The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies

İlhan İLTER (Bayburt Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bayburt, Türkiye)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
10 0
Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1106 - 1129 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, metin tabanlı örgütsel bir yapı olan Frayer modelinin sosyal bilgilerde kelime hazinesi gelişimi üzerinde etkilerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Araştırmada yarı-deneme modellerinden eşitlenmemiş kontrol gruplu desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada deneysel uygulama için bir deney (N=19) bir de kontrol grubu (N=18) belirlenmiştir. Kelime öğretiminde deney grubunda grafik düzenleyicilerden Frayer modelidiyagramı kullanılırken, kontrol grubunda tanımsal ve içerik yaklaşımlarının bütünleştirilmesi yoluyla kelime öğretimi gerçekleştirilmiştir.Araştırma, 2013-2014 öğretim yılında Bayburt ilinde orta sosyo-ekonomik düzeyde olduğu kabul edilen bir devlet okulunda öğrenim gören 4. sınıf öğrencileriyle yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada öğrencilerin kelime bilgisi düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla Wesche ve Paribakht(1996) tarafındangeliştirilen ve araştırmacı tarafından Türkçeye çevrilerek geçerliği ve güvenirliği yapılan kelime bilgisini değerlendirme ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlarda, deney grubunun kontrol grubuna göre kelime bilgisini daha fazla genişleterek hedeflenen ünite kavramlarının anlamlarını güçlendirdiği dolayısıyla, kelime hazinesini daha fazlageliştirdiği saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda ulaşılan veriler göstermektedir ki, Frayer modeli, ön bilgilerin etkinleştirilmesiyle kavramların ilgili, ilgisiz özellikleri, örnekleri, örnek olmayanları ve diğer kavramlar arası ilişkileri ve hiyerarşik yapıları açığa kavuşturarak öğrencilerin davranışlarını kavramları yeniden tanımlamaya yönlendirmekte, böylece kelime bilgisi gelişimi ve kavram kazanımını daha fazla kolaylaştırmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Sosyal Bilgilerde Kelime Hazinesinin Geliştirilmesinde Frayer Modelinin Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Öz:
The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of Frayer model on the development of vocabulary knowledge in social studies. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was used in the study. For the research, an experimental (N=19) and a control group (N=18) were randomly selected. While Frayer model as text based organizer was utilized on vocabulary instruction in the experimental group, the definitional and contextual approaches by integrating were used in the control group. This research was implemented at a state school with the 4th grade students in Bayburt, in 2013-2014 academic season. The scale, which was developed by Wesche and Paribakht (1996) and validity and reliability of which were examined and adapted to Turkish by the researcher, was used to determine the students' vocabulary knowledge level. As for the results, it was found that the experimental group was more successful in vocabulary knowledge through the meanings of the target words by enlarging their vocabulary capacity in-depth. The data obtained from the study demonstrated that Frayer model facilitated the students to identify relevant, irrelevant attributes, examples and non-examples of the concepts and uncover the relationships and hierarchical structures between the concepts, thus guide to generate the meanings of terms by activating prior knowledge. Therefore, it helps to the students facilitate development of vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary acquisition
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, E. A. (2009). Teacher use of literacy strategies in secondary mathematics class. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Idaho.
  • Akyol, H.(2005). Türkçe ilk okuma-yazma öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A yay.
  • Alkış, S. (2012). Sosyal bilgilerde kavram öğretimi (s. 76). Safran, M. (Ed.), Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Allen, J. (1999). Word, word, words: Teaching vocabulary in grades (pp. 4-12). Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Anderson, R. C., and Nagy, W. E. (1993). The vocabulary conundrum (Tech. Rep. No. 570). Urbana, IL: Center for the study of reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED354489)
  • Anderson, R.C., and Freebody, P.(1981). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18 (3), 277-294.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in learning and retention of meaningful material. Journal of Education Psychology, 51, 267-272.
  • Balcı, A. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Barth, J. (1993). Social studies: There is a history, there is a body, but is it worth saving? Social Education, 57(2), 56-57.
  • Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame'enui, E. J., and Olejnik, S. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150-176.
  • Baumann, J. F., Kame'enui, E. J., and Ash, G. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp and Squire, J.R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in teaching the English Language Arts (2nd ed., pp. 752-785). New York.
  • Baumann, J. K., and Kame'enui, E. J. (Eds.) (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Beck, I. L., Mckeown, M. G., and Kucan, L. (2008). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, The Guilford Press.
  • Becker, K. A. (2013). Pre-service special education teachers in urban school settings to teach content literacy strategies. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The George Washington University.
  • Berry, G. (2013). Literacy for Learning: A handbook of content area strategies for middle and high school teachers. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, United Kingdom.
  • Berry, J.L. (2011). The effects of concept mapping and questioning on students' organizatıon and retention of science knowledge while using interactıve informational read-alouds. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A & M University.
  • Billmeyer, R., and Barton, M. L. (2002). Teaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then who? (pp. 70-100). Aurora, Colorado, ASCD. Alexandria, VA.
  • Blachowicz, C. L. Z., and Fisher, P. J. (2010). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms (4 th ed.), (pp. 40-196). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Blachowicz, C.L.Z. (1986). Making connection alternatives to the vocabulary notebook. Journal of Reading, 29, 539-543.
  • Boote, C. (2006). Vocabulary: Reasons to teach it, an effective teaching method, and words worth teaching. New England Reading Association Journal, 42(2), 24.
  • Bozen, S. and Honnert, A. (2004). The effects of note taking and summarization skills on the success of students in a seventh grade science course. (Unpublished master thesis). Aurora University
  • Brassell, D.(2011). Dare to differentiate: Vocabulary strategies for all students (3th ed.), (pp. 55-120). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
  • Brewer, W. F., and Treyins, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.
  • Brown, C. (2007). Strategies for making social studies texts more comprehensible for English-language learners. Social Studies, 98(5), 185-188.
  • Bruton, A. (2009). The vocabulary knowledge scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(4), 288-297.
  • Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (2nd ed.). Newark, De: International Reading Association
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz Ş. ve Demirel, F.(2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı) Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Carney, J.,Anderson, D., Blackburn, C., and Blessing, D. (1984). Preteaching vocabulary and the comprehension of social studies materials by elementary school children. Social Education, 48(3), 195-196.
  • Carss, W.D. (2007). The effects of using thınk-pair-share during guided reading lessons. (Unpublished master thesis). The University of Waikato.
  • Çelik, S. ve Keser, H. (2010). Veri yönlendirmeli öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencelerin sözcük edinimleri üzerinde etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35, 158-170.
  • Centrone, (1996). Teachıng reading strategies through science to middle school below-level readers and its implications for staff development. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida Atlantic University.
  • Checkley, K. (2008). The essential of social studies grades k-8. Priorities in practice. Effective curriculum instruction and assessment (p. 34). Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandra, Virginia, USA.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisarel uygulamaları. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Ed.Inc.
  • Cronan, C. (2010). Determining best practice for vocabulary instruction in a middle school setting. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas.
  • Curtis, C. Y. (2008). Socially mediated vs. contextually driven vocabulary strategies: Which are most effective? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon.
  • Deshler, D. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., and Nair, M. (Eds.). (2008). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers: A research-based guide to instructional programs and practices. Ny, International Reading Association, New York.
  • Doğanay, A. (2002). Öğretimde kavram ve genellemelerin geliştirilmesi. Öztürk, C. ve Dilek, D. (ed.), Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Ehsanzadeh, S.J. (2012). Depth versus breadth of lexical repertoire: assessing their roles in EFL students' incidental vocabulary acquisition. TESL Canada Journal, 29(2), 24-41.
  • Enge, S. (2005). The impact of the Frayer model on vocabulary. (Unpublished Action Research). Shawnee Mission Board of Education, Shawnee Mission.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., and Wallen, E. N. (2005). How to design and emulated research in education (6th ed.). McGraw Hill.
  • Fraser, C. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225-241.
  • Frayer, D. A., Fredrick, W. C., and Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of concept mastery. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
  • Graves, M. (2004). Teaching prefixes: As good as, it gets. In J. F. Baumann and E. J. Edwards (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice, (pp. 81-99). New York: The Guilford Press,
  • ? (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, Language and Literacy Series.
  • Graves, M. F., and Penn, M. C. (1986). Costs and benefits of various methods of teaching vocabulary. Journal of Reading. 29 (7), 596-602.
  • Gülersoy, E. (2013). İdeal ders kitabı arayışında sosyal bilgiler ders kitaplarının bazı özellikler açısından incelenmesi. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports and Science Education, 2(1), 8-26
  • Harmon, J. M., Hedrick, W. B. and Fox, E.A.(2000). A content analysis of vocabulary instruction in social studies textbooks for grades 4-8. The Elementary School Journal, 100 (3), 253-271.
  • Harmon, J. M., and Hedrick, W. B. (2000). Zooming in and zooming out: Enhancing vocabulary and conceptual learning in social studies. The Reading Teacher, 54 (2), 155-159.
  • Hedrick, W.B., Harmon, J.M,. and Linerode, P.M. (2004). Teachers' beliefs and practices of vocabulary instruction with social studies textbooks in grades 4-8. Reading Horizons, 45(2), 103-125.
  • Host, M. (2005). Learning vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355-382.
  • Hyerle, D. (1993). Thinking maps as tools for multiple modes of understanding. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
  • İlter, İ.(2013). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde 5E öğrenme döngüsü modelinin öğrenci başarısına, bilimsel sorgulayıcı-araştırma becerilerine, akademik motivasyona ve öğrenme sürecine etkileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü: Erzurum.
  • İlter, İ. (2014). Kelime öğretiminde grafik düzenleyicileri (Frayer modeli örneği). Turkish Studies- International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(3),755-770.
  • Johnson, B., and Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research quantitative qualitative and mixed approach (2th ed.). Pearson Education Research Navigator.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
  • Kame'enui, E.J., and Baumann, J. F. (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: Guilford.
  • Karakaş, A., and Sariçoban, A.(2012). The impact of watching subtitled animated cartoons on incidental vocabulary learning of ELT students. Teaching English with Technology, 12(4), 3-15.
  • Karjala, L. (2010). Math vocabulary instruction in an inclusive classroom 1 direct instruction and the Frayer model: Effects on mathematics achievement in an inclusive classroom. (Unpublished master thesis). Southwest State University Marshall, Minnesota.
  • King, M. (2011). Effects of teaching vocabulary using various forms of rich instruction in thematically versus randomly grouped sets. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
  • Kweon, S.O., and Kim, H.R. (2008). Beyond raw frequency: Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 191-215.
  • Labrosse. P. (2007). Analysis of the effect of specific vocabulary instruction on high school chemistry students' knowledge and understanding. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts Lowell.
  • Laflamme, J.G. (1997). The effect of multiple exposure vocabulary method and the target reading/writing strategy on test scores. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(5), 372-384.
  • Latham, K. K. (2011). The effects of an interactıve vocabulary strategy on teachers and students' perceptions of word learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Charlotte.
  • Manzo, U., Manzo, U., and Thomas, M. (2006). Rationale for systematic vocabulary development: Antidote for state mandates. Journal for Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 610-619.
  • Marzano, R. J. (2004). What works in schools: Translating research into action? Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Printed in USA.
  • Mccall, A.L. Janssen B., and Riderer K.(2008). More time for powerful social studies: When university social studies methods faculty and classroom teachers collaborate. Social Studies, 99(3), 135-141,
  • Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. vocabulary acquisition research group virtual library. 10 Şubat 2015 tarihinde http://www.lognostics.co.uk/vlibrary/meara1996c.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53, 253-279.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, [MEB] (2014). İlköğretim 5.sınıf sosyal bilgiler: Öğretmen kılavuz kitabı. Ankara: Harf Yay.
  • Milligan, J. L., and Ruff, T. P. (1990). A linguistic approach to social studies vocabulary development. The Social Studies, 81 (5), 218-220.
  • Monroe, E.E. (1998). Using graphic organizers to teach vocabulary: Does available research inform mathematics instruction? Education, 118, 538-572.
  • Monroe, E.E., and Pendergrass, M. (1997). Effects of mathematical vocabulary on fourth grade students. Reading İmprovement, 34(3), 120-132.
  • Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension (pp. 15-30). Urbana, I11., International Reading Association, Washington, DC: Newark, Del.
  • Nagy, W. E., and Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge. In M. McKeown ve M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 lexical inferencing, strategy use and success. Modern Language Journal, 90 (3), 387-401.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques (pp. 18-37). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (N.D.A). (no date) National assessment of educational progress (NAEP):Frequently Http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/faq.asp sayfasından erişilmiştir. asked questions. 10 Şubat 2015 tarihinde
  • National Council for the Social Studies [NCSS] (1994). Curriculum Standard for the social studies: Expectations of Excellence. Bulletin Washington
  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Ogle, D., and Blachowicz, C.L.Z. (2002). Beyond literature circles. In C.C. Block and M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 259-274). New York: Guilford.
  • Overturf, B. J. (1999). Developıng teachers' knowledge of mıddle level readıng within a socıal constructivist professional development perspective. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville.
  • Overturf, B. J., Montgomery, L. H., and Smith, M. H. (2013). Words nerds: Teaching all students to learn and love vocabulary (pp. 40-50). York, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Owen-Tittsworth, M.D. (2013). Measuring teacher self-efficacy using English language learner shadowing as a catalyst for implementation of two instructional strategies to support the academic language development of long-term English language learners. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University.
  • Öztürk, C. (2009). Sosyal bilgiler: Toplumsal yaşama disiplinlerarası bir bakış. Öztürk, C. (Ed.), Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi: Demokratik vatandaşlık eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Papadopoulou, E. (2007). The impact of vocabulary instructıon on the vocabulary knowledge and writing performance of third grade students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Maryland.
  • Paribakht, T. S., and Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11(1), 9-29.
  • Peters, C.W. (1974). A comparison between the Frayer model of concept attainment and the textbook approach to concept attainment. Reading Research Quarterly, 10(2), 252-254.
  • Popielarcheck, A. E. (2008). The investigation of the affect literacy strategies have on the reader friendliness of expository text. (Unpublished master thesis). California University of Pennsylvania.
  • Pulido, D. (2004). The effect of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 20-53.
  • Punch, M., and Robinson, M. (1992). Social studies vocabulary mnemonics. Social Education, 56(7), 402- 403.
  • Qian, D.D. (1998). Depth of vocabulary knowledge: Assessing its role in adults' reading comprehension in English as a second language. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
  • Read, J.(1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A Kunnan (ed.) Validation in language assessment (p.41-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rice, G. E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology, 15, 39-67.
  • Rott, S., and Williams, J. (2003). Making form-meaning connections while reading: A qualitative analysis of word processing. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 45-75.
  • Rott, S., Williams, J., and Cameron, R. (2002). The effect of multiple-choice l1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research, 6, 183-222.
  • Schatz, E. K., and Baldwin, R. S. (1986). Context clues are unreliable predictors of word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 429-453.
  • Se´ne´chal, M., and Cornell, E. H. (1993). Vocabulary acquisition through shared reading experiences. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 360-374.
  • Sharma, S.A. (2006). Transfer of professıonal development into classroom practice: A case study of a readıng specıalist/learnıng coach and two elementary social studiıes teachers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oakland University.
  • Shea, A. A.(2011). Redefining vocabulary: The new learning strategy for social studies. The Social Studies 102, 95-103.
  • Simpson, M. L., Stahl, N. A., and Francis, M. A. (2004). Reading and learning strategies: Recommendations for the 21st century. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), 15-32.
  • Southerland, L. (2011). The effects of using interactıve word walls to teach vocabulary to middle school students. (Unpublished Work). University of North Florida.
  • Stall, S., and Fairbanks, I. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta analyze. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72-110.
  • Stewart, J., Batty, A.O.B., and Bovee, N. (2012). Comparing multidimensional and continuum models of vocabulary acquisition: an empirical examination of the vocabulary knowledge scale. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 695-721.
  • Suarez, K. (2011). Graphic organizers and higher order thinking skills with nonfiction text. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lesley University.
  • Sunal, C. S., and Haas, M. E. (2005). Social studies for elementary and middle grades a constructivist approach (2th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Tabachnick, B. R., Weible, E., and Frayer, D. A.(1970). Selection and analysis of social studies concepts for inclusion in tests of concept attainment. Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, Working Pap.
  • Terry, B. H. (2012). Use of tactual materials on the achievement of content specific vocabulary and termınology acquisition within an intermediate level science curriculum. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). St. John's University.
  • Tobia, S.(1988). Effects of instruction using an awareness strategy on college readers' comprehension and recall of expository text written wıth four organizatıonal structures. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University Graduate Board
  • Vacca, R. T., Vacca, J. L., and Mraz, M. E. (2011). Content area reading. Literacy and learning across the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Wanzek, J. (2014).Building word knowledge: Opportunities for direct vocabulary instruction in general education for students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 3,139-164.
  • Wesche, M., and Paribakht, T.S. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 155-178.
  • Wixson, K.K. (1986). Vocabulary instruction and children's comprehension of basal stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(3), 317-329.
  • Yazıcı, H. ve Samancı, O. (2003). Ilköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler ders konuları ile ilgili bazı kavramları anlama düzeyleri, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 158, 83-90.
  • Yearta, L.S. (2012). The effect of digital word study on fifth graders' vocabulary acquisition, retention, and motivation: A mixed methods approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of North Carolina.
  • Yel, S. (2006). Kavram geliştirme ve öğretimi. Öztürk, C. (Ed.), Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi: Demokratik vatandaşlık eğitimi (s. 147-178). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
APA İlter İ (2015). The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. , 1106 - 1129.
Chicago İlter İlhan The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. (2015): 1106 - 1129.
MLA İlter İlhan The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. , 2015, ss.1106 - 1129.
AMA İlter İ The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. . 2015; 1106 - 1129.
Vancouver İlter İ The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. . 2015; 1106 - 1129.
IEEE İlter İ "The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies." , ss.1106 - 1129, 2015.
ISNAD İlter, İlhan. "The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies". (2015), 1106-1129.
APA İlter İ (2015). The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 14(3), 1106 - 1129.
Chicago İlter İlhan The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 14, no.3 (2015): 1106 - 1129.
MLA İlter İlhan The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.14, no.3, 2015, ss.1106 - 1129.
AMA İlter İ The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2015; 14(3): 1106 - 1129.
Vancouver İlter İ The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2015; 14(3): 1106 - 1129.
IEEE İlter İ "The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 14, ss.1106 - 1129, 2015.
ISNAD İlter, İlhan. "The Investigation of the Effects of Frayer Model on Vocabulary Knowledge in Social Studies". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 14/3 (2015), 1106-1129.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 23:26

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları