Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin

Önder ERKARSLAN, (ondererkarslan@gmail.com)
Hande YILMAZ (handeeyilmaz@gmail.com)
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
2 0
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 22 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin

Öz:
Kalite Fonksiyon Göçerimi (KFG), ürünlerde yapılacak ileri iyileştirme ve geliştirmeler için üretim sonrasında olduğu kadar tasarım süreci boyunca da uygulanabilen yararlı bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışma, müşteri beklentilerini ve tasarım kalitesini ürüne aktarabilmek için KFG ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS)’nin ürün tasarımında uygulanabilirliğini ölçmeyi amaçlar ve bir seramik lavabo tasarımı vaka çalışması özelinde konuyu ele alır. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde, ele alınan ürünle ilgili müşteri gereksinimleri ve beklentileri araştırılmıştır. Bu veriler öncelikle Müşteri Sesi adı verilen tablolara aktarılmış, oradan da teknik özelliklere karşılık gelecek biçimde dönüştürülerek Mühendisin Sesi adı verilen tablolar oluşturulmuştur. Analitik Hiyerarşi Sürecinin bu vakaya uygulanması ile müşteri beklentileri ve teknik özellikler bir ölçü sistemi içerisinde sayısal değerlere dönüştürülmüştür. Kalite özellikleri önem seviyelerine göre müşteri ağırlıklarının hesaplanmasıyla elde edilerek daha sonra Kalite Evi adı ile anılan ve ölçülebilen teknik değerler içeren tablolara aktarılmıştır. Daha kesin sonuçlar elde etmek amacı ile birbirleriyle ilişkileri olan müşteri beklentileri, teknik özellikler ve planlanlama engelleri bir matrise yerleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, KFG yönteminin tasarım sürecinin ilk aşamalarında kullanıldığında, ürün iyileştirme konusunda daha etkin olabileceğini kanıtlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: kalite fonksiyon yayılımı müşteri gereksinimleri ürün geliştirme ürün optimizasyonu Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi (AHP) endüstri ürünleri tasarımı seramik objeler ürün tasarımı endüstriyel ürün

Konular: Mimarlık

Kalite fonksiyon göçerimi ve analitik hiyerarşi süreci aracılığıyla ürün tasarımının optimizasyonu: Bir seramik lavabo tasarımı

