Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 57 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism

Öz:
This article traces the evolution of Turkey s humanitarian diplomacy as an example of the new humanitarianism associated with emerging countries. It discusses both the promise as well as the challenges of the new humanitarianism. It then introduces the idea of middle power activism in international affairs as one way to understand Turkey s behavior. This lens is then used to identify the aspects of Turkey s behavior that are more likely to endure as contributions to global humanitarian affairs. It identifies state-centered humanitarian aid, regional approaches, and the supplementing of humanitarian aid with political and economic goals as aspects of the Turkish approach likely to endure and to appeal to other emerging actors.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1 Andrea Binder and Claudia Meier, “Opportunity Knocks: Why Non-Western Donors Enter Humanitarianism and How to Make the Best of It”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 884 (2011), p. 1146.
  • 2 Julia Harte, “Turkey Shocks Africa”, World Policy Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4 (2012), p. 29.
  • 3 Mehmet Özkan, “Does ‘Rising Power’ Mean ‘Rising Donor’? Turkey’s Development Aid in Africa”, Africa Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2013), pp.139-47; Abdirahman Ali, “Turkey’s Foray into Africa: A New Humanitarian Power?”, Insight Turkey, Vol. 13, No. 4 (2011), pp. 65-73.
  • 4 “2016 World Humanitarian Summit to Be Held in İstanbul”, Cihan News Agency, 27 September 2013.
  • 5 Davide Rodogno, Against Massacre: Humanitarian Interventions in the Ottoman Empire, 1815-1914, Princeton, N.J, Princeton University Press, 2011.
  • 6 Reşat Bayer and E. Fuat Keyman, “Turkey: An Emerging Hub of Globalization and Internationalist Humanitarian Actor?”, Globalizations, Vol. 9, No. 1 (2012), pp.73-90.
  • 7 Philippe Regnier, “The Emerging Concept of Humanitarian Diplomacy: Identification of a Community of Practice and Prospects for International Recognition”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 93, No. 884 (2011), pp.1211-37.
  • 8 Abdullah Bozkurt, “Turkey in Humanitarian and Development Aid”, Today’s Zaman, 12 August 2013.
  • 9 “Turkey Urged to Acknowledge ‘Red Lines’ in Pursuing Interests in Somalia”, Somali Suna Times, 30 September 2013.
  • 10 “Erdoğan’s Deep Pockets”, The Majallah, 26 August 2013.
  • 11 “IHH Warns of Possible ‘Massacre’ in Xinjiang”, Dunya, 4 July 2013.
  • 12 Emre Uslu, “Aid Organizations: How Humanitarian Are They?”, Cihan News Agency, 16 September 2013.
  • 13 Jan Egeland, “Humanitarian Diplomacy”, in Andrew Cooper, Jorge Heine, and Ramesh Thakur (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • 14 Michael N. Barnett and Thomas George Weiss, Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2008.
  • 15 C. William Walldorf, Just Politics: Human Rights and the Foreign Policy of Great Powers, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2008, pp. 42-73.
  • 16 Husrev Tabak, “Nongovernmental Humanitarianism in Turkey: The Quest for Internationalist Virtue”, Daily Sabah, 20 November 2014.
  • 17 Andrea Binder and Ceyda Erten, “From Dwarf to Giant: Turkey’s Contemporary Humanitarian Assistance”, World Conference on Humanitarian Studies: Human SecurityHumanitarian Perspectives, İstanbul, 24-27 October 2013, p. 11.
  • 18 Pınar Akpınar, “Turkey’s Peacebuilding in Somalia: The Limits of Humanitarian Diplomacy”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2013), pp. 735-57.
  • 19 “Turkish Foreign Minister: ‘It Is a Great Honour that Turkey Will Host the World Humanitarian Summit 2016’”, Anadolu (Anatolian) News Agency, 27 September 2013.
  • 20 Binder and Erten, “From Dwarf to Giant”
  • 21 Kyle Westaway, “Turkey is Poised to Cash in on a Stable Somalia”, Quartz Media, 17 September 2013.
  • 22 Larry Minear, “The Craft of Humanitarian Diplomacy”, in Larry Minear and Hazel Smith (eds.), Humanitarian Diplomacy: Practitioners and Their Craft, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 2007, p. 32.
  • 23 Hazel Smith, “Humanitarian Diplomacy: Theory and Practice”, in Minear and Smith (eds.), Humanitarian Diplomacy, p. 50.
  • 24 Tom J. Farer, Toward a Humanitarian Diplomacy: A Primer for Policy, New York, New York University Press, 1980.
  • 25 Atta Al-Mannan Bakhit, “Humanitarian Challenges: Perspectives from the South and Islamic Countries”, Annual WFP Partnership Consultation, 29-30 October 2014, Rome, Italy, p. 6.
  • 26 “Official Says Turkey Humanitarian Hub”, Hürriyet, 5 February 2015.
  • 27 Binder and Meier, “Opportunity Knocks”
  • 28 Egeland, “Humanitarian Diplomacy”.
  • 29 Andrea Binder, “The Shape and Sustainability of Turkey’s Booming Humanitarian Assistance”, Articles and Debates, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2014), pp.1-14.
  • 30 Andrew Fenton Cooper, Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1997.
  • 31 John Ravenhill, “Cycles of Middle Power Activism: Constraint and Choice in Australian and Canadian Foreign Policies”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 52, No. 3 (1998), pp. 309-28.
  • 32 Robert W. Cox, “Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order”, International Journal Vol. 44, No. 4 (1989), pp. 823-62; Yoshihide Soeya, Nippon No “Midorupawā” Gaikō - Sengo Nippon No Sentaku to Kōsō (Japan’s “Middle Power” Diplomacy: Idea Selection and Postwar Japan), Tokyo, Chikuma Shobo, 2005.
  • 33 Sang-bae Kim, “Middle Powers from a Network Perspective”, The Role of Middle Powers in 21st Century International Relations, Seoul, 21-22 May, 2013.
  • 34 B. Senem Cevik and Philip Seib, Turkey’s Public Diplomacy, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
  • 35 “Turkish Premier Visits Somali Camp”, Anadolu (Anatolian) News Agency, 19 August 2011.
  • 36 Pınar Tank, “Turkey’s New Humanitarian Approach in Somalia”, NOREF Policy Brief (Peace Research Institute Oslo), 20 December 2013.
  • 37 Ahmet Davutoğlu, “Turkey’s Humanitarian Diplomacy: Objectives, Challenges and Prospects”, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 41, No. 6 (2013), pp. 865-70.
  • 38 B. Senem Çevik, “Turkey’s Humanitarian Assistance: The Fourth Largest Donor State”, at http://www.asem.org.tr/en/publication/details/87 (last visited 30 December 2014).
  • 39 Cemalettin Haşimi, “Turkey’s Humanitarian Diplomacy and Development Cooperation”, Insight Turkey, Vol. 16, No. 1 (2014), pp.127-45.
  • 40 Eduard Jordaan, “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers”, Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2003), pp. 165-81; Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil (eds.), Middle Powers and the Rise of China, Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, 2014.
  • 41 Kohei Imai, “Comparative Middle Power Diplomacies: Turkey and Japan”, Middle East Institute Papers, 7 November 2013.
  • 42 B. Senem Çevik, “An Emerging Actor in Humanitarian Diplomacy”, at http://www.asem. org.tr/en/publication/details/88 (last visited 30 December 2014).
APA GILLEY B (2015). Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. , 37 - 57.
Chicago GILLEY Bruce Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. (2015): 37 - 57.
MLA GILLEY Bruce Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. , 2015, ss.37 - 57.
AMA GILLEY B Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. . 2015; 37 - 57.
Vancouver GILLEY B Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. . 2015; 37 - 57.
IEEE GILLEY B "Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism." , ss.37 - 57, 2015.
ISNAD GILLEY, Bruce. "Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism". (2015), 37-57.
APA GILLEY B (2015). Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 20(1), 37 - 57.
Chicago GILLEY Bruce Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 20, no.1 (2015): 37 - 57.
MLA GILLEY Bruce Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol.20, no.1, 2015, ss.37 - 57.
AMA GILLEY B Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. 2015; 20(1): 37 - 57.
Vancouver GILLEY B Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. 2015; 20(1): 37 - 57.
IEEE GILLEY B "Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism." Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 20, ss.37 - 57, 2015.
ISNAD GILLEY, Bruce. "Turkey, Middle Powers, and the New Humanitarianism". Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 20/1 (2015), 37-57.