The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics

Tatar, Arkun; SALTUKOĞLU, Gaye

The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics

Arkun TATAR, (Haliç Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Gaye SALTUKOĞLU (Haliç Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni

11 3

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 213 - 227 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics

Öz:

Amaç: Bu araştırmada CES-Depresyon Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Ölçeğin uyarlanması için toplamda 1143 kişilik veri kullanılmıştır. Değişik yollarla toplanan veriler, farklı geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları için kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Türkçe’ye uyarlanan ölçeğin güvenirlik ve geçerlik bulguları literatürle oldukça benzerdir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı 0,75 ile 0,90 arasında, Guttman iki yarım test güvenirliği 0,89, iki hafta arayla yapılan test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayısı 0,69 olarak bulunmuştur. Madde Cevap Kuramı ile incelenen ölçek maddelerinden 7. madde en düşük ayırt edicilik gösteren madde olmuştur. Bu maddeyi sırasıyla 11, 15 ve 13. maddeler izlemiştir. Ayırt ediciliği en yüksek maddeler ise sırasıyla 6, 3 ve 8. maddelerdir. Ölçeğin açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları da diğer çalışmalara oldukça benzerdir. Ölçeğin dört faktörlü yapısının test edildiği Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucunda iyi uyum katsayısı 0,84 olarak elde edilmiştir. Ölçeğin Beck Depresyon envanteri ile bağıntı düzeyi 0,77 bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin hasta ve hasta olmayan grupları birbirinden ayırt etmede %81,7 oranında etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: Türkçe’ye uyarlanan CES-Depresyon Ölçeği’nin tarama amaçlı grup uygulamalarında kullanılabileceği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık

CES-Depresyon Ölçeği’nin doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve madde cevap kuramı kullanımı ile Türkçe’ye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Öz:

The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics Objective: The purpose of this study was to adapt the CES-Depression scale into Turkish and to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the scale. Method: The data were collected from 1143 subjects for the validity and reliability analyses through different procedures. Results: The reliability and validity results of the scale found in this study were quite similar to the results in the literature. The internal consistency coefficient was between 0.75 and 0.90. The Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.89. The test-retest reliability by two weeks was 0.69. The analysis of items by item response theory showed item 7 to be the least discriminant item, and consecutively item 11, 15, and 13 followed. The most discriminant items happened to be 6, 3, and 8. The factor loadings of the items of the scale, both by the explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses, led to similar results found in other studies. The four factor structure of the scale was tested and the GFI was 0.84 through confirmatory factor analysis. The correlation coefficient between the CES-D and Back Depression Inventory was 0.77. We observed that the scale discriminated between patient and non-patient groups effectively at 81.7%. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CES-D scale can be used for the screening purposes during the assessment process of groups.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1977; 1: 385-401.
2. Sheehan TJ, Fifield J, Reisine S, Tennen H. The measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. J Pers Assess 1995; 64(3): 507-521.
3. Gonçalves B, Fagulha T. The Portuguese Version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Eur J Psychol Assess 2004; 20: 339-348.
4. Orme JG, Reis J, Herz E. Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD) Scale. J Clin Psychol 1986; 42: 28-33.
5. Santor DA, Zuroff DC, Ramsay JO, Cervantes P, Palacios J. Examining scale discriminability in the BDI and CES-D as a function of depressive severity. Psychol Assessment 1995; 7: 131- 139.
6. Hubley AM, Hemingway D, Michalos AC. A comparison of older informal caregivers and non-caregivers living in non-metropolitan areas. Soc Indic Res 2003; 61: 241-258.
7. Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA, Wilson J, Hall LA, Rayens MK, Sachs B, Cunningham LL. Psychometrics for two short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Issues Ment Health Nurs 1998; 19: 481-94.
8. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med 1994; 10: 77-84.
9. Cole JC, Rabin AS, Smith TL, Kaufman AS. Development and Validation of a Rasch-Derived CES-D Short Form. Psychol Assessment 2004; 16: 360-372.
10. Irwin M, Artin KH, Oxman MN. Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 1701-1704.
11. Kohout FJ, Berkman LF, Evans DA, Cornoni-Huntley J. Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index. J Aging Health 1993; 5: 179-193.
12. Luyckx K, Soenens B, Goossens L, Beckx K, Wouters S. Identity Exploration And Commitment In Late Adolescence: Correlates Of Perfectionism And Mediating Mechanisms On The Pathway To Well–Being. J Soc Clin Psychol 2008; 27: 336-361.
13. Santor DA ve Coyne JC. Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression. Psychol Assessment 1997; 9: 233-243.
14. Shrout PE, Yager TJ. Reliability and validity of screening scales: Effect of reducing scale length. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 69-78.
15. Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 5-18.
16. Leventhal AM, Chasson GS, Tapia E, Miller EK, Pettit JW. Measuring Hedonic Capacity in Depression:A Psychometric Analysis of Three Anhedonia Scales. J Clin Psychol 2006; 62: 1545–1558.
17. Perreira KM, Deeb-Sossa N, Haris KM, Bollen K. What Are We Measuring? An Evaluation of the CES-D Across Race/Ethnicity and Immigrant Generation. Soc Forces 2005; 83: 1567–1602.
18. Phillips GA, Shadish WR, Murray DM, Kubik M, Lytle LA, Birnbaum AS. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale with a young adolescent population: A confirmatory factor analysis and implementation of a general hierarchical model. Multivar Behav Res 2006; 41: 147-163.
19. Pettit JW, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Hibbard JH, Hurtado AV. Association between the Center for Epidemiologie Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and mortality in a community sample: An artifact of the somatic complaints factor? IJCHP 2008; 8: 383-397.
20. Santor DA. The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. A. E. Kazdin (Chief Editor) American Psychology Association Encyclopedia of Psychology. American Psychology Association Press. 2000.
21. Schein RL, Koenig HG. The Center for Epidemiological Studies- Depression (CES-D) Scale: Assessment of depression in the medically ill elderly. Int J Geriatr Psych 1997; 12: 436-446.
22. Shafer AB. Meta-analysis of the Factor Structures of Four Depression Questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and Zung. J Clin Psychol 2006; 62:123-146.
23. Dick RW, Beals J, Keane EM, Manson SM. Factorial structure of the CES-D among American Indian adolescents. J Adolescence 1994; 17: 73-79.
24. Jennifer AB, McCreary DR, Wright KD, Asmundson GJG. Factorial validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression (CES-D) scale in military peacekeepers. Depress Anxiety 2003; 17(1): 19-25.
25. Knight RG, Williams S, McGee R, Olaman S. Psychometric properties of the centre for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) in a sample of women in middle life. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35: 373-380.
26. Azocar F, Arean P, Miranda J, Munoz RF. Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol 2001; 57: 355-365. 27. Dershem LD, Patsiorkovski VV, O’Brien DJ. The use of the CES-D for measuring symptoms of depression in three rural russian villages. Soc Indic Res 1996; 39: 89-108.
28. Fountoulakis K, Iacovides A, Kleanthous S, Samolis S, Kaprinis SG, Sitzoglou K, Kaprinis GS, Bech P. Reliability, validity, and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale. BMC Psychiatry 2001; 1: 1-20.
29. Iwata N, Roberts RE. Age differences among Japanese on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: An ethnocultural perspective on somatization. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 967-974.
30. Lin L, Shi-Zhong W, Changmin Z, Qifu F, Keqiang L, Golinag S. Psychological long-term effects of sterilization on anxiety and depression. Contraception 1996; 54: 345-357.
31. Noh S, Avison WR, Kaspar V. Depressive symptoms among Korean immigrants: Assessment of a translation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale. Psychol Assessment 1992; 4: 84-91.
32. Schroevers MJ Ranchor AV, Sanderman R. The role of age at the onset of cancer in relation to survivors’ long-term adjustment: A controlled comparison over an eight-year period. Psycho-Oncol 2004; 13(10): 740-752.
33. Arreola S, Neilands T, Pollack L, Paul J, Catania J. Childhood Sexual Experiences and Adult Health Sequelae Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Defining Childhood Sexual Abuse. J Sex Res 2008; 45(3): 246-252.
34. Boey KW. Cross-validation of a short form of the CES-D in Chinese elderly. Int J Geriatr Psych 1999; 14(8): 608-17.
35. Fendrich M, Weissman MM, Warner V. Screening for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: validating the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131(3): 538-551.
36. Fichman L, Koestner R, Zuroff DC. Depressive Styles in Adolescence: Assessment, Relation to Social Functioning, and Developmental Trends. J Youth Adolescence 1994; 23(3): 315-330.
37. Garrison CZ, Addy CL, Jackson KLAB, McKeown RE, Waller JLBS. The CES-D as a screen for depression and other psychiatric disorders in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Psy 1991; 30: 636-641.
38. Gatz M, Hurwicz ML. Are old people more depressed? Cross sectional data on Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale factors. Psychol Aging 1990; 5: 284-290.
39. Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES D) as a screening instrument for depression among community residing older adults. Psychol Aging 1997; 12: 277-287.
40. Mathet F, Martin-Guehl C, Maurice-Tison S, Bouvard MP. Prevalence of depressive disorders in children and adolescents attending primary care. A survey with the Aquitaine Sentinelle Network. Encephale 2003; 29: 391-400.
41. Badger T, Segrin C, Meek P, Lopez AM, Bonham E, Sieger A. Telephone interpersonal counseling for women with breast cancer: Symptom management and quality of life. Oncol Nurs Forum 2005; 32: 273-279.
42. Katz MR, Kopek N, Waldron J, Devins GM, Tomlinson G. Screening for depression in head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncol 2004; 13: 269–280.
43. Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Stommel M, Given CW, Given B. Predictors of depressive symptomatology of geriatric patients with lung cancer-A longitudinal analysis. Psycho-Oncol 2002; 11(1): 12-22.
44. Lawrence F, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Annals of Family Medicine 2008; 6: 246-252.
45. Beals J, Manson SM, Keane EM, Dick RW. Factorial Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale Among American Indian College Students. Psychological Assessment: J Consult Clin Psych 1991; 3, 4, 623-627.
46. Black SA, Markides KS. Depressive symptoms and mortality in older Mexican Americans. Ann Epidemiol 1999, 9: 45-52.
47. Crockett LJ, Randall BA, Shen Y, Russell ST, Driscoll AK. Measurement equivalence of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale for Latino and Anglo adolescents: A national study. J Consult Clin Psych 2005; 73: 47-58.
48. Golding JM, Aneshensel CS. Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites. Psychological Assessment: J Consult Clin Psych 1989; 1: 163-168.
49. Manson SM, Ackerson LM, Dick RW, Baron AE, Fleming CM. Depressive symptoms among American Indian adolescents: Psychometric characteristics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scales (CES-D). Psychol Assessment: J Consult Clin Psych 1990; 2: 231-237.
50. Cuijpers P, Smit F. Excess mortality in depression: A meta-analysis of community studies. J Affect Disorders 2002; 72: 227-236.
51. Baker FM, Parker DA, Wiley C, Velli SA, Johnson JT. Depressive symptoms in African American medical patients. Int J Geriatr Psych 1995; 10: 9-14.
52. Kawada T, Suzuki S, Kubota K, Ohnishi N, Satoh K. Content and Cross Validity of the Todai Health Index Depression Scale in Relation to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale. J Occup Health 1999; 41: 154-159.
53. Santor DA, Coyne JC. Evaluating the continuity of symptomatology between depressed and nondepressed individuals. J Abnorm Psychol 2001a; 110: 216-225.
54. Santor DA, Coyne JC. Examining symptom expression as a function of symptom severity: Item performance on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Psychol Assessment 2001b; 13:127-139.
55. Segal DL, Coolidge FL, Cahill BS, O’Riley AA. Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Behav Modif 2008; 32: 3-20.
56. Bonilla J, Bernal G, Santos A, Santos D. A Revised Spanish Version of the Beck Depression Inventory: Psychometric Properties with a Puerto Rican Sample of College Students. J Clin Psychol 2004; 60: 119-30.
57. Roberts RE, Andrews JA, Lewinsohn PM, Hops H. Assessment of depression in adolescents using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Psychological Assessment: J Consult Clin Psych 1990; 2: 122-128.
58. Van’t Veer-Tazelaar PJ, van Marwijk HWJ, Jansen APD, Rijmen F, Kostense PJ, van Oppen P, van Hout HPJ, Stalman WAB, Beekman ATF. Depression in old age (75+), the PIKO study. J Affect Disorders 2008; 106: 295-299.
59. Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P. Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: Evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D). J Psychosom Res 1999; 46: 437-443.
60. Morrison R, O’Connor RC. Predicting Psychological Distress in College Students: The Role of Rumination and Stres. J Clin Psychol 2005; 61: 447-460.
61. Wong YI. Measurement Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale in a Homeless Population. Psychol Assessment 2000; 12: 69-76.
62. Bush BA, Novack TA, Schneider JJ, Madan A. Depression Following Traumatic Brain Injury: The Validity of the CES-D as a Brief Screening Device. J Clin Psychol Med S 2004; 11: 195-201.
63. Dozois DJA. The Psychometric Characteristics of the Hamilton Depression. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 31-40.
64. Edman JL, Danko GP, Andrade N, McArdle JJ, Foster J, Glipa J. Factor structure of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) among Filipino-American adolescents. Soc Psych Psych Epid 1999; 34: 211-215.
65. Wehner JS, Stoner SC. Tools and Techniques for Evaluating. J Pharm Pract 2001; 14: 448-452.
66. Ceyhun B. Depresyonun Psikolojik Değerlendirmesi, Duygu Durum Dizisi 2001; 4: 192-197.
67. Smits CHM, de Vries WM, Beekman ATF. The CIDI as an instrument for diagnosing depression in older Turkish and Moroccan labour migrants: an exploratory study into equivalence. Int J Geriatr Psych 2005; 20: 436-445.
68. Spijker J, Van der Wurff FB, Poort EC, Smits CHM, Verhoeff AP, Beekman ATF. Depression in first generation labour migrants in Western Europe: the utility of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Int J Geriatr Psych 2004; 19, 6, 538- 544.
69. Van der Wurff, FB, Beekman ATF, Dijkshoorn H, Spijker JA, Smits CHM, Stek ML, Verhoef A. Prevalence and risk factors for depression in elderly Turkish and Moroccan migrants in the Netherlands. J Affect Disorders 2004; 83: 33-41.
70. Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanteri’nin geçerliği üzerine bir çalışma. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1988; 6: 118-126.
71. Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanteri’nin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliği, güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1989; 7: 3-13 (Turkish).
72. MacDonald P, Paunonen SV. A Monte Carlo comparison of item and person statistics based on item response theory versus classical test theory. Educ Psychol Meas 2002; 62: 921-943.
73. Hambleton RK, Robin F, Xing D. Item response models for the analysis of educational and psychological test data. In. HEA Tinsley ve SD Brown (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. San Diego: Academic Press 2000; 553-581.
74. Collins WC, Raju NS, Edwards JE. Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale. J Appl Psychol 2000; 85: 451-462.
75. Raju NS, Laffitte LJ, Byrne BM. Measurement equivalance: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. J Appl Psychol 2002; 87: 517-529.
76. Reise SP, Waller NG. How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items? Psychol Methods 2003; 8(2): 164- 184.
77. Somer O. Gruplararası Karşılaştırmalarda Ölçek Eşdeğerliğinin İncelenmesi: Madde ve Test Fonksiyonlarının Farklılaşması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 2004; 19: 69-82 (Turkish).
78. Du Toit M (Ed.). IRT from SSI: BILOG-MG, MULTILOG, PARSCALE, TESTFACT. Lincolnwood (IL): Scientific Software International 2003.
79. Rouse SV, Finger MS, Butcher JN. Advances in clinical personality measurement: An item response theory analysis of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales. J Pers Assess 1999; 72: 282-307.
80. Cook JM, Elhai JD, Areán PA. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist with older primary care patients. J Trauma Stress 2005; 18: 371-376.
81. Yasuda T, Lubin B, Kim J, Whitlock RV. The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised: Development and Validation. J Clin Psychol 2003; 59: 93-109.
82. Thomas JL, Brantley PJ. Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Low-Income Women Attending Primary Care Clinics. Eur J Psychol Assess 2004; 20, 2, 106–115.
83. Helmes E, Nielson WR. An examination of the internal structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale in two medical samples. Pers Indiv Differ 1998; 25: 735-743.
84. Hertzog C, Alstine JV, Usala PD, Hultsch DF, Dixon R. Measurement Properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Older Populations. Psychological Assessment: J Consult Clin Psych 1990; 2: 64-72.
85. Lubin B, Roth AV, Dean LM, Hornstra RK. Correlates of depressive mood among normals. J Clin Psychol 1978; 34: 650-653.
86. Spielberger CD, Ritterband LM, Reheiser EC, Brunner TM. The nature and measurement of depression. IJCHP 2003; 3, 2 209-234.

APA	Tatar A, SALTUKOĞLU G (2010). The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. , 213 - 227.
Chicago	Tatar Arkun,SALTUKOĞLU Gaye The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. (2010): 213 - 227.
MLA	Tatar Arkun,SALTUKOĞLU Gaye The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. , 2010, ss.213 - 227.
AMA	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. . 2010; 213 - 227.
Vancouver	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. . 2010; 213 - 227.
IEEE	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G "The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics." , ss.213 - 227, 2010.
ISNAD	Tatar, Arkun - SALTUKOĞLU, Gaye. "The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics". (2010), 213-227.

APA	Tatar A, SALTUKOĞLU G (2010). The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 20(3), 213 - 227.
Chicago	Tatar Arkun,SALTUKOĞLU Gaye The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 20, no.3 (2010): 213 - 227.
MLA	Tatar Arkun,SALTUKOĞLU Gaye The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, vol.20, no.3, 2010, ss.213 - 227.
AMA	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni. 2010; 20(3): 213 - 227.
Vancouver	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni. 2010; 20(3): 213 - 227.
IEEE	Tatar A,SALTUKOĞLU G "The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics." Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 20, ss.213 - 227, 2010.
ISNAD	Tatar, Arkun - SALTUKOĞLU, Gaye. "The adaptation of the CES-Depression scale into Turkish through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory and the examination of psychometric characteristics". Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 20/3 (2010), 213-227.