Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 89 - 109 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors

Öz:
Bu çalışmada teknoloji kabulünün olası yordayıcılarını nitel bir incelemeyle analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır. Kuramsal çerçevelerini Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM)’nin oluşturduğu makaleler bu çalışmanın hedefini oluşturmaktadır. Bu nedenle 1999 ve 2010 yılları arasında 32 dergi ve 9 konferansta yayınlanmış olan 50 makale incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarında incelenen makalelerin çoğunluğunun eğitim ve iş alanları hakkında olduğu görülmüştür. Bu makaleler üç temel hedefe yönelik incelenmiştir: (1) etkili ve etkisiz bulunan TKM değişkenlerini kritik bir bakış açısıyla incelemek; (2) en etkili bulunan değişkenlerin kullanımını vurgulamak; (3) TKM’nin çalışma alanlarını ortaya çıkarmak. Bu makaleler tümevarımsal yaklaşım ile içerik analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın ilk aşamasında daha önceden tanımlanmış kavramlara göre kodlama yapılmış (tarama, ölçüt belirleme) ve bu bağlamda temalar elde edilmiştir. Daha sonra veriler temalara göre organize edilmiş, gruplanmış ve uygun durumlarda sayısallaştırılmıştır. Son olarak elde edilen bulgular yorumlanmıştır. Sonuçlar birçok yeni değişkenin var olan değişkenlere eklenmesine rağmen TKM’deki temel değişkenlerin en etkili değişkenler olarak kaldığını göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

-

Öz:
This study aims at analyzing possible predictors of technology acceptance model based on qualitative review of relative articles. Thus, within the scope of this study articles which had based their theoretical framework on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) were screened. For this reason, fifty papers, which were published in thirty-two journals and nine conferences between the years 1999 and 2010, were reviewed. In terms of the articles reviewed, search results revealed that most of the research studies were in the fields of education and business. These papers were examined with three main objectives in mind: (1) to investigate TAM variables that were found effective and ineffective from a critical point of view; (2) to highlight the top use of the effective variables; (3) to compose the study fields of TAM. These papers were analyzed through content analysis by an inductive approach. In the first stage coding was carried out according to previously identified concepts (scanning, selection criteria) and themes that were emerged in this context. Then the data were organized and grouped according to themes and presented by means of making numerical transformation in appropriate cases. Finally, the obtained findings were interpreted. The results showed that the main variables of “Technology Acceptance Model” were remained as the most effective ones though numerous attempts have been made to add other variables to existing ones.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Indiana University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37).
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-340.
  • Dillon, A. (2001). User acceptance of information technology. In W. Karwowski (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Dillon, A. & Morris, M. (1996). User acceptance of new information technology: Theories and models. In M. Williams (Eds.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Medford NJ: Information Today, 31, 3-32.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Fusilier, M., Durlabhji, S. & Cucchi, A. (2008). An investigation of the integrated model of user technology acceptance: Internet user samples in four countries. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(2), 155-182.
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
  • King, W. R. & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755.
  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A. & Larsen, K.R.T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752-780.
  • Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
  • Ma, Q. & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59–72.
  • Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th edition). The Free Press. New York.
  • Schepers, J. & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, 90–103.
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
  • Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52, 463-479.
  • Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Qarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. (5th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. (6th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yuena, A. H.K. & Ma, W. W.K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229–243.
APA YUCEL AVCI U, GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y (2013). Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. , 89 - 109.
Chicago YUCEL AVCI Ummuhan,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN YASEMİN Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. (2013): 89 - 109.
MLA YUCEL AVCI Ummuhan,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN YASEMİN Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. , 2013, ss.89 - 109.
AMA YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. . 2013; 89 - 109.
Vancouver YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. . 2013; 89 - 109.
IEEE YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y "Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors." , ss.89 - 109, 2013.
ISNAD YUCEL AVCI, Ummuhan - GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN, YASEMİN. "Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors". (2013), 89-109.
APA YUCEL AVCI U, GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y (2013). Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 89 - 109.
Chicago YUCEL AVCI Ummuhan,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN YASEMİN Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 46, no.1 (2013): 89 - 109.
MLA YUCEL AVCI Ummuhan,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN YASEMİN Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.46, no.1, 2013, ss.89 - 109.
AMA YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 46(1): 89 - 109.
Vancouver YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 46(1): 89 - 109.
IEEE YUCEL AVCI U,GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN Y "Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors." Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, ss.89 - 109, 2013.
ISNAD YUCEL AVCI, Ummuhan - GÜLBAHAR GÜVEN, YASEMİN. "Technology acceptance model: A review of the prior predictors". Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 46/1 (2013), 89-109.