İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi

ARZU KARAMAN AKGÜL (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
ÖNERİ
1 0
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 35 Sayfa Aralığı: 173 - 181 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Küresel rekabet, kısalan ürün yaşam eğrileri ve imalât teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler, imalât firmalarını karmaşık ve belirsiz bir çevre içerisinde rekabet etmeye zorlamıştır. Müşterilerin gereksinimleri ve firmaların bu gereksinimleri karşılama eğilimleri dikkate alındığında, maliyetleri ve pazara giriş süresini düşüren, kalite ve teslimatı arttıran firmaların en yüksek imalat performansını elde edeceği göz ardı edilemeyecek bir gerçektir.Akademik yazın incelendiğinde çeşitli yazarlar tarafından çok sayıda imalat performansı ölçütü önerildiği ve kullanıldığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, imalat performansının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan boyutların irdelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Rekabetçi imalat öncelikleri olarak adlandırılan bu ölçütlerle ilgili olarak farklı yazarlar tarafından yapılmış olan çalışmalar incelenmiş ve ilgili çalışmalarda kullanılan ölçütler sunulmuştur. Akademik yazın incelendiğinde dört temel rekabetçi imalat önceliği olduğu görülmüştür. Bunlar maliyet, kalite, teslimat ve esnekliktir. Ancak yakın zamanda yapılan çalışmalarda bu dört unsura ilave olarak başka önceliklere de yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile imalat performansının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan ve günümüz koşullarında en geçerli olduğu düşünülen tüm göstergelerle ilgili detaylı bir araştırma yapmak ve sonuçları ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Evalua tion of manufacturing performance

Öz:
Global competition, shortened product life cycles, and developments in manufacturing technologies compel manufacturing firms to compete in complex and dynamic markets. Considering the needs of customers and the intentions of firms for growing to meet those needs, the firms are forced to accomplish the best manufacturing and firm performanceIn production and operations management literature the factors used as a means of evaluating manufacturing performance were named in many different ways such as manufacturing tasks, competitive priorities, order winners and qualifiers, etc. Because "competitive manufacturing priorities" is mostly used in the literature, it is decided to call the factors used in evaluating manufacturing performance as "competitive manufacturing priorities" in this study. The commonly used competitive manufacturing priorities are cost, quality, delivery, and flexibility However, there are also additional priorities existing in recent studies The main objective of this study is to scrutinize the dimensions of manufacturing performance.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • [1] Li, L.L.X. (2000). Manufacturing Capability Development in a Changing Business Environment. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(6), 261-270.
  • [2] Jusoh, R.; Ibrahim, D.N. & Zainuddin, Y. (2006). Assessing the Alignment between Business Strategy and Use of Multiple Performance Measures Using Interaction Approach. The Business Review, 5(1), 51-60.
  • [3] Akal, Z. (1998). İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi: Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri. No: 473. Ankara: Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi.
  • [4] Neely, A.; Gregory, M. & Platts, K. (1995). Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
  • [5] Leachman, C.; Pegels, C.C. & Shin, S.K. (2005). Manufacturing Performance: Evaluation and Determinants. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(9), 851 -874.
  • [6] Clark, K.B. (1996). Competing through Manufacturing and the New Manufacturing Paradigm: Is Manufacturing Strategy Passe? Production and Operations Management, 5(1), 42-58.
  • [7} Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing-Missing Link in Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47(3), 136-145. .
  • [8] Sarmiento, R.; Byrne, M.; Contreras, L.R. & Rich, N. (2007). Delivery Reliability, Manufacturing Capabilities and New Models of Manufacturing Efficiency. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(4), 367-386.
  • [9] Hallgren, M. & Olhager, J. (2006). Quantification in Manufacturing Strategy: A Methodology and Illustration. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 113-124.
  • [10] Christiansen, T.; Berry, W.L.; Bruun, P. & Ward, P. (2003). A Mapping of Competitive Priorities, Manufacturing Practices, and Operational Performance in Groups of Danish Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(10), 1163-1183.
  • [11] Platts, K.W.; Mills, J.F.; Bourne, M.C.; Neely, A.D.; Richards, A.H. & Gregory, M.J. (1996). Testing Manufacturing Strategy Formulation Processes. International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 517-523.
  • [12] Boyer, K.K. & McDermott, C. (1999). Strategic Consensus in Operations Strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 17(3), 289-305.
  • [13] Antonio, K.W.L.; Yam, R.C.M. & Tang, E. (2007). The Impacts of Product Modularity on Competitive Capabilities and Performance: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 1 -20.
  • [14] Ferdows, K. & De Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 168-184.
  • [15] Kim, J.S. & Arnold, P. (1996). Operationalizing Manufacturing Strategy: An Exploratory Study of Constructs and Linkage. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(12), 45-73.
  • [16]Acquaah, M. (2005). Enterprise Ownership, Market Competition and Manufacturing Priorities in a Sub-Saharan African Emerging Economy: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(3/4), 205-235.
  • [17] Krajewski, L.J. & Ritzman, L.P. (2005). Operations Management: Processes and Value Chains. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • [18] Hayes, R.H. & Schmenner, R.W. (1978). How Should You Organize Manufacturing? Harvard Business Review, 56 (1), 105-118.
  • [19] Richardson, P.R.; Taylor, A.J. & Gordon, J.R.M. (1985). A Strategic Approach to Evaluating Manufacturing Performance. Interfaces, 15(6), 15-27.
  • [20] Ward, P.T.; Duray, R.; Leong, G.K. & Sum, C. (1995). Business Environment, Operations Strategy, and Performance: An Empirical Study of Singapore Manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 13(2), 99-115.
  • [21] Corbett, L.M. & Claridge, G.S. (2002). Key Manufacturing Capability Elements and Business Performance. International Journal of Production Research, 40(1), 109-131.
  • [22] Chin, H.G. & Saman, M.Z.M. (2004). Proposed Analysis of Performance Measurement for a Production System. Business Process Management Journal, 10(5), 570-583.
  • [23] Chase, R.B.; Aquilano, N.J. & Jacobs, F.R. (2004). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. Boston: McGraw-Hill/lrwin.
  • [24] Fine, C.H. & Hax, A.C. (1984). Designing Manufacturing Strategy. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1(3/4), 423-439
  • [25] Fine, C.H. & Hax, A.C. (1985). Manufacturing Strategy: A Methodology and an Illustration. Interfaces, 15(6), 28-46.
  • [26] Leong, G.K.; Snyder, D.L. & Ward, P.T. (1990). Research in the Process and Content of Manufacturing Strategy, Omega, 18(2), 109-122.
  • [27] Boyer, K.K. (1998). Longitudinal Linkages Between Intended and Realized Operations Strategies. International Journal of Operations &Production Management, 18(4), 356-373.
  • [28] Manoochehri, G. (1999). The Road to Manufacturing Excellence: Using Performance Measures to Become World-Class. Industrial Management, 41(2), 7-13.
  • [29] Badri, M.A.; Davis, D. & Davis, D. (2000). Operations Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model of Industries in Developing Countries. Omega, 28(2), 155-173.
  • [30] Boyer, K.K. & Pagell, M. (2000). Measurement Issues in Empirical Research: Improving Measures of Operations Strategy and Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Journal of Operations Management, 18(3), 361-374.
  • [31] Boyer, K.K. & Lewis, M.W. (2002). Competitive Priorities: Investigating the Need for Trade-offs in Operations Strategy. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 9-20.
  • [32] Yurdakul, M. (2002). Measuring a Manufacturing System's Performance Using Saaty's System with Feedback Approach. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(1), 25-34.
  • [33] Demeter, K. (2003). Manufacturing Strategy and Competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 81-82, 205-213.
  • [34] Joshi, M.P.; Kathuria, R. & Porth, S.J. (2003). Alignment of Strategic Priorities and Performance: An Integration of Operations and Strategic Management Perspectives. Journal of Operations Management, 21 (3), 353-369.
  • [35] Kazan, H.; Özer, G. & Çetin, A.T. (2006). The Effect of Manufacturing Strategies on Financial Performance, Measuring Business Excellence, 10(1), 14-26.
  • [36] Zhao, X.; Yeung, J.H.Y. & Zhou, Q. (2002). Competitive Priorities of Enterprises in Mainland China. Total Ouality Management, 13(3), 285-300.
  • [37] Gröpler, A. & Grübner, A. (2006). An Empirical Model of the Relationships between Manufacturing Capabilities International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(5), 458-485.
  • [38] Noble, M.A. (1997). Manufacturing Competitive Priorities and Productivity: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(1) 85-99.
  • [39] Ward, P.T. ve Duray, R., 2000. Manufacturing Strategy in Context: Environment, Competitive Strategy and Manufacturing Strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 123-138.
  • [40] Forker, L.B.; Vickery, S.K. & Droge, C.L.M. (1996). The Contribution of Quality to Business Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 44-62.
  • [41] Kleindorfer, P.R. & Partovi, F.Y. (1990). Integrating Manufacturing Strategy and Technology Choice. European Journal of Operational Research, 47(2), 214-224.
  • [42] Ghalayini, A.M.; Noble, J.S. & Crowe, T.J. (1997). An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measurement System for Improving Manufacturing Competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 48(3), 207-225.
  • [43] Avella, L.; Fernandez, E. & Vazquez, C.J. (2001). Analysis of Manufacturing Strategy as an Explanatory Factor of Competitiveness in the Large Spanish Industrial Firm. International Journal of Production Economics, 72(2), 139-157.
  • [44] Gilgeous, V. (2001). The Strategic Role of Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 39(6), 1257-1287.
  • [45] Kim, J.S. & Arnold, P. (1992). Manufacturing Competence and Business Performance: A Framework and Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(10), 4-25.
  • [46] Chenhall, R. H. (1996). Strategies of Manufacturing Flexibility, Manufacturing Performance Measures and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1 (5), 25-32.
  • [47] Burgess, T.F.; Gules, H.K.; Gupta, J.N.D. & Telcin, M. (1998). Competitive Priorities, Process Innovations and Time-Based Competition in the Manufacturing Sectors of Industrializing Economies: The Case of Turkey. Benchmarking for Ouality Management & Technology, 5(4), 304-316.
  • [48] Abdel-Maksoud, A.B. (2004). Manufacturing in the UK: •Contemporary Characteristics and Performance Indicators. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(2), 155-171.
  • [49] Gomes, C.F.; Yasin, M.M. & Lisboa, J.V. (2004). An Examination of Manufacturing Organizations' Performance Evaluation: Analysis, Implications and a Framework for Future Research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 488-513.
  • [50] Gomes, C.F.; Yasin, M.M. & Lisboa, J.V. (2006). Key Performance Factors of Manufacturing Effective Performance: The Impact of Customers and Employees. The TQM Magazine, 18(4), 323-340.
  • [51] Gomes, C.F.; Yasin, M.M. & Lisboa, J.V. (2006). Performance Measurement Practices in Manufacturing Firms: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(2), 144-167.
  • [52] Phusavat, K. & Kanchana, R. (2007). Competitive Priorities of Manufacturing Firms in Thailand Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(7), 979-996.
  • [53] Vickery, S.K.; Droge, C. & Markland, R.E. (1993). Production Competence and Business Strategy: Do They Affect Business Performance. Decision Sciences, 24(2),435-455.
  • [54] Kathuria, R. & Partovi, F.Y. (2000). Aligning Work Force Management Practices with Competitive Priorities and Process Technology: A Conceptual Examination. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11 (2), 215-234.
  • [55] Davis, R.A. & Vokurka, R.J. (2005). The Effect of Facility Size on Manufacturing Structure and Performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(8), 1022-1038.
  • [56] Urgal-Gonzâlez, B. & Garcia-Vasquez, J.M. (2007). The Strategic Influence of Structural Manufacturing Decisions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), 605-626.
  • [57] Zhang, Q.; Vonderembse, M.A. & Lim, J. (2003). Manufacturing Flexibility: Defining and Analyzing Relationships among Competence, Capability, and Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), Sİ73-191.
  • [58] Bateman, N.; Stockton, D.J. & Lawrence, P. (1999). Measuring the Mix Response Flexibility of Manufacturing Systems. International Journal of Production Research, 37(4), 871-880.
  • [59] Narasimhan, R.; Talluri, S. & Das, A. (2004). Exploring Flexibility and Execution Competencies of Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Operations Management, 22( 1), 91 -106.
  • [60] Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2003). The Relationships among Selected Business Environment Factors and Manufacturing Strategy: Insights from an Emerging Economy. Omega, 31(4), 287-301.
  • [61] Garvin, D.A. (1993). Manufacturing Strategic Planning. California Management Review, 35(4), 85-106.
  • [62] Gupta, Y.P. & Somers, T.M. (1996). Business Strategy, Manufacturing Flexibility, and Organizational Performance Relationships: A Path Analysis Approach. Production and Operations Management, 5(3), 204-233.
  • [63] Mapes, J.; New, C. & Szwejczewski, M. (1997). Performance Trade-Offs in Manufacturing Plants. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(10), 1020-1033.
  • [64] Omar, R.; Zailani, S.; Sulaiman, M. & Ramayah, T. (2006). Supplier Involvement, Customer Focus, Supply Chain Technology and Manufacturing Performance: Findings from a Pilot Study. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 876-880.
  • [65] Vonderembse, M.A. (2002). Building Supplier Relations that Enhance Manufacturing Performance, London: Spiro Press.
  • [66] Krause, D.R.; Pagell, M. & Curkovic, S. (2001). Toward A Measure of Competitive Priorities for Purchasing. Journal of Operations Management, 19(4), 497-512.
  • [67] Vonderembse, M.A. & Tracey, M. (1999). The Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 33-39.
APA KARAMAN AKGÜL A (2011). İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. , 173 - 181.
Chicago KARAMAN AKGÜL ARZU İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. (2011): 173 - 181.
MLA KARAMAN AKGÜL ARZU İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. , 2011, ss.173 - 181.
AMA KARAMAN AKGÜL A İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. . 2011; 173 - 181.
Vancouver KARAMAN AKGÜL A İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. . 2011; 173 - 181.
IEEE KARAMAN AKGÜL A "İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi." , ss.173 - 181, 2011.
ISNAD KARAMAN AKGÜL, ARZU. "İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi". (2011), 173-181.
APA KARAMAN AKGÜL A (2011). İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. ÖNERİ, 9(35), 173 - 181.
Chicago KARAMAN AKGÜL ARZU İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. ÖNERİ 9, no.35 (2011): 173 - 181.
MLA KARAMAN AKGÜL ARZU İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. ÖNERİ, vol.9, no.35, 2011, ss.173 - 181.
AMA KARAMAN AKGÜL A İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. ÖNERİ. 2011; 9(35): 173 - 181.
Vancouver KARAMAN AKGÜL A İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi. ÖNERİ. 2011; 9(35): 173 - 181.
IEEE KARAMAN AKGÜL A "İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi." ÖNERİ, 9, ss.173 - 181, 2011.
ISNAD KARAMAN AKGÜL, ARZU. "İmalat performansının değerlendirilmesi". ÖNERİ 9/35 (2011), 173-181.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 16:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları