Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 2011 Sayı: 41 Sayfa Aralığı: 449 - 460 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability

Öz:
Bu araştırmanın amacı, yaşam boyu öğrenme yeterliklerine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirmek ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik yapısını incelemektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu rastgele olarak seçilen 300 ortaokul öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğine ilişkin bulgular faktör analizi yöntemi ile hesaplanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda 6 alt boyuttan meydana gelen yaşam boyu öğrenme yeterlikleri ölçeği (YBÖYÖ) 51 maddeden oluşmuştur. Belirlenen 6 alt boyut ise sırasıyla; "öz yönetim yeterlikleri", "öğrenmeyi öğrenme yeterlikleri", "inisiyatif ve girişimcilik yeterlikleri", "bilgiyi elde etme yeterliği", "dijital yeterlikler" ve "karar verebilme yeterliği" şeklinde isimlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alfa güvenirlik katsayısı ise 0.95 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarına göre ölçek kullanılabilir niteliklere sahiptir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aiken, L. R. (1997). Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. New York: J. Wiley.
  • Antikainen, A. (1998). Between structure and subjectivity: Life-histories and lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 44 (2-3), 215-234.
  • Barratt, R. S. (2006). Meeting lifelong learning needs by distance teaching a clean technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 906-915.
  • Bath, D. M., & Smith, C. D. (2009). The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 173-189.
  • Beycioğlu, K., & Konan, N. (2008). Lifelong learning and education policies of the European Union. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 7(24), 369-382.
  • Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Bryce, J. (2004). Different ways that secondary schools orient to lifelong learning. Educational Studies, 30(1).
  • Cansever, B. A. (2009). Educational policies of European Union and evaluation of Turkey's adaptation process to these policies: International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1 (1), 222-232.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2005). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the council on key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved 5 August 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/kevrec en.pdf
  • Cowan, D. T., Roberts, J. D., Fitzpatrick, J. M., While, A. E., & Baldwin, J. (2004). The approaches to learning of support workers employed in the care home sector: An evaluation study. Nurse Education Today, 24,98-104.
  • Çoklar, A. N., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2009). Educational technology standards scale (ETSS): A study of reliability and validity for Turkish preservice teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4).
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  • Dehmel, A. (2006). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality? Some critical reflections on the European Union's lifelong learning policies. Comparative Education, 42(1), 49-62.
  • Demiralay, R, & Karadeniz, Ş. (2008). Developing information literacy skills for lifelong learning in elementary education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(6), 89-119.
  • Demirel, M. (2009a). Lifelong learning and schools in the twenty-first century. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1709-1716.
  • Demirel, M. (2009b). Implications of lifelong learning on educational institutions. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 199-211.
  • Demirel, M. (2009c). Critical analyses of primary school programs in terms of lifelong learning skills. The First International Congress of Educational Research "Trends and Issues of Educational Research". Retrieved 9 July 2010, from http:// oc. eab .org. tr/egtconf/kkitapcik3 2 .php
  • Ekici, G. (2005). The validity and reliability of the biology self-efficacy instrument. H. U. Journal of Education, 29, 85-94.
  • Eneroth, B. (2008). Knowledge, sentience and seceptivity: A paradigm of lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 43(2).
  • European Commission. (2002). European report on quality indicators of lifelong learning. Retrieved 8 July 2010, from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/report.pdf
  • Fahr, R. (2005). Loafing of learning? The demand for informal education. European Economic Review, 49, 75-98.
  • Figel, J. (2006). Key competences for lifelong learning. Education and Training, Retrieved 8 July 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/kevcomp_en.pdf
  • Fischer, G. (2001). Lifelong learning and its support with new media. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41.
  • Friesen, N., & Anderson, T. (2004). Interaction for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 679-687.
  • Green, A. (2002). The many faces of lifelong learning: Recent education policy trends in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 611-626.
  • Goto, K., Maki, H., & Kasai, C. (2010). The minimal English test: A new method to measure English as a second language proficiency. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 91-104.
  • Gürbüztürk, O., & Şad, S. N. (2010). Turkish parental involvement scale: Validity and reliability studies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 487-491.
  • Hake, B. (1999). Lifelong learning policies in the European Union: Developments and issues. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 29(1), 53-69.
  • Hojat, M., Nasca, T. J., Erdmann, J. B., Frisbee, A. J., Veloskı, J. J., & Gonnella, J. S. (2003). An operational measure of physician lifelong learning: Its development, components and preliminary psychometric data. Medical Teacher, 25(4), 433-437.
  • Hoe-Lau, S., & Woods, P. C. (2009). Understanding learner acceptance of learning objects: The roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1059-1075.
  • Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 30,1-11.
  • Hürsen, Ç., Ozcinar, Z., Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2011). The communicative competences of students and teachers in different levels of education in North Cyprus. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 59-66.
  • Isaacs, G. (1996). Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Retrieved 27 July 2010, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/downloads/bloom.pdf
  • Janssen, J., Tattersall, C., Waterinlc, W., Berg, B., Bolman, C., & Koper, R. (2007). Self-organising navigational support in lifelong learning: How predecessors can lead the way. Computers & Education, 49, 781-793.
  • Johson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the constructivist learning environment survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7, 65-80.
  • Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training and practice: Principles, advances and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684-718.
  • Kang, D. J. (2007). Rhizoactivity: Toward a postmodern theory of lifelong learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(3), 205-220.
  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd Edition). New York: Holt McDougal.
  • Knapper, C., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Leap in to lifelong learning. Retrieved 8 July 2010, from http: //www. adel aide. edu. au/clpd/materi a/leap/leapinto/Lifelong Learning.pdf
  • Kiley, M., & Cannon, R. (2005). Lifelong learning. The University of Adelaide. Retrieved 9 July 2010, from http.V/www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/resources/leap/leapinto/LifelongLearning.pdf
  • Koper, R., Giesbers, B., Rosmalen, P. V., Sloep, P., Bruggen, J. V., Tattersall, C., Vogten, H., & Brouns, F. (2005). A design model for lifelong learning networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 71-92.
  • Muller, H., Swanepoel, E., & De Beer, A. (2010). Success profiling: a methodological perspective on the interactive nature of success predictors on student performance at an open and distance learning institution. Perspectives in Education, 28(2), 64-74.
  • Namlu, A. G., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2007). Unethical computer using behavior scale: A study of reliability and validity on Turkish university students. Computers & Education, 48, 205-215.
  • Neale, J. M., & Liebert, R. M. (1980). Science and behavior: An introduction to methods of research. London: Prentice Hall.
  • Otten, H., & Ohana, Y. (2009). The eight key competencies for lifelong learning: An appropriate framework within which to develop the competence of trainers. The field of European youth work or just plain politics? IKAB. Retrieved 9 July 2010, from http://www.salto-youth.net/downloads/4171881 /Trainer_%20Competence_study_final.pdf
  • Özcan, D. (2011). Evaluation of 4th And 5th Classes Teachers' Competence Perceptions towards Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1-9.
  • Özçmar, Z. (2006). Developing a scale on the instructional communicative qualification of parents with teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1).
  • Özdamlı, F. (2009). A cultural adaptation study of multimedia course materials forum to Turkish. World Journal on Educational Technology, 1(1), 30-45.
  • Peterson, K. D., Wahlguist, C., & Bone, K. (2000). Student surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 135-153.
  • Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample size. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 153-161.
  • Sapnas, K. G. (2004). Letters to the editor: Determining adequate sample size. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(1), 4.
  • Sharpies, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34, 177-193.
  • Sim, J., Zadnik, M. G., & Radloff, A. (2003). University and workplace cultures: Their impact on the development of lifelong learners. Radiography, 9, 99-107.
  • Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Tuan, H. L., Chang, H. P., Wang, K. H., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). The development of an instrument for assessing students' perceptions of teachers' knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 385-398.
  • Uzunboylu, H., & Tuncay, N. (2010). Divergence of digital world of teachers. Educational Technology and Society, 13 (1), 186- 194.
  • Van de Ven, A., & Ferry, D. L. (1979). Measuring and assessing organization. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Viswanathan, M., Gajendiran, S., & Venkatesan, R. (2008). Understanding and enabling marketplace literacy in subsistence contexts: The development of a consumer and entrepreneurial literacy educational program in South India. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 300-319.
  • Wallace, B. (2008). Raising the motivation and self-esteem of all learners by creating a climate for all talents to flourish: developing empowerment for life: research article. Perspectives in Education, 26(3), 19-28.
  • Wang, C. Y. (2008). Enhancing the interactive relationship between lifelong learning and social changes to carry out a learning society in Taiwan. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(5), 535-542.
  • Woodrow, M. (1999). The struggle for the soul of lifelong learning. Widening Participation & Lifelong Learning Journal, 1(1).
  • Yazıcı, S., Başol, G., & Toprak, G. (2009). Teachers' attitudes toward multicultural education: A study of reliability and validity. H. U. Journal of Education, 37, 229-242.
APA UZUNBOYLU H, HÜRSEN Ç (2011). Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. , 449 - 460.
Chicago UZUNBOYLU Hüseyin,HÜRSEN Çiğdem Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. (2011): 449 - 460.
MLA UZUNBOYLU Hüseyin,HÜRSEN Çiğdem Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. , 2011, ss.449 - 460.
AMA UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. . 2011; 449 - 460.
Vancouver UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. . 2011; 449 - 460.
IEEE UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç "Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability." , ss.449 - 460, 2011.
ISNAD UZUNBOYLU, Hüseyin - HÜRSEN, Çiğdem. "Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability". (2011), 449-460.
APA UZUNBOYLU H, HÜRSEN Ç (2011). Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011(41), 449 - 460.
Chicago UZUNBOYLU Hüseyin,HÜRSEN Çiğdem Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011, no.41 (2011): 449 - 460.
MLA UZUNBOYLU Hüseyin,HÜRSEN Çiğdem Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.2011, no.41, 2011, ss.449 - 460.
AMA UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 449 - 460.
Vancouver UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 2011(41): 449 - 460.
IEEE UZUNBOYLU H,HÜRSEN Ç "Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011, ss.449 - 460, 2011.
ISNAD UZUNBOYLU, Hüseyin - HÜRSEN, Çiğdem. "Lifelong learning competence scale (LLLCS): The study of validity and reliability". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011/41 (2011), 449-460.