Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 218 - 223 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center

Öz:
Amaç: Rektum kanserinin tedavisinde tek başına standart cerrahi tedavi lokal rekürrens oranını %20'nin altına düşürememektedir. Bu nedenle birçok merkez lokal rekürrensi önlemek için eşzamanlı kemoterapiyle birlikte veya tek başına neoadjuvan radyoterapi (preop RTx) uygulamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, cerrahi ardından adjuvan kemoradyoterapi (Grup A) alan ve neoadjuvan kemoradyoterapiyi takiben cerrahi uygulanan (Grup NA) orta ve distal rektum kanserli 164 ardışık hastanın sonuçlarını sunduk. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada TNM evreleme sistemi olarak bilinen Amerikan Kanser Ortak Komitesi'nin (AJCC) evreleme sistemi kullanıldı. Radyolojik evre 1 (sadece T2N0M0) ile evre 3C (T4bN1-2M0) olarak değerlendirilen ve patolojik olarak R0 rezeksiyon uygulanan hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Cerrahi yöntem olarak total mezorektal eksizyon (TME) uygulandı. Radyoterapi günlük fraksiyone 180 cGy dozda 28 ardışık günde verildi. Kemoterapi; 5-fluorourasil (450 mg/m2/d) ve leucovorin (20 mg/m2/d) bolus olarak 1 ile 5. günler arası ve 29 ile 33. günler arası uygulandı.Bulgular: Grup NA'da 9 hastada (%13) patolojik tam yanıt (pCR) elde edildi. Grup NA ve Grup A'da, lokorejyonel rekürrens oranları sırasıyla %6,7 ve %30,8 idi (p<0,001), ortalama lokorejyonel rekürrenssiz sağkalım sırasıyla 190,0±7,3 ay ve 148,0±11,7 ay idi (p=0,002) ve ortalama sağkalım sırasıyla 119,2±15,3 ay ve 103,0±9,4 ay idi (p=0,23). Lokorejyonel rekürrens yönünden 0,92 istatistiksel güç ile anlamlılık elde edildi. Çalışmanın sekonder sonlanımı olan hastalıksız sağkalım ve genel sağkalım yönünden anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Neoadjuvan kemoradiyoterapi ile birlikte TME, özellikle MRI-Evre 2A ve 3C distal 2/3 rektal adenokarsinomalar için etkili bir tedavi protokolüdür. Klinik olarak T2N0M0 hastaların önemli bir bölümünde patolojik tam yanıt elde edildi, bu nedenle bu tedavi yöntemi daha ileri çalışmalar için temel oluşturabilir
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Distal rektum kanserlerinde adjuvan ve neoadjuvan kemoradyoterapi: Tek merkezde iki on yıllık dönemin karşılaştırması

Öz:
Objective: Standard surgery alone was not able to decrease local recurrence (LR) rate below 20% in rectal cancer treatment. Thus, many centers administered neoadjuvant radiotherapy (preopRTx) with or without concomitant chemotherapy for the prevention of LR. In this study, the results of 164 consecutive patients with mid- and distal rectal cancer who received surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group A) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group NA) followed by surgery are presented.Material and Methods: The staging system used in this study is that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), also known as the TNM system. Eligible patients were required to have radiologically assessed stage 1 (only T2N0M0) to stage 3C (T4bN1-2M0) tumor with pathologically confirmed R0 resection. The surgical method was total mesorectal excision (TME). Radiotherapy was applied with daily 180 cGy fractions for 28 consecutive days. Chemotherapy comprised 5-fluorouracil (450 mg/m2/d) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2/d) bolus at days 1-5 and 29-33.Results: Nine patients (13%) in Group NA achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). In Group NA and Group A, locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates were 6.7% and 30.8%, (p<0.001), the mean LR-free survival was 190.0±7.3 months and 148.0±11.7 months (p=0.002) and the mean overall survival (OS) was 119.2±15.3 months and 103.0±9.4 months (p=0.23), respectively. A significant difference with regard to LR has been obtained with a statistical power of 0.92. Secondary outcome measures (DFS and OS) have not been met.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with TME is an efficient treatment protocol, particularly for the treatment of magnetic resonance imaging-staged 2A to 3C patients with two or three distal rectal adenocarcinomas. Given that a considerable proportion of patients with cT2N0M0 would develop pCR, this method of treatment can be considered for further studies
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Wiggers T, de Vries MR, Veeze-Kuypers B. Surgery for local re- currence of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 323- 328. [CrossRef]
  • Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donald- son G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer 1983; 52: 1317-1329. [CrossRef]
  • Cummings BJ. Radiation therapy for colorectal cancer. Surg Clin N Ame 1993; 73: 167-181.
  • James RD, Haboubi N, Schofield PF, Mellor M, Salhab N. Prog- nostic factors in colorectal carcinoma treated by preoperative radiotherapy and immediate surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 546-551. [CrossRef]
  • Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group: Preoperative short- term radiation therapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A pro- spective randomized trial. Cancer 1990; 66: 49-55. [CrossRef]
  • Local recurrence rate in a randomised multicentre trial of pre- operative radiotherapy compared with operation alone in re- sectable rectal carcinoma. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 397-402.
  • Uslu A, Postaci H, Yetis H, Selek E, Nart A, Corumlu B, et al. Longitudinal surveillance of mid- and distal rectum cancer in a subset of patients with specific histology. Hepatogastroen- terology 2011; 58: 388-394.
  • Pahlman L. Preoperative treatment of rectal cancer. In Bleiberg H, Rougier P, Joachim Wilke H (eds). Management of colorectal cancer. Martin Dunitz Ltd. 1998: 153-166.
  • Gérard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejar- din MT, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4620-4625. [CrossRef]
  • Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic- Jelic L, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1114-1123. [CrossRef]
  • Onaitis MW, Robert B, Noone RB, Hartwig M, Hurwitz H, Morse M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analy- sis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experi- ence. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 778-785. [CrossRef]
  • Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rödel C, Kuo LJ, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 835- 844. [CrossRef]
  • Garajová I, Di Girolamo S, de Rosa F, Corbelli J, Agostini V, Bi- asco G, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status. Chemother Res Pract 2011; 2011: 839742. [CrossRef]
  • McCarthy K, Pearson K, Fulton R, Hewitt J. Pre-operative chemo- radiation for non-metastatic locally advanced rectal cancer. Co- chrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12: CD008368. [CrossRef]
  • Petrelli F, Coinu A, Lonati V, Barni S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 447-457. [CrossRef]
  • Williamson JS, Jones HG, Davies M, Evans MD, Hatcher O, Bey- non J, et al. Outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer with highly selective preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1290-1298. [CrossRef]
  • Hong YS, Nam BH, Kim KP, Kim JE, Park SJ, Park YS, et al. Ox- aliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ADORE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 1245-1253. [CrossRef]
  • Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow- up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1926-1933. [CrossRef]
  • Sanghera P, Wong DW, McConkey CC, Geh JI, Hartley A. Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response. Clin Oncol (R Coll Ra- diol) 2008; 20: 176-183. [CrossRef]
APA ZENGEL B, Uslu A, Adibelli Z, YETİŞ H, cengiz f, AYKAS A, Simsek C, akpınar g, ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N, DURAN A (2015). Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. , 218 - 223.
Chicago ZENGEL Baha,Uslu Adam,Adibelli Zehra Hilal,YETİŞ Halit,cengiz fevzi,AYKAS Ahmet,Simsek Cenk,akpınar göksever,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN NUKET,DURAN ALİ Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. (2015): 218 - 223.
MLA ZENGEL Baha,Uslu Adam,Adibelli Zehra Hilal,YETİŞ Halit,cengiz fevzi,AYKAS Ahmet,Simsek Cenk,akpınar göksever,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN NUKET,DURAN ALİ Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. , 2015, ss.218 - 223.
AMA ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. . 2015; 218 - 223.
Vancouver ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. . 2015; 218 - 223.
IEEE ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A "Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center." , ss.218 - 223, 2015.
ISNAD ZENGEL, Baha vd. "Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center". (2015), 218-223.
APA ZENGEL B, Uslu A, Adibelli Z, YETİŞ H, cengiz f, AYKAS A, Simsek C, akpınar g, ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N, DURAN A (2015). Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 31(4), 218 - 223.
Chicago ZENGEL Baha,Uslu Adam,Adibelli Zehra Hilal,YETİŞ Halit,cengiz fevzi,AYKAS Ahmet,Simsek Cenk,akpınar göksever,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN NUKET,DURAN ALİ Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 31, no.4 (2015): 218 - 223.
MLA ZENGEL Baha,Uslu Adam,Adibelli Zehra Hilal,YETİŞ Halit,cengiz fevzi,AYKAS Ahmet,Simsek Cenk,akpınar göksever,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN NUKET,DURAN ALİ Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.31, no.4, 2015, ss.218 - 223.
AMA ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2015; 31(4): 218 - 223.
Vancouver ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2015; 31(4): 218 - 223.
IEEE ZENGEL B,Uslu A,Adibelli Z,YETİŞ H,cengiz f,AYKAS A,Simsek C,akpınar g,ÖZKAVRUK ELİYATKIN N,DURAN A "Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center." Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 31, ss.218 - 223, 2015.
ISNAD ZENGEL, Baha vd. "Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in distal rectal cancer: Comparison of two decades in a single center". Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 31/4 (2015), 218-223.