Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 27 - 70 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b)

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ANTON AE, Civil Jurisdiction in Scotland, Edinbrough 1984.
  • BARTLETT S. Lee, Full Faith and Credit Comes to the Common Market: An Analysis of the Provisions of the Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 24(1975) ICLQ.
  • BAUER Hubert, Compétence Judiciaire Internationale Des Tribunaux Civils Français Et Allemands, Paris 1965.
  • BİLGE Necip/ÖNEN Ergun, Medenî Yargılama Hukuku Dersleri, 3. bası, Ankara 1978.
  • BORCHERS J. Patrick, Comparing Personal Jurisdiction in the United States and the European Community: Lessons from American Reform, XL(1992)1 AJCL.
  • BORN B. Gary, International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing, 2nd ed., Kluwer Law International 2006.
  • BRIGGS Andrian, The Conflict of Laws, Oxford 2002.
  • CHESHIRE and NORTH’s Private International Law, Edt. PM North/JJ Fawcett, 13th ed. (reprinted), London 2004.
  • CLARKSON CMV/HILL Jonathan, The Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed., Oxford 2006.
  • CLERMONT M. Kevin/PALMER R.B. John, French Article 14 Jurisdiction, Viewed from the United States, Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Seriews. Paper 13, 2004, s. 9-10 [http://Isr.nellco.org/cornell/Isrp/papers/13 (18.9.2008)].
  • COLLIER JG, Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed., Cambridge 2001.
  • COLLINS Lawrence, The Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, Some Practical Aspects of United Kingdom Accession, with Particular Reference to Jurisdiction, Harmonisation of Private International Law by the EEC, Edt. K. Lipstein, London 1978.
  • COLLINS Lawrence, Provisional and Protective Measures in International Litigation, 234(1992)III Recueil des cours. (Provisional and Protective Measures)
  • ÇELİKEL Aysel/SANLI Cemal/ÖZTEKiN Günseli/ERDEM Bahadır/ATAMAN İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Sözlesmeleri, II. Cilt: İki Taraflı Sözlesmeler, İstanbul 2005.
  • DANFORD B. Brandon, The Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States and Europe: How Can We Achieve a Comprehensive Treaty, 23(2004)2 Review of Litigation.
  • DANNEMANN Gerhard, Jurisdiction Based on the Presence of Assets in Germany: A Case Note, 41(1992) ICLQ.
  • DARDOĞAN Esra, Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda “Askın Yetki” Kavramı, Ankara 2005.
  • DELAUME R. Georges, The Rules of Adjudicatory Jurisdiction in the Civil Law Countries of the EC, Transnational Contracts Applicable Law and Settlement of Disputes- A Study in Conflict Avoidance Chapter VIII, Booklet 10, Release 86-1, Issued Columbia April 1986.
  • DICEY/MORRIS, The Conflict of Laws, Edt. Lawrence Collins/Jonathan Hill/JD Mc. Clean/CGJ Morse, London 2000.
  • EKSİ Nuray, Türk Mahkemelerinin Milletlerarası Yetkisi, 2. bası, İstanbul 2000.
  • EKSİ Nuray, Milletlerarası Nitelikli Davalara İliskin Mahkeme Kararları, İstanbul 2007
  • EKSİ Nuray, Devletler Özel Hukukunda Asırı Yetki Kuralları, Selâhattin Sulhi
  • TEKİNAY'ın Hatırasına Armağan, İstanbul 1999. (Asırı Yetki)
  • EKSİ Nuray, Uluslararası Ticaret Hukukuna İliskin Mevzuat ve Antlasmalar, 2. bası, İstanbul 2006.
  • EKSİ Nuray, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuka İliskin Temel Mevzuat, 4. bası, İstanbul 2010.
  • FLETCHER F. Ian, Conflict of Laws and European Community Law with Special Reference to the Community Conventions on Private International Law, Amsterdam 1982.
  • HARTLEY C. Trevor, Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments, London 1984.
  • HARTLEY C. Trevor, The Recognition of Foreign Judgments in England under the Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, Harmonisation of Private International Law by the EEC, Edt. K Lipstein, London 1978.
  • HARTLEY C. Trevor, The Modern Approach to Private International Law International Litigation and Transactions From a Common-Law Perspective, General Cours on Private International Law, offprint from the Recueil des cours Volume 319 (2006), Leiden/Boston 2007.
  • HAY Peter, Flexibility Versus Predictability and Uniformity in Choice of Law Reflections on Current European and United States Conflicts Law, 226(1991)I Recueil des cours.
  • JACOB Jack, Private International Litigation, London 1988.
  • JENARD P., Report on the Convention on Jurisdiction and the Eforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, OJ 5.3.19979, C 59, s. 19-20.
  • JENARD/MÖLLER, Report on the Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, done at Lugano, on 16 September 19888, Publications of the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law 13, Zurih 1991.
  • KERAMEUS Konstantinos, Introduction to Greek Law, Edt. Konstantinos D. Kerameus/Pheadon J. Kozyris, Kluwer/Sakkoulas 1997.
  • LASOK D./STONE PA, Conflict of Laws in the European Community, Exeter 1987. LIPSTEIN Kurt, Harmonisation of Private International Law by the EEC, London 1978.
  • LOWENFELD F. Andreas, International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness, essay in Private International Law, Oxford 1996.
  • MANN FA, The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law, 111(1964)I Recueil des cours.
  • MAYSS Abla, Principles of Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed., London 1999.
  • MOSS Giuditta Cordero, Between Private and Public International Law: Exorbitant Jurisdiction as Illustrated by the Yukos Case, 32(2007) RCEEL.
  • MURRAY L. Peter/STÜRNER Rolf, German Civil Justice, Durham 2004.
  • NADELMANN H. Kurt, Jurisdictionally Improper Fora in Treaties on Recognition of Judgments: The Common Market Draft, 67(1967)6 Col. LR.
  • NOMER Ergin, Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 17. bası Nomer/Sanlı, İstanbul 2009.
  • NOMER Ergin, Milletlerarası Usul Hukuku, İstanbul 2009.
  • O’MALLEY Stephen/LAYTON Alexander, European Civil Practice, London 1989.
  • SAKMAR Atâ, Yabancı İlâmların Türkiye’deki Sonuçları, İstanbul 1982. (Yabancı İlâmlar)
  • SAKMAR Atâ, Devletler Hususî Hukukunda Bosanma, İstanbul 1976.
  • SAKMAR Atâ, Le Nouveau Droit International Privé Turc, 223 (1990) IV Recueil des cours. (Le Nouveau Droit International Privé Turc)
  • SAKMAR Atâ, Avrupa Ekonomik Topluluğuna Üye Devletlerden Birinde Verilen Mahkeme Kararının Diğer Üye Devletlerde Tanınması ve Tenfizi, Birinci Avrupa Hukuku Haftası, İstanbul 1979.
  • SAKMAR Atâ/EKSİ Nuray, Hukukî ve Ticarî Konularda Mahkemelerin Milletlerarası Yetkisi ve Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması Tenfizi Hakkında AB Konsey Tüzüğü: Prof. Dr. Ergin NOMER’e Armağan, İstanbul 2003.
  • SCHACK Haimo, BGH, 2.7.1991 XI ZR 206/90 Zur Internationalen Zuständigkeit Nach § 23 ZPO, I(1992)1 JZ.
  • SCOLES F. Eugene/HAY Peter/BORCHERS J. Patrick/SYMEONIDES C. Symeon, Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed., St. Paul. Minn. 2000.
  • STONE PA, The Lugano Convention on Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments, (1988)8 YEL.
  • STONE Peter, EU Private International Law Harmonization of Laws, Cheltenham 2006.
  • VAGTS DF, Dispute-Resolution Mechanisms in International Business, 203(1987)III Recueil des cours.
  • VISCHER Frank, General Course on Private International Law, 232(1992)I Recueil des cours.
  • WESER Martha, Bases of Juducial Jurisdiction in the Common Market Countries, 10(1961) AJCL.
  • WINTER LI, Excessive Jurisdiction in Private International Law, 17(1968) ICLQ.
  • YESSIOU-FALTSI Pelayia, The Forum Based on Property (Article 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure), International Encylopedia of Laws, Kluwer Law International 2004.
APA EKŞİ N (2010). Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). , 27 - 70.
Chicago EKŞİ NURAY Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). (2010): 27 - 70.
MLA EKŞİ NURAY Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). , 2010, ss.27 - 70.
AMA EKŞİ N Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). . 2010; 27 - 70.
Vancouver EKŞİ N Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). . 2010; 27 - 70.
IEEE EKŞİ N "Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b)." , ss.27 - 70, 2010.
ISNAD EKŞİ, NURAY. "Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b)". (2010), 27-70.
APA EKŞİ N (2010). Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 27 - 70.
Chicago EKŞİ NURAY Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9, no.2 (2010): 27 - 70.
MLA EKŞİ NURAY Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2010, ss.27 - 70.
AMA EKŞİ N Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 9(2): 27 - 70.
Vancouver EKŞİ N Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 9(2): 27 - 70.
IEEE EKŞİ N "Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b)." İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, ss.27 - 70, 2010.
ISNAD EKŞİ, NURAY. "Yabancı mahkemenin aşırı yetkisinin tenfiz mahkemesi tarafından denetlenmesi (5718 sayılı MÖHUK md. 54/b)". İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (2010), 27-70.