Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces

Mut, Hanife; AYAN, İlknur; ACAR, Zeki; BAŞARAN, UĞUR; ÖNAL AŞCI, ÖZLEM

Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces

UĞUR BAŞARAN, (Bozok Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Hanife MUT, (Bozok Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

ÖZLEM ÖNAL AŞCI, (Ordu Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Ordu, Türkiye)

Zeki ACAR, (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)

İlknur AYAN (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Samsun, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Field Crops

0 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 9 - 14 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces

Öz:

In this study, variation regarding the days from sowing to 50% flowering stage (FL); dry weight at 50% flowering stage (DW); and contents of crude protein (CP), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and dry matter digestibility (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), relative feed value (RFV), Ca/P ratio and K/(Ca+Mg) ratio characteristics in hay were investigated in 56 grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) accessions comprice of 51 Turkish landraces, one released variety ‘Gürbüz-2001’, and 4 ICARDA lines (560, 564, 565, 566) in 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 growing seasons. Number of the days to 50% flowering was between 174 and 184, and plant dry weight was between 7.63 and 25.52 g amongst grass pea accessions. The range in hay was 20.95 – 26.31% for CP, 28.80 – 34.40% for ADF, 33.42 – 45.01% for NDF and 129 - 185 for RFV amongst accessions. In general, while hay of landraces had higher CP, Ca, Mg, K and P content and RFV than ICARDA lines and released variety, the earliest accession was Gürbüz-2001 variety. Landraces N2, D1 and BR1 were the most promising accessions for hay production or breeding for their CP, ADF, NDF contents, RFV value and yield.

Anahtar Kelime: landraces forage Turkey Lathyrus sativus feed evaluation crude protein

