Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 2011 Sayı: 41 Sayfa Aralığı: 398 - 410 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests

Öz:
Bu makalede araştırmacı, sınav hazırlama ve uygulamada (a) yapılandırma: tasarım, yapı, geliştirme, (b) uygulama ve (c) yabancı dil sınavlarını değerlendirme konularını incelemiş ve bazı önerilerde bulunmuştur. Ankara ilinde devlet lisesinde staj yapan ve araştırmacının danışmanlığını yaptığı son sınıf stajyer öğrencilerden kendi rehber öğretmenlerinin öğrencilerini değerlendirmek üzere kullandıkları sınavlardan birer kopya (yazılı ya da sözlü) getirmeleri istenmiştir. Sınav örneklerinin ortak özellikleri geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik, dil becerileri ve hece, bağlam, zaman, yazım, öğrencilerin dil yeterlilikleri (basit ya da karmaşık yapıların kullanılması), yönergeler ve yabancı dil öğrenim etkinliklerinin yansıması gibi dil alanlarından oluşan konular incelenmiş ve tartışılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulgularından hareketle yabancı dil öğretmenlerine konuya ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

İngilizce öğretmenlerinin sınav hazırlamalarına ilişkin bir çalışma

Öz:
In this article the researcher has examined the current situation in test (a) construction: designing, structuring, developing, (b) administering, and (c) assessing the foreign language tests to see if we are still at the same point (traditional) and has given some suggestions on this indispensable issue. To collect the necessary data the 4th year students doing their practicum studies at a state high school in Ankara under the supervision of the researcher are asked to collect one sample of each test (written or oral form) their mentors have been using to assess their foreign language students. The common characteristics of the test samples are scrutinized in terms of validity and reliability, language skills and areas including spelling, contextualization, time, typing, students' foreign language level (simple or complex structures), instructions, and backwash effect. Relying on the findings of the study some recommendations have been made for foreign language teachers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alderson, J.C. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses, a study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280-297.
  • Alderson, J.C. & Wall, D. (1993).Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 2,115-129.
  • Andrews, S. (1995). Washback or washout? The relationship between examination reform and curriculum innovation. In D. Nunan, V. Berry & R. Berry (Eds.) Bringing about Change in Language Education, (pp. 67-81). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
  • Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Test Usefulness: Qualities of Language Tests. In Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S. Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests, (pp. 17-42). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 3, 257-279.
  • Bodgan, R., & S. K. Biklen. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Chapman, D.W. & Synder, C,W, Jr. (2000). Can high-stakes testing improve instruction: Reexamining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development 20, 457-474.
  • Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11, 1, 38-54.
  • Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of a public examination change on students' perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 3, 279-301.
  • Cheng, L. (1999). Changing assessment: Washback on teacher perceptions and actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75,253-271.
  • Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
  • Eckes T., Ellis, M., Kalnberzina, V., Pizorn, K., Springer, C., Szollâs, K., Tsagari, C., et al. (2005). Progress and problems in reforming public language examinations in Europe: cameos from the Baltic States, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, France and Germany. Language Testing, 22, 3, 355-377.
  • Figueras, N., North, B., Takala, S., Verhelst, N., & Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Relating examinations to the Common European Framework: A Manual. Language Testing, 22, 3, 261-279.
  • Fred eri ksen, N. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist, 39, 3, 193-202.
  • Haladyna,T.M., Nolen, S.B., & Haas, N.S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20, 5, 2-7.
  • Hamp-Lyons,L. (1997). Washback, impact, validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing 14,3, 295-303.
  • Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English Language Tests (New Edition). Longman Group UK Limited.
  • Hughes, A. (1988). Introducing a needs based test of English language proficiency into an English medium university in Turkey. In A. Hughes (Ed.) Testing English for university study, (pp. 134-153) London: Modern English Publications.
  • Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  • Instructional Assessment Resources. (2010). Assess Teaching: Document Analyses. Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/teaching/plan/method/doc-analysis.php.
  • Kabadayı, A. (1998). Testing the Tests: A Case Study on the Determination of the Learners' Performance by Conducting C-Test and Cloze in In-class Procedure. Dil Dergisi, 66, 50-57.
  • Kohonen, V. (2001). Developing the European Language Portfolio as a pedagogical tool for advancing student autonomy. In L. Karlsson, F. Kjisik and J. Nordlund (Eds.), All together now: Papers from the Nordic Conference on autonomous language learning, (pp. 20-44). Helsinki: University of Helsinki Language Centre.
  • Koksal, D. (2004). Assessing teachers' testing skills in ELT and enhancing their professional development in testing and assessment through distance learning on the NET. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 5, 1.
  • Li, X. (1990.) How powerful can a language test be? The MET in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 11, 393-404.
  • Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 2, 4-16.
  • Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39, 167-190.
  • Maclcey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maddaus, G.W. (1988).The influence of testing on curriculum. In L.N. Tanner (Ed.) Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 3, 241-256.
  • Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22, 2, 142-173.
  • Shohamy, E. (2001) The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the use of Language Tests. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
  • Shohamy, E., Donitsa Schmidt S. & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13, 3, 298-317.
  • Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C.Clapman and D. Dorson, (Eds.) Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 291-301). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar-translation come from the entrance exam? Preliminary findings from classroom based research. Language Testing, 13, 318-333.
  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Limitations of the Common European Framework for developing comparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22, 3, 281-300.
  • Zareva, A. (2005). What is new in the new TOEFL-iBT 2006 test format? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2, 2, 45-57.
APA Saricoban A (2011). A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. , 398 - 410.
Chicago Saricoban Arif A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. (2011): 398 - 410.
MLA Saricoban Arif A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. , 2011, ss.398 - 410.
AMA Saricoban A A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. . 2011; 398 - 410.
Vancouver Saricoban A A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. . 2011; 398 - 410.
IEEE Saricoban A "A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests." , ss.398 - 410, 2011.
ISNAD Saricoban, Arif. "A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests". (2011), 398-410.
APA Saricoban A (2011). A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011(41), 398 - 410.
Chicago Saricoban Arif A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011, no.41 (2011): 398 - 410.
MLA Saricoban Arif A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.2011, no.41, 2011, ss.398 - 410.
AMA Saricoban A A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 398 - 410.
Vancouver Saricoban A A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 398 - 410.
IEEE Saricoban A "A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011, ss.398 - 410, 2011.
ISNAD Saricoban, Arif. "A study on the english language teachers' preparation of tests". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011/41 (2011), 398-410.