Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması

EKREN, ORHUN; KURTOĞLU, Cem; KÖROĞLU, Aslıhan

Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması

Aslıhan KÖROĞLU, (Çukurova Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Adana)

Orhun EKREN, (Boş)

Cem KURTOĞLU (Çukurova Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Adana)

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

30 3

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 205 - 216 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması

Öz:

Son yıllarda sabit protetik yaklaşımlardaki teknik ve materyallerin değişimi simanların geliştirilmesini zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Simanlar sabit protetik restorasyon ve destek diş dokusu arasında mekanik bağlanma ve adezyon sağlar. Çinko fosfat simanlar ve çinko polikarboksilat simanlar sabit protetik restorasyonların yapıştırılmasında güncelliğini korumaktadırlar. Ancak adezyon eksikliği ve çözünürlük gibi dezavantajları vardır. Bu gibi sorunları gidermek için ilk olarak cam iyonomer simanlar ve reçine modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar geliştirilmiştir. Son zamanlarda ise reçine simanlar çözünürlük ve adezyon eksikliği gibi dezavantajların üstesinden geldikleri için kullanımı yaygınlanmıştır. Bu derleme çalışmasında simanlar ve taşıması gereken özellikler açıklanarak, hekime klinik pratiğinde kullanabileceği bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Conventional and adhesive dental luting agents; A literature review

Öz:

Fixed prosthodontic approaches in restorative dentistry are changed with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials in recent years. With this change, improvements and modification of luting agents became mandotary. Luting agents provide the mechanical bond and adhesion between a fixed prosthesis and the supporting tooth structure. Zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements retained their popularity for luting fixed prosthodontic restorations. Their disadvantages are particularly solubility and lack of adhesion. In order to struggle these problems glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer luting agents are firstly developed. Recently resin cements became popular, primarily because they overcame the disadvantages of solubility and lack of adhesion. In this literature review, luting agents and their proporties are explained in order to give information to the dentist which can be useful in clinical practice.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection,3rd ed. Canada, Quintessence, 2002: p.132,35-143,46.
1. Pegoraro TA, da Silva NR, Carvalho RM. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):453-471
2. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; (81):135-141.
3. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues, 1st ed. Chicago, Quintessence,1998. p.97
4. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Bacterial growth and pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc phosphate cement and Epoxylite CBA 9080. J Prosthet Dent 1974; (31):556.
5. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Comparison of pulpal effect of two liners. Acta Odontol Scand 1969; (27):443–451.
6. Akyor A. Tanalp J. Operatif Dişhekimliğinde Gelişmeler Güncel Pratik Uygulamalar Cilt 1. Birinci baskı. İstanbul, Quintessence 2006. s:98
7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current litarature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;(80): 280-301
8. Önal B, Restoratif Dişhekimliğinde Maddeler ve Uygulamaları, Birinci baskı, Ege Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları İzmir, 2004 p.111- 14,128-29
9. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT, Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosthet Dent 1990; (63):513-521.
10. Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ, Heys DR, Charbeneau GT. An evaluation of aglass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; (114):783-786
11. Inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent 2004; 29(6):685–692
12. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P. Four-year water degradation of a resinmodified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112(1):73–83.
13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Glassionomer adhesion: the mechanisms at the interface, J Dent 2006:615–617.
14. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LVJ, Narhi TO, Valittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2005;(21):201–209.
15. Yli-Urpo H, Forsback AP, Vakiparta M, Narhi TO, Valittu PK. Release of silica, calcium, phosphorus and fluoride fromglass ionomer cement containing bioactive glass. J Biomater Appl 2004;(19):5–20.
16. Palmer G, Jonesa FH, Billingtonb RW, Pearson GJ. Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004;25(23): 5423- 5431
17. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between onebottle light-cured adhesives and chemicalcured composites. Dent Mater 2001;(17):542– 556.
18. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 2003; (28): 747–755.
19. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified- step adhesives and chemically cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;(5):267–282.
20. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;(30):371– 382.
21. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegarora LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise selfetching primers to dentin. J Dent 2004;(32):55– 65.
22. Myers ML, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of restoration composition, shade, and thickness on the cure of a photoactivated resin cement. J Prosthodont 1994;(3):149–157.
23. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995;(73):515-524.
24. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991;(66):187–192.
25. White SN, Furuichi R, Kyomen SM. Microleakage through dentin after crown cementation. J Endod 1995; (21):9-12.
26. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:156-61.
27. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;(67):11-15.
28. Milleding P. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; (50):295- 301.
29. Blair KF, Koeppen RG, Schwartz RS, Davis RD. Microleakage associated with resin composite cemented cast glass ceramic restoration. Int J Prosthod 1993; (6):579-584.
30. Ferrari M, Dalloca L, Kugel G, Bertelli E. An evaluation of the effect of the adhesive luting on microleakage of the IPS empress crowns. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;(6):15-23.
31. Shortall AC, Fayyad MA, Williams JD. Marginal seal of injection-molded ceramic crowns cemented with three adhesive sistems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;(61):24-27.
32. Strygler H, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. Microleakage at the resin-alloy interface of chemically retained composite resins for cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent1991;(65):733-739.
33. Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;(22):43-47.
34. Alanko K, Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Kannas L, Estlander T. Oral mucosal diseases investigated by patch testing with a dental screening series. Contact Dermatitis 1996;(34):263-267.
35. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylate in ultraviolet-light-cured paint, and bisphenol A in dental composite resin. Contact Dermatitis 1995;(33):94-99.
36. Bruze M. Sistemically induced contact dermatitis from dental resin. Scand J Dent Res 1994;(102):376-378.
37. Bjorkner B, Niklasson B. Contact allergy to the UV absorber Tinuvin P in a dental restorative material. Am J Contact Dermat 1997; (8):6-7.
38. Dooms-Goossens A, Bruze M, Buysse L, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Stals H. Contact allergy to allyl glycidyl ether present as an impurity in 3- glycidyloxypropyl trimethoxysilane, a fixing additive in silicone and polyurethane resins. Contact Dermatitis 1995;(33):17-19.
39. Muzynski BL, Greener E, Jameson L, Malone WF. Fluoride release from glass ionomers used as luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1988;(60):41-44.
40. Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Rolla G. Availability of fluoride from glass ionomer luting cements in human saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1991;(99):60-63.
41. Kao EC, Culbertson BM, Xie D. Preparation of glass ionomer cement using N-acryloyl-substituted amino acid monomers-evaluation of physical properties. Dent Mater 1996;(12):44-51.
42. Gilbert JL, Ney DS, Lautenschlager EP. Selfreinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties. Biomaterials 1995;(16):1043-1055.
43. Bansal RK, Tewari US, Singh P, Murthy DV. Modified polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement— a study. J Oral Rehabil 1995;(22):533-7.
44. Bruce WL, Stevens L. Strength properties of three zinc phosphate cements mixed to two different consistencies. Aust Dent J 1989;(34): 132-135.
45. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Pareja C, Moore BK. In vitro degradation of cements: a comparison of three test methods. J Prosthet Dent 1989;(62): 17-23.
46. Osborne JW, Wolff MS. The effect of powder/liquid ratio on the in vivo solubility of polycarboxylate cement. J Prosthet Dent 1991; (66): 49-51.
47. Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1992;(23):209-214.
48. Curtis SR, Richards MW, Meiers JC. Early erosion of glass-ionomer cement at crown margins. Int J Prosthod 1993;6:553-7.
49. Rodrigues Garcia RC, De Goes MF, Del Bel Cury AA. Influence of protecting agents on the solubility of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1995;(8): 294-296.
50. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1995;(26):351-358.
51. Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995;(11):137- 141.
52. Indrani DJ, Cook WD, Televantos F, Tyas MJ, Harcourt JK. Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995;(11):201-207.
53. Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of water sorption on the development of shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1995;(11):186-190.
54. Nordlander J, Weir D, Stoffer W, Ochi S. The taper of clinical preparations for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1988;(60):148- 151
55. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;(77):116-121.
56. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The Relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading. Int J Prosthod 1996;(9):117-139.
57. Fitchie JG, Zardiackas LD, Givan DA, Anderson L, Caughman WF. Tensile fatigue of two composite cements bonding three base metal alloys to bovine enamel. Dent Mater 1993;(9):28-32.
58. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005;(31):608–612.
59. Cury AH, Goracci C, de Lima Navarro MF, Carvallo RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod 2006;(32):537–540.
60. Michelini FS, Belser UC, Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG. ;Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Int J Prosthod 1995;(8):324-331.
61. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990; (3): 425-429
62. Malament KA, Grossman DG. Bonded vs nonbonded Dicor crowns. J Dent Res 1992;71:321
63. Rosenstiel SF, Gupta PK, Van der Sluys RA, Zimmerman MH. Strength of a dental glassceramic after surface coating. Dent Mater 1993;(9):274-279.
64. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;(69): 36- 39.
65. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;(1279:1171-1181
66. Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro Wear simulation measurements ofcomposite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; (14): 368-376,.
67. Brauer GM, Dulik DM, Antonucci JM, Termini DJ, Argentar H. New amine accelerators for composite restorative resins. J Dent Res 1979;(58): 1994-2000.
68. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Schwartz IS. Color stability of selected dual-cure composite resin cements. J Prosthodont 1993;(2):24-27.
69. Goshima T, Goshima Y. Optimum radiopacity of composite inlay materials and cements. Oral Surg 1991;(72):257-260.
70. Rawls HR, Marshall MV, Cardenas HL, Bhagat HR, Cabasso I. Cytotoxicity evaluation of a new radiopaque resin additive-triphenyl bismuth. Dent Mater 1992;(8):54-59.
71. Brackett WW, Vickery JM. The influence of mixing temperature and powder/ liquid ratio on the film thickness of three glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1994;(7):13-16.
72. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Davidson CL, DeGee AJ, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual cure luting composites-part II: clinically related properties. J Oral Rehabil 1994;(21):57-66.
73. Stark H. Does temporary cementing have an effect on the bond strength of definitively cemented crowns? Dtsch Zahnartzl Z 1991;(46):774-776.
74. Schwartz R, Davis R, Mayhew R. Effect of a ZOE temporary cement on the bond strength of a resin luting cement. Am J Dent 1990;(3):28-30.
75. Gregory WA, Campbell Z. Interim luting agents, composite core surface hardness and retention of interim and final restorations. Am J Dent 1990;(3):207-212
76. Abo-Hamar SE, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin Dental Materials 2005 ;21(9):794-803
77. F. Aykent, A. Usumez, N. Ozturk, MT. Yucel. Effect of provisional restorations on the final bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers. Journal of Rehabilitation 2005 (32); 46-50.
78. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; (66): 777-781.

APA	KÖROĞLU A, EKREN O, KURTOĞLU C (2012). Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. , 205 - 216.
Chicago	KÖROĞLU Aslıhan,EKREN ORHUN,KURTOĞLU Cem Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. (2012): 205 - 216.
MLA	KÖROĞLU Aslıhan,EKREN ORHUN,KURTOĞLU Cem Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. , 2012, ss.205 - 216.
AMA	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. . 2012; 205 - 216.
Vancouver	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. . 2012; 205 - 216.
IEEE	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C "Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması." , ss.205 - 216, 2012.
ISNAD	KÖROĞLU, Aslıhan vd. "Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması". (2012), 205-216.

APA	KÖROĞLU A, EKREN O, KURTOĞLU C (2012). Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 205 - 216.
Chicago	KÖROĞLU Aslıhan,EKREN ORHUN,KURTOĞLU Cem Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 22, no.2 (2012): 205 - 216.
MLA	KÖROĞLU Aslıhan,EKREN ORHUN,KURTOĞLU Cem Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.22, no.2, 2012, ss.205 - 216.
AMA	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 22(2): 205 - 216.
Vancouver	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 22(2): 205 - 216.
IEEE	KÖROĞLU A,EKREN O,KURTOĞLU C "Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması." Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, ss.205 - 216, 2012.
ISNAD	KÖROĞLU, Aslıhan vd. "Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması". Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 22/2 (2012), 205-216.