What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?

TAVUKÇUOĞLU, Zehra; Eken, Meryem; Ozel, Aysegul; İLHAN, GÜLŞAH; ATMACA, Fatma Verit Ferda; Eric Ozdemir, Mucize; GÜNGÖR, Emre Sinan

What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?

Gülşah İLHAN, (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Fatma Verit Ferda ATMACA, (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Meryem EKEN, (Zeynep Kamil Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Zehra TAVUKÇUOĞLU, (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ayşegül ÖZEL, (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Mucize ÖZDEMİR, (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Emre Sinan GÜNGÖR (Süleymaniye Doğumevi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi

1 0

Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 75 - 78 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışma Türk kadınının vajinal doğum hakkındaki görüşünü belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif kohort çalışma, Şubat 2015 ve Nisan 2015 arasında İstanbulda Süleymaniye Kadın Doğum ve Çocuk Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde yürütüldü. Bu çalışmanın katılımcıları vajinal doğum yapan 100 primipar gebe idi. Bu 100 primipar gebeye, vajinal doğum sonrası yüz yüze anket yapıldı. Veriler sosyo-demografik ve klinik anketler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan gebelerin %90ı doğum öncesinde ideal doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu, gebelerin %10u ise sezaryen doğumu tercih etmişlerdir. Doğumdan önce doğum tercihini etkileyen en önemli faktör ağrı anksiyetesi idi. Vajinal doğum sonrası kadınların %84ü vajinal doğumdan memnun olduklarını ve bir sonraki gebelik için vajinal doğumu tercih edeceklerini bildirdi. Ancak, kadınların %16sı travay ağrısı, epizyotomi ağrısı, ağrı anksiyetesi, uzun travay üresi gibi nedenlerle bir sonraki gebelik için sezaryen doğumu tercih edeceklerini bildirmişlerdir. Sonuç: Sonuçlar; kadınların çoğunun doğum öncesinde doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu tercih ettiğini ve ideal doğum şekli olarak vajinal doğumu gördüklerini göstermektedir. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:75-8

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Türk kadınının vajinal doğum hakkındaki görüşü nedir?

Öz:

Objective: To determine Turkish women s opinion about vaginal birth. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Süleymaniye Maternity Research and Training Hospital in İstanbul, Turkey, between February 2015 and April 2015. The participants of this study were 100 primiparous pregnant women who had vaginal deliveries. The women were interviewed face-to-face after the birth. Data were collected through a socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire. Results: Ninety percent of the women reported vaginal birth as the ideal mode of delivery route; a minority of the women (10%) had decided on cesarean birth before having a vaginal birth. Anxiety of pain was the major factor that influenced choice of delivery type before giving birth. After vaginal birth, 84% of women were satisfied with vaginal birth and reported that they would prefer vaginal birth for their next pregnancy. However, 16% reported that they would prefer cesarean birth for their next pregnancy due to pain of labor, pain of episiotomy, anxiety, and prolonged duration of labor. Conclusion: The results suggest the majority of women prefer to give birth vaginally and reported vaginal birth as the ideal choice. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2015;2:75-8

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Hacettepe Universitiy Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey Main Report 2008. Avaliable from: http:/www.hipshacettepe. edu.tr.
2. World Health Organization. The World Health Statistics report 2010. 2011. Avaliable from: http: //www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2010/ en/.
3. Hacettepe Universitiy Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey Main Report 2008. Avaliable from: http:/www.hipshacettepe. edu.tr/tnsa2013/data/TNSA-2013-anaRapor-tr.pdf.
4. No authors listed. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-7.
5. O Boyle AL, O Boyle JD, Calhoun B, Davis GD. Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:69-72.
6. Delancey JO, Kane Low L, Miller JM, Patel DA, Tumbarello JA. Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:610-5.
7. Landon MB, Spongy CY, Thomas E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:12-20.
8. Visco AG, Viswanathan M, Lohr KN, Wechter ME, Gartlehner G, Wu JM, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal ad neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1517-29.
9. Gee H. Caesarean section should be available on request: For: the mothers autonomy should be paramount. BJOG 2015;122:359.
10. Silver RM. AGAINTS: Caesarean delivery on maternal request is a bad idea. BJOG 2015;122:360.
11. Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Ryding EL. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesare an section and experience of childbirth. BJOG 2006;113:638-46.
12. Wiklund I, Edman G, Ryding EL, Andolf E. Expectations and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesare an section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:324-31.
13. Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Womens fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:807-13.
14. Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Fewwomenwishto be deliveredbycaesareansection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:618-23.
15. Kringeland T, Daltveit AK, Møller A. What characterizes women in Norway who wish to have a cesarean section. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:364-71.
16. Karlström A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I. Behind the mythfew women prefer cesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery 2011;27:620-7.
17. Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E. Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:451-6.
18. Pang SM, Leung DT, Leung TY, Lai CY, Lau TK, Chung TK. Determinants of preference for elective cesarean section in Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women. Hong Kong Med J 2007;13:100-5.
19. Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Fanara G, Settineri S, Triolo O, Giacobbe A. Womens preference on mode of delivery in SouthernItaly. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:694-9.
20. Lin HC, Xirasagar S. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: A 5-year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:848-55.
21. Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, Hesami E, Moradi F, Mazloomi E, Joulaei H, et al. The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal orcesarean deliveries. J Res Med Sci 2013;18:943-50.
22. Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Are cesarean deliveries more likely for poorly educated parents? A brief report from Italy. Birth 2008;35:241-4.
23. Rebelo F, da Rocha CM, Cortes TR, Dutra CL, Kac G. High cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: the role of private practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:903-8.
24. Ahmad-Nia S, Delavar B, Eini-Zinab H, Kazemipour S, Mehryar AH, Naghavi M. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates. East Mediterr Health J 2009;15:1389-98.
25. Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:45.
26. Pang SM, Leung DT, Leung TY, Lai CY, Lau TK, Chung TK. Determinants of preference for elective cesarean section in Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women. Hong Kong Med J 2007;13:100-5.
27. Mohammad Beigi A, Tabatabaee SHR, Mohammad Salehi N, Yazdani M. Factors influencing cesarean delivery method in Shiraz Hospitals. Iran J Nursing 2009;21:37-45.
28. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sanchez AJ, et al. Womens preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG 2011;118:391-9.
29. Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M. Are there unnecessary cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth 2007; 34:32-41.
30. Gamble J, Creedy D, McCourt C, Weaver J, Beake S. A critique of the literature on womens request for cesarean section. Birth 2007;34:331-40.
31. Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Montilla P, Scolaro E, Seuc A, Mazzoni A, et al. Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013:26;13:78.

APA	İLHAN G, ATMACA F, Eken M, TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z, Ozel A, Eric Ozdemir M, GÜNGÖR E (2015). What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. , 75 - 78.
Chicago	İLHAN GÜLŞAH,ATMACA Fatma Verit Ferda,Eken Meryem,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Zehra,Ozel Aysegul,Eric Ozdemir Mucize,GÜNGÖR Emre Sinan What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. (2015): 75 - 78.
MLA	İLHAN GÜLŞAH,ATMACA Fatma Verit Ferda,Eken Meryem,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Zehra,Ozel Aysegul,Eric Ozdemir Mucize,GÜNGÖR Emre Sinan What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. , 2015, ss.75 - 78.
AMA	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. . 2015; 75 - 78.
Vancouver	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. . 2015; 75 - 78.
IEEE	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E "What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?." , ss.75 - 78, 2015.
ISNAD	İLHAN, GÜLŞAH vd. "What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?". (2015), 75-78.

APA	İLHAN G, ATMACA F, Eken M, TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z, Ozel A, Eric Ozdemir M, GÜNGÖR E (2015). What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, 12(2), 75 - 78.
Chicago	İLHAN GÜLŞAH,ATMACA Fatma Verit Ferda,Eken Meryem,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Zehra,Ozel Aysegul,Eric Ozdemir Mucize,GÜNGÖR Emre Sinan What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi 12, no.2 (2015): 75 - 78.
MLA	İLHAN GÜLŞAH,ATMACA Fatma Verit Ferda,Eken Meryem,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Zehra,Ozel Aysegul,Eric Ozdemir Mucize,GÜNGÖR Emre Sinan What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, vol.12, no.2, 2015, ss.75 - 78.
AMA	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi. 2015; 12(2): 75 - 78.
Vancouver	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi. 2015; 12(2): 75 - 78.
IEEE	İLHAN G,ATMACA F,Eken M,TAVUKÇUOĞLU Z,Ozel A,Eric Ozdemir M,GÜNGÖR E "What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?." Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, 12, ss.75 - 78, 2015.
ISNAD	İLHAN, GÜLŞAH vd. "What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?". Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi 12/2 (2015), 75-78.