An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses

Feride BACANLI (Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
12 0
Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 163 Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 28 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses

Öz:
Bu araştırmanın amacı, dört genel karar verme stili ve ego kimlik statüleri arasındaki ilişkilerin doğasını incelemektir. Karar verme stratejileri (Kuzgun, 2005) ve Genişletilmiş Ego Kimlik Statüleri (Oskay, 1997) ölçekleri üniversiteye yeni başlamış 298 (168 kız ve 130 erkek) Türk öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. İki değişken seti arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek için kanonik analiz uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, başarılı kimlik statüsünün mantıklı karar verme stiliyle pozitif anlamlı fakat bağımlı ve kararsız stiller ile negatif anlamlı ilişkili olduğunu gösterdi. Kargaşalı, bağımlı ve moratorium statüler içtepisel ve kararsızlık stilleriyle pozitif anlamlı ilişkiliydiler. Sonuçlar ilgili literatürle ilişkilendirilerek tartışıldı ve gelecek araştırmalar için öneriler sunuldu.
Anahtar Kelime: ergenlik ego kimlik statüsü ölçeği ben karar verme yöntemi

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Karar verme stratejileri ve ego kimlik statüleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi

Öz:
The purpose of this study was to examine the nature of the relations amongst four general decision making styles and ego identity statuses. Measures of Decision- Making Strategies(Kuzgun, 2005) and Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status- EOM- EIS (Oskay,1997) were administrated to 298 Turkish freshmen university students (168 female and 130male). A canonical analysis was performed to examine the relationships between the two sets of the variables. The results indicated that identity- achievement status was positively related to rational decision- making style, but it was negatively related to dependent and indecisiveness styles. Diffusion, foreclosure and moratorium statuses were positively related to the intuitive and indecisiveness styles. The results were discussed in relation to the relevant literature and the suggestions were presented for future research.
Anahtar Kelime: ego decision making method adolescence ego identity status scale

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arroba, T. (1977). Styles of decision making and their use: An empirical study. British Journal of Guidance &Counseling, 5, 149- 158.
  • Bacanli, F. (2000). Kararsızlık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [The development of Indecisiveness Scale]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 2(14), 7-16.
  • Bacanli, F. (2006). Personality characteristics as predictors of personal indecisiveness. Journal of Career Development, 32, 320-332.
  • Baron, J. (1989). Teaching Decision-Making to Adolescents. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  • Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H. J., & Tversky, A. (1988). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D.E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.) Decision making (pp.9-30).New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bennion, L. D., & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the Extended Version of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 183-198.
  • Blustein, D., L., & Phillips, S. D. (1990), Relation between ego identity statues and decision- making styles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 160- 168.
  • Cella, D. F., DeWolfe, A. S., & Fitzgibbon, M. (1987) Ego identity status, identification, and decision-making style in late adolescence. Adolescence, 22, 849- 861.
  • D’Zurilla, T. J., & Chang, E. C. (1995). The relations between social problem solving and coping. Cognitive Theraphy and Research, 19, 547-562.
  • D’Zurilla, T. J., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Kant, G. L. (1998). Age and gender differences in social problem solving ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 241-252.
  • Deniz, E. M. (2006). The relationships among coping with stress, life stisfaction, decision- making styles and decision self esteem: An investigation with Turkish University students. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(9), 1161-1170
  • Elliot, G.R. & Feldman, S. S. (2001) Capturing the adolescent experience. In Feldman, S. S. & Elliot, G. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 277-207). Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.
  • Ferrari, J.R., & Dovidio, J.F. (2001).Behavioral decision making strategies by indecisiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1113-1123.
  • Ferrari, J.R., & Dovidio, J.F. (2000). Examining behavioral processes in indecision: Decisional procrastination and decision-making style. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 127-137.
  • Fischhoff, B., Crowell, N. A., & Kipke, M. (Eds.). (1999). Adolescent decision making: Implications for prevention programs: Summary of a workshop. Commision on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Fondacaro, M. R., Brank, E.M., Stuart, J., Abraham, S., Luescher, J. & McNatt, P. S. (2006). Identity Orientation, Voice, and Judgments of Procedural Justice During Late Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 987-997.
  • Gati, I., & Asher, I. (2001). The PIC model for Career Decision Making: Prescreening, In Depth Exploration, and Choice. In T. L. Frederick, & A. Barak (Eds.); Contemporary Models in Vocational Psychology (pp.7-54). Mahvah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Gelatt, H. B. (1989). Positive uncertainty: A new decision making framework for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 252-256.
  • Germeijs, V., & De Boeck, P. (2002). A measurement scale for indecisiveness and its relation to career indecision and other types of indecision. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 113-122.
  • Germeijs, V., Verschueren, K., & Soenens, B. (2006). Indecisiveness and high school students’ career decision-making process: Longitudinal associations and the mediational role of anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 397-410.
  • Grotevant, H. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203-222.
  • Gucray, S. S. (2005). A study of the decision- making behaviors of Turkish adolescents, Pastoral Care, 75, 34-44.
  • Hardin, E. E. & Leong F. T. L. (2004). Decision- making theories and career assessment: A psychometric evaluation of the Decision Making Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 51-64.
  • Harmon, L. W., & Farmer, H. S. (1983). Current theoretical issues in vocational psychology. In. W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds). Handbook of vocational psychology (Vol 1. pp. 39 -77). Hillsdale, NS: Erlbaum.
  • Harren, V. H. (1979). A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 19- 133.
  • Harren, V. H. (1984). Assessment of career decision making. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  • Horan, J.J. (1979).Counseling for effective decision making: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. North Scituate, MA: Duxburg Press.
  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. Psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.
  • Jepsen, D. A. (1974). Vocational decison- making strategy types: An exploratory study. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 23 (1), 17- 23.
  • Johson, R. (1978). Individual styles of decision making: A theoretical model for counseling. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 56, 530- 536.
  • Köse, A. (2002). Psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin cinsiyet ve algılanan sosyoekonomik düzey açısından psikolojik ihtiyaçları ve karar verme stratejilerinin incelenmesi (Psychological counseling and guidance first grade students personal preferences and decision making strategies regarding gender and socioeconomic status). Unpublished mastery thesis, Social Science Institute of Hacettepe University.
  • Kroger, J. (2000). Ego identity status research in the new millennium. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24 (2), 145-148.
  • Kroll, A. M., Dinklage, L. B. , Lee, J., Morley, E.D. , & Wilson, E. M. (1970). Career development: Growth and crisis. New York: Willey.
  • Kuzgun, Y. (2005). Karar Stratejileri Ölçeği. [Decision Making Strategies Scale]. In Y. Kuzgun & F. Bacanli (Eds.) [Measurement devices and programmes series used in practice guidance and psychological counseling: Measurement devices used in practice GPC: 1, pp.9-27)],Ankara-Turkey, Nobel Publication.
  • Mann, L. (1989). Becoming a better decision maker. Australian Psychologist, 24, 141-155.
  • Mann, L., Burnett, P. C., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire An instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 1- 19.
  • Mann, L., Harmoni, R., & Power, C.(1989). Adolescent decision- making: The development of competence. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 265-278.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Eds.). Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: Wiley.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1993). The ego identity status approach to ego identity. In D. R. Matteson, J. L. Orlofsky, A. S. Waterman, S. L. Archer, & J. E. Marcia (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook of psychosocial research (pp. 3-21). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Marcia, J. E. (1994). The empirical study of ego identity. In H. A. Bosma, T. L.Graafsma, H. D. Grotevant, & D. J. Delevita (Eds.), Identity and development: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 67-80). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Mau, W. C. (1995). Decision- making styles as a predictor of career decision status and treatment gains. Journal of Career Assessment, 3, 90-101.
  • Mau, W. C. ___________ (2000). Cultural differences in career decision- making styles and selfefficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 365-378.
  • Miller-Tiedeman, A. (1980). Explorations of decision making in the expansion of adolescent personal development. In W. L. Erickson & J. M. Whiteley (Eds.). Developmental counseling and teaching (pp. 158- 187). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
  • Morsümbül, Ü. (2005). Ergenlikte kimlik statülerinin bağlanma stilleri, cinsiyet ve eğitim düzeyi açısından incelenmesi (An examination of ego identity in adolescence with regard to attachments styles, gender, and education level). Unpublished mastery thesis, Education Sciences Institute of Ankara University.
  • Munley, P. H. (1977). Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development and career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, 261- 269.
  • Nota, L., Mann, L. Soresi, S., & Friedman, I. (2002). Decisione e Scelte [Decisions and choices]. Firenze: Iter-Organizzazioni Speciali,
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oskay, G. (1998). Genişletilmiş Objektif Ego Kimlik Statüsü Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları [The adaptation of Extended Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status- EOM-EIS: Validity and Reability studies]. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi (Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal), 3, 17-21.
  • Payne, J. W, Bettmen, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adoptive Decision-Maker. Cambridge University Press: New York, 330.
  • Phillips, S. D., Friedlander, M. L., Pazienza, N. J., & Kost, P. (1985). A factor analytic investigation of career decision- making styles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 106-115. Rassin, E., Muris, P., Booster, E., & Kolsloot, I. (2008). Indecisiveness and informational tunnel vision. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 96-102.
  • Rassin, E., Muris, P., Franken, I., Smit, M., & Wong, M. (2007). Measuring general indecisiveness. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 61-68.
  • Rubinton, N. (1980). Instruction in career decision making and decision making styles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20, 215- 222.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818-831.
  • Shiloh, S., Koren, S., & Zakay, D. (2001). Individual differences in compensatory decision making style amd need for closure as correlates of subjective decision complexity and difficulty,Personal and Individual Differences, 30, 699-710.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.
  • Taylor, K. M. (1982). An investigation of vocational indecision in college students: Corralates and moderators. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 21, 318-329.
  • Yenihayat, T. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kimlik statüleri, kişilik özellikleri ve algıladıkları ebeveyn tutumları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi (An examination of relationships between perceived parent attitudes and personality characteristics, ego identity status). Unpublished mastery thesis, Social Science Institute of Istanbul University.
  • Waterman, A. S. (1985). Identity in the context of adolescent psychology. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.) Identity in adolescence: Process and contents ( pp. 5-24). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Waterman, C. K. , & Waterman, A. S. (1974). Ego identity status and decision styles. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 3, 1- 6.
APA Bacanlı F (2012). An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. , 17 - 28.
Chicago Bacanlı Feride An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. (2012): 17 - 28.
MLA Bacanlı Feride An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. , 2012, ss.17 - 28.
AMA Bacanlı F An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. . 2012; 17 - 28.
Vancouver Bacanlı F An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. . 2012; 17 - 28.
IEEE Bacanlı F "An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses." , ss.17 - 28, 2012.
ISNAD Bacanlı, Feride. "An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses". (2012), 17-28.
APA Bacanlı F (2012). An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 17 - 28.
Chicago Bacanlı Feride An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. Eğitim ve Bilim 37, no.163 (2012): 17 - 28.
MLA Bacanlı Feride An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.37, no.163, 2012, ss.17 - 28.
AMA Bacanlı F An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(163): 17 - 28.
Vancouver Bacanlı F An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(163): 17 - 28.
IEEE Bacanlı F "An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses." Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, ss.17 - 28, 2012.
ISNAD Bacanlı, Feride. "An examination of the relationship amongst decision-making strategies and ego ıdentity statuses". Eğitim ve Bilim 37/163 (2012), 17-28.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 17:9

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları