Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety

Serpil TANGOLAR, (Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, Adana, Türkiye)
Semih TANGOLAR, (Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, Adana, Türkiye)
Sevilay TOPÇU (Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü, Adana, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
0 0
Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 887 - 897 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety

Öz:
The effects of two irrigation practices (RDI-I and RDI-II) and two bud load treatments on the yield and quality of the KalecikKarası red wine grape variety were studied. The midday leaf water potential thresholds were used for irrigation timing, and those valueswere set as 10 bars until flowering, 13 bars between the berry set veraison and the veraison ripening periods, and 12 bars afterharvest for both irrigation treatments. Water volumes applied in the irrigations of the RDI-I plots were 50% and 75% of the cumulativeevaporation from a class A pan between the berry set veraison and veraison ripening growth stages, respectively, while those portionsfor the RDI-II treatment were vice versa. The effects of control (K) and two-fold increased bud loads (2K) based on mean pruning weighton the grape yield and quality were also investigated. Irrigation and higher bud load treatments considerably increased grape yield inboth years of the study. The highest and lowest grape yields were obtained in the RDI-II and the nonirrigated treatments, respectively.The increase in grape yield of irrigated vines in relation to nonirrigated ones was 53.3% in the first year and 54.3% in the second year.With doubling the bud load, the achieved increases in grape yield were 37.8% and 45.1% compared to the traditional bud loads in thefirst and the second year, respectively. The bud load effect was more apparent for the irrigated vines compared to the rain-fed cultivation.Cluster weight was also higher for the irrigated vines. These increases can most probably be related to improved canopy developmentunder irrigation application. The leaf stomatal conductance was higher as a consequence of the higher soil water contents in bothirrigated treatments. The improved gas exchange due to the stomatal openings led to a higher leaf area index as well as an increase ingrape yield of the irrigated plants. Our findings reveal that the grape yield of the Kalecik Karası grape variety can be increased withirrigation and higher bud load applications. It is also worth noting that a limited irrigation application may help to maintain a betterberry quality compared to the traditional rain-fed grape cultivation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Orman Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Basile B, Marsal J, Mata M, Vallverdú X, Bellvert J, Girona J (2011). Phenological sensitivity of Cabernet Sauvignon to water stress: vine physiology and berry composition. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 452–461.
  • Basinger AR, Hellman EW (2006). Evaluation of regulated deficit irrigation on grape in Texas and implications for acclimation and cold hardiness. Int J of Fruit Sci 6: 3–22.
  • Bowen P, Bogdanoff C, Usher K, Estergaard B, Watson M (2011). Effects of irrigation and crop load on leaf gas exchange and fruit composition in red wine grapes grown on loamy sand. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 9–22.
  • Bravdo B, Hepner Y, Loinger C, Tabacman H (1985). Effect of irrigation and crop level on growth, yield and wine quality of Cabernet Sauvignon. Amer J Enol Vitic 36: 132–139.
  • Çelik H, Ağaoğlu YS, Fidan Y, Marasalı B, Söylemezoğlu G (1998). Genel Bağcılık. Sun Fidan AŞ Mesleki Kitaplar Serisi 1 (in Turkish).
  • Çelik S (2007). Bağcılık (Ampeloloji). Vol. 1. Namık Kemal Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Bahçe Bitkileri Böl. Tekirdağ. Avcı Ofset, İstanbul. (in Turkish).
  • Chaves MM, Santos TP, Souza CR, Ortuno MF, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2007). Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann Appl Biol 150: 237–252.
  • Costa JM, Ortuño MF, Chaves MM (2007). Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. J Integr Plant Biol 49: 1421–1434.
  • Dokoozlian NK, Kliewer WM (1996). Influence of light on grape berry growth and composition varies during fruit development. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 121: 869–874.
  • Dry PR, Loveys BR (1999). Grapevine shoot growth and stomatal conductance are reduced when part of the root system is dried. Vitis 38: 151–156.
  • El-Ansary DO, Nakayama S, Hirano K, Okamoto G (2005). Response of Muscat of Alexandria table grapes to post-veraison regulated deficit irrigation in Japan. Vitis 44: 5–9.
  • Escalona JM, Flexas J, Medrano H (1999). Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Aust J Plant Physiol 26: 421–433.
  • Fawzi MIF, Shahin MFM, Kandil EA (2010). Effect of bud load on bud behavior, yield, cluster characteristics and some biochemical contents of the cane of Crimson Seedless grapevines. J Amer Sci 6: 187–194.
  • Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007). Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58: 147–159.
  • Geller JP, Kurtural SK (2013). Mechanical canopy and crop-load management of Pinot gris in a warm climate. Am J Enol Vitic 64: 65–73.
  • Hellman E, Basinger AR (2009). Evaluation of regulated deficit irrigation in west Texas. In: Proceedings of the Texas Viticulture and Enology Research Symposium, 2–3 June, Granbury, TX, USA.
  • Kang S, Zhang J (2004). Controlled alternate partial rootzone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55: 2437–2446.
  • Keller M (2005). Deficit irrigation and vine mineral nutrition. Am J Enol Vitic 56: 267–283.
  • Keller M, Smithyman RP, Mills LJ (2008). Interactive effects of deficit irrigation and crop load on Cabernet Sauvignon in an arid climate. Am J Enol Vitic 59: 221–234.
  • Kurtural SK, Wessner LF, Dervishian G (2013). Vegetative compensation response of a procumbent grapevine (Vitis vinif era cv. Syrah) cultivar under mechanical canopy management. Hortscience 48: 576–583.
  • Lovisolo C, Hartung W, Schubert A (2002). Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines.  Funct Plant Biol 29: 1349–1356.
  • Matthews MA, Anderson MM (1989). Reproductive development in grape (Vitis vinif era  L.): responses to seasonal water deficits. Am J Enol Vitic 40: 52–60.
  • McCarthy MG, Loveys BR, Dry PR, Stoll M (2002). Regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying as irrigation management techniques for grapevines. In: Deficit Irrigation Practices. FAO Water Reports No. 22. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp. 79–87.
  • Romero P, Fernandez-Fernandez JI, Martinez-Cutillas A (2010). Physiological thresholds for efficient regulated deficit- irrigation management in wine grapes grown under semiarid conditions. Am J Enol Vitic 61: 300–312.
  • Santos TP, Lopes CM, Rodrigues ML, Souza CR, Maroco JP, Pereira JS, Silva JR, Chaves MM (2003). Partial rootzone drying effects on growth and fruit quality of field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinif era). Funct Plant Biol 30: 663–671.
  • Santos TP, Lopes CM, Rodrigues ML, Souza CR, Silva JR, Maroco JS, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (2005). Effects of partial rootzone drying irrigation on cluster microclimate and fruit composition of Castelão field-grown grapevines. Vitis 44: 117–125.
  • Terry DB, Kurtural SK (2011). Achieving vine balance of Syrah with mechanical canopy management and regulated deficit irrigation. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 426–437.
  • TÜİK (2011). Turkey in Statistics. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute.
  • Wessner LF, Kurtural SK (2013). Pruning systems and canopy management practice interact on the yield and fruit composition of Syrah. Am J Enol Vitic 64: 134–138.
  • Williams LE, Matthews MA (1990). Grapevine. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR, editors. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops (Agronomy). Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 1019–1055.
  • Winkler AJ, Cook JA, Kliewer WM, Lider LA (1974). General Viticulture. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
APA TANGOLAR S, TANGOLAR S, TOPÇU S (2015). Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. , 887 - 897.
Chicago TANGOLAR Serpil,TANGOLAR SEMİH,TOPÇU Sevilay Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. (2015): 887 - 897.
MLA TANGOLAR Serpil,TANGOLAR SEMİH,TOPÇU Sevilay Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. , 2015, ss.887 - 897.
AMA TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. . 2015; 887 - 897.
Vancouver TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. . 2015; 887 - 897.
IEEE TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S "Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety." , ss.887 - 897, 2015.
ISNAD TANGOLAR, Serpil vd. "Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety". (2015), 887-897.
APA TANGOLAR S, TANGOLAR S, TOPÇU S (2015). Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39(6), 887 - 897.
Chicago TANGOLAR Serpil,TANGOLAR SEMİH,TOPÇU Sevilay Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39, no.6 (2015): 887 - 897.
MLA TANGOLAR Serpil,TANGOLAR SEMİH,TOPÇU Sevilay Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.39, no.6, 2015, ss.887 - 897.
AMA TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2015; 39(6): 887 - 897.
Vancouver TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2015; 39(6): 887 - 897.
IEEE TANGOLAR S,TANGOLAR S,TOPÇU S "Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39, ss.887 - 897, 2015.
ISNAD TANGOLAR, Serpil vd. "Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39/6 (2015), 887-897.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 22:20

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları