The making sense of modernization movements from Ottoman Empire to the Republic can be best seen in the identification processes of social layers. Understanding this process is a significant determinant for the cultural disengagement of social layers since traditionally those social layers from Ottoman Empire to the Republic first created an identity, then constructed their culture on that identity. This situation went for both the conservative culture and the Kemalist culture. The identities of both culture codes started to come into being towards the last epoch of Ottoman Empire and continued structuring. However, both social cultures showed organic similarity throughout the Republican epoch. As long as it was the power, the Kemalist culture, in the first years of the Republic and later, took exemplary of the conservative culture which traditionally defined its existence over the state and found a cultural ground in this way. They, too, were stuck in statist and traditionalist swamp in the conservative culture. Nevertheless, like this, the conservative culture showed the reflections of the Kemalist culture as long as it was the power. How should this vicious and queer circle of the Turkish politics which is a cultural problem be solved? In order to cease the vicious circle in question, a synchronic tracing of the changes of the information structure in universal context must be done because with the tracing of data mutation and transformation, the time, space, and human perception of the culture is updated. Thence, the conservative and Kemalist cultures –which have a mask culture in the historical context from Ottoman Empire to the Republic- can acquire dynamism and the democracy can be linked to universal values sequence such as the superiority of the individual and human rights.