, Hypotheses and the State of Research”, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4): 500–528.
Settembri, P. (2007), “The surgery succeeded. Has the patient died? The impact of enlargement on the European Union”, Jean Monnet Working Paper 04/07. www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/07/070401.html ( erişim 29. 11. 2010).
Sjursen, H. (2002) “Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU’s enlargement policy”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 491–513.
Sjursen, H. (2006), “What kind of power?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (2), 169‐ 181.
Sjursen H. (2008), “Enlargement in perspective: The EU’s quest for identity” ARENA Working Paper No. 5.
Solana, J. (2001), “Enlargement of the European Union — Opportunity or Threat?’ On The Occasion Of The Ninth "European Lecture" Utrecht Theater 19.06. 2001. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/applications/solana/details.a sp?cmsid=358&BID=107&DocID=66956&insite=1
Stawarska, R. (1999), “EU enlargement from the Polish Perspective”, Journal of European Public Policy, 6 (5), 822‐838.
Thomson, R. (2009) “Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement” European Journal of Political Research 48: 756–781.
Tsoukalis L. (2006), “The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the European Union” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (1), 1–15.
Varbanova L. (2007), “The European Union Enlargement Process: Culture in between National Policies and European Priorities” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 37 (1) 48‐64
Wiarda H. J. (2005), “Where Does Europe End Now? Expanding Europe's Frontiers and the Dilemmas of Enlargement and Identity” The Brown Journal Of World Affairs 12 (1), 89‐98.
Wiener, A. (2002), “Finality vs. Enlargement Constitutive Practices and Opposing Rationales in the Reconstruction of Europe” NYU School of Law, Jean Monnet Working Paper 8/02.
Zielonka, J. (2007), “Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (1), 187–209.

APA	DİNÇ C (2011). Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. , 201 - 233.
Chicago	DİNÇ Cengiz Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. (2011): 201 - 233.
MLA	DİNÇ Cengiz Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. , 2011, ss.201 - 233.
AMA	DİNÇ C Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. . 2011; 201 - 233.
Vancouver	DİNÇ C Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. . 2011; 201 - 233.
IEEE	DİNÇ C "Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler." , ss.201 - 233, 2011.
ISNAD	DİNÇ, Cengiz. "Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler". (2011), 201-233.

APA	DİNÇ C (2011). Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 201 - 233.
Chicago	DİNÇ Cengiz Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 6, no.2 (2011): 201 - 233.
MLA	DİNÇ Cengiz Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.6, no.2, 2011, ss.201 - 233.
AMA	DİNÇ C Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 6(2): 201 - 233.
Vancouver	DİNÇ C Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 6(2): 201 - 233.
IEEE	DİNÇ C "Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler." Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6, ss.201 - 233, 2011.
ISNAD	DİNÇ, Cengiz. "Avrupa birliğinin beşinci genişlemesi: Ana temalar ve faktörler". Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 6/2 (2011), 201-233.