Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers

KARADERE, Emrah; DEMİREL, Basak; YAVUZ, K. Fatih; TÜRKÇAPAR, M. Hahan

Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers

K. Fatih YAVUZ, (Bakırköy Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Psikiyatri, Nöroloji ve Beyin Cerrahisi, 5. Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

M. Hahan TÜRKÇAPAR, (Dışkapı, Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, 2. Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Başak DEMİREL, (Isparta Devlet Hastanesi, Isparta, Türkiye)

Emrah KARADERE (Boş)

Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi

8 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 273 - 282 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers

Öz:

Üniversite öğrencileri ve çalışanları örnekleminde Leahy Duygusal Şema Ölçeği’nin Türkçeuyarlaması, geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği Amaç: Duygusal şema kavramı duygularla ilgili inançları ve tutumları belirleyebilmek amacıyla geliştirilmiştir. Buaraştırma, Leahy Duygusal Şema Ölçeği’nin (LDŞÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasını, Türkçe formunun geçerlilik vegüvenilirliğinin analiz edilmesini amaçlamaktadır.Yöntem: Araştırma, iki ildeki üniversite öğrencileri, öğrenci yakınları ve çalışanlarından oluşan 436 gönüllü katı lımcı üzerinde yapıldı. LDŞÖ’nün Türkçeye çevrilmesi aşamasında çeviri, geri çeviri ve pilot uygulama yapılarakölçeğe son biçimi verildi. Katılımcılara; sosyodemografik özellikler formu, LDŞÖ ve Üst-Biliş Ölçeği-30 (ÜBÖ-30)uygulandı. LDŞÖ’nün güvenilirliği; test-tekrar test, test yarılama, Cronbach alfa katsayısı ve madde-alt boyuttoplam puan korelasyonu ile analiz edildi. Faktör analizinde temel bileşenler yöntemi ve varimax rotasyonukullanıldı. Örtüşme ve ayrışma geçerliliğini belirlemek için Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Araştırma örnekleminin %51.1’i (n=223) kadındı. Yaş ortalaması 22.5±4.84 ve yaş aralığı 18-53 olarak sap tandı. İstatistiksel analizde, LDŞÖ Türkçe formunun güvenilirliğini destekleyen sonuçlar elde edildi. Madde-altboyut toplam puan korelasyon katsayıları istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu ve iç tutarlılığının yüksek olduğu tes pit edildi (Cronbach alfa = 0.86). Faktör analizinde, orijinal formda olduğu gibi saptanan 14 alt boyut, toplam var yansın %56.8’ini açıkladı. Alt boyutların beşinde orijinal formla uyumsuzluk saptandı. LDŞÖ’nün örtüşme ve ayrış ma geçerliğinin araştırılması için ÜBÖ-30 alt boyutları ile korelasyonuna bakıldı ve anlamlı ilişkiler elde edildi. Sonuç: Araştırmanın bulguları, LDŞÖ Türkçe formunun klinik olmayan örneklem grubunda, duygulara yönelikşemaları ve tutumları geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde ölçtüğünü göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Üniversite öğrencileri ve çalışanları örnekleminde leahy duygusal şema ölçeği’nin türkçe uyarlaması, geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği

Öz:

Adaptation, validity and reliability of the Leahy Emotional Schema Scale Turkish versionbased on Turkish university students and workersObjective: Emotional schema concept is developed for determining beliefs and attributions aboutemotions. The aim of this study was to examine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of “LeahyEmotional Schema Scale” (LESS).Method: The sample consisted of 436 participants including students, workers and their relatives fromvarious faculties of two Turkish universities. Translation, back-translation and pilot assessment of LESS Turkishversion completed. Socio-demographic data form, LESS Turkish version and short form of the MetacognitionQuestionnaire (MCQ-30) were administered to participants. For reliability of LESS test-retest correlation,split-half technique, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and item-dimension total score correlations were used.Principal component analysis and varimax rotation used for factor analysis and Pearson correlation analysiswas used for convergent and divergent validity.Results: The mean age of participants was 22.5±4.84 years (age range: 18-53 years) and 51.1% (n=223) werefemale. Statistically significant results supported LESS Turkish version’s reliability. Item-dimension total scorecorrelation analyses revealed statistically significant correlation coefficients that show high internalconsistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.86). Factor analysis revealed that LESS Turkish version, as the originalversion, had 14 dimensions, and these explained 56.8% of the total variance. In five dimensions, factoranalysis showed inconsistency with original version of LESS. For convergent and divergent validity, wecompared related subscales of LESS and MCQ-30 and revealed significant relations. Conclusion: The results of this study show that the Turkish version of LESS is a reliable and valid scale forthe assessment of beliefs and attributions about emotions on non-clinical population.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Rimes KA, Chalder T. The Beliefs about Emotions Scale: validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68:285-292.
2. Goldin PR, Gross JJ. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder. Emotion 2010; 10:83-91.
3. Newman MG, Castonguay LG, Borkovec TD, Fisher AJ, Boswell JF, Szkodny LE, Nordberg SS. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder with integrated techniques from emotion-focused and interpersonal therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79:171-181.
4. Leahy RL. Emotional schemas and resistance to change in anxiety disorders. Cogn Behav Pract 2007; 14:36-45.
5. Wells A. Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy. West Sussex: Wiley, John & Sons, 2000; 55-73.
6. Papageorgiou C, Wells A. Treatment of recurrent major depression with attention training. Cogn Behav Pract 2000; 7:407-413.
7. Wells A, King P. Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: an open trial. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2006; 37:206-212.
8. Greenberg LS, Paivio SC. Working with the Emotions in Psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press, 1997.
9. Greenberg L, Warwar S, Malcolm W. Emotion-focused couples therapy and the facilitation of forgiveness. J Marital Fam Ther 2010; 36:28-42.
10. Leahy RL. A model of emotional schemas. Cogn Behav Pract 2002; 9:177-190.
11. Leahy RL. Overcoming Resistance in Cognitive Therapy. New York: The Guilford Press, 2001.
12. Leahy RL. Roadblocks in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Transforming Challenges into Opportunities for Change. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003.
13. Makino H. The Development of a new performance-based- test for measuring emotional intelligence: humility-empathy- assertiveness-respect test. Dissertation, Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia, 2010.
14. Santos VM. Improving mood through acceptance of emotional experience. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, 2007.
15. Cartwright-Hatton S, Wells A. Beliefs about worry and intrusions: the metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates. J Anxiety Disord 1997; 11:279-296.
16. Wells A, Cartwright-Hatton S. A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behav Res Ther 2004; 42:385-396.
17. Tosun A, Irak M. Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 2008; 19:67-80.
18. Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1954; 16:296-298.
19. Kaiser H. A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 1970; 35:401-415.
20. Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974; 39:31-36.
21. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (editors). Principal Components and Factor Analysis. In: Using Multivariate Statistics. Forth Ed. New York: HarperCollins, 2001, 607-675.
22. Aydemir Ö. Psikiyatride Değerlendirme Araçları: Özellikleri, Türleri, Kullanımı: İçinde Aydemir Ö, Köroğlu E (editors). Psikiyatride Kullanılan Klinik Ölçekler. Dördüncü Baskı. Ankara: HYB Basın Yayın, 2009, 21-33 (Article in Turkish).
23. Van Minnen A, Arntz A, Keijsers GP. Prolonged exposure in patients with chronic PTSD: predictors of treatment outcome and dropout. Behav Res Ther 2002; 40:439-457.
24. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. Second Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
25. Averill, JR, Chon KK, Haan DW. Emotions and creativity, East and West. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2001; 4:165-183.
26. Papageorgiou C, Wells A (editors). Nature, Functions, and Beliefs About Depressive Rumination. In: Depressive Rumination: Nature, Theory, and Treatment. First ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2004.
27. Kim J, Mueller CW (editors). Construction of Factor Scales. In: Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. First Ed. California: Sage Publications, 1978, 60-73.
28. Stevens J. Confirmatoryand Exploratory Factor Analysis. In: Applied Multivariate Statistics for The Social Sciences. Forth Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Inc., 2002; 385-454.

APA	YAVUZ K, TÜRKÇAPAR M, DEMİREL B, KARADERE E (2011). Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. , 273 - 282.
Chicago	YAVUZ K. Fatih,TÜRKÇAPAR M. Hahan,DEMİREL Basak,KARADERE Emrah Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. (2011): 273 - 282.
MLA	YAVUZ K. Fatih,TÜRKÇAPAR M. Hahan,DEMİREL Basak,KARADERE Emrah Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. , 2011, ss.273 - 282.
AMA	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. . 2011; 273 - 282.
Vancouver	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. . 2011; 273 - 282.
IEEE	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E "Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers." , ss.273 - 282, 2011.
ISNAD	YAVUZ, K. Fatih vd. "Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers". (2011), 273-282.

APA	YAVUZ K, TÜRKÇAPAR M, DEMİREL B, KARADERE E (2011). Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4), 273 - 282.
Chicago	YAVUZ K. Fatih,TÜRKÇAPAR M. Hahan,DEMİREL Basak,KARADERE Emrah Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi 24, no.4 (2011): 273 - 282.
MLA	YAVUZ K. Fatih,TÜRKÇAPAR M. Hahan,DEMİREL Basak,KARADERE Emrah Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, vol.24, no.4, 2011, ss.273 - 282.
AMA	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 24(4): 273 - 282.
Vancouver	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 24(4): 273 - 282.
IEEE	YAVUZ K,TÜRKÇAPAR M,DEMİREL B,KARADERE E "Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers." Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 24, ss.273 - 282, 2011.
ISNAD	YAVUZ, K. Fatih vd. "Adaptation, validity and reliability of the leahy emotional schema scale turkish version based on turkish university students and workers". Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi 24/4 (2011), 273-282.