Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population

HOLOĞLU, Feyza; TURKAL, Mustafa; Çelebi, Fatih; TURKAL, Hümeyra; TAŞKAN, MEHMET MURAT

Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population

Fatih ÇELEBİ, (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye)

Mehmet Murat TAŞKAN, (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş Çene Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Kliniği, Tokat, Türkiye)

Mustafa TURKAL, (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye)

Hümeyra TURKAL, (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye)

Feyza HOLOĞLU (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Tokat, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

0 0

Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 343 - 350 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population

Öz:

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental anomalies in the Middle Black Sea population.Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on panoramic radiographies of 3795 patients (2357 female, 1438 male). Patients who attended the Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziosmanpaşa University to treatment for various dental problems, were from 15 to 60 years old. Radiograpies were evaluated in terms of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, tooth transposition and supernumerary tooth. 3. molar tooth was excluded from the study.Results: The total prevalence of dental anomalies which were evaluated in the study was diagnosed % 6.58 (%6.27 female, %7.09 male). The prevalence of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, transposition and supernumerary tooth were detected %4.29 (%4.28 female, %4.31 male), %1.10 (%1.10 female, %1.11 male), %0.28 (%0.38 female, %0.13 male) and %0.89 (%0.50, %1.52), respectively. The prevalence of transmigrated canines was also detected %0,13 (%0,12 female, %0,14 male). In supernumerary tooth group, statistically significant gender difference was noted and there was no statistically significant gender difference in other groups.Conclusions: The most frequently ocurred dental anomaly which was evaluated in the study was tooth impaction and lower incisor tooth agenesis, supernumarary tooth, transposition have followed, respectly. Dentists must be aware of situations which can not be detected by only clinical examination and radiograpic examination doesn’t must be neglected

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Orta Karadeniz toplumunda dentalanomalilerin görülme sıklığı

Öz:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental anomalies in the Middle Black Sea population.Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on panoramic radiographies of 3795 patients (2357 female, 1438 male). Patients who attended the Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziosmanpaşa University to treatment for various dental problems, were from 15 to 60 years old. Radiograpies were evaluated in terms of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, tooth transposition and supernumerary tooth. 3. molar tooth was excluded from the study.Results: The total prevalence of dental anomalies which were evaluated in the study was diagnosed % 6.58 (%6.27 female, %7.09 male). The prevalence of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, transposition and supernumerary tooth were detected %4.29 (%4.28 female, %4.31 male), %1.10 (%1.10 female, %1.11 male), %0.28 (%0.38 female, %0.13 male) and %0.89 (%0.50, %1.52), respectively. The prevalence of transmigrated canines was also detected %0,13 (%0,12 female, %0,14 male). In supernumerary tooth group, statistically significant gender difference was noted and there was no statistically significant gender difference in other groups.Conclusions: The most frequently ocurred dental anomaly which was evaluated in the study was tooth impaction and lower incisor tooth agenesis, supernumarary tooth, transposition have followed, respectly. Dentists must be aware of situations which can not be detected by only clinical examination and radiograpic examination doesn't must be neglected.ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2009.
2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
3. Brook AH. Multi level complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:3-17.
4. Xianghhong Bu, Khalaf K, Hobsonc RS. Dental arch dimensions in oligodontia patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:768-772.
5. Harris EF, Clark LL. Hypodontia: an epidemiologic study of American black and white people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134:761-767.
6. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dent 2012; 2012:837270.
7. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 231-238.
8. Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population.Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 263-269.
9. Thongudomporn U1, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. AustDent J. 1998 Dec;43(6):395-398.
10. Shokri A1, Poorolajal J2, Khajeh S1, Faramarzi F3, Kahnamoui HM3. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):7-13.
11. Ezoddini AF1, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):140-144.
12. Murray P, Brown NL: The conservative approach to managing unerupted lower premolars two case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003,13:198–203.
13. Karapanou V: Endodontic management of an impacted premolar. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005,29:293–298.
14. Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumeraryteeth: a review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42:160-165.
15. Sedano HO, Gorlin RJ. Familial occurrence of mesiodens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:360-361.
16. Salcido-García JF, Ledesmamontes C, Hernández-flores F, Pérez D, Garcés-ortíz M. Frequency of supernumeraryteeth in Mexican population. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal 2004;9:403–409.
17. Joshi MR, Shetye SB. Transmigration of mandibular canines: A review of the literature and report of two cases. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 291-294.
18. Alaejos-Algarra C, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Transmigration of mandibular canines: Report of six cases and review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 395-398.
19. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intrabony migration of impacted teeth. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:738-743.
20. Buyukkurt MC, Aras MH, Caglaroglu M, Gungormus M. Transmigrant mandibular canines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(10):2025-2029.
21. Kumar S, Jayaswal P, Pentapati KC, Valiathan A, Kotak N. Investigation of the transmigrated canine in an orthodontic patient population. J Orthod. 2012;39(2):89-94.
22. Torres-Lagares D, Flores-Ruiz R, Infante-Cossio P, GarciaCalderon M, GutierresPerez JL: Transmigration of impacted lower canine. Case report andreview of theliterature. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal 2006, 11:171–174.

APA	Çelebi F, TAŞKAN M, TURKAL M, TURKAL H, HOLOĞLU F (2015). Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. , 343 - 350.
Chicago	Çelebi Fatih,TAŞKAN MEHMET MURAT,TURKAL Mustafa,TURKAL Hümeyra,HOLOĞLU Feyza Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. (2015): 343 - 350.
MLA	Çelebi Fatih,TAŞKAN MEHMET MURAT,TURKAL Mustafa,TURKAL Hümeyra,HOLOĞLU Feyza Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. , 2015, ss.343 - 350.
AMA	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. . 2015; 343 - 350.
Vancouver	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. . 2015; 343 - 350.
IEEE	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F "Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population." , ss.343 - 350, 2015.
ISNAD	Çelebi, Fatih vd. "Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population". (2015), 343-350.

APA	Çelebi F, TAŞKAN M, TURKAL M, TURKAL H, HOLOĞLU F (2015). Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 18(4), 343 - 350.
Chicago	Çelebi Fatih,TAŞKAN MEHMET MURAT,TURKAL Mustafa,TURKAL Hümeyra,HOLOĞLU Feyza Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18, no.4 (2015): 343 - 350.
MLA	Çelebi Fatih,TAŞKAN MEHMET MURAT,TURKAL Mustafa,TURKAL Hümeyra,HOLOĞLU Feyza Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.18, no.4, 2015, ss.343 - 350.
AMA	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2015; 18(4): 343 - 350.
Vancouver	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2015; 18(4): 343 - 350.
IEEE	Çelebi F,TAŞKAN M,TURKAL M,TURKAL H,HOLOĞLU F "Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 18, ss.343 - 350, 2015.
ISNAD	Çelebi, Fatih vd. "Dental anomaly prevalence in middle black sea population". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18/4 (2015), 343-350.