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Anonymous, 2009. Turkish State Meteorological Services, Samsun Meteorology Regional Directorate, Samsun.
Abbasi, M.K., M.M. Tahır, A.S. Shah, F. Batool. 2009. Mineral nutrient composition of different ecotypes of white clover and their nutrient credit to soil at Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Pak. J. Bot., 41(1): 41-51, 2009.
Abd El Moneim, A., B. Van Dorrestein, M. Baum, J. Ryan, G. Bejiga. 2001. Role of ICARDA in improving the nutritional quality and yield potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.), for subsistence farmers in dry areas. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 2 (2), 55–58.
Acıkgoz E., 2001. Forages. Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Bursa-Turkey. Ayan, I., H. Mut, O. Onal-Asci, U. Basaran, Z. Acar. 2010. Effects of manure application on the chemical composition of rangeland hay. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advences, 9 (13): 1852-1857.
Basaran, U., Z. Acar, O. Onal Ascı, H. Mut, O. Tongel. 2010. Cultivated local Lathyrus varieties in Turkey and their some agronomical traits. The contributions of grasslands to the conservation of Mediterranean biodiversity. C Porqueddu. S. Rios (eds). Zaragoza: CIHEAM/CIBIO/FAO. 2010, 286 p. (Options Méditerranéennes, Series A: Mediterranean Seminars, No. 92) pp. 129-133.
Campbell, C.G., R.B. Mehra, S.K. Agrawal, Y.Z. Chen, A.M. El-Moneim, H.I.T. Khawaja, C.R. Yadov, J.U. Tay, W.A. Araya. 1994. Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). Euphytica 73, 167–175.
Campbell, C.G., 1997. Grasspea. Lathyrus sativus L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 18. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/ International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
Croft, A.M., E.C.K. Pang, P.W.J. Taylor. 1999. Molecular analysis of Lathyrus sativus L. (grasspea) and related Lathyrus species, Euphytica 107 (), pp. 167–176.
De La Rosa, L., I. Martin, 2001. Morphological characterization of Spanish genetic resources of Lathyrus sativus L. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter, 2, 31-34.
Hanbury, C.D., K.H.M. Siddique, N.W. Galwey, P.S. Cooks. 1999. Genotype-environment interaction for seed yield and ODAP concentration of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. in a Mediterranean-type environments. Euphytica 110, 45–60.
Jefferson, P.G., H.F. Mayland,. K.H. Asay, J.D. Berdahl. 2001. Variation in mineral concentration and grass tetany potential among Russian Wildrye Accessions, Crop Sci. 41, pp. 543–548.
Karadag, Y., U. Buyukburc, 2004. Forage qualities, forage yields and seed yields of some legume-triticale mixtures under rainfed conditions. Acta Agri. Scan., Sec. B, Soil and Plant Sci. 54: 140-148.
Karadag, Y., S. Iptas, M.Yavuz. 2004. Agronomic potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus) under rainfed conditions in semi-arid regions of Turkey, Asian J. Plant Sci. 3 (2004), pp. 151–155.
Kiraz, A.B., 2011. Determination of relative feed value of some legume hays harvested at flowering stage. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6: 525-530.
Larbi, A., A.M. Abd El-Moneim, H. Nakkoula, B. Jammalb, S. Hassana. 2010. Intra-species variations in yield and quality in Lathyrus species: 1. Grasspea (L. sativus L.) Animal Feed Science and Technology 161 (2010) 9–18.
Mikic , A., V. Mihailovic, B. Cupina, G. Krstic, S. Vasiljevic, D. Milic. 2010. Forage and seed yield components in four French landraces of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). In: Huyghe, C. (Ed.), Sustainable Use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 127–130.
Miller, D.A., H.F. Reetz-Jr, 1995. Forage fertilization. In: Forages Vol. I: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. (Eds.): R.F. Barnes, D.A. Miller and C.J. Nelson. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 79-91.
NRC (National Research Council), 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Poland, C., T. Faller, L. Tisor. 2003. Effect of chickling vetch (Lathyrus sativus L.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa) hay in gestation ewe diets. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl. 3, 38–40.
Polignano G.B., V. Bisignano, V. Tomaselli, P. Uggenti, V. Alba, C. Della Gatta, 2009. Genotype environment interaction in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines. Article ID 898396, International Journal of Agronomy p. 7, Avaliable at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ija/2009/898396.html (accessed 23.11.2010).
Rohweder, D.A., R.F. Barnes, N. Jorgenson. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality, Journal of Animal Science 47 (1978), pp. 747–759.
Siddique, K.H.M., S.P. Loss, K.L. Regan, R.L. Jettner. 1999. Adaptation and seed yield of cool season grain legumes in Mediterranean environments of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 375–387.
Skiba, B., A. Gurung, E. Pang, 2007. 'Genome mapping and molecular breeding in Lathyrus’, in Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants. Pulses, Sugar and Tuber Crops. Springer, NewYork, 123 - 131, ISBN: 978-3540345374.
SPSS Inc., 1999. SPSS for Windows. Release 10.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago,USA.
Tejada, R., L.R. McDowell, F.G. Martin, J.H. Conrad. 1985. Mineral element analyses of various tropical forages in Guatemala and their relationship to soil concentrations. Nutrition Reports International, 32: 313-323.
Tekeli, A.S., E. Ates, 2005. Yield potential and mineral composition of white clover (Trifolium repens l.)-tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea schreb.) mixtures. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 6: 27-34.
TUIK, 2008. Turkısh Stastical Enstitute, Agiculture statistics (Crop production stataistics, 2008), Avaliable at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr.Tuna, C., L. Coskuntuna, F. Koc. 2004. Determination of nutritional value of some legume and grasses. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 1750-1753.
Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd edition. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University Press. 476 pp.
Vaz Patto, M.C., B. Skiba, E.C.K. Pang, S.J. Ochatt, F. Lambein, D. Rubiales, 2006. Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 147, 133–147.
Yolcu, H., M. Dasci, M. Tan, 2009a. Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole and intercrop in spring frost condition for animal feeding I. yield end Quality. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(7): 1337-1342.
Yolcu, H., A. Gunes, M. Turan, 2009b. Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole and intercrop in spring frost condition for animal feeding II. Mineral Composition . Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8(7): 1343-1348

APA	BAŞARAN U, Mut H, ÖNAL AŞCI Ö, ACAR Z, AYAN İ (2011). Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. , 9 - 14.
Chicago	BAŞARAN UĞUR,Mut Hanife,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM,ACAR Zeki,AYAN İlknur Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. (2011): 9 - 14.
MLA	BAŞARAN UĞUR,Mut Hanife,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM,ACAR Zeki,AYAN İlknur Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. , 2011, ss.9 - 14.
AMA	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. . 2011; 9 - 14.
Vancouver	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. . 2011; 9 - 14.
IEEE	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ "Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces." , ss.9 - 14, 2011.
ISNAD	BAŞARAN, UĞUR vd. "Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces". (2011), 9-14.

APA	BAŞARAN U, Mut H, ÖNAL AŞCI Ö, ACAR Z, AYAN İ (2011). Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16(1), 9 - 14.
Chicago	BAŞARAN UĞUR,Mut Hanife,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM,ACAR Zeki,AYAN İlknur Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16, no.1 (2011): 9 - 14.
MLA	BAŞARAN UĞUR,Mut Hanife,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM,ACAR Zeki,AYAN İlknur Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, vol.16, no.1, 2011, ss.9 - 14.
AMA	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2011; 16(1): 9 - 14.
Vancouver	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2011; 16(1): 9 - 14.
IEEE	BAŞARAN U,Mut H,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö,ACAR Z,AYAN İ "Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces." Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16, ss.9 - 14, 2011.
ISNAD	BAŞARAN, UĞUR vd. "Variability in forage quality of Turkish grass pea (Lathyrus sativus l.) landraces". Turkish Journal of Field Crops 16/1 (2011), 9-14.