Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities

SAVAŞ, Selçuk; BÖLÜKBAŞI, Başak; KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, EBRU; UZER ÇELİK, ESRA

Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities

Ebru KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, (İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pedodonti Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

ESRA UZER ÇELİK, (İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Selçuk SAVAŞ, (İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pedodonti Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Başak BÖLÜKBAŞI (İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Pedodonti Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

3 0

Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 116 - 127 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities

Öz:

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı; sınıf V kavitelere uygulanan kendinden bağlanabilen akışkan kompozitler ile üç farklı adeziv sistemle (üç basamaklı asitlenen ve yıkanan adeziv, iki basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv ve bir basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv) birlikte uygulanan akışkan kompozitlerin mikrosızıntı değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çürüksüz insan molar dişlerinin bukkal ve lingual/palatinal yüzeylerinde yetmiş beş adet standart sınıf V kavite hazırlandı. Kavitelerin oklüzal kenarları minede, gingival kenarları dişeti kenarından mine-sement birleşiminin 1 mm altında olacak şekilde yer aldı. Preperasyonu tamamlanan örnekler, rastgele 5 alt gruba ayrıldı: (1) Kendinden bağlanabilen akışkan kompozit (Fusio Liquid Dentin, FLD), (2) Kendinden bağlanabilen akışkan kompozit (Vertise Flow, VF), (3) Üç basamaklı asitlenen ve yıkanan adeziv/Akışkan kompozit (Optibond FL/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 3ER-AK), (4) İki basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv/Akışkan kompozit (Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 2SE-AK), (5) Bir basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv/Akışkan kompozit (Clearfil S3 Bond Plus/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 1SE-AK). Termal siklüs ve %0.5'lik bazik fuksin boya uygulamasından sonra, örneklerden kesitler alındı ve stereomikroskop altında boya penetrasyon dereceleri skorlandı (n=30). Sonuçlar istatiksel olarak, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U ve Wilcoxon Signed Ranks testleri uygulanarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kavitelerin mine yüzeyinde; VF, FLD, 3ER-AK grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlenmezken, 2SE-AK ve 1SE-AK grupları istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha yüksek mikrosızıntı değerleri gösterdi (p < 0.05). Kavitelerin dentin yüzeyinde ise 3ERAK ve 2SE-AK grupları, VF, FLD ve 1SE-AK gruplarından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük mikrosızıntı değerleri gösterdi (p < 0.05). 2SE-AK grubu mine yüzeyinde daha yüksek mikrosızıntı değeri gösterirken (p < 0.05), VF,FLD, 1SE-AK grupları dentin yüzeyinde daha fazla mikrosızıntı değeