A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 2011 Sayı: 41 Sayfa Aralığı: 267 - 277 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education
Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim 4. ve 5 sınıflarda, okuduğunu anlama stratejisi olarak özetleme stratejisinin nasıl kullanıldığının ortaya konulmasıdır. İzmir/Buca'da yapılan çalışmada, nitel araştırma stratejisinde kullanılan doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, "Çevre Kirliliği" isimli metin ve "Değerlendirme Kriterleri Formu" kullanılmıştır. Yapılan maksimum örnekleme sonucunda, altı ayrı okulda, toplam 246 öğrenci veri kaynağı olarak alınmıştır. Örneklemi oluşturan deneklerin ana dili Türkçedir. Öğrencilere, "Çevre Kirliliği" metninin Türkçe özeti çıkarılarak, "özetleme stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri değerlendirilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde "yüzeysel özetleme, konu ile ilişki kurma, metnin aynısını yazma, ana düşünceyi kendi cümleleriyle yazma, ana düşünceden uzaklaşma ve ana düşünceyi hiç belirtmeme" kodlarına ulaşılmıştır. Öğrencilerin yaptığı özetler genel olarak incelendiğinde özetleme stratejilerinin yeterince iyi kullanılmadığı tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
İlköğretimde özetleme stratejilerinin kullanımına ilişkin nitel bir araştırma
Öz: The objective of this study is to reveal how well summarizing strategies are used by Grade 4 and Grade 5 students as a reading comprehension strategy. This study was conducted in Buca, İzmir and the document analysis method, a qualitative research strategy, was employed. The study used a text titled "Environmental Pollution" and an "Evaluation Criteria Form". The maximum sampling method was used to obtain data from 246 students from 6 different schools. The first language of the participants in the sample was Turkish. Students were asked to summarize the text "Environmental Pollution" and their summarizing strategies were evaluated. The summaries were then assessed and codified as follows: surface summarizing, relating to the subject and writing the very same text again, paraphrasing the main idea, diverging from the main idea, and missing the main idea. In general we found that students made insufficient use of summarizing strategies.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akkaya; N. (2011). Effects of Using Reading Comprehension Strategies on the Attitudes and Success at Elementary School 8th Grade Turkish Course. Students Attitudes (47-57).Upper Galilee: Nova Publisher.
- Allen, S. (2003). An analitic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. Internal Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41-4, 319.
- Friend, R. (2001). Teaching Summarization as a Content Area Reading Strategy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 4, 320.
- Garcia, J., & Michaelis, J.U. (2001). Social studies for children a guide to basic instruction. Needham Heights USA: Allyn and Bacon A Pearson Education Company.
- Demirci, Z. (2003). Türkçe ders kitabı 5. Istanbul: Akdeniz Yayıncılık.
- Deneme, S. (2009). İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının Özetleme Stratejilerini Kullanım Tercihleri. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 5, 2, 85-91
- Hamman, D.D. (1995), An analysis of the real-time effects of reading strategy training. Unpublished PhD. The University of Texas At Austin.: Texas.
- Harvey, S. & Goodvis, A. (2002). Strategies that work: teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York ME: Stenhouse Publisher.
- Hess, P. M. (2004). A study of teachers' selection and implementation of meta-cognitive reading strategies for fourth/fifth grade reading comprehension from a success for all reading program perspective moving beyond the fundamentals. Unpublished PhD. University of the Pacific Stockton.: California.
- Keer, H. V., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005) Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficiency perception. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1, 73, 4, 291-329.
- Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: an interpretive approach, thousand oaks. California: Sage Publications.
- Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publication.
- Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering andcomprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication.
- Senemoğlu, N. (2001). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim. Ankara: Ertem Yayıncılık.
- Susar Kırmızı, F. & Akkaya, N. (2009). University Students for Using The Summarizing Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1,2496-2499.
- Wormeli, R. (2004). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision&Curriculum Development.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (&. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Matbaası.
- http://www.ncsd.kl2.pa.us/pssa/Reading/rihnd20a.htm Redrived 15.0ctober.2006. from.
- Oluk, S. & Başöncül, N. (2009). Elementary 8th Grade Students' Frequency of Metacognitive Reading Strategies and its effects on Science and Technology and Turkish Course Success. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 17, 1, 183-194.
- Temizkan. M. (2007). Reading Strategies' Effect on Comprehension on Elementary Second Stage Turkish Language Courses. Unpublished PhD. Gazi University: Ankara.
- Tok Ş. ve Beyazıt N. (2007). İlköğretim 3. Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Özetleme ve Not Alma Stratejilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama ve Kalıcılık Üzerindeki Etkileri. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 28, 113-122.
| APA | KIRMIZI SUSAR F, AKKAYA N (2011). A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. , 267 - 277. |
| Chicago | KIRMIZI SUSAR Fatma,AKKAYA Nevin A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. (2011): 267 - 277. |
| MLA | KIRMIZI SUSAR Fatma,AKKAYA Nevin A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. , 2011, ss.267 - 277. |
| AMA | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. . 2011; 267 - 277. |
| Vancouver | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. . 2011; 267 - 277. |
| IEEE | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N "A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education." , ss.267 - 277, 2011. |
| ISNAD | KIRMIZI SUSAR, Fatma - AKKAYA, Nevin. "A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education". (2011), 267-277. |
| APA | KIRMIZI SUSAR F, AKKAYA N (2011). A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011(41), 267 - 277. |
| Chicago | KIRMIZI SUSAR Fatma,AKKAYA Nevin A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011, no.41 (2011): 267 - 277. |
| MLA | KIRMIZI SUSAR Fatma,AKKAYA Nevin A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.2011, no.41, 2011, ss.267 - 277. |
| AMA | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 267 - 277. |
| Vancouver | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 267 - 277. |
| IEEE | KIRMIZI SUSAR F,AKKAYA N "A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011, ss.267 - 277, 2011. |
| ISNAD | KIRMIZI SUSAR, Fatma - AKKAYA, Nevin. "A qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elementary education". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011/41 (2011), 267-277. |
