Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

Aleksandar JANJIC, (Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia)
Suzana SAVIC, (Faculty of Occupational Safety, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia)
Lazar VELIMIROVIC, (Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia)
Vesna NIKOLIC (Faculty of Occupational Safety, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia)
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
0 0
Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 1896 - 1912 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

Öz:
Unlike the traditional way of efficiency assessment of renewable energy sources integration, the smart grid concept is introducing new goals and objectives regarding increased use of renewable electricity sources, grid security, energy conservation, energy efficiency, and deregulated energy market. Possible benefits brought by renewable sources integration are evaluated by the degree of the approach to the ideal smart grid. In this paper, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methodology for the integration efficiency has been proposed, taking into account the presence of multiple criteria of both qualitative and quantitative nature, different performance indicators, and the uncertain environment of the smart grid. The methodology has been illustrated on the choice of the size and location of a distributed generator in the radial distribution feeder.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mühendislik, Elektrik ve Elektronik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Afgan NH, Carvalho MG. Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy 2002; 27: 739–755.
  • [2] Hosseini SA, Madahi SSK, Razavi F, Karami M, Ghadimi AA. Optimal sizing and siting distributed generation resources using a multi objective algorithm. Turk J Electr Eng Co 2013; 21: 825–850.
  • [3] Aras H, Erdo˘gmu¸s S¸, Ko¸c E. Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renew Energ 2004; 29: 1383–1392.
  • [4] Lee SK, Mogi G, Kim JW. Decision support for prioritizing energy technologies against high oil prices: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2009; 22: 915–920.
  • 5] Taha RA, Daim T. Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature review. Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry 2013; 8: 17–30.
  • [6] Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND. Optimal distributed generation placement in power distribution networks: models, methods, and future research. IEEE T Power Syst 2013, 28: 3420–3428.
  • [7] Janjic A, Savic S, Janackovic G. Multi-criteria decision support for optimal distributed generation dispatch. In: 2nd International Symposium on Environment Friendly Energies and Applications; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; 2012. New York, NY, USA: IEEE, pp. 134–139.
  • [8] Barin A, Kanha LN, Abaide AR, Magnago KF, Wottrich B. Multicriteria analysis of the operation of renewable energy sources taking as basis the AHP method and fuzzy logic concerning distributed generation systems. Online Journal on Electronics and Electrical Engineering 2009; 1: 52–57.
  • [9] European Commission. Strategic Deployment Document for Europe’s Electricity Networks of the Future. European Technology Platform. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2010.
  • [10] European Network for the Security of Control and Real-Time Systems. R&D and Standardization Road Map, Final Deliverable 3.2. Brussels, Belgium: ESCORTS, 2011.
  • [11] European Commission Task Force for Smart Grids. Expert Group 2: Regulatory Recommendations For Data Safety, Data Handling And Data Protection. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2010.
  • [12] European Commission Task Force for Smart Grids. Expert Group 3: Roles and Responsibilities. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2010.
  • [13] European Electricity Grid Initiative. Roadmap 2010-18 and Detailed Implementation Plan 2010-12. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2010.
  • [14] US Department of Energy. Guidebook for ARRA SGDP/RDSI Metrics and Benefits. DOE Report. Washington, DC, USA: DOE, 2010.
  • [15] Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • [16] Duru O, Bulut E, Yoshida S. Regime switching fuzzy AHP model for choice-varying priorities problem and expert consistency prioritization: a cubic fuzzy-priority matrix design. Expert Syst Appl 2012; 39: 4954–4964.
  • [17] Kulak O, Durmusoglu B, Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. J Mater Process Tech 2005; 169: 337–345.
  • [18] Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Set Syst 1983; 11: 229–241. [19] Buckley J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst 1985; 17: 233–247.
  • [20] Fatti L. Water research planning in South Africa. In: Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT, editors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1989; pp. 122–137.
  • [21] Ridgley M. A multicriteria approach to allocating water under drought. Resource Management and Optimization 1993; 92: 112–132.
  • [22] Srdjevic B, Medeiros Y. Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manag 2008; 22: 877– 894.
  • [23] Cheng CH. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. Eur J Oper Res 1996; 96: 343–350.
  • [24] Gumus AT. Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation forms by using a two step fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 2009; 36: 4067–4074.
  • [25] Bozbura F, Beskese A, Kahraman C. Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 2007; 32: 1100–1112.
  • [26] Bulut E, Duru O, Kececi T, Yoshida S. Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping asset management. Expert Syst Appl 2012; 39: 1911–1923.
  • [27] Da˘gdeviren M, Y¨uksel I. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inform Sciences 2008; 178: 1717–1733.
  • [28] Janackovic G, Savic S, Stankovic M. Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: case study in road construction companies. S Afr J Ind Eng 2013; 24: 175–189.
  • [29] Lee SK, Mogi G, Kim JW, Gim BJ. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008; 33: 6840–6848.
  • [30] Kahraman C, Kaya I, Cebi S. A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 2009; 34: 1603–1616.
  • [31] Lee SK, Mogi G, Lee SK, Hui SK, Kim JW. Econometric analysis of the R&D performance in the national hydrogen energy technology development for measuring relative efficiency: the fuzzy AHP/DEA integrated model approach. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010. 35: 2236–2246.
  • [32] Lee SK, Mogi G, Hui SK. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: in the case of energy technologies against high oil prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013; 21: 347–355.
  • [33] Kaya T, Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 2010; 35: 2517–2527.
  • [34] Dupont B, Meeus L, Belmans R. Measuring the “smartness” of the electricity grid. In: 7th International Conference on the Energy Market EEM; Madrid, Spain; 2010. New York, NY, USA: IEEE, pp. 1–6.
  • [35] Electric Power Research Institute. Methodological Approach for Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Smart Grid Demonstration Projects. Palo Alto, CA, USA: EPRI, 2010.
  • [36] European Commission. Guidelines for Conducting Cost-Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid Projects. Reference ReportJoint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2012.
  • [37] European Commission. Guidelines for Cost-Benefit Analysis of smart Metering Deployment. Scientific and Policy Report-Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2012.
  • [38] Beria P, Maltese I, Mariotti I. Multi-criteria versus cost benefit analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. Eur Transp Res Rev 2012; 4: 137–152.
  • [39] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 1965; 8: 338–353.
  • [40] Grawford G, Williams C. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J Math Psychol 1985; 29: 387–405.
  • [41] Aquaron J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jimenez JM. Consistency stability intervals for a judgment in AHP decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 2003; 145: 382–393.
  • [42] Aquaron J, Moreno-Jimenez JM. The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 2003; 147: 137–145.
  • [43] Escobar MT, Aquaron J, Moreno-Jimenez JM. A note on AHP Group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. Eur J Oper Res 2004; 153: 318–322.
APA JANJIC A, SAVIC S, VELIMIROVIC L, NIKOLIC V (2015). Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. , 1896 - 1912.
Chicago JANJIC Aleksandar,SAVIC Suzana,VELIMIROVIC Lazar,NIKOLIC Vesna Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. (2015): 1896 - 1912.
MLA JANJIC Aleksandar,SAVIC Suzana,VELIMIROVIC Lazar,NIKOLIC Vesna Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. , 2015, ss.1896 - 1912.
AMA JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. . 2015; 1896 - 1912.
Vancouver JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. . 2015; 1896 - 1912.
IEEE JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V "Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process." , ss.1896 - 1912, 2015.
ISNAD JANJIC, Aleksandar vd. "Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process". (2015), 1896-1912.
APA JANJIC A, SAVIC S, VELIMIROVIC L, NIKOLIC V (2015). Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 23(6), 1896 - 1912.
Chicago JANJIC Aleksandar,SAVIC Suzana,VELIMIROVIC Lazar,NIKOLIC Vesna Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 23, no.6 (2015): 1896 - 1912.
MLA JANJIC Aleksandar,SAVIC Suzana,VELIMIROVIC Lazar,NIKOLIC Vesna Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol.23, no.6, 2015, ss.1896 - 1912.
AMA JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2015; 23(6): 1896 - 1912.
Vancouver JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2015; 23(6): 1896 - 1912.
IEEE JANJIC A,SAVIC S,VELIMIROVIC L,NIKOLIC V "Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process." Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 23, ss.1896 - 1912, 2015.
ISNAD JANJIC, Aleksandar vd. "Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process". Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 23/6 (2015), 1896-1912.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 21:51

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları