The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process

İpek TÜZÜN KALEMCİ, (Başkent Üniversitesi, Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Fatih ÇETİN, (Türk Kara Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye)
H. Nejat BASIM (Başkent Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi
6 1
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 85 - 103 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process

Öz:
Bu çalışmada temel olarak algılanan örgütsel destek ve amir desteği ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkiler araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada psikolojik sermayenin belirtilen ilişkilerde aracılık ya da biçimlendiricilik etkisinin olup olmadığı da sorgulanmıştır. Araştırma modeli sosyal değişim kuramı ve devamında gelişen örgütsel destek yaklaşımı üzerine kurgulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları algılanan örgütsel destek ve amir desteği ile işten ayrılma niyeti arasında ters yönlü bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgulara göre psikolojik sermaye algılanan amir desteği ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide biçimlendiricilik; algılanan örgütsel destek ve işten ayrılma niyetinin arasındaki ilişkide ise aracılık rolü üstlenmektedir. Çalışma sonuçları işgücü devir hızını oluşturan etkenleri araştırmak isteyen uygulamacılara ve akademisyenlere hem psikolojik sermaye gelişiminin önemine hem de desteğin farklı boyutlarına dikkat çekmek adına kapsayıcı bir çerçeve oluşturmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

Psikolojik sermaye ve destekleyici örgütsel uygulamaların işten ayrılma süreçlerine etkisi

Öz:
This paper investigates the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and perceived supervisory support (PSS) with turnover intentions based on social exchange theory. The paper also examines the role of employee’s psychological capital (PsyCap) level in POS, PSS and turnover intentions relations. Findings of this study concluded that both POS and PSS were negatively associated with turnover intentions. Results showed that there is a significant difference between low PsyCap in the PSS and turnover intentions relationship, referring to that low level of PsyCap moderates only the relationship between PSS and turnover intentions. However no differences were found between POS and turnover intentions relationship. Moreover, the relationship between POS and turnover intentions is mediated by PsyCap, but there is no significant indirect effect between PSS and turnover intentions through PsyCap. The findings of this study proposed that recognizing the level of an employee's psychological capital might also play an important role in leveraging how organizational and supervisory support might shape employee turnover intentions. This paper might be valuable for academicians and managers in practice and might inspire the future researchers to investigate turnover intentions.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ALLEN, D.G., SHORE, L.M. and GRIFFETH, R.W. (2003), “The Role of Perceived Organizational Support And Supportive Human Resource Practices in The Turnover Process”, Journal of Management, 29 (1), 99-118.
  • ANGLE, H.L. and PERRY, J.L. (1983), “Organizational Commitment: Individual and Organizational Influences”, Work and Occupations, 10, 123-146.
  • ARBUCKLE, J.L. and WOTHKE, W. (1999), AMOS Users Guide Version 4.0., Chicago:Smallwaters.
  • AVEY, J.B., LUTHANS, F. and YOUSSEF, C.M. (2009a), “The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviors”, Journal of Management, 36, 430-452.
  • AVEY, J.B. LUTHANS, F. and JENSEN, S.M. (2009b), “Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource for Combating Employee Stress and Turnover”, Human Resource Management, 48 (5), 677- 693.
  • AVEY, J.B., REICHARD, R.J., LUTHANS, F. and MHATRE, K.H. (2011), “Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22 (2), 127–152.
  • AVEY, J.B., WERNSING, T.S. and LUTHANS, F. (2008), “Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48–70.
  • AVOLIO, B.J. and LUTHANS, F. (2006), The High Impact Leader: Moments Matter in Accelerating Authentic Leadership Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • BLAU, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York, NY.
  • BRISLIN, R.W. (1980), “Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Material”, In H.C. Triandis and J.W. Berry (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, (2), pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • CROPANZANO R., HOWES, J.C., GRANDEY, A.A. and TOTH, P. (1997), “The Relationship Of Organizational Politics and Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes and Stress”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (2), 159-180.
  • CROPANZANO, R. and MITCHELL, M.S. (2005), “Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review”, Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
  • ÇETIN, F. and BASIM, H.N. (2012), “Örgütsel Psikolojik Sermaye: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45 (1), 121-136.
  • EDER, P. and EISENBERGER, R. (2008), “Perceived Organizational Support: Reducing the Negative Influence of Coworker Withdrawal Behavior”, Journal of Management, 34 (1), 55-68.
  • EISENBERGER, R., ARMELI, S., REXWINKEL, B., LYNCH, P.D. and RHOADES, L. (2001), “Reciprocation of Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 42–51.
  • EISENBERGER, R., FASOLO, P. and DAVIS-LAMASTRO, V. (1990), “Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1), 51–59.
  • EISENBERGER, R., HUNTINGTON, R., HUTCHISON, S. and SOWA, D. (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
  • EISENBERGER, R., STINGLHAMBER, F., VANDENBERGHE, C., SUCHARSKI, I.L. and RHOADES, L. (2002), “Perceived Supervisory Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 565-573.
  • FREDRICKSON, B.L. (1998), “What good are positive emotions?”, Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.
  • FREDRICKSON, B.L. (2001), “The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden and Build Theory”, American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
  • FREDRICKSON, B.L. and LOSADA, M. (2005), “Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing”, American Psychologist, 60 (7), 678-686.
  • GEORGE, J.M. and JONES, G.R. (1996), “The Experience of Work and Turnover Intentions: Interactive Effects of Value Attainment, Job Satisfaction and Positive Mood”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (3), 3 1 8-325.
  • GOULDNER, A.W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”, American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.
  • HAIR, J.F., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. and BLACK, W.C. (2005), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • HILL, C.A. (1987), “Affiliation Motivation: People Who Need People But in Different Ways”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1008-1018.
  • HOBFOLL, S. (2002), “Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation”, Review of General Psychology, 6, 307-324.
  • KLINE, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • KOTTKE, J.L. and SHARAFINSKI, C.E. (1988), “Measuring Perceived Supervisory and Organizational Support”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48 (4), 1075–1079.
  • LEVINSON, H. (1965), “Reciprocation: The Relationship Between Man and Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 9 (4), 370–390.
  • LIDEN, R.C., SPARROWE, R.T. and WAYNE, S.J. (1997), “Leader Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential for the Future”. In G.R. Ferris, (Ed), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, (pp.47-119).Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI.
  • LOI, R., HANG-YUE, N. and FOLEY, S. (2006), “Linking Employees’ Justice Perceptions to Organizational Commitment and Intention to Leave: The mediating Role Of Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79 (1), 101–120.
  • LUTHANS, F. and YOUSSEF, C.M. (2004), “Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing In People for Competitive Advantage”, Organizational Dynamics, 33, 143–160.
  • LUTHANS, F., AVEY, J.B. and PATERA, J.L. (2008a), “Experimental Analysis of a Web-Based Training Intervention to Develop Positive Psychological Capital”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 209-221.
  • LUTHANS, F., AVEY, J.B., AVOLIO, B.J., NORMAN, S.M. and COMBS, G.M., (2006), “Psychological Capital Development: Toward a Micro-intervention”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 387–393.
  • LUTHANS, F., AVEY, J.B., AVOLIO, B.J. and PETERSON, S.J. (2010), “The Development and Resulting Performance Impact of Psychological Capital”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 41-67.
  • LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B., WALUMBWA, F. and LI, W. (2005), “The Psychological Capital of Chinese Workers: Exploring the Relationship with Performance”, Management and Organization Review, 1, 247-269.
  • LUTHANS, F., YOUSSEF, C.M. and AVOLIO, B.J. (2007a), Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B.J., AVEY, J.B and NORMAN, S.M. (2007b), “Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572.
  • LUTHANS, F., NORMAN, S.M., AVOLIO, B.J. and AVEY, J.B. (2008b), “The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Supportive Organizational Climate Employee Performance Relationship”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 219–238.
  • MAERTZ, C.P., GRIFFETH, R.W., CAMPELL, N.S. and ALLEN, D.G. (2007), “The Effects of Perceived Organizational Support Ad Perceived Supervisory Support on Employee Turnover”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1059-75.
  • MAERTZ, C.P., STEVENS, M.J. and CAMPION, M.A. (2003), “A Turnover Model for The Mexican Maquiladoras”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 111-115.
  • MALLINCKRODT, B., ABRAHAM, T.W., WEI, M. and RUSSELL, D.W. (2006), “Advance in Testing Statistical Significance of Mediation Effects”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372– 378.
  • MARTIN, H.J. (1984), “A Revised Measure of Approval Motivation and Its Relationship to Social Desirability”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 508-519.
  • MARUYAMA, G. and MCGARVEY, B. (1980), “Evaluating Causal Models: An Application of Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Structural Equations”, Psychological Bulletin, 87, 505– 512.
  • MASTERSON, S.S., LEWIS K., GOLDMAN, B.M. and TAYLOR, M.S. (2000), “Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships”, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 738-748.
  • MOBLEY, W.H., HORNER, S.O. and HOLLINSWORTH, A.T. (1978), “An Evaluation of Precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408–414.
  • MOORE, K.A. (2001), “Hospital Restructuring: Impact on Nurses Mediated By Social Support and a Perception of Challenge”, Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 23, 490– 517.
  • NORMAN, S.M., AVEY, J.B., NIMNICHT, J.L. and PIGEON, N.G. (2010), “The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Organizational Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17 (4), 380- 391.
  • PAYNE, S.C. and HUFFMAN, A.H. (2005), “A Longitudinal Examination of the Influence of Mentoring on Organizational Commitment and Turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1), 158-168.
  • PREACHER, K.J. and HAYES, A.F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models”, Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879-891.
  • RANDALL, M.L., CROPANZANO, R., BORMANN, C.A. and BIRJULIN, A.(1999), “Organizational Politics and Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (2), 159-174.
  • RHOADES, L. and EISENBERGER, R. (2002), “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 698-714.
  • RHOADES, L., EISENBERGER, R. and ARMELI, S. (2001), “Affective Commitment of the Organization: The Contribution to Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (5), 825-836.
  • SELIG, J.P. and PREACHER, K.J. (2008), Monte Carlo Method for Assessing Mediation: An Interactive Tool for Creating Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects [computer software]. Available at http://quantpsy.org.
  • SELIGMAN, M.E.P. and CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (2000), “Positive psychology”, American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
  • SELIGMAN, M.E.P. (1998). Learned Optimism. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
  • SETTOON, R.P., BENNETT, N. and LIDEN, R.C. (1996), “Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader Member Exchange and Employee Reciprocity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (3), 219-227.
  • SHORE, L.M., COYLE-SHAPIRO, J.A.M., CHEN, X.P. and TETRICK, L.E. (2009), “Social Exchange in Work Settings: Content, Process, and Mixed Models”, Management and Organization Review, 5 (3), 289–302.
  • SHROUT, P.E. and BOLGER, N. (2002), “Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations”, Psychological Methods, 7 (4), 422-445.
  • STEEL, R.P. and OVALLE, N.K. (1984), “A Review and Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship between Behavioral Intentions and Employee Turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (4), 673–686.
  • STINGLHAMBER, F. and VANDENBERGHE, C. (2003), “Organizations and Supervisors as Sources of Support and Targets of Commitment: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 251-270.
  • TATE, U., WHATLEY, A. and CLUGSTON, M. (1997), “Sources and Outcomes of Job Tension: A Three-Nation Study”, International Journal of Management, 3, 350–358.
  • TUZUN, I.K. and KALEMCI, A. (2012), “Organizational and Supervisory Support in Relation to Employee Turnover Intentions”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27 (5), 518-534.
  • WAYNE, S.J., SHORE, L.M. and LIDEN, R.C. (1997), “Perceived Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), 82–111.
  • WUBIN, S. and ZHAOLIANG, Y. (2010), “Main Effect and Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital in the Model of Employee Turnover Intention”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Management Science (ICAMS), 09 Jul - 11 Jul 2010, 152–156.
APA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ, ÇETİN F, Basım H (2014). The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. , 85 - 103.
Chicago TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İpek,ÇETİN FATİH,Basım H. Nejat The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. (2014): 85 - 103.
MLA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İpek,ÇETİN FATİH,Basım H. Nejat The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. , 2014, ss.85 - 103.
AMA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. . 2014; 85 - 103.
Vancouver TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. . 2014; 85 - 103.
IEEE TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H "The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process." , ss.85 - 103, 2014.
ISNAD TÜZÜN KALEMCİ, İpek vd. "The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process". (2014), 85-103.
APA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ, ÇETİN F, Basım H (2014). The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 41(2), 85 - 103.
Chicago TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İpek,ÇETİN FATİH,Basım H. Nejat The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 41, no.2 (2014): 85 - 103.
MLA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İpek,ÇETİN FATİH,Basım H. Nejat The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, vol.41, no.2, 2014, ss.85 - 103.
AMA TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. 2014; 41(2): 85 - 103.
Vancouver TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi. 2014; 41(2): 85 - 103.
IEEE TÜZÜN KALEMCİ İ,ÇETİN F,Basım H "The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process." ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 41, ss.85 - 103, 2014.
ISNAD TÜZÜN KALEMCİ, İpek vd. "The role of psychological capital and supportive organizational practices in the turnover process". ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 41/2 (2014), 85-103.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 20:16

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları