A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks
Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 81 - 109 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks
Öz: The aim of this thesis is to compare the laws in the EU and Turkey on trademark dilution in the light of case law. In the first part, EU law is explained under the headings of Trademark Directive, Trademark Regulation and Benelux trademark law. In the second part, Turkish trademark on dilution examined. The comparison part focused on the similarities and differences between the sides mainly which mainly focus on reputation, likelihood of confusion, detrimentally to distinctive character or reputation, due cause and the proof requisites to anti-dilution protection. It was concluded that, although European Union and Turkey has different structures, policies and aims in trademark law; political relations between parties makes the trademark laws against dilution develop in similar way.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Guy Tritton. Intellectual Property in Europe. 3rd ed. Sweet & Maxwell, London. 2008.
- Soyoung Yook. Trademark Dilution in European Union, 11 Intl Legal Persp. 223, 2001.
- Spyros M. Maniatis, Anselm Kamperman Sanders. A consumer trade mark: protection based on origin and quality, E.I.P.R. 1993, 15(11), 406-415.
- Martin Senftleben. Bringing EU Trademark Protection Back Into Shape Lessons to Learn From Keyword Advertising, http://www.epip.eu/conferences/epip06/papers/Parallel%20Session%20 Papers/SENFTLEBEN%20Martin.pdf (accessed on 12 July)
- William T. Vuk. Protecting Baywatch and Wagamama; Why the European Union Should Revise the 1989 Directive to Mandate Dilution Protection for Trademarks, 21 FORDHAM INTL L. J. 861,906 (1998).
- Remco E. P. de Ranitz and Peter P. J. M. Verhaag, Landmark Case Holds that Ordinary Marks Are Protected Only If Theres a Risk of Confusion, INTELL. PROP. WORLDWIDE, May/ June 1998.
- Arthur Schwartz, David Morfesi. Dilution Comes of Age: The United States, Europe and South Africa, 87 TRADEMARK REP. 436, 455 (1997).
- Aybey, Ali. Turkey and the European Union Relations: A Historical Assesment. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt:4, No:1 (Güz: 2004), p. 19-38.
- Heinz Kramer. A Changing Turkey: The Challenge to Europe and the United States, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2000.
- Screening Report: Turkey. Chapter 7 Intellectual Property Law. 19 October 2006. http:// ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/turkey/screening_reports/screening_report_07_tr_internet_en.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2012)
- Esin Örücü. Turkey: Change Under Pressure, in E. Örücü, E. Attwooll & S. Coyle, (eds.) Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing, The Hague, London, Kluwer Law International, 1996, 89-111.
- Hanife Dirikkan. Tanınmış Markanın Korunması, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2003, Ankara.
- S. Karahan, C. Suluk, T. Saraç, T. Nal. Fikri Mülkiyet Hukukunun Esasları, Seçkin Yayıncılık (Second Ed.) Ankara 2009.
- Ünal Tekinalp. Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku, İstanbul 2002, §25, no.64
- Sabih Arkan. Marka Hukuku Cilt 1,Ankara 1997.
- Hamdi Yasaman, Marka Hukuku 556 Sayılı Kanun Şerhi, Cilt 1, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 2004.
- Alper Çağrı Yılmaz. Türk Marka Hukuku ve Avrupa Birliği Hukukunda Mutlak Tescil Engelleri, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, DPT Yayın No 2769, 2008.
- İbrahim Ekdial. Tanınımış Markalar ve Uygulamaya Genel Bakış, İstanbul Patent Marka
- Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti, 15.12.2003.
- http://www.istanbulpatent.com/tr/mak_marka_taninmis.
- htm (accessed on 12 July)
- http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf
- http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2011/package/tr_rapport_2011_en.pdf
- CASE LAW
- Case C-408/01 Adidas Benelux BW v. Fitnessworld Trading
- Case C-375/97, General Motors Corp. v. Yplon SA (1999)
- Case C-251/95, Sabel BV v. Puma AG (1997)
- Case C-487/07, LOréal SA and Others. v. Bellure NV and Others (2009)
- Case C-252/07, Intel v. CPM- Intelmark (2008)
- Case C-63/97, Bayerische Motorenwerke AG and BMW Nederland BV v. Deenik (1998)
- Case T-215/03, Sigla SA v. OHIM
- Audi-Med Trademark, 1998 R.P.C. 863, 1998 E.T.M.R. 1010, 1017 (1998) UnionlUnion Soleure, 20 May 1983, NJ 72.
- Lucas Bols v. Colgate- Palmolive (1979) E.C.C. 419, Benelux Court of Justice 11th Chamber of Court of Appeal, E. 1982/3859, K. 1982/4025, 21.10.1982
- 11th Chamber of Court of Appeal, E.2004/49, K 2004/9168, 04.10.2004
- 11th Chamber of Court of Appeal, E. 2007/5927, K. 2007/9302, 18.06.2007
- Ankara 2nd Civil Court of Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights, E.2010/191, K.2011/143,
- http://www.deris.com.tr/Upload/CourtDecision/42afa496-e558-4ffb-ba7e-c078dd1a5a23/ MAX-MAXDEN%20KARAR%20OZETI.pdf (accessed on 12 July)
| APA | Şeker E (2013). A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. , 81 - 109. |
| Chicago | Şeker Emriye Özlem A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. (2013): 81 - 109. |
| MLA | Şeker Emriye Özlem A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. , 2013, ss.81 - 109. |
| AMA | Şeker E A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. . 2013; 81 - 109. |
| Vancouver | Şeker E A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. . 2013; 81 - 109. |
| IEEE | Şeker E "A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks." , ss.81 - 109, 2013. |
| ISNAD | Şeker, Emriye Özlem. "A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks". (2013), 81-109. |
| APA | Şeker E (2013). A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. Ankara Bar Review, 6(1), 81 - 109. |
| Chicago | Şeker Emriye Özlem A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. Ankara Bar Review 6, no.1 (2013): 81 - 109. |
| MLA | Şeker Emriye Özlem A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. Ankara Bar Review, vol.6, no.1, 2013, ss.81 - 109. |
| AMA | Şeker E A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. Ankara Bar Review. 2013; 6(1): 81 - 109. |
| Vancouver | Şeker E A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks. Ankara Bar Review. 2013; 6(1): 81 - 109. |
| IEEE | Şeker E "A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks." Ankara Bar Review, 6, ss.81 - 109, 2013. |
| ISNAD | Şeker, Emriye Özlem. "A Comparison Of Trademark Laws In European Union And Turkey On Protection Against Dilution Of Trademarks". Ankara Bar Review 6/1 (2013), 81-109. |
