Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding

Mahmut KAPLAN, (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)
Taner AKAR, (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Antalya, Türkiye)
Adem KAMALAK, (Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Zootekni Bölümü, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye)
Sancar BULUT (Erciyes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Kayseri, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
1 0
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 838 - 846 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding

Öz:
Einkorn and emmer wheat are still cultivated in the mountainous areas of Turkey. Tey are resistant to biotic and abiotic stressconditions and are routinely used as food stufs due to reasonable dietary fber rate and vitamin and micronutrient content. Terefore,the present study was conducted to determine the feed potential of einkorn and emmer wheat populations. A total of 17 hulled wheatpopulations collected from diferent provinces of Turkey were studied during the years 2012 and 2013. Experiments were carried out inrandomized complete block design with 3 replications to investigate grain yield, harvest index, chemical composition, and gas and methaneproduction of the grain. Grain yield varied between 2.477 and 4.617 t ha 1 , harvest index between 27.55% and 36.03%, crude protein (CP)between 6.69% and 16.22%, neutral detergent fber (NDF) between 25.99% and 31.99%, acid detergent fber (ADF) between 14.35% and19.05%, crude oil (CO) between 1.33% and 2.05%, crude ash (CA) between 4.23% and 5.22%, metabolizable energy (ME) between 2.58 and2.25 Mcal kg 1 DM, organic matter digestibility (OMD) between 65.59% and 72.73%, and gas production (GP) between 46.01 and 52.22mL. While einkorn populations had higher ME, OMD, CP, and CO content values, emmer wheat populations had higher ADF and NDFrates. Moreover, there were signifcant variations in gas and methane production in all hulled wheat populations. Genotype-trait biplotanalysis clearly indicated the variation limits of NDF, ADF, CP, OMD, ME, methane, GP, CO, and CA of hulled wheat populations. Terewere also signifcant linear relationships between CP and ME (0.585) and OMD (0.613); between CO and GP (0.513); and between GP andME (0.623) and OMD (0.696). It was concluded that with regard to higher yield and digestibility, these hulled wheat populations could beused as basic germplasm for breeding of new einkorn and emmer wheat cultivars to be used as alternative feedstuf.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdel-Aal E-SM, Hucl P, Sosulski FW (1995). Compositional and nutritional characteristics of spring einkorn and spelt wheats. Cereal Chem 72: 621–624.
  • Acquistucci R, D’Egidio MG, Vallega V (1995). Amino acid composition of selected strains of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L. Cereal Chem 72: 213.
  • Akçura M (2011). Te relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For 35: 115–125.
  • Akgün İ, Kaya M, Altındal D (2007). Determination of yield and yield components in some triticale lines/genotypes under Isparta ecological conditions. Akdeniz Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg 20: 171–182 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • AOAC (1990). Ofcial Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Ofcial Analytical Chemists.
  • Blümmel M, Ørskov ER (1993). Comparison of an in Vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 40: 109– 119.
  • Buerli M (2006). Farro in Italy. A Desk Study. Rome, Italy: Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species.
  • Cubadda R, Marconi E (1994). Aspetti relativi alla utilizzazione e alla caratterizzazione tecnologica e nutrizionale del farro. In: Perrino P, Semeraro D, Laghetti G, editors. Proc. Il farro: un cereale della salute Potenza, Italy. Bari, Italy: CNR, pp. 82–88 (in Italian).
  • Cubadda R, Marconi E (2002). Spelt wheat. In: Belton PS, Taylor JRN, editors. Pseudocereals and Less Common Cereals – Grain Properties and Utilization Potential. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 153–173.
  • D’Antuono LF (1994). Obsolete wheats in Italy: an overview on cultivation, use and perspectives for their conservation. In: Padulosi S, Ager H, Frison E, editors. Report of the IPGRI Workshop on Conservation and Use of Underutilized Mediterranean Species. Rome, Italy: IPGRI, pp. 41–48.
  • D’Egidio MG, Nardi S, Vallega V (1993). Grain, four, and dough characteristics of selected strains of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L. Cereal Chem 70: 298–303.
  • FAO (1990). Micronutrient Assessment at the Country Level: An International Study. Rome, Italy: FAO Soils Bulletin 63.
  • Feil B (1992). Breeding progress in small grain cereals. A comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breeding 108: 1–11.
  • Feldman M, Horowitz A, Anikster Y (1988). Utilization of biodiversity from in situ reserves, with special reference to wild wheat and barley. Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement 21: 311–323.
  • Gebre-Mariam H, Larter EN (1979). Efect of plants density on yield, yield components and quality in triticale and Glenlea wheat. Can J Plant Sci 59: 679–683.
  • Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2008). Efect of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extract on partitioning of nutrients from roughage-and concentrate-based feeds to methane. Anim Feed Sci Tech 147: 72–89.
  • Grausgruber H, Scheiblauer J, Schönlechner R, Ruckenbauer P, Berghofer E (2004). Variability in chemical composition and biologically active constituents of cereals. In: Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, Ruckenbauer P, editors. Genetic Variation for Plant Breeding. Proceedings of the 17th EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria, 8–11 September 2004, pp. 23–26.
  • Hammer K, Perrino P (1984). Further information on farro (T. monococcum L. and T. monococcum Schrank) in South Italy. Kulturpfanze 32: 143–151.
  • Konvalina P, Capouchová I, Stehno Z (2011). Genetic resources of hulled wheat species in Czech organic farming. In: 62. Tagung der Vereinigung der Pfanzenzüchter und Saatgutkaufeute Österreichs 2011, pp. 81–86.
  • Lipkovich I, Smith EP (2002). Biplot and singular value decomposition macros for excel. Blacksburg, VA, USA: Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech.
  • Løje H, Møller B, Laustsen AM, Hansen A (2003). Chemical composition, functional properties and sensory profling of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.). J Cereal Sci 37: 231–240.
  • Lopez S, Makkar HPS, Soliva CR (2010). Screening plants and plant products for methane inhibitors. In: Vercoe PE, Makkar HPS, Schlink A, editors. In Vitro Screening of Plant Resources for Extra Nutritional Attributes in Ruminants: Nuclear and Related Methodologies. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 191–231.
  • Menke KH, Steingass H (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fuid. Anim Res Develop 28: 9–55.
  • Mielke H, Rodemann B (2007). Der Dinkel, eine besondere Weizenart-Anbau, Pfanzenschutz, Ernte und Verarbeitung. J Cult Plant 59: 40–45 (in German).
  • Moudry J (1999). Productivity of spelt wheat (Triticum spelta L.) spike. Sci Agric 30: 15–26.
  • NRC (1996). Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  • NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  • Pelillo M, Ferioli F, Iafelice G, Marconi E, Caboni MF (2010). Characterisation of the phospholipid fraction of hulled and naked tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. J Cereal Sci 51: 120– 126.
  • Peterson DM (1992). Composition and nutritional characteristics of oat grain products. In: Marshall HG, Sorrells ME, editors. Oat Science and Technology. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, pp. 265–292.
  • Piergiovanni AR, Laghetti G, Perrino P (1996). Characteristics of meal from hulled wheats (Triticum dicoccon Schrank and T spelta L.): an evaluation of selected accessions. Cereal Chem 73: 732–735.
  • Plant Breeding International (1990). Cereals. Cambridge, UK: Plant Breeding International.
  • Rüegger A, Winzeler H, Noseberg J (1990). Die Ertragsbildung von Dinkel (Triticum spelta L.) und Weizen (Triticum aestivum L.) unter verschiedenen Umweltbedingungen im Freiland. J Agron Crop Sci 164: 145–162.
  • SAS Institute (1999). SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc.
  • Schmid JE, Winzeler M, Winzeler H (1994). Analysis of disease resistance and quality characters of F1 hybrids of crosses between wheat (Triticum aestivum ) and spelt (Triticum spelta). Euphytica 75: 105–110.
  • Sharma HC, Waines JG, Foster KW (1981). Variability in primitive and wild wheats for useful genetic characters. Crop Sci 21: 555–559.
  • Shewry PR, Hawkesford MJ, Piironen V, Lampi AM, Gebruers K, Boros D, Andersson AAM, Aman P, Rakszegi M, Bedo Z et al. (2013). Natural variation in grain composition of wheat and related cereals. J Agric Food Chem 61: 8295–8303.
  • Stehno Z, Bradove J, Dotlacil Konvalina P (2010). Landraces and obsolete cultivars of minor wheat species in the Czech collection of wheat genetic restufs. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 46: 100–105.
  • Suchowilska E, Wiwart M, Borejszo Z, Packa D, Kandler W, Krska R (2009). Discriminant analysis of selected yield components and fatty acid composition of chosen Triticum monococcum , Triticum dicoccum and Triticum spelta accessions. J Cereal Sci 49: 310–315.
  • TOVEP (1991). Türkiye toprakları verimlilik envanteri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü (in Turkish).
  • Troccoli A, Codianni P (2005). Appropriate seeding rate for einkorn, emmer, and spelt grown under rainfed condition in southern Italy. Europ J Agronomy 22: 293–300.
  • Van Slageren MW (1994). Wild Wheats: A Monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub and Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University/ICARDA.
  • Van Soest PJ (1963). Te use of detergents in the analysis of fbre feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fbre and lignin. J Assoc Of Ana Chem 46: 829–835.
  • Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967). Te use of detergents in the analysis of fbrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. J Assoc Of Ana Chem 50: 50–55.
  • Wieser H (2000). Comparative investigations of gluten proteins from diferent wheat species. I. Qualitative and quantitative composition of gluten protein types. Eur Food Res Technol 211: 262–268.
  • Yan W, Kang MS (2003). GGE-Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Yan W, Rajcan I (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci 42: 11–20.
  • Yan W, Reid JF (2008). Breeding line selection based on multiple traits. Crop Sci 48: 417–423.
APA Kaplan M, Akar T, KAMALAK A, Bulut S (2014). Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. , 838 - 846.
Chicago Kaplan Mahmut,Akar Taner,KAMALAK Adem,Bulut Sancar Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. (2014): 838 - 846.
MLA Kaplan Mahmut,Akar Taner,KAMALAK Adem,Bulut Sancar Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. , 2014, ss.838 - 846.
AMA Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. . 2014; 838 - 846.
Vancouver Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. . 2014; 838 - 846.
IEEE Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding." , ss.838 - 846, 2014.
ISNAD Kaplan, Mahmut vd. "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding". (2014), 838-846.
APA Kaplan M, Akar T, KAMALAK A, Bulut S (2014). Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38(6), 838 - 846.
Chicago Kaplan Mahmut,Akar Taner,KAMALAK Adem,Bulut Sancar Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38, no.6 (2014): 838 - 846.
MLA Kaplan Mahmut,Akar Taner,KAMALAK Adem,Bulut Sancar Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.38, no.6, 2014, ss.838 - 846.
AMA Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2014; 38(6): 838 - 846.
Vancouver Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2014; 38(6): 838 - 846.
IEEE Kaplan M,Akar T,KAMALAK A,Bulut S "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38, ss.838 - 846, 2014.
ISNAD Kaplan, Mahmut vd. "Use of diploid and tetraploid hulled wheat genotypes for animal feeding". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38/6 (2014), 838-846.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 20:31

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları