HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ

İlke GÖÇMEN (Ankara Üniversitesi, Hukuk Fakültesi, Avrupa Birliği Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
4 0
Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 167 - 226 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Öz:
Avrupa Birliği ( AB ), hizmetler iç pazarı yönünden, iş kurma ve hizmet sunumu serbestîsini desteklemek üzere ve bunları dayanak alarak, bir Hizmetler Direktifi ( HD ) çıkarmıştır. HD, klasik iç pazar uyumlaştırma tasarruflarından oldukça farklı olduğundan; HDnin iş kurma ve hizmet sunma serbestîsi ile ilişkisini tam olarak kavrayabilmek, karmaşık bir iştir; ama kaçınılmazdır. Zira bu ilişki, uygulanacak hukuki rejimdeki farklılıklar nedeniyle, mühim sonuçlar ihtiva etmektedir. İşte bu çalışma, HD ile iş kurma ve hizmet sunumu serbestîsi arasındaki ilişkiyi, bir yandan, hangisinin ne zaman uygulanabilir olduğu; diğer yandan birinin diğerine nispetle ne tür katma değerler içerdiği yönleriyle ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, herhangi bir somut olay yönünden, bu ilişkiye yönelik ne tür bir yaklaşım takip edilebileceği, tespit edilecekse de; bu ilişki, muhtemelen epey yargılama konusu yapılacak olup; ancak AB Adalet Divanının gelecekteki kararları ile bütünüyle aydınlatılabilecektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

THE RELATIONSHİP OF THE SERVICES DIRECTIVE WITH THE FREEDOM OF ESTABLISHMENT AND TO PROVIDE SERVICES

Öz:
As regards internal market for services, European Union ( EU ) adopted a Services Directive ( SD ) in order to promote the freedom of establishment and to provide services and relying on them. Since SD is quite different from ordinary internal market harmonization measures, to realize exactly the relationship between the SD and freedom of establishment and to provide services is complicated task; but it is inevitable; because this relationship involves significant consequences, since there are differences in the applicable legal regimes. This article tries to reveal the relationship between the SD and freedom of establishment and to provide services, on the one hand, as regards when is which one of them is applicable, on the other hand, as regards which one of them has added-value in relation to the other one. Consequently, there will be a suggestion on how to approach a concrete case at hand regarding this relation; nonetheless, this relationship will probably be a subject of lots of litigation and can only be completely illuminated with the future decisions of Court of Justice of the EU.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Kaynakça
  • Kitaplar
  • Barnard, Catherine. The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms, 4th ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  • Chalmers, Damian, Gareth Davies & Giorgio Monti. European Union Law, 2d ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
  • Craig, Paul & Grainne De Búrca. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011.
  • Dashwood, Alan et al. Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union Law, 6th ed, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2011.
  • Edward, David & Robert Lane. Edward and Lane on European Union Law, Student ed, Edward Elgar, Chelthenham, 2013.
  • Göçmen, İlke. Avrupa Birliği’nde İç Pazardaki Serbest Dolaşımlar ve Birlik Vatandaşlığının Etkileşimi, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara, 2011.
  • Hatzopoulos, Vassilis. Regulating Services in the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  • Kaczorowska, Alina. European Union Law, 3d ed, Routledge, London, 2013.
  • Kapteyn, P J G et al. The Law of the European Union and the European Communities, Kluwer Law International, Alphen Aan Den Rijn, 2008.
  • Stelkens, Ulrich, Wolfgang Weiß & Michael Mirschberger, eds. The Implementation of the EU Services Directive - Transposition, Problems and Strategies, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2012.
  • Wiberg, Maria. The EU Services Directive: Law or Simply Policy?, T.M.C. Asser Press, New York, 2014.
  • Woods, Lorna & Philippa Watson. Steiner & Woods EU Law, 12th ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.
  • Makaleler & Kitap Bölümleri
  • Barnard, Catherine. “Unravelling the Services Directive”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt: 45, Sayı: 2, 2008.
  • Chang, Michele, Dominik Hanf & Jacques Pelkmans. “The Services Directive: Trojan Horse or White Knight?”, Journal of European Integration, Cilt: 32, Sayı: 1, 2010.
  • Davies, Gareth. “The Services Directive: Extending the Country of Origin Principle and Reforming Public Administration”, European Law Review, Cilt: 32, Sayı: 2, 2007.
  • Delimatsis, Panagiotis. “The EU Services Directive and the mandate for the creation of professional codes of conduct”, Ioannis Lianos & Okeoghene Odudu, eds, Regulating Trade in Services in the EU and the WTO: Trust, Distrust and Economic Integration, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012.
  • Enchelmaier, Stefan. “Always at Your Service (Within Limits): The ECJ’s Case Law on Article 56 TFEU (2006– 11)”, European Law Review, Cilt: 36, Sayı: 5, 2011.
  • Göçmen, İlke. “İç Pazar”, Belgin Akçay & İlke Göçmen, eds, Avrupa Birliği: Tarihçe, Teoriler, Kurumlar ve Politikalar, 2d ed,Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2014.
  • Gronden, Johan van de & Henri de Waele. “All’s Well That Bends Well? The Constitutional Dimension to the Services Directive”, European Constitutional Law Review, Cilt: 6, Sayı: 3, 2010.
  • Hatje, Armin. “Services Directive - A Legal Analysis”, Fritz Breuss, Gerhard Fink & Stefan Griller, eds, Services Liberalisation in the Internal Market, Springer, Vienna, 2008.
  • Hatzopoulos, Vasilis. “Assessing the Services Directive (2006/123/EC)”, Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Cilt: 10, 2007.
  • Hatzopoulos, Vasilis & Thien Uyen Do. “The Case Law of the ECJ concerning the Free Provision of Servicess: 2000-2005”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt: 43, Sayı: 4, 2006.
  • Hatzopoulos, Vassilis. “Recent Developments of the Case Law of the ECJ in the Field of Services”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt: 37, Sayı: 1, 2000.
  • Hatzopoulos, Vassilis. “The Court’s Approach to Services (2006- 2012): From Case Law to Case Load?”, Common Market Law Review, Cilt: 50, Sayı: 2, 2013.
  • Jarass, Hans D. “A Unified Approach to the Fundamental Freedoms”, Mads Andenas & Wulf-Henning Roth, eds, Services and Free Movement in EU Law, Oxford University Press, United States of America, 2004.
  • Maydell, Niklas. “The Services Directive and Existing Community Law”, Fritz Breuss, Gerhard Fink & Stefan Griller, eds, Services Liberalisation in the Internal Market, Springer, Vienna, 2008.
  • Diğer Çalışmalar
  • Barnard, Catherine. Employment Rights, Free Movement under the EC Treaty and the Services Directive (2008).
  • Davies, Gareth. Services, Citizenship and the Country of Origin Principle (2007).
  • European Commission. Handbook on Implementation of the Services Directive (2007).
  • European Commission. The Role of European Codes of Conduct (2007).
  • Schlachter, Monika & Phillip Fischinger. From Bolkenstein to the Services Directive - and Further (2009). Weatherill, Stephen. Promoting the Consumer Interest in an Integrated Services Market (2007).
  • Witte, Bruno de. Setting the Scene: How did Services get to Bolkestein and Why? (2007).
  • Mahkeme Kararları Case 44/72 (Court of Justice) Pieter Marsman v M. Rosskamp [1972] ECR 1243.
  • Case 2/74 (Court of Justice) Jean Reyners v Belgian State [1974] ECR 631.
  • Case 33/74 (Court of Justice) Johannes Henricus Maria van Binsbergen v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Metaalnijverheid [1974] ECR 1299.
  • Case 36/74 (Court of Justice) B.N.O. Walrave and L.J.N. Koch v Association Union cycliste internationale, Koninklijke Nederlandsche Wielren Unie and Federación Española Ciclismo [1974] ECR 1405.
  • Case 59/82 (Court of Justice) Schutzverband gegen Unwesen in der Wirtschaft v Weinvertriebs-GmbH [1983] ECR 1217.
  • Joined cases 286/82 and 26/83 (Court of Justice) Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro [1984] ECR 377.
  • Case 205/84 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany [1986] ECR 3755.
  • Case C-113/89. (Court of Justice) Rush Portuguesa Lda v Office national d’immigration [1990] ECR I-1417.
  • Joined Cases C-54/88, C-91/88 and C-14/89 (Court of Justice) Criminal proceedings against Eleonora Nino and others [1990] ECR I-3537.
  • Case C-288/89 (Court of Justice) Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda and others v Commissariaat voor de Media [1991] ECR I- 4007.
  • Case C-340/89 (Court of Justice) Vlassopoulou v Ministerium fuer Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Wuerttemberg [1991] ECR I-2357.
  • Case C-55/94 (Court of Justice) Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano [1995] ECR I-4165.
  • Case C-237/94 (Court of Justice) John O’Flynn v Adjudication Officer [1996] ECR I-2617.
  • Case C-97/98 (Court of Justice) Peter Jägerskiöld v Torolf Gustafsson [1999] ECR I-7319.
  • Case C-224/97 (Court of Justice) Erich Ciola v Land Vorarlberg [1999] ECR I-2517.
  • Case C-255/97 (Court of Justice) Pfeiffer Großhandel GmbH v Löwa Warenhandel GmbH [1999] ECR I-2835.
  • Case C-423/98 (Court of Justice) Alfredo Albore [2000] ECR I-5965. Case C-3/99 (Court of Justice) Cidrerie Ruwet SA v Cidre Stassen SA and HP Bulmer Ltd [2000] ECR I-8749.
  • Case C-281/98 (Court of Justice) Roman Angonese v Cassa di Risparmio di Bolzano SpA [2000] ECR I-4139.
  • Case C-443/98 (Court of Justice) Unilever Italia SpA v Central Food SpA [2000] ECR I-7535.
  • Case C-309/99 (Court of Justice) J. C. J. Wouters, J. W. Savelbergh and Price Waterhouse Belastingadviseurs BV v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten [2002] ECR I-1577.
  • Case C-6/01 (Court of Justice) Associação Nacional de Operadores de Máquinas Recreativas (Anomar) and Others v Estado português [2003] ECR I-8621.
  • Case C-445/03 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg [2004] ECR I-10191.
  • Joined cases C-397/01 to C-403/01 (Court of Justice) Bernhard Pfeiffer (C-397/01), Wilhelm Roith (C-398/01), Albert Süß (C-399/01), Michael Winter (C- 400/01), Klaus Nestvogel (C-401/01), Roswitha Zeller (C-402/01) and Matthias Döbele (C- 403/01) v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV [2004] ECR I-8835.
  • Case C-496/01 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v French Republic [2004] ECR I- 2351.
  • Case C-512/03 (Court of Justice) J. E. J. Blanckaert v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst / Particulieren / Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen [2005] ECR I-7685.
  • Case C-464/02 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark [2005] ECR I-7929.
  • Case C-451/03 (Court of Justice) Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti Srl v Giuseppe Calafiori [2006] ECR I-2941.
  • Case C-346/04 (Court of Justice) Robert Hans Conijn v Finanzamt Hamburg-Nord [2006] ECR I-6137.
  • Case C-290/04 (Court of Justice) FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel [2006] ECR I-9461.
  • Case C-507/03 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Ireland [2007] ECR I-9777.
  • Joined Cases C-463/04 and C-464/04 (Court of Justice) Federconsumatori, Adiconsum, ADOC, Ercole Pietro Zucca (C-463/04) and Associazione Azionariato Diffuso dell’AEM SpA, Filippo Cuccia, Giacomo Fragapane, Pietro Angelo Puggioni, Annamaria Sanchirico, Sandro Sartorio (C-464/04) v Comune di Milano [2007] ECR I-10419.
  • Case C-231/05 (Court of Justice) Oy AA [2007] ECR I-6373.
  • Case C-438/05 (Court of Justice) International Transport Workers’ Federation and Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti [2007] ECR I-10779.
  • Case C-347/06 (Court of Justice) ASM Brescia SpA v Comune di Rodengo Saiano [2008] ECR I-5641.
  • Case C-319/06 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg [2008] ECR I-4323.
  • Case C-110/05 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic [2009] ECR I- 519.
  • Case C-219/08 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium [2009] ECR I-9213.
  • Case C-564/07 (Court of Justice) Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria [2009] ECR I-100.
  • Case C-384/08 (Court of Justice) Attanasio Group Srl v Comune di Carbognano [2010] ECR I-2055.
  • Case C-458/08 (Court of Justice) European Commission v Portuguese Republic [2010] ECR I-11599.
  • Case C-268/99 (Court of Justice) Aldona Malgorzata Jany and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie [2011] ECR I- 8615.
  • Case C-119/09 (Court of Justice) Société fiduciaire nationale d’expertise comptable v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Fonction publique [2011] ECR I-2551.
  • Case C-470/11 (Court of Justice) SIA Garkalns v Rīgas dome [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:505.
  • Case C-577/10 (Court of Justice) European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:814.
  • Joined cases C-357/10 to C-359/10 (Court of Justice) Duomo Gpa Srl (C-357/10), Gestione Servizi Pubblici Srl (C- 358/10) and Irtel Srl (C-359/10) v Comune di Baranzate (C-357/10 and C-358/10) and Comune di Venegono Inferiore (C-359/10) [2012].
  • Joined cases C-197/11 and C-203/11 (Court of Justice) Eric Libert and Others v Gouvernement flamand (C-197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV and Others v Vlaamse Regering (C-203/11) [2013].
  • Case C-57/12 (Court of Justice) Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune de Bruxelles-Capitale [2013].
  • Case C-539/11 (Court of Justice) Ottica New Line di Accardi Vincenzo v Comune di Campobello di Mazara [2013]. Joined cases C-162/12 and C-163/12 (Court of Justice) Airport Shuttle Express scarl and Giovanni Panarisi (C-162/12) and Società Cooperativa Autonoleggio Piccola arl and Gianpaolo Vivani (C-163/12) v Comune di Grottaferrata [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:74.
  • Case C-351/12 (Court of Justice) OSA - Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s. [2014].
  • Case C-600/13 (Court of Justice) Intelcom Service Ltd v Vincenzo Mario Marvulli [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:609.
  • Case C-270/13 (Court of Justice) Iraklis Haralambidis v Calogero Casilli [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2185.
  • Case C-525/12 (Court of Justice) European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2202.
  • Case C-315/13 (Court of Justice) Criminal proceedings against Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2408.
APA göçmen i (2015). HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. , 167 - 226.
Chicago göçmen ilke HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. (2015): 167 - 226.
MLA göçmen ilke HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. , 2015, ss.167 - 226.
AMA göçmen i HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. . 2015; 167 - 226.
Vancouver göçmen i HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. . 2015; 167 - 226.
IEEE göçmen i "HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ." , ss.167 - 226, 2015.
ISNAD göçmen, ilke. "HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ". (2015), 167-226.
APA göçmen i (2015). HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 167 - 226.
Chicago göçmen ilke HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no.1 (2015): 167 - 226.
MLA göçmen ilke HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.6, no.1, 2015, ss.167 - 226.
AMA göçmen i HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 6(1): 167 - 226.
Vancouver göçmen i HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 6(1): 167 - 226.
IEEE göçmen i "HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ." İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, ss.167 - 226, 2015.
ISNAD göçmen, ilke. "HİZMETLER DİREKTİFİNİN İŞ KURMA VE HİZMET SUNUMU SERBESTÎSİ İLE İLİŞKİSİ". İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6/1 (2015), 167-226.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 21:50

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları