Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 13 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application

Öz:
Karar verme kavramı, eğer sonuçlar kesin değilse opsiyonlardan bir tanesinin seçimi süreci olaraktanımlanabilir. Karar vermenin en basit şekli olan bir kritere dayalı olarak karar verme pratikte opsiyonların değerlendirilmesi için yeterli değildir. Böyle hallerde en iyi opsiyonu seçmek için farklı bilgilerin tamamınıgözönüne almalıyız ki bu durum çok kriterli karar verme metotlarının gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmıştır.AHP (Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci) farklı mertebeden ilişkileri modelleyen bir tekniktir. Diğer tarafanbu teknik karşılıklı ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesinde yetersiz kalmaktadır. ANP(Analitik Ağ Süreci) konuile ilgili bütün kriterlerin kullanılmasına olanak sağlar. ANPnin ilk aşaması bütün sistemdeki kriterlerikarşılaştıran süper matrisi oluşturmaktır ki burada ikili karşılaştırmalar uzmanlara sorularak oluşturulur.ANPnin ilk adımı her bir kriter arasındaki önemin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Sonraki adımı özdeğermetodunu kullanarak her bileşendeki kriterlerin etkisinin hesaplanmasıdır.Bu çalışmada, süper karar yazılımı ile ANP modeli uygulanarak 2006 - 2010 yılları arasında Türk sigortasektöründe hayat dışı branşında faaliyet gösteren büyük ölçekli şirketlerin fnansal fnansal performanssıralaması yapılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

Türk sigorta şirketlerinin performans sıralaması: Anp uygulaması

Öz:
Decision making concept can be defned as selection process choosing one of the options, if theoutcomes are not certain. In practice it is not sufcient to evaluate the options according to the simplestform of decision making only based on a criterion. In such cases, we must consider all the variety of diferentinformation to decide to best option. It arise the requirement of multi-criteria decision making methods.AHP (Analytical Hierarch Process) is a technique that models the relations which are diferent stage.On the other hand that technique is insufcient to evaluate interdependency relations. Te ANP (AnalyticNetwork Process) has the ability to add all the criteria related with the issue. Te method of the ANP canbe described as follows. Te first phase of the ANP is to compare the criteria in whole system to form thesupermatrix. Tis is done through pairwise comparisons by asking experts.Te first step of the ANP is to compare the importance between each criterion. Te next step is tocalculate the influence of the elements (criteria) in each component (matrix) using the eigenvalue method.In this research, fnancial performans ranking of Turkish Insurance companies, which large-scaledbusiness in non-life branches, are obtained for the period 2006-2010 using fnancial ratios of companies and applying the ANP model which was developed with the superdecision sofware.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Amaratunga, D. & Baldry, D. 2000a, Performance Evaluation in Facilities Management: Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach. In the proceedings of COBRA 2000 RICS (Construction and Building Research Conference). Royal Naval College, University of Greenwich, UK., 1-16.
  • Bassioni, H.A., Price, A.D.F. and Hassan, T.M., 2004, Performance Measurement in Construction Firms. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(2), 42–50.
  • Evangelidizs, K., 1992, Performance measured is performance gained. Te Treasurer, February, 45–47.
  • Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R. and Aouad, G., 2001, Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 85–95.
  • Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., 1992, Te Balanced ScorecardMeasures Tat Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
  • Lin ,C.T., Lee, C. and Wu, C.S., 2009, Optimizing a Marketing Expert Decision Process for the Private Hotel’ , Expert Systems with Applications,36 5613–5619.
  • Meade, L.M., 1996, A Methodology for the Formulation of Agile Critical Business Process, PhD Tesis, Te University of Texas at Arlington.
  • Meade, L. M. & Sarkis, J., 1999, Analyzing Organizational Project Alternatives for Agile Manufacturing Processes-An Analytical Network Approach. International Journal of Production Research 37, 241-261.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1990, How to Make a Decision: Te Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1) 9-26
  • Saaty, T.L., 1996, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: Te Analytic Network Process, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
  • Saaty, T.L & Ozdemir, M.S., 2005, Te Encyclical: A Dictionary of Decision with Dependence and Feedback Based the Analytical Network Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburg,.
APA AKHİSAR İ (2014). Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. , 1 - 13.
Chicago AKHİSAR İlyas Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. (2014): 1 - 13.
MLA AKHİSAR İlyas Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. , 2014, ss.1 - 13.
AMA AKHİSAR İ Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. . 2014; 1 - 13.
Vancouver AKHİSAR İ Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. . 2014; 1 - 13.
IEEE AKHİSAR İ "Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application." , ss.1 - 13, 2014.
ISNAD AKHİSAR, İlyas. "Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application". (2014), 1-13.
APA AKHİSAR İ (2014). Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 6(11), 1 - 13.
Chicago AKHİSAR İlyas Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi 6, no.11 (2014): 1 - 13.
MLA AKHİSAR İlyas Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, vol.6, no.11, 2014, ss.1 - 13.
AMA AKHİSAR İ Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. 2014; 6(11): 1 - 13.
Vancouver AKHİSAR İ Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. 2014; 6(11): 1 - 13.
IEEE AKHİSAR İ "Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application." Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 6, ss.1 - 13, 2014.
ISNAD AKHİSAR, İlyas. "Performance ranking of Turkish insurance Companies: THE anp application". Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi 6/11 (2014), 1-13.