Öz:
Quality Function deployment (QFD) is a useful method for optimizing products which can be applied during the design process as well as in the postproduction process for further developments and revisions. This paper aims at examining the applicability of QFD and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to incorporate customer expectations and design quality into the product through a case study on a ceramic washbasin (1). In the first phase of the study customer needs and satisfaction are surveyed based on the current product design. This data is then merged with a Voice of Engineer (VOE) chart where technical attributes and features corresponding to the items in the Voice of Customer (VOC) are listed. By using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the customer needs as well as technical attributes are quantified and prioritized. Quality characteristics are then obtained by the calculation of customer weights according to the level of importance, which were then transformed into measurable technical attributes in the House of Quality (HOQ). Interrelations among customer requirements, technical attributes and planning blocks were put in a matrix in order to get precise evaluations. The findings of this study demonstrate that the application of QFD at an earlier period in the design phase can help to efficiently implement design remediation.
Anahtar Kelime: industrial design ceramic objects product design industrial product quality function deployment customer requirements product development product optimization Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Konular: Mimarlık
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AKAO, Y. (1990) Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge MA.
  • ASKIN, R.G., DAWSON, D.W. (2000) Maximizing Customer Satisfaction by Optimal Specification of Engineering Characteristics, IIE Transactions, 32 (1) 9-20.
  • BHATTACHARYA, A., SAKAR, B., MUKHERJEE, S.K. (2005) Integrating AHP with QFD for Robot Selection Under Requirement Perspective, International Journal of Product Research, 43 (17) 3671-85.
  • CHAN, L.K., WU, M.L. (2002) Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review, European Journal of Operational Research, n: 143; 463-97.
  • CHAN, L.K., WU, M.L. (2005) A Systematic Approach to Quality Function Deployment with a Full Illustrative Example, OMEGA-International journal of management science, 33( 2) 119-39.
  • CHEN, L.H., WENG, M.C. (2003) A Fuzzy Model For Exploiting Quality Function Deployment, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 38 (5-6) 559-70.
  • CHEN, Y., TANG, J., Fung, R.Y.K., REN, Z. (2004) Fuzzy Regression- Based Mathematical Programming Model For Quality Function Deployment, International Journal of Production Research, 42 (5) 1009- 27.
  • CHEN, Y., FUNG, R.Y.K, YANG, J. (2005) Fuzzy Expected Value Modeling Approach for Determining Target Values of Engineering Characteristics in QFD, International Journal of Production Research, 43 (17) 3583-604.
  • CLAUSING, D. and COHEN, L. (1994) Recent Developments in QFD in the United States, Institution of Mechanical Engineering Conference, Coventry, UK.
  • COHEN, L. (1995) Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • DAWSON, D., ASKIN, R.G. (1999) Optimal New Product Design Using Quality Function Deployment with Empirical Value Functions, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 15 (1) 17-32.
  • DIKMEN, I., BIRGONUL, M. T., KIZILTAS, S. (2005) Strategic Use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in the Construction Industry, Building and Environment (40) 245-55.
  • DWEIRI, F.T., KABLAN, M.M. (2005) An Integration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process into the Quality Function Deployment Process,International Journal of Industrial Engineering-Theory, Applications and Practice, 12 (2) 180-8.
  • FUNG, R.Y.K., POPPLEWELL, K., XIE, J. (1998) An Intelligent Hybrid System for Customer Requirements Analysis and Product Attribute Targets Determination, International Journal of Production Research, 36 (1) 13-34.
  • FUNG, R.Y.K., CHEN, Y.Z., TANG, J.F. (2006) Estimating the Functional Relationships for Quality Function Deployment Under Uncertainties, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157 (1) 98-120.
  • GERLING, W.H., PREUSSGER, A.F., WULFERT, W. (2002) Reliability Qualification of Semiconductor Devices Based on Physics-of-Failure and Risk and Opportunity Assessment, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 18 (2) 81-98.
  • HAN, C.H., KIM, J.K., CHOI, S.H. (2004) Prioritizing Engineering Characteristics in Quality Function Deployment with Incomplete Information: A Linear Partial Ordering Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 91 (3) 235-49.
  • HARI, A., KASSER, J.E., WEISS, M. (2007) How Lessons Learned from Using QFD Led to the Evolution of a Process for Creating Quality Requirements for Complex Systems, Willey Interscience, 10 (1) 45-63.
  • HAUSER, J.R., CLAUSING, D. (1988) The House of Quality, Harvard Business Review, 66 (3) 63-73.
  • HO, W. (2008) Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Applications A Literature Review, European Journal of Operational Research, n: 186; 211-28.
  • KAHN, K.B. (2006) New Product Forecasting: An Applied Approach, Armonk, NY.
  • KAHRAMAN, C., ERTAY, T., BUYUKOSMAN, G. (2006) A Fuzzy Optimization Model for QFD Planning Process Using Analytic Network Approach, European Journal of Operational Research (171) 390-411.
  • KALARGEROS, N., GAO, J.X. (1998) QFD: Focusing on its Simplification and Easy Computerization Using Fuzzy Logic Principles, International Journal of Vehicle Design (19) 315-25.
  • KING, B. (1989) Better Designs in Half the Time. Goal/QPC, Methuen, MA.
  • KARSAK, E.E., SÖZER, S., ALPTEKIN, S.E. (2003) Product Planning in Quality Function Deployment Using A Combined Analytic Network Process and Goal Programming Approach, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44 (1) 171-90.
  • KARSAK, E.E. (2004) Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making Approach to Prioritize Design Requirements in Quality Function Deployment, International Journal of Production Research, 42 (18) 3957-74.
  • KIM, K. (1997) Determining Optimal Design Characteristic Levels in QFD, Quality Engineering, 10 (2) 295-307.
  • KIM, K., MOSKOWITZ, H., DHINGRA, A., EVANS, G. (2000) Fuzzy Multicriteria Models for Quality Function Deployment, European Journal of Operational Research, 121 (3)504-18.
  • LAI, X., XIE, M., TAN, K.C. (2004) Optimizing Product Design Using the Kano Model and QFD, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference. IEEE EMS Singapore; 1085-9.
  • LAI, X., TAN, K.C., XIE, M. (2007) Optimizing Product Design Using Quantitative Quality Function Deployment: A Case Study, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, n: 23; 45-57.
  • LIN, M.C., WANG, C.C., CHEN, M.S., CHANG, C.A. (2008) Using AHP and Topsis Approaches in Customer-Driven Product Design Process, Computers in Industry, n: 59; 17-31.
  • LIU, S.T. (2005) Rating Design Requirements in Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment via Mathematical Programming Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 43 (17) 497-513.
  • LU, M., MADU, C.N., KUEI, C., WINOKUR, D. (1994) Integrating QFD, AHP and Benchmarking in Strategic Marketing, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 9 (1) 41-50.
  • MAZUR, G. (1997) Voice of Customer Analysis: A Modern System of Front-End QFD Tools, with Case Studies, AQC Milwakuee American Society of Quality Control, Orlando.
  • MAZUR, G. (2008) Modern QFD Introduction, 2nd National Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  • MOSKOWITZ, H., KIM, K. (1997) QFD Optimizer: A Novice Friendly Quality Function Deployment Decision Support System for Optimizing Product/Service Designs, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 32 (3) 641-55.
  • MRAD, F. (1997) An Industrial Workstation Characterization and Selection Using Quality Function Deployment, Quality Reliability Engineering International, 13 (5) 261-8.
  • PARK, T., KIM, K.J. (1998) Determination of An Optimal Set of Design Requirements Using House of Quality, Journal of Operations Management (16) 569-81.
  • POEL, I. (2007) Methodological Problem in QFD and Directions for Future Development, Research Engineering Design (18) 21-36.
  • PRASAD, B. (1998a) Review of QFD and Related Deployment Techniques, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 17 (3) 221-34.
  • PRASAD, B. (1998b) Synthesis of Market Research Data through A Combined Effort of QFD, Value Engineering, and Value Graph Techniques, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1 (3) 156-72.
  • PRESSON, P., KAMMERLIND, P., BERGMAN, B., ANDERSON, J. (2000) A Methodology for Multi-Characteristic Systems Improvement with Active Expert Involvement, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16 (5) 405-16.
  • SAATY, T.L. (1980) Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, Newyork. SHEN, X.X., TAN, K.C. (1998) Customer Satisfaction Benchmarking in QFD: Avoiding Pitfalls, 2nd International and 5th National Research Conference on Quality Management, Monash University: Victoria, Australia; 196-203.
  • STEUER, R.E., NA, P. (2003) Multiple Criteria Decision Making Combined with Finance: A Categorized Bibliographic Study, European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3) 496-515.
  • SULLIVAN, L.P. (1986) Quality Function Deployment. Quality Progress, 19 (6) 39-50.
  • VAIDYA, O.S., KUMAR, S. (2006) Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1) 1-29.
  • VANEGAS, L.V., LABIB, A.W. (2001) A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) Model for Deriving Optimum Targets, International Journal of Production Research, 39 (1) 99-120.
  • YILMAZ, H. (2009) Optimization of the Product Design Through Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): A Case Study of A Ceramic Washbasin, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü, İYTE, İzmir.
  • YORAM, R., EYAL, L. (2005) Managing Product Design Quality Under Resource Constraints, International Journal of Production Research, 42 (13) 2555-72.
APA ERKARSLAN Ö, YILMAZ H (2011). Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. , 1 - 22.
Chicago ERKARSLAN ÖNDER,YILMAZ Hande Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. (2011): 1 - 22.
MLA ERKARSLAN ÖNDER,YILMAZ Hande Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. , 2011, ss.1 - 22.
AMA ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. . 2011; 1 - 22.
Vancouver ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. . 2011; 1 - 22.
IEEE ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H "Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin." , ss.1 - 22, 2011.
ISNAD ERKARSLAN, ÖNDER - YILMAZ, Hande. "Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin". (2011), 1-22.
APA ERKARSLAN Ö, YILMAZ H (2011). Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 1 - 22.
Chicago ERKARSLAN ÖNDER,YILMAZ Hande Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28, no.1 (2011): 1 - 22.
MLA ERKARSLAN ÖNDER,YILMAZ Hande Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.28, no.1, 2011, ss.1 - 22.
AMA ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 28(1): 1 - 22.
Vancouver ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 28(1): 1 - 22.
IEEE ERKARSLAN Ö,YILMAZ H "Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin." Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, ss.1 - 22, 2011.
ISNAD ERKARSLAN, ÖNDER - YILMAZ, Hande. "Optimization of product design through quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process: Case study of a ceramic washbasin". Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 28/1 (2011), 1-22.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 17:19

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları