STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ

Ali Murat ALPARSLAN, (Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Sağlık Yönetimi Bölümü, Burdur, Türkiye)
İlker Hüseyin ÇARIKÇI (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, Isparta, Türkiye)
Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi
4 0
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 29 Sayfa Aralığı: 64 - 85 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ

Öz:
Bu çalışmada akademik çalışmalar açısından performans ölçümünün birincelemesi yapılmıştır. Amaç akademisyenlerin stratejik yönetim alanındayapılan araştırmalarda, örgütsel performans ölçümünde hangi boyutlarkapsamında hangi göstergeleri kullandıklarını belirlemektir. Yapılan içerikanalizi bundan sonraki araştırmalara da rasyonel bir kaynak oluşturacaktır.Araştırmanın kapsamı stratejik yönetim alanına dair araştırmalarınyayımlandığı ve alandaki öncü dergi olan Strategic Management Journaldayayımlanmış ve örgütsel performansı konu edinmiş çalışmalardır. Bukapsamda 82 makale içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Bulgular göstermiştirki verimlilik, kârlılık ve büyüme göstergeleri en fazla kullanılan göstergelerarasındadır. Buna ek olarak, verimlilik göstergelerinden varlıkların getirisi,büyüme göstergelerinden satışlardaki değişim ve kârlılık göstergelerinden isekâr marjı sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bunun yanında özellikli sübjektifgöstergelerin de kullanımı mevcuttur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İşletme Finans

THE ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLISHED ARTICLES CONTAINING PERFORMANCE WITH REGARDS TO PERFORMANCE DIMENSION AND INDICATOR IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT J OURNAL

Öz:
In this study, a review of academic studies in terms of performancemeasurement is performed. The purpose of study is to determine whichdimension and indicators academics use for organizational performancemeasurement in research of strategic management discipline. This contentanalysis will also generate a rational source for future research. The contentof this research is published articles about organizational performance inStrategic Management Journal" which is the pioneer journal in strategicmanagement discipline. In this context, 82 research articles were subjectedto content analysis. Results have shown that the most commonly usedindicators are efficiency, profitability and growth. In addition to that; thereturn on assets of efficiency indicators, the change in sales of growthindicators, and the profit margin of profitability indicators are often used.Besides all, there is the usage of specific and subjective indicators.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ANSOFF, H. I., (1987) “The Emerging Paradigm of Strategic Behavior” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 8: 501-515.
  • BARCA, M. ve Hızıroğlu, M., (2009) “2000’li Yıllarda Türkiye’de Stratejik Yönetim Alanının Entelektüel Yapısı”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(1): 113-148,
  • BARCA, M., (2005) “Stratejik Yönetim Düşüncesinin Evrimi: Bilimsel Bir Disiplinin Oluşum Hikayesi”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1): 7-38,
  • BEHN, R., (2003) “Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures” Public Administration Review, September/October, (63)5: 586-606.
  • BESCOS P. L. and Cauvin,E. (2004) “Performance Measurement in French Companies: An Empirical Study”, Studies in Manag ierial and Financial Accounting , Ed. M.J . EPSTEIN and J .F. MANZONI, 14: 185-202.
  • BOURNO, M., Mills, J ., Wilcox, N., Neely, A., ve Platts, K (2000) “Designing, Implementing and Updating Performance Measurement Systems, International J ournal of Op eration&Production Manag ement, 20(7): 754-771.
  • BRUSH, C.G. ve Vanderwerf, P.A. (1992) ‘A Comparison of Methods and Sources For Obtaining Estimates of New Venture Performance’, J ournal of Business Venturing , 7: 157–70.
  • CARTON, R. B. ve Hofer, C. W. (2006) Measuring Org anizational Perf ormance; Metrics f or Entrep reneurship Strateg ic Manag ement Research, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, USA,
  • CHAKRAVARTHY, B.S., (1986) ‘Measuring Strategic Performance’, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 7: 437– 458.
  • CHRISTENSEN, H. K. ve Montgomery, C. A. (1981) “Corporate Economic Performance: Diversification Strategy Versus Market Structure”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 2: 327-343.
  • DESS, G. G. ve Robinson, R. B. (1984) “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 5: 265-273.
  • DRUCKER, P. ve Maciariello, J . A. (2009) Yönetim, Peter Drucker 100. Yıl Kitaplığı, Optimist Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • DRUCKER, P. (1995) Gelecek İçin Yönetim, 1990’lar ve Sonrası, Çev. Fikret Üçcan, 3. Baskı, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • DUMAN, Ş. A., Kalemci, R. A. ve Çakar, M. (2005), “Türkiye’de Stratejik Yönetim Alanının Kapsamını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1): 57- 72.
  • GOOD, C. D. ve Georges, L. (2004) “Social Practices and Corporate Performance”, Studies in Manag ierial and Financial Accounting , Ed. M.J . EPSTEIN and J .F. MANZONI, 14: 75-96.
  • HODGKINSON, C., (2008) Yönetim Felsef esi, Çev. İbrahim Anıl, BinaliDoğan, Beta BasımYayın, İstanbul.
  • KAPLAN, R. S., ve Norton, D. P. (1992) “The Balanced Scorecard— Measures that Drive Performance” Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71– 91.
  • KENNERLEY, M. ve Neely, A. (2003) “Measuring Performance in a Changing Business Environment”, International J ournal of Op eration&Production Manag ement, 23(2): 213-229.
  • LUECKE, R., (2008) Stratej i, Çev. T. PARLAK, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • MURPHY, G.B., Trailer, J .W. ve Hill, R.C. (1996) ‘Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research’, J ournal of Business Research, 36:15–23.
  • NEELY, A., (1999) “The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and What Next?” International J ournal of Op eration&Production Manag ement, 19(2): 205-228.
  • POLANCO, X. (1995) Inf ométrie et ing énierie de la connaissance, in J .‐M. Noyer (Ed.), Les sciences de l'information bibliométrie scientométrie infométrie, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 1995’ dan aktaran ZIEGLER, B. “Methods for Bibliometric Analysis of Research: Renewable Energy Case Study”, Working Pap er CISL# 2009-2010.
  • RAWLEY, T. ve Lipson, M. (1985) Linking Corp orate Return Measures to Stock Prices, St. Charles, IL: HOLT Planning Associates.
  • REJ C, A. ve Slapnicar, S. (2004) “Determinants of Performance Measurement System Design and Corporate Financial Performance”, Studies in Manag erial and Financial Accounting , Ed. M.J . EPSTEIN and J .F. MANZONI, 14: 47-74.
  • ROBINSON, K.C., (1995) ‘Measures Of Entrepreneurial Value Creation: An Investigation Of The Impact Of Strategy And Industry Structure On The Economic Performance Of Independent New Ventures’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
  • VENKATRAMAN, N. ve Ramanujam, V. (1986) ‘Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches’, Academy of Manag ement Review, 11(4): 801–814.
  • ZIEGLER, B. (2009) “Methods for Bibliometric Analysis of Research: Renewable Energy Case Study”, Working Paper CISL# 10, http://web.mit.edu/smadnick/www/wp/2009-10.pdf E. T. 10.01.2014.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliometrics.
  • İÇERİK ANALİZİNE TABİ TUTULAN 82 MAKALE
  • ACQUAAH, M., (2012 “Social Networkıng Relatıonships, Fırm-Specific Managerial Experience And Firm Performance In A Transitıon Economy: A Comparative Analysis Of Family Owned And Nonfamily Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1215–1228.
  • BARNETT, M. L. ve Salomon, R. M. (2012) “Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1304–1320.
  • BARNETT, W. P., Greve, H. R. ve Park, D. Y. (1994) “An Evolutionary Model Of Organizational Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 15: 11-28.
  • BARROSO, A. ve Giarratana, M. S. (2013) “Product Proliferation Strategies and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Product Space Complexity, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 34: 1435–1452.
  • BAUM, J . R. ve Wally, S. (2003) “Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 24: 1107–1129.
  • BETTIS R. A., (1981) “Performance Differences in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms” Strategic Manag ement J ournal, 2: 379-393.
  • BIRLEY, S. ve Westhead, P. (1990) “Growth and Performance Contrasts between Types' Of Small Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 11: 535- 557.
  • BOUMGARDEN, P., Nickerson, J . ve Zenger, T. R. (2012) “Sailing into the Wind: Exploring the Relationships among Ambidexterity, Vacillation, And Organizational Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 587–610.
  • BRUSH, T. H., Dangol, R. ve O’brien, J . P. (2012) “Customer Capabilities, Switching Costs, and Bank Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1499–1515.
  • BUSIJA, E. C. H., O’neill, M. ve Zeithaml, C. P. (1997) “Diversification Strategy, Entry Mode, And Performance: Evidence of Choice and Constraints”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 18(4): 321–327.
  • CAMPBELL B. A., Ganco, M., Franco, A. M., Agarwal, R. (2012) “Who Leaves, Where to, and Why Worry? Employee Mobility, Entrepreneurship and Effects on Source Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 65–87.
  • CAPON, N., Hulbert, J . M., Farley, J . U., ve Martin, L. E. (1988) “Corporate Diversity and Economic Performance: The Impact of Market Specialization”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 9: 61-74.
  • CHAKRAVARTHY, B.S., (1986) “Measuring strategic performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 7: 437–458,
  • CHNG, D. H. M, Rodgers, M. S., Shih, E. ve Song, X.-B. (2012) “When Does Incentive Compensation Motivate Managerial Behaviors? An Experimental Investigation of the Fit between Incentive Compensation, Executive Core Self-Evaluatıon, and Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1343–1362.
  • CHRISTENSEN, H. K. ve Montgomery, C. A. (1981) “Corporate Economic Performance: Diversification Strategy Versus Market Structure”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 2: 327-343.
  • CHUNG, C ve Luo, X. R. (2013) “Leadership Succession and Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy: Successor Origin, Relational Embeddedness, And Legitimacy”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 34: 338–357.
  • CROOK, T. R., Ketchen, D. J ., Combs J . G. ve Todd, S. Y. (2008) “Strategic Resources and Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 29: 1141–1154.
  • DAVIES, H. ve Walters, P. (2004) “Emergent Patterns of Strategy, Environment and Performance in a Transition Economy”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 25: 347–364.
  • DESS, G. G., (1987) “Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in A Fragmented Industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 8: 259-277.
  • DESS, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. ve Covin, J . G. (1997) “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 18: 677–695.
  • DESS, G. G. ve Robinson, R. B. (1984) “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 5: 265-273.
  • DEZS, C. L. ve Ross, D. G. (2012) “Does Female Representation In Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1072–1089.
  • ECHOLS, A. ve Tsai, W. (2005) “Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of Network Embeddedness”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 26: 219–238.
  • EBBEN, J . J . ve Johnson, A. C. (2005) “Efficiency, Flexibility, Or Both? Evidence Linking Strategy To Performance In Small Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 26: 1249–1259.
  • EISENMANN, T. R., (2006) “Companies’ Growth Strategies: Determinants of Investment Intensity and Long-Term Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 27: 1183–1204.
  • FEESER, H. R. ve Willard, G. E. (1990) “Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High And Low Growth High Tech Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 11: 87-98.
  • GERINGER, J . M., Beamish, P. W. ve Dacosta, R. C. (1989) “Diversification Strategy and Internationalization: Implications for Mne Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 10: 109-119.
  • GRANT, R. M, (1988) “Dominant Logic, Relatedness and the Link between Diversity and Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 9: 639-642.
  • GREVE, H. R., (2010) “Positional Rigidity: Low Performance and Resource Acquisition in Large and Small Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 32: 103–114.
  • GRINYER, P. H., Mckiernan P. ve Ardekani, M. Y. (1988) “Market, Organizational And Managerial Correlates Of Economic Performance In The U.K. Electrical Engineering industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 9:297-318.
  • GOLDEN, B. R., (1992) “Sbu Strategy and Performance: The Moderatıng Effects of the Corporate-Sbu Relationship”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 13:145-158.
  • HABIB, M. M. ve Victor, B. (1991) “Strategy, Structure, and Performance of U.S. Manufacturing and Service MNCs: A Comparative Analysis” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 12: 589-606,
  • HANSEN, G. S. ve Wernerfelt, B., (1989) “Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 10: 399-411.
  • HENDERSON, R. ve Mitchell, W. (1997) “The Interactions of Organizational and Competitive Influences on Strategy and Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 18: 5–14.
  • HILL, C. W.L. ve Snell, S. A. (1988) “External Control, Corporate Strategy, and Firm Performance in Research-intensive Industries”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 9: 577-590.
  • HITT, M. A. ve Ireland, R. D. (1985) “Corporate Distinctive Competence, Strategy, Industry and Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 6:273-293.
  • HOPKINS W. E. ve Hopkins, S. A. (1997) “Strategic Planning–Financial Performance Relationships in Banks: A Causal Examination”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 18: 635–652.
  • HOROVITZ, J . H. ve Thietart, R. A. (1982) “Strategy, Management Design and Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 3: 67-76.
  • JIANG, R. J ., Tao, Q. T. ve Santoro, M. D. (2010) “Alliance Portfolio Diversity And Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 31: 1136–1144.
  • J OHNSON, G. ve Thomas, H. (1987) “The Industry Context of Strategy, Structure and Performance: The U.K. Brewing Industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 8:343-361.
  • KATSIKEAS, C. S., Samiee, S. ve Theodosiou, M. (2006) “Strategy Fit and Performance Consequences of International Marketing Standardization”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 27: 867–890,
  • KIM, W. C. Hwang, P. ve Burgers, W. P. (1989) “Global Diversification Strategy And Corporate Profit Performance” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 10: 45-57.
  • KIM, H, R. Hoskisson, E. ve Wan, W. P. (2004) “Power Dependence, Diversification Strategy, And Performance In Keiretsu Member Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 25: 613–636.
  • KUNC, M. H. ve Morecroft, J . D. W. (2010) “Managerial Decision Making And Firm Performance Under A Resource-Based Paradigm”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 31: 1164–1182,
  • LAHIRI, N. ve Narayanan, S. (2013) “Vertical Integration, Innovation, And Alliance Portfolio Size: Implications for Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 34: 1042–1064.
  • LENZ, R.T (1980) “Environment, Strategy, Organization Structure and Performance: Patterns in One Industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 1: 209-226,
  • LENZ, R.T., (1981) “'Determinants' of Organizational Performance: an Interdisciplinary Review”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 2: 131-154,
  • LEWIS, P. ve Thomas, H. (1990) “The Linkage between Strategy, Strategic Groups, and Performance in the U.K. Retail Grocery Industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 11: 385-397.
  • LI, S. X. ve Greenwood, R. (2004) “The Effect of Within-Industry Diversification on Firm Performance: Synergy Creation, Multi- Market Contact and Market Structuration”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 25: 1131–1153.
  • LUO, Y., (2002) “Product Diversification in International Joint Ventures: Performance Implications in an Emerging Market”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 23: 1–20.
  • MACKEY, A., (2008) “Research Notes and Commentaries the Effect of Ceos on Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 29: 1357– 1367.
  • MARKIDES, C. C. ve Williamson, P. J . (1994) “Related Diversification, Core Competences And Corporate Performance”, Strategic Manag ement J ournal, 15: 149-165.
  • MARLIN, D., Lamont, B. T. ve Hoffman, J . J . (1994) “Choice Situation, Strategy, And Performance: A Reexamination”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 15: 229-239.
  • MEJIA, L. R. G., (1992) “Structure ve Process Of Diversification, Compensation Strategy, And Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 13: 381-397.
  • MILLER, D. J ., (2004) “Firms’ Technological Resources and the Performance Effects of Diversification: A Longitudinal Study”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 25: 1097–1119.
  • MILLER, D. J ., (2006) “Technological Diversity, Related Diversification, and Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 27: 601–619.
  • MOLITERNO, T. P. ve Wiersema, M. F. (2007) “Firm Performance, Rent Appropriation, And the Strategic Resource Divestment Capability”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 28: 1065–1087,
  • MOLLICK, E., (2012) “People and Process, Suits and Innovators: The Role of Individuals in Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 33: 1001–1015.
  • NEWBERT, S. L. (2008) “Value, Rareness, Competitive Advantage, and Performance: A Conceptual-Level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 29: 745–768.
  • NDOFOR, H. A., Sirmon, D. G. ve He, X. (2011) “Firm Resources, Competitive Actions and Performance: Investigating a Mediated Model with Evidence from the In-Vitro Diagnostics Industry”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 32: 640–657,
  • NGUYEN, T. H., Seror, A. ve Devinney, T. M. (1990) “Diversification Strategy And Performance In Canadian Manufacturing Firms”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 11: 411-418.
  • NIELSEN B. B ve Nielsen, S. (2013) “Top Management Team Nationalıty Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 34: 373–382.
  • LIN, Z. (JOHN), Yang, H. ve Arya, B. (2009) “Alliance Partners and Firm Performance: Resource Complementarity and Status Association”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 30: 921–940.
  • PEARCE, J . A., Robbins, D. K. ve Robinson, R. B., (1987) “The Impact Of Grand Strategy And Planning Formality On Financial Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 8: 125-134,
  • PRAHALAD, C. K. ve Bettis, R. A. (1986) “The Dominant Logic: a New Linkage between Diversity and Performance”, Strategic Manag ement J ournal, 7, 485-501.
  • REGER R. K., Duhaime, I. M. ve Stimpert, J . L. (1992) “Deregulation, Strategic Choice, Risk And Financial Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 13: 189-204.
  • ROTHAERMEL, F. T., Hitt, M. A. ve Jobe, L. A. (2006) “Balancing Vertical Integration and Strategic Outsourcing: Effects on Product Portfolio, Product Success, And Firm Performance” Strategic Manag ement J ournal, 27: 1033–1056.
  • SHANER, J . ve Maznevski, M. (2011) “The Relationship between Networks, Institutional Development, And Performance in Foreign Investments”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 32: 556–568.
  • SIEGEL, D. S. ve Simons, K. L. (2010) “Assessing the Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Firm Performance, Plant Productivity, And Workers: New Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 31: 903–916.
  • QUIGLEY, T. J ., ve Hambrick, D. C. (2012) “When the Former CEO Stays on as Board Chair: Effects on Successor Discretion, Strategic Change, And Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal 33: 834–859.
  • SINGH, H. ve Montgomery, C. A. (1987) “Corporate Acquisition Strategies And Economic Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 8: 377-386.
  • SLATER, S. F. ve Olson, E. M. (2000) “Strategy Type and Performance: The Influence of Sales Force Management”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 21: 813–829.
  • SMITH, C. G. A. ve Cooper, C. (1988) “Established Companies Diversifying into Young Industries: A Comparison of Firms with Different Levels of Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 9: 111- 121.
  • SORENSON, O., Mcevily, S. C. Ren, R. ve Roy, R. (2006) “Niche Width Revisited: Organizational Scope, Behavior and Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, N. 27: 915–936.
  • UOTILA, J ., Maula, M., Keil, T. ve Zahra, S. A. (2009) “Exploration, Exploitation, And Financial Performance: Analysis of S&P 500 Corporations”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 30: 221–231.
  • WHITE, R. E., (1986) “Generic Business Strategies, Organizational Context and Performance: An Empirical Investigation”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 7: 217-231.
  • WIKLUND, J ve Shepherd, D. (2003) “Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, And The Performance Of Small And Medium-Sized Businesses”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 24: 1307– 1314.
  • WOOLDRIDGE, B. ve Floyd, S. W. (1990) “The Strategy Process, Middle Management Involvement, And Organizational Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 11: 231-241.
  • ZAHAVI, T ve Lavie, D. (2013) “Intra-Industry Diversification And Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 34: 978–998
  • ZAHRA, S. A. ve Covin, J . G. (1993) “Business Strategy, Technology Policy And Firm Performance” Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 14: 451- 478.
  • ZHOU, K. Z., Li, Zhou, J . J . N. ve Su, C. (2008) “Market Orientation, Job Satisfaction, Product Quality, And Firm Performance: Evidence from China”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 29: 985–1000.
  • ZOTT, C. ve Amit, R. (2008) “The Fit between Product Market Strategy and Business Model: Implications for Firm Performance”, Strateg ic Manag ement J ournal, 29: 1–26.
APA alparslan a, Çarıkçı İ (2014). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. , 64 - 85.
Chicago alparslan ali murat,Çarıkçı İlker Hüseyin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. (2014): 64 - 85.
MLA alparslan ali murat,Çarıkçı İlker Hüseyin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. , 2014, ss.64 - 85.
AMA alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. . 2014; 64 - 85.
Vancouver alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. . 2014; 64 - 85.
IEEE alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ "STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ." , ss.64 - 85, 2014.
ISNAD alparslan, ali murat - Çarıkçı, İlker Hüseyin. "STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ". (2014), 64-85.
APA alparslan a, Çarıkçı İ (2014). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 14(29), 64 - 85.
Chicago alparslan ali murat,Çarıkçı İlker Hüseyin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 14, no.29 (2014): 64 - 85.
MLA alparslan ali murat,Çarıkçı İlker Hüseyin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol.14, no.29, 2014, ss.64 - 85.
AMA alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2014; 14(29): 64 - 85.
Vancouver alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2014; 14(29): 64 - 85.
IEEE alparslan a,Çarıkçı İ "STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ." Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 14, ss.64 - 85, 2014.
ISNAD alparslan, ali murat - Çarıkçı, İlker Hüseyin. "STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL'DA YAYIMLANMIŞ PERFORMANS İÇERİKLİ MAKALELERİN, PERFORMANS BOYUTLARI VE ÖLÇÜTLERİ AÇISINDAN ANALİZİ". Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi 14/29 (2014), 64-85.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 21:38

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları