Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme

Cem Harun MEYDAN (Kara Harp Okulu, Ankara, Dekanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye)
Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi
9 0
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 40 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme

Öz:
Dinamizm ve rekabetin artması örgütlerin farklı stratejiler izlemesine neden olmaktadır. Bu stratejilerden bir tanesi de örgütlerin stratejik ittifaklar oluşturmasıdır. Örgütler farklı amaçlarla stratejik ittifak kurma yolunu seçmektedir. Kaynaklara ulaşmak, işlem maliyetlerini azaltmak ve meşrulaşmak bunlardan birkaçını oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca örgütlerin içinde bulunduğu ağ düzeneklerinin oluşabilecek ittifaklar üzerinde etkisi olabilmektedir. Bu çerçevede, şirketlerin ittifak oluşturma nedenlerine kuramsal olarak açıklık getirmeyi hedefleyen çalışmada öncelikle stratejik ittifaklar ele alınmakta, ardından kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni kurumsal kuram çerçevesinde stratejik ittifak nedenleri değerlendirilmektedir. Sonuç olarak, örgütlerin stratejik ittifaka giderken hangi amaçlarla hareket ettiği kuramsal olarak ortaya konmakta, kaynaklara ulaşmayı, işlem maliyetlerini düşürmeyi ve meşrulaşmayı hedefleyen stratejik ittifakların altında yatan nedenler ile örgütsel ağların bunlar üzerindeki etkisi ortaya konmakta ve kuramsal öneriler sunulmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Savunma Bilimleri

An analysis on alliance formation of organizations with resource dependence transaction cost, organizational network and institutional theory

Öz:
Increasing dynamism and competitiveness let organizations follow different strategies. One of the strategies for the organizations is forming alliances. Firms form alliances with different purposes. To acquire resources, to minimize transaction costs and to gain legitimization constitutes some of those purposes. Furthermore, organizational network in which an organization does business can have an effect on the formation of an alliance. In this framework, in this study, which aims to clarify the alliance formation patterns in organizational theory framework, firstly handles strategic alliances then strategic alliances were examined in resource dependence, transaction cost, organizational network, institutional theory frameworks. As a result, we identified the alliance formation patterns theoretically, the reasons of the alliances which aim to reach resources, to minimize transaction costs or legitimization of an organization, and the effect of organizational networks on alliance formation patterns, and we developed theoretical propositions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Savunma Bilimleri
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adobor, H., 2006. The Role of Personal Relationships in Inter-Firm Alliances: benefits, Dysfunctions, and Some Suggestions, Business Horizons, 49, 473-486.
  • Alvarez S.A., Ireland, R.D. ve Reuer, J.J., 2006. Entrepreneurship and Strategic Alliances, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 401-404.
  • Baldo F., Rabelo R. J. ve Vallejos R. V., 2009. A framework for selecting performance indicators for virtual organisation partners’ search and selection, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 17, 4737–4755.
  • Barney J. B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17: 99–120.
  • Baum, J.A.C. ve Oliver C., 1991. Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187-218.
  • Beckman, C.M. ve Haunschild P.R., 2002. Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 1, 92-124.
  • Boyd, D. E. ve K. L. Webb (2008). Interorganizational ethical conflict within alliances: A conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 15,1, 1-24.
  • Brouthers, K.D., Brouthers, L.E. ve Wilkinson, T.J., 1995. Strategic Alliances: Choose Your Partners, Long Range Planning, 28, 3. 18-25.
  • Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D. ve Li, H.-L., 2010. Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 3, 1540-6520.
  • Buckley P.J. ve Casson M.C., 1998. Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies: Extending the Internalization Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 3, 539-561.
  • Burgers, W.P., Hill, C.W.L. ve Kim, W.C., 1993. A Theory of Global Strategic Alliances - the Case of the Global Auto Industry. Strategic Management Journal , 14, 6, 419-432.
  • Burns, T. ve Stalker, G., 1961. The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.
  • Chen, H. ve Chen, T., 2003. Governance Structures in Strategic Alliances: TCE vs. RBV, Journal Of World Business, 38, 1-14.
  • Colombo, M.G., Grilli, L. ve Piva, E., 2006. In Search of Complementary Assets: The determinants of Alliance Formation of High-tech Start-ups, Research Policy, 35, 1166-1199.
  • Cruijssen, F., Dullaert, W. ve Fleuren, H., 2007. Horizontal Cooperation in Transport and Logistics: A Literature Review. Transportation Journal, 46, 3, 22-39.
  • Dacin, M., Oliver, C. ve Roy, J. 2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 2. 169-187.
  • Das, T.K. ve Kumar, R., 2010. Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances: Managing cultural differences and internal tensions. Management Decision, 48, 1, 17-36.
  • Das, T.K. ve Teng, B., 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliance formation, Journal of Management. 26, 31-61.
  • Delerue, H.H. ve Simon, E.E., 2009. National cultural values and the perceived relational risks in biotechnology alliance relationships. International Business Review, 18, 1. 14-25.
  • Dickson P.H. ve Weaver K.M., 2011. Institutional Readiness and Small to Medium-Sized Enterprise Alliance Formation, Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 1, 126–148.
  • Dong, L. ve Glaister, K.W., 2006. Motives and Partner Selection Criteria in İnternational Strategic Alliances: Perspectives of Chinese Firms, International Business Review, 15, 577-600.
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. ve Kale P., 2008. Splitting the Pie: Rent Distribution in Alliances and Networks, Managerial And Decision Economics, 29: 137–148.
  • Edelman, L.B., 1992. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of Civil Rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1536.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. ve Schoonhoven, C. B., 1996. Resource-Based view of the Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms, Organization Science, 7, 2. 136-150.
  • Galaskiewicz, J. ve Wasserman, S., 1989. Mimetic and Normative Processes within an Interorganizational field: An Empirical Test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454-479.
  • Geringer J.M., 1991. Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures, Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 41-62.
  • Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, 481-510.
  • Gulati, R., 1998. Alliances and Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317.
  • Gulati, R., Nitin, N. ve Akbar, Z., 2000. Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 3, 203-215.
  • Hagedoorn, J., 2006. Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 3, 670-680.
  • Hamel, G., 1991. Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103.
  • Heimeriks, K.H. ve Schreiner, M., 2002. Relational quality and alliance capacity: A conceptual framework for their influence on alliance performance, Strategic Management Society, 22nd Annual International Conference, 22-25.
  • Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., ve Schneck, R.E., 1971. A Strategic Contingencies’ Theory of Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
  • Hughes, S.F. ve Beasley, F., 2008. A framework for strategic alliance partner choice. cover story. Journal of Business Inquiry: Research, Education ve Application, 7, 1. 53-60.
  • Hyder, A. S. ve Abraha D., 2003. Strategic Alliances In Eastern And Central Europe, Pergamon: Amsterdam
  • Kalaignanam, K., Shankar, V. ve Varadarajan, R.P., 2006. Asymmetric New Product Development Alliance: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnership? ISBM Report 2-2006, Mays School of Business Texas A&M University.
  • Kale, P., Singh, H. ve Perlmutter, H., 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217-237.
  • Keil, T., 2000. Strategic Alliances – A Review Of The State Of Art, Helsinky University WP Series, 10.
  • Kogut, B., 1988. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319–322.
  • Kogut, B., 2000. The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 405–425.
  • Lei, D., 2007. Strategic Alliances, Cooper, C.L., (Der.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/ tocnode?id=g9780631233176_chunk_g978140511697822_ss1-43,, 17.02.2010).
  • Lin Z., Yang H. ve Arya B., 2009a. Alliance Partners and Firm Performance: Resource Complementarity and Status Association, Strategic Management Journal, 30, 9, 921-940.
  • Lin, Z., Peng M., Yang H. ve Sun L., 2009b. How Do Networks and Learning Drive MveAs? An Institutional Comparison between China and the United States, Strategic Management Journal, 30, 10, 1113-1132.
  • Macher, J.T. ve Richman, B.D., 2008. Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences. Business and Politics, 10, 1, 1-63.
  • March, J. G. ve Simon, H., 1958. Organizations, Wiley, New York.
  • Mitsuhashi, H. ve Greve H., 2009. A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility, The Academy of Management Journal, 52, 5, 975-995.
  • Mizruchi, M. S. ve Mina Y., 2002. Interorganizational Power and Dependence, Baum J.A.C., der. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Oxford: Blackwell, 599-620.
  • O'farrell, P. N. ve Wood, P. A., 1999. Formation of strategic alliances in business services: Towards a new client, The Service Industries Journal, 19, 1. 133-151.
  • Oliver C., 1997. Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 9, 697-713.
  • Oliver, C., 1990. Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions, The Academy of Management Review, 15, 2. 241-265.
  • Osborn, R.N., Hagedoorn, J., Denekamp, J.G., Duysters, G. ve Baughn, C.C., 1998. Embedded Patterns of International Alliance Formation: An Institutional Perspective, Organization Studies, 19, 617-638.
  • Oxley, J. ve Wada, T., 2009. Alliance Structure and the Scope of Knowledge Transfer: Evıdence from Us-Japan Agreements, Management Science, 55, 4. 635-649.
  • Palmer, D. A., ve Biggart, N. W., 2002. Organizational institutions. Baum J. A. C., Der.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 259-280.
  • Pfeffer, J, ve Salancik, G.R., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Porter, M. E., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Pres: New York, NY.
  • Ranft, A.L., ve Marsh, S.J., 2008. Accessing knowledge through acquisitions and alliances: An empirical examination of new market entry. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20: 51-67.
  • Rosenkopf L. ve Padula G., 2008. Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry, Organization Science, 19, 5, 669–687.
  • Sakakibara, M., 2002. Formation of R&D consortia: Industry and company effects, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 11, 1033-1050.
  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Serapio, M.G. ve Cascio, W.F., 1996. End-games in International Alliances, Academy of Management Executive,10, 1. 62.
  • Silverman, B.S.,, 2002. Organizational Economics, Baum, J.A.C., (Der.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 467- 493.
  • Strang, D. ve Sine, W.D., 2002. Interorganizational Institutions, Baum, J.A.C., (Der.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 497-519.
  • Townsend, J.D., 2003. Understanding Alliances: a Review of International Aspects in Strategic Marketing, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21, 3, 143-155.
  • Vaidya, S., 1999. Strategic Alliances: A Unification of the Current Literature, Southwest Review International Business Research, March 10-13, 1999.
  • Van De Ven, H.A., 1976. On the nature, formation and maintenance of relations among organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1, 4, 24-36.
  • Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free pres.
  • Williamson, O. E., 1979. Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 22: 233-261.
  • Williamson, O. E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
  • Wisnieski, J.M. ve Dowling, M.J., 1997. Strategic Alliances in New Ventures: Does Governance Structure Affect New Venture Performance?, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers97/wisniesk/wisni2.htm, 15.09.2009.
  • Xİa, J., 2010. Resource Dependence and Cross-border Constraint- absorption: A Study of Market Entry Strategies, Management International Review, 50, 155–183.
  • Yasuda H., 2005. Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory, Technovation, 25, 763-770.
  • Young-Ybarra, C. ve Wiersema, M. 1999. Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory, Organization Science, 10, 439-460.
  • Zukin, S. ve DiMaggio P., 1990. Introduction. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. S. Zukin and P. DiMaggio. Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1-36.
APA Meydan C (2010). Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. , 17 - 40.
Chicago Meydan Cem Harun Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. (2010): 17 - 40.
MLA Meydan Cem Harun Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. , 2010, ss.17 - 40.
AMA Meydan C Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. . 2010; 17 - 40.
Vancouver Meydan C Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. . 2010; 17 - 40.
IEEE Meydan C "Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme." , ss.17 - 40, 2010.
ISNAD Meydan, Cem Harun. "Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme". (2010), 17-40.
APA Meydan C (2010). Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 17 - 40.
Chicago Meydan Cem Harun Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi 9, no.2 (2010): 17 - 40.
MLA Meydan Cem Harun Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2010, ss.17 - 40.
AMA Meydan C Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 9(2): 17 - 40.
Vancouver Meydan C Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 9(2): 17 - 40.
IEEE Meydan C "Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme." Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9, ss.17 - 40, 2010.
ISNAD Meydan, Cem Harun. "Kaynak bağımlılığı, işlem maliyetleri, örgütsel ağ ve yeni-kurumsal kuram ile örgütlerin ittifak oluşturma sebepleri üzerine bir inceleme". Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi 9/2 (2010), 17-40.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
16-04-2024 23:42

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları