Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme

KARAMAN, Adem; BOZDOĞAN, Erol; ALPER, Fatih; Akgün, Metin; HRAMAN, MustafaKA

Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme

Adem KARAMAN, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, Türkiye)

MustafaKA HRAMAN, (Erzurum Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Erol BOZDOĞAN, (Özel Sevgi Can Hastanesi, Radyoloji Bölümü, Adana, Türkiye)

Fatih ALPER, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Aziziye Araştırma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Metin AKGÜN (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Aziziye Araştırma Hastanesi, Göğüs Hastalıkları Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Tüberküloz ve Toraks

23 1

Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 215 - 230 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme

Öz:

Tora ksta manyetik rezonans görüntü leme (MRG) ile sa dece morfo lojik de ğerlen dirme yapa b ilme kteyk en artık günümüz de difü zyon za ğırlıklı görüntü leme gib i fon ksiyone l ince leme leri de k u llana b ilme kteyiz. Hare k eti aza ltıc ı yazılım lar, ço klu k ana l k u llan ımı, pa ra le largörüntü leme ve h ızlı se k anslar gib i yeni te kno lo jiler sayesin de tora k sta artık doyurucu ka lite de görüntü ler a lınma kta dır. Son yıl a rdallaçok sayıda toraks MRG çalışmalarında umut verici sonuçlar yayınlanm ıştır. Radyasyon içermediği için baz ı endikasyonlar da bilgisa -lgyarlı tomo grafinin a lternatifi o la b ilece ği görü lme kte dir. Bu derleme de difüzyon MR ince lemenin a kciğer ve me diasten pato lo jile rin deri hangi durum larda nasıl uy gu lan dığıy la ilgili yapılan günce l ça lışma ları gözden geçirdik ve tora ks pato lo jilerinin tan ım lanmas nda,ınk ara kterizasyonun da ne tür b ilgiler sa ğla dığın ı ortaya koymaya çalıştık.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Solunum Sistemi Kulak, Burun, Boğaz

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of thorax

Öz:

Alth ou gh ma gnetic resonance ima ging (MRI) of T h orax is on ly use -fu l for morph o logica l eva luation, currently we can use it for func-tiona l eva luation suc h as diffusion weigh te d ima gin g. Currently, wecan obtain higher quality ima ges because of new technolo giessuc h as software th at decrease motion artefact, use of mu lti-ch an -ne l, para lle l ima gin g an d fast sequences. Many promisin g resu lts o fth orax MRI h ave b een pu blis he d. It ma y a lso b e an a lternative to th orax computed tomograph y in some in dications with out radiation exposure risk. In th is review, we evaluated current literature onuse of DWI MRI examination on th e path ologies of lungs an d mediastinum an d aime d to present wh at kin d of information is pro-vided on recognition an d ch aracterization of th oracic path ologies

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Solunum Sistemi Kulak, Burun, Boğaz

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Eisen b erg RL; Fleisch ner Society. Ways to improve ra dio lo - gists' a dh erence to Fleisch ner Society guide lines for man - a gement of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radio l 2013 ;10:439-41 .
2. Lacson R, Preve de llo LM , An drio le KP, Gill R, Lenoci- Edwards J, Ro y C, et a l; Fleisch ner Society . Factors associ- ated with radiolo gists' adherence to Fleischner Society guide lines for mana gement of pulmonary no du les. J Am Co ll Ra dio l 2012 ; 9:468-73.
3. Mato b a M, Tonami H, Kondou T, Yo kota H, Higash i K, To ga H, et a l. Lun g carcinoma: diffusion-weigh te d m r imaging--pre liminary eva luation with apparent diffusion coefficient. Ra dio lo gy 2007;243:570-7.
4. Ko şucu P, Te kin b a ş C, Ero l M, Sari A, Kavgaci H, Oztuna F, et a l. Me diastina l ly mph no des: assessment with diffu - sion-weigh te d MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imagin g 2009;30 : 292 -7.
5. Raze k AA, E lmorsy A, E ls hafe y M, Elh a de dy T, Hamza O. Assessment of me diastina l tumors with diffusion-weighte d single-sh ot ech o-planar MRI. J Magn Reson Imagin g 2009;30 :5 3 5-4 0.
6. Mo desti G, Zimmermann B, Börsc h M, Herrmann A, Saa lwäc h ter K. Diffusion in Mo de l Networks as Stu die d by NMR an d Fluorescence Corre lation S pectrosco py. Macromo lecu les 2009 ;42:4681-9 .
7. Gilllard JH , Waldman AD, Barker PB. Clinical MR Neuroima gin g Diffusion, Perfusion an d Spectroscopy. In: Jones, D.K. e d, Fun damenta ls of diffusion MR ima gin g, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pres., 2005:54-86 .
8. Bie derer J, Beer M , Hirsch W , Wild J, Fa b e l M, Pu derb ach M, et a l. MRI of th e lun g (2/3). W h y wh en h ow? Insigh ts Ima gin g 2012;3:355-71 .
9. Kanauc hi N, Oizumi H, Honma T , Kato H , En do M , Suzu ki J, et a l. M. Ro le of diffusion-weigh te d ma gnetic resonance ima gin g for pre dictin g of tumor invasiveness for clinica l sta ge IA non-sma ll ce ll lun g cancer. Eur J Cardioth orac Surg 2009 ;35:706-1 0 .
10. Hase gawa I, Boise lle PM, Kuwa b ara K, Sawafu ji M, Su giura H . Me diastina l lym ph no des in patients with non-sma ll ce ll lun g cancer: pre liminary experience with diffusion-weigh t- e d MR ima gin g. J T horac Ima gin g 2008;23:157-61 .
11. Ka h raman M. Plevra l pato lo jisi o lan h asta larda difüzyon manyetik rezonans incelemenin benign malign ayrım ında y eri ve önemi (tez). Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi T ıp Fa kü ltesi; 2012 .
12. Sato h S , Kitazume Y, O hdama S , Kimu la Y, Taura S, En do Y. Can ma lignant an db enign pu lmonary no du les b e differ- entiate d with diffusion-weigh te d MRI? AJR Am J Roentgeno l. 2008 ;1 91 :464-70 .
13. Ko yama H, O h no Y, Kono A, Ta kena ka D, Maniwa Y, Nish imura Y, et a l. Quantitative an d q ua litative assessmen t of non-contrast-en h ance d pu lmonary MR imaging for man - a gement of pu lmonary no du les in 161 su bjects. Eur Ra dio l 2008 ;1 8:21 20-31.
14. Frericks BB, Me y er BC, Martus P, Wen dt M, Wo lf KJ, Wacker F. MRI of the thorax during whole-body MRI: eva luation of different MR se q uences an d com parison to th oracic mu ltidetector compute d tomo graph y (MDCT). J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:538-45 .
15. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Sakuma T, Seki H, O guchi M, Taniguch i M, et a l. Com parison of [(18)F]FDG PET an d (201)T l SPECT in eva luation of pu lmonary no du les. J Nuc l Me d 2001 ;42:1489-96.
16. O h no Y, Koyama H, Ta kena ka D, No gami M, Maniwa Y, Nish imura Y, et a l. D ynamic MRI, dy namic mu ltidetector- row compute d tomo graph y (MDCT), an d core gistere d 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomo graph y (FDG-PET)/CT: comparative stu dy of capa b il- ity for mana gement of pu lmonary no du les. J Ma gn Reson Ima gin g 2008;27:1284-95 .
17. Girvin F, Ko JP. Pu lmonary no du les: detection, assessment, an d CAD. AJR Am J Roentgeno l 2008;191:1057-69 . 18. Re gier M, Sc h warz D, Henes FO, Groth M, Kooi jman H, Be gemann PG, et a l. Diffusion-weigh te d MR-ima gin g fo r th e detection of pu lmonary nodu les at 1.5 Tesla: intrain di- vidua l comparison with mu ltidetector compute d tomo gra - ph y. J Me d Ima gin g Ra diat Onco l 2011;55:266-74 .
19. Ch en W, Jian W, Li HT, Li C, Zh an g YK, Xie B, et a l. W h o le - b o dy diffusion-weigh te d ima gin g vs. FDG-PET for th e detection of non-sma ll-ce ll lun g cancer. How do th e y measure up? Ma gn Reson Ima gin g 2010;28:613-20 .
20. O hb a Y, Nomori H , Mori T , S h iraish i K, Namimoto T , Kata h ira K. Diffusion-weigh te d ma gnetic resonance fo r pu lmonary no du les: 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla. Asian Cardiovasc T h orac Ann 2011 ;19:108-14 .
21. O h no Y, Koyama H, Onish i Y, Ta k ena ka D, No gami M, Yosh ik awa T, et a l. Non-sma ll ce ll lun g cancer: wh o le-b o dy MR examination for M-sta ge assessment--utility for wh o le - b o dy diffusion-weigh te d ima gin g compare d with inte grate d FDG PET/CT. Ra dio lo gy 2008;248:643-54 .
22. Mori T , Nomori H , Ike da K, Kawana k a K, S h iraish i S , Kata h ira K, et a l. Diffusion-weigh te d ma gnetic resonance ima ging for dia gnosin g ma lignant pu lmonary nodu les / masses: comparison with positron emission tomo graph y. J T h orac Onco l 2008 ;3:358-64 .
23. Uto T, Ta ke h ara Y, Na kamura Y, Naito T, Hash imoto D , Inui N, et a l. High er sensitivity an d specificity for diffusion - weigh te d ima gin g of ma lignant lun g lesions with out appar- ent diffusion coefficient quantification. Ra dio lo gy 2009;2 5 2 :2 47-54 .
24. Tanaka R, Horikoshi H , Nakazato Y, Seki E, Minato K, Ii jima M, et a l. Ma gnetic resonance ima ging in periph era l lung a denocarcinoma: corre lation with h istopath o logic features. J T h orac Ima gin g 2009;24:4-9 .
25. Luna A, Sánch ez-Gonza lez J, Caro P. Diffusion-weigh te d ima ging of the chest. Ma gn Reson Ima gin g Clin N Am 2011 ;19:69-94 .
26. Baysa l T, Mutlu DY, Yo loglu S. Diffusion-weighte d ma g- netic resonance imaging in differentiation of posto b struc - tive conso lidation from centra l lun g carcinoma. Ma gn Reson Ima gin g 2009;27:1447-54 .
27. Qi LP, Zhang XP, Tan g L, Li J, Sun YS, Zh u GY. Usin g diffu - sion-weighted MR ima gin g for tumor detection in the col- lapse d lun g: a pre liminary stu dy. Eur Ra dio l 2009;19:333- 41 .
28. Yabuuchi H, Hatakenaka M, Taka yama K, Matsuo Y, Sunami S, Kamitani T, et a l. Non-sma ll ce ll lung cancer: detection of early response to ch emoth erapy b y usin g contrast-en h ance d dynamic an d diffusion-weigh te d MR ima gin g. Ra dio lo gy 2011;261:598-604 .
29. Zh ou R, Yu T, Fen g C, Ma L, Wan g Y, Li W, et a l. Diffusion - weigh te d imaging for assessment of lung cancer response to ch emoth erapy. Zhon gguo Fei Ai Za Zh i 2011;14:256 - 6 0 .
30. Ta k ena k a D, Oh no Y, Matsumoto K, Ao y ama N, Onish i Y, Ko yama H, et a l. Detection of b one metastases in non - sma ll ce ll lun g cancer patients: comparison of w ho le-b o dy diffusion-weigh te d ima gin g (DWI), wh o le-b o dy MR ima g- ing with out an d with DWI, wh o le-b o dy FDG-PET/CT, an d b one scintigraphy. J Ma gn Reson Ima gin g 2009;30:298- 30 8.
31. Nomori H , Watana b e K, O h tsu k a T , Naru ke T , Suemasu K, Ko b ayash i T, et a l. Fluorine 18-ta gge d fluoro deoxyglucose positron emission tomo graph ic scannin g to pre dict lymph n o de metastasis, invasiveness, or b oth, in c linica l T1 N0 M0 lun g a denocarcinoma. J T h orac Cardiovasc Surg 2 004 ;1 28:396-401.
32. Ro b erts PF, Follette DM, von Haa g D, Park JA, Va lk PE, Poun ds TR, et a l. Factors associate d with fa lse-positive sta g- in g of lun g cancer b y positron emission tomo graph y. Ann T h orac Surg 2000;70:1154-9 .
33. Nomori H , Mori T , Ike da K, Kawana ka K, Sh iraish i S, Kata h ira K, et a l. Diffusion-weigh te d ma gnetic resonance ima gin g can b e use d in place of positron emission tomog- raph y for N sta gin g of non-sma ll ce ll lun g cancer with fewer false-positive results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2 008 ;1 35:81 6-22 .
34. Pau ls S, Sch midt SA, Juch ems MS, Klass O , Luster M , Resk e SN, et a l. Diffusion-weigh te d MR imaging in comparison to inte grate d [¹?F]- DG PET/CT for N-sta gin g in patients with lun g cancer. Eur J Ra dio l 2012;81:178-82 .
35. O h no Y, Ko yama H, Yosh ikawa T, Nish io M, Ao yama N, Onis h i Y, et a l. N sta ge disease in patients with non-sma ll ce ll lung cancer: efficacy of quantitative an d qua litative assessment with STIR turb o spin-ec h o ima gin g, diffusion - weigh te d MR imaging, an d fluoro deoxyglucose PET/CT. Ra dio lo gy 2011;261:605-15 .
36. Gümü şta ş S, Inan N, Sariso y HT, Anik Y, Arslan A, Ciftçi E, et a l. Ma lignant versus b enign me diastina l lesions: quanti- tative assessment with diffusion weighted MR ima gin g. Eu r Ra dio l 2011 ; 21:2255-60 .
37. Abde l Raze k AA, So liman N, E lash ery R. Apparent diffu - sion coefficient va lues of me diastina l masses in ch ildren. Eur J Ra dio l 2012 ; 81:1311-4 .
38. Lin C, Luciani A, Itti E, El-Gnaoui T, Vignau d A, Beaussart P, et a l. W h o le-b o dy diffusion-weighte d ma gnetic reso - n ance ima ging with apparent diffusion coefficient mappin g for staging patients with diffuse large B-ce ll lymph oma. Eu r Ra dio l 2010 ; 20:2027-38 .

APA	KARAMAN A, HRAMAN M, BOZDOĞAN E, ALPER F, Akgün M (2014). Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. , 215 - 230.
Chicago	KARAMAN Adem,HRAMAN MustafaKA,BOZDOĞAN Erol,ALPER Fatih,Akgün Metin Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. (2014): 215 - 230.
MLA	KARAMAN Adem,HRAMAN MustafaKA,BOZDOĞAN Erol,ALPER Fatih,Akgün Metin Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. , 2014, ss.215 - 230.
AMA	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. . 2014; 215 - 230.
Vancouver	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. . 2014; 215 - 230.
IEEE	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M "Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme." , ss.215 - 230, 2014.
ISNAD	KARAMAN, Adem vd. "Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme". (2014), 215-230.

APA	KARAMAN A, HRAMAN M, BOZDOĞAN E, ALPER F, Akgün M (2014). Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, 62(3), 215 - 230.
Chicago	KARAMAN Adem,HRAMAN MustafaKA,BOZDOĞAN Erol,ALPER Fatih,Akgün Metin Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. Tüberküloz ve Toraks 62, no.3 (2014): 215 - 230.
MLA	KARAMAN Adem,HRAMAN MustafaKA,BOZDOĞAN Erol,ALPER Fatih,Akgün Metin Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, vol.62, no.3, 2014, ss.215 - 230.
AMA	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. Tüberküloz ve Toraks. 2014; 62(3): 215 - 230.
Vancouver	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme. Tüberküloz ve Toraks. 2014; 62(3): 215 - 230.
IEEE	KARAMAN A,HRAMAN M,BOZDOĞAN E,ALPER F,Akgün M "Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme." Tüberküloz ve Toraks, 62, ss.215 - 230, 2014.
ISNAD	KARAMAN, Adem vd. "Toraks difüzyon manyetik rezonans görüntüleme". Tüberküloz ve Toraks 62/3 (2014), 215-230.