Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 32 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 11 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool

Öz:
Abstract The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of freshmen at an ELT department on using the portfolio process as an assessment tool in an advanced reading-writing course. The data were collected through the reflective essays reflecting students opinions on the portfolio-keeping process, their progress and feedback. The data analysis was done through content analysis by coding the students opinions under specific themes. Unstructured interviewing technique was also used in the study. The findings indicate that the students had positive thoughts about the assessment of their assignments over their portfolio despite the workload in the integrated reading and writing course. The students believe that the portfolio process eliminates the negative influence resulting from exam anxiety, and considering their effort and the time spent, they find it fair to be assessed over their portfolio. The students opinions also indicate that the portfolio process leads to a positive change in students attitude towards the writing skill with respect to the motivation it brings about, and that students portfolio can be used as an effective assessment tool in a reading-writing course.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Bir İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümünde Portfolyonun Bir Değerlendirme Aracı Olarak Kullanılmasına İlişkin Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Görüşleri

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir İngilizce öğretmenliği bölümünde birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin ileri okuma- yazma dersinde portfolyo sürecinin bir değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanılması hakkındaki görüşlerini belirlemektir. Çalışmanın verileri, öğrencilerin portfolyo süreci üzerine görüşlerini, gelişimlerini ve geri dönütlerini yansıttıkları kompozisyonlarından elde edilmiştir. Veri analizi, öğrenci görüşlerinin içerik analizi yoluyla belli konular altında kodlanmasıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada yapılandırılmamış görüşme tekniği de ayrıca kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular, getirdiği iş yüküne rağmen, öğrencilerin ileri okuma ve yazma dersi bağlamında gerçekleştirdikleri ödev çalışmalarının portfolyo üzerinden değerlendirilmesi hakkında olumlu düşünceye sahip olduklarını göstermektedir. Öğrenciler, portfolyo sürecinin sınav heyecanından kaynaklanan olumsuz etkiyi ortadan kaldırdığına inanıyor, çabaları ve harcadıkları zaman düşünüldüğünde de, portfolyo üzerinden değerlendirilmeyi oldukça adilce buluyorlar. Öğrenci görüşleri, portfolyo sürecinin yarattığı motivasyon bakımından öğrencilerin yazma becerisine karşı olan tutumlarında olumlu bir değişime yol açtığını ve öğrenci portfolyosunun bir okuma-yazma dersi bağlamında etkin bir değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Belanoff, P. & Elbow, P. (1986). Using portfolios to increase collaboration and community in a writing program. Writing Program Administration, 9 (3), 27-40. Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. CA: Sage Publications. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Erdoğan, T. (2006). Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Portfolyoya Dayalı Değerlendirmenin Öğrenci Başarısı ve Derse Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir. Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative?, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 22, 175-198. Fontana, A. & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interview: the art of science (In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. CA: Sage Publications. Hamp-Lyons, L. & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Herman, J.L., Gearhart, M, & Aschbacher, P.R. (1996). Portfolios for classroom assessment: Design and implementation issues. (In R. Calfee and P. Perfume (Eds.), Writing portfolios in the classroom: Policy and practice, promise and peril. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.) Horowitz, D. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-462. Kılıç, E. (2009). Portfolio Implementation at Turkish University Preparatory Schools, and Teachers’ Perceptions of Portfolios and Problems Experienced with Portfolio Use. An unpublished MA Thesis, Bilkent University, Faculty of Letters, MA TEFL Program, Ankara. Kroll, B. (Ed.) (1990). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response (In B.Kroll, Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) Lo, Ya-Fen (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan, Language Teaching Research, 14(1) 77–95. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Murphy, S. & Camp, R. (1996). Moving towards systematic coherence: a discussion of conflicting perspectives in portfolio assessment (In R. Calfee and Perfume (Eds.), Writing portfolios in the classroom: Policy and practice, promise, and peril. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.) Murphy, S., and M. A. Smith (1992). Looking into portfolios, (In Kathleen Blake Yancey (Ed.) Portfolios in the Writing Classroom, Urbana, IL: NCTE, pp. 49–60.) Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. & Lamb, C. (1996). The Self- Directed Teacher: Managing the Learning Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oğuz, Ş. (2003). State University Preparatory Class EFL Instructors’ Attitudes Towards Assessment Methods Used at their Institutions and Portfolios as a Method of Alternative Assessment. An unpublished MA Thesis, Bilkent University, Faculty of Letters, MA TEFL Program, Ankara. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sağlam, M. (2005). Portfolio Assessment versus Traditional Assessment Techniques: A Case Study on the Proficiency Development and Classroom Practices of EFL Students in a Turkish Military High School. An unpublished MA Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Institute for Graduate Studies in Social Sciences, Istanbul. Santos, M.G. (1997). Portfolio Assessment:And the Role of Learner Reflection, English Teaching Forum, 35(2). Silva, T. (1990). Second language Composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL (In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) Stake, R.E. (1994). Case Studies (In Denzin & Lincoln (Eds.), (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. CA: Sage Publications.) Straus, A.L. & Corbib, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Şahinkarakaş, Ş. (1998). Portfolio Assessment in Writing Classes: implementation and assessment. a PhD Dissertation, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Tailor, G.R. (2005). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Research (second ed.). Maryland: University Press of America. Trumbull, M. (2005). Qualitative research methods (In Tailor, Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Research (second ed.). Maryland: University Press of America.) Wallace, M.J. (1998). Action Research. Cambridge University Press. Weigle S.C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7th edition), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
APA OK S (2012). Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. , 1 - 11.
Chicago OK SELAMİ Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. (2012): 1 - 11.
MLA OK SELAMİ Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. , 2012, ss.1 - 11.
AMA OK S Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. . 2012; 1 - 11.
Vancouver OK S Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. . 2012; 1 - 11.
IEEE OK S "Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool." , ss.1 - 11, 2012.
ISNAD OK, SELAMİ. "Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool". (2012), 1-11.
APA OK S (2012). Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(32), 1 - 11.
Chicago OK SELAMİ Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 0, no.32 (2012): 1 - 11.
MLA OK SELAMİ Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.0, no.32, 2012, ss.1 - 11.
AMA OK S Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 0(32): 1 - 11.
Vancouver OK S Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012; 0(32): 1 - 11.
IEEE OK S "Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool." Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 0, ss.1 - 11, 2012.
ISNAD OK, SELAMİ. "Opinions of ELT Students in Freshman Class on Using Portfolio as an Assessment Tool". Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 32 (2012), 1-11.