Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Mehmet ÇINAR, (Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Ekonometri Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Hülya AKAY KANALCI, (Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Nejla ADANUR AKLAN (Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)
Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi
8 3
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 593 Sayfa Aralığı: 7 - 20 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Öz:
Çalışmanın temel amacı, kurumsal kaliteyi yansıtan değişkenler (regülasyon ka- litesi, hukukun üstünlüğü, rüşvetin kontrolü, politik istikrar, hükümetin etkinliği,hesap verilebilirlik) ile finansal istikrarsızlık arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını or- taya koymaktır. Bu çerçevede finansal istikrarı temin etme sürecinde makroeko- nomik değişkenler dışında ülkelerin yönetimsel etkinlik ve kurumsal kalitelerininrolü tartışmaya açılmış olacaktır. Çalışmada, 2002-2012 dönemi verileri kullanı- larak regresyon modeli tahmin edilmiştir. Ampirik sonuçlar genel olarak değer- lendirildiğinde, politik istikrar ve hesap verilebilirlik değişkenleri istatistiksel olarakanlamlı bulunmamıştır. Buna karşın, regülasyon kalitesi, hukukun üstünlüğü, rüş- vetin kontrolü ve hükümetin etkinliği değişkenleri ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlıbulunmuştur. Diğer bir ifadeyle, ilgili dönemde Türkiyede politik istikrar ve hesapverilebilirlik dışındaki kurumsal kalite değişkenlerinin finansal istikrarsızlığı azalt- tığını göstermektedir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre, finansal istikrarsızlık üzerindeetkili olan en önemli değişken, regülasyon kalitesidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş İletişim İşletme Halkla İlişkiler İktisat İşletme Finans

Financial (in)Stability and Institutional Quality Relationship: Evidence from Turkey

Öz:
The main purpose of the study, is to determine whether a relationship betweenwith variables reflecting institutional quality (regulation quality, rule of law, corrup- tion control, political stability, government effectiveness, voice and accountabi- lity) and financial instability. In this context, to ensure financial stability in exceptfor the macroeconomic variables, the role of institutional quality and the administ- rative activities of the country will be opened to discussion. In the study, regressi- on model was estimated using 2002-2012 period data. The empirical results aregenerally evaluated, political stability and accountability variables were not sta- tistically significant. However, the quality of regulation, rule of law, control of cor- ruption and government effectiveness variables were statistically significant. Inother words, except political stability and accountability, the variables of instituti- onal quality shows that it reduces to financial instability in relevant period. Accor- ding to the results, the most important variable that is effective on financial insta- bility is the regulation quality.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş İletişim İşletme Halkla İlişkiler İktisat İşletme Finans
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ACEMOGLU, D., S. JOHNSON, J. ROBINSON, Y. THAICHA- ROEN; (2003) “Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symp- toms: Volatility, Crises and Growth”, Journal of Monetary Eco- nomics, 50(1), pp. 49-123.
  • ACEMOGLU, D. and J. ROBINSON; (2010) “The Role of Insti- tutions in Growth and Development”, Review of Economics and Institutions, 1(2), pp. 1-33.
  • AGÉNOR, P-R and A. L. P A. SILVA; (2013), “Inflation Target- ing and Financial Stability: A Perspective from the Developing”, World Banco Central do Brasil Working Papers, No. 324.
  • AIKINS, S. K.; (2009), “Global Financial Crisis and Government Intervention: A Case for Effective Regulatory Governance”, In- ternational Public Management Review, 10(2), pp. 23-43.
  • ALFARO, L., Ş. KALEMLI-OZCAN, and V. VOLOSOVYCH; (2008), “Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Coun- tries? An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), pp. 347-368.
  • ALLEN, W. and G. WOOD; (2006), “Defining and Achieving Financial Stability”, Journal of Financial Stability, 2(2), pp. 152–72.
  • ALESINA, A. and G-M. ANGELETOS; (2005), “Corruption, In- equality, and Fairness”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, pp. 1227-1244.
  • ANGELINI, P., S. NICOLETTI-ALTIMARI and I. VISCO; (2012), “Macroprudential, Microprudential and Monetary Policies: Con- flicts, Complementarities and Trade-offs”, Questioni di Econo- mia e Finanza (Occasional papers), No. 140.
  • ANGELINI, P., S. NERI and F. PANETTA; (2011), “Monetary and Macroprudential Policies” Banca d'Italia Working Paper, No. 801. BEAN, C., M. PAUSTIAN, A. PENALVER and T. TAYLOR; (2010), “Monetary Policy after the Fall”, The Federal Re- serve Bank of Kansas City, Annual Conference, Jackson Hole,Wyoming. BEAU, D., L. CLERC, and B. MOJON; (2012), “Macro-Pruden- tial Policy and the Conduct of Monetary Policy”, Banque de France Working Papers, No. 390.
  • BILGIN, C.; (2007), “Finansal İstikrarsızlık Sorunu ve İktisat Politikası Bağlamında Türkiye”, Çukurova University Unpub- lished Ph. D. Thesis, Adana.
  • BOLLERSLEV, T.; (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Con- ditional Heteroscedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp. 307-327.
  • BORIO, C. and P. LOWE; (2002), “Asset Prices, Financial and Monetary Stability: Exploring the Nexus”, BIS Working Papers, No. 114.
  • BORIO, C. and M. DREHMANN; (2009), “Towards an Opera- tional Framework for Financial Stability: ‘Fuzzy’ Measurement and Its Consequences”, BIS Working Paper, No. 284.
  • BOYD, J. H., G. DE NICOLO, and E. LOUKOIANOVA; (2009), “Banking Crises and Crisis Dating: Theory and Evidence”, IMF Working Paper, No. 141.
  • BRUNNERMEIER, M., A. CROCKETT, C. GOODHART, A. D. PERSAUD, and H. SHIN, (2009), “The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation”, Geneva Reports on the World Econ- omy, No. 11.
  • BUCHANAN, J. and G. TULLOCK; (1962), “The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy”, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. CAO, C. Q. and R. S. TSAY; (1992), “Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Stock Volatilities”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, pp. 165-185.
  • CECCHETT, S. G. and M. KOHLER; (2012), “When Capital Adequacy and Interest Rate Policy are Substitutes (and When They are not)”, BIS Working Papers, No. 379.
  • CIHÁK, M.; (2007), “Systemic Loss: A Measure of Financial Stability”, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 57(1-2), pp. 5-26.
  • CIHÁK, M. and K. SCHAECK; (2010), “How Well Do Aggregate Prudential Ratios Identify Banking System Problems?”, Journal of Financial Stability, 6(3), pp. 130-144.
  • CROCKETT, A.; (2000), “Marrying the Micro and Macropruden- tial Dimensions of Financial Stability”, BIS Speeches. DAS, U. S., M. QUINTYN, and K. CHENARD; (2004), “Does Regulatory Governance Matter for Financial System Stability? An Empirical Analysis”, IMF Working Paper, No. 89.
  • DATTELS, P., R. MCCAUGHRIN, K. MIYAJIMA, and J. PUIG; (2010), “Can You Map Global Financial Stability?”, IMF Work- ing Paper, No. 145.
  • ENGLE, R. F.; (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heterosce- dasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom In- flation”, Econometrica, 50, pp. 987-1007. European Central Bank (2005), “Measurement Challenges in Assessing Financial Stability”, Financial Stability Review, pp. 131-141.
  • GADANECZ, B. and K. JAYARAM; (2009), “Measures of Fi- nancial Stability – A Review”, IFC Bulletin, No. 31.
  • HALDANE, A.; (2004), “Defining Monetary and Financial Stabil- ity”, Unpublished, London, Bank of England.
  • HOLMBERG, S., B. ROTHSTEIN, and N. NASIRITOUSI; (2008), “Quality of Government: What You Get”, Gothenburg: Quality of Government Institute Working Paper, No. 21. HANSON, S. G., A. K. KASHYAP, and J. C. STEIN; (2011), “A Macroprudential Approach to Financial Regulation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), pp. 3–28. IMF, (2003), “Growth and Institutions”, IMF World Economic Outlook, April, .pp. 95–128. IMF, (2005), “The IMF’s Approach to Promoting Good Gover- nance and Combating Corruption: A Guide”. Available at: www. imf.org/external/np/gov/guide/eng/index.htm. IMF, (2011), “Macroprudential Policy: What Instruments and How to Use them”, IMF Working Papers, No. 238.
  • KASHYAP, A. K, R. G. RAJAN and J. C. STEIN; (2008), “Re- thinking Capital Regulation”, (in) Maintaining Stability in a Changing Financial System, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp. 431–71.
  • KAUFMANN, D., A. KRAAY, and M. MASSIMO; (2011), “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues”, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), pp. 220-246.
  • KHEMIRI S. and S. JAOUADI; (2013), “Financial Instability in Tunisia (April 2012)”, Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2(1), pp. 44-49. LEE, C, K. and D. STRANG; (2006), “The International Dif- fusion of Public Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-driven Learning”, International Organization, 60, pp. 883-909.
  • MINOGUE, M. and L. CARINO; (2006), Requlatory Gover- nance in Developing Countries, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. MISHKIN, F. S.; (1999), “Global Financial Instability: Frame- work, Events, Issues”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), pp. 3-20.
  • OECD, (2011), Regulatory Policy and Governance: Support- ing Economic Growth and Serving the Public Interest, OECD Publishing.
  • PACEK, A. C. and B. RADCLIFF; (2008), “Welfare Policy and Subjective Well-being Across Nations: An individual-level As- sessment”, Social Indicators Research, 89(1), pp. 179-191.
  • PADOA-SCHIOPPA, T.; (2003), “Central Banks and Financial Stability: Exploring the Land in Between”, in The Transmission of the European Financial System, V Gaspar, P Hartmann and O Sleijpen (eds), European Central Bank, Frankfurt.
  • PELTZMAN, S.; (1976), “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation” in Chicago Studies in Political Economy (ed) Sti- gler G, The University of Chigago Press, pp. 234-267.
  • POSNER, R. (1974), “Theories of Economic Regulation”, NBER Working Papers, No. 41. ROTHSTEIN, B.; (2011), The Quality of Government: Corrup- tion, Social Trust and Inequality in a Comparative Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ROSE-ACKERMAN, S.; (2008), “Corruption and Government”, International Peacekeeping, 15(3), pp.328–343.
  • SCHINASI, G.; (2004), “Defining Financial Stability”, IMF Work- ing Paper, No. 187.
  • STIGLER, G.; (1971), “The Theory of Economic Regulation” , in Chicago Studies in Political Economy (ed) . Stigler G, The Uni of Chigago Press, pp. 209-234. United Nations Development Programme (2011), Governance Principles, Institutional Capacity and Quality, pp. 268-293. in Towards Human Resilience: Sustaining MDG Progress in an Age of Economic Uncertainty. Worldwide Governance Indicators (2012), Available at: http:// data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indi- cators
APA ÇINAR M, AKAY KANALCI H, ADANUR AKLAN N (2014). Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. , 7 - 20.
Chicago ÇINAR Mehmet,AKAY KANALCI Hülya,ADANUR AKLAN Nejla Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. (2014): 7 - 20.
MLA ÇINAR Mehmet,AKAY KANALCI Hülya,ADANUR AKLAN Nejla Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. , 2014, ss.7 - 20.
AMA ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. . 2014; 7 - 20.
Vancouver ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. . 2014; 7 - 20.
IEEE ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N "Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği." , ss.7 - 20, 2014.
ISNAD ÇINAR, Mehmet vd. "Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği". (2014), 7-20.
APA ÇINAR M, AKAY KANALCI H, ADANUR AKLAN N (2014). Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 51(593), 7 - 20.
Chicago ÇINAR Mehmet,AKAY KANALCI Hülya,ADANUR AKLAN Nejla Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi 51, no.593 (2014): 7 - 20.
MLA ÇINAR Mehmet,AKAY KANALCI Hülya,ADANUR AKLAN Nejla Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, vol.51, no.593, 2014, ss.7 - 20.
AMA ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi. 2014; 51(593): 7 - 20.
Vancouver ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi. 2014; 51(593): 7 - 20.
IEEE ÇINAR M,AKAY KANALCI H,ADANUR AKLAN N "Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği." Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 51, ss.7 - 20, 2014.
ISNAD ÇINAR, Mehmet vd. "Finansal İstikrar(sızlık) ve Kurumsal Kalite İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği". Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi 51/593 (2014), 7-20.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 21:42

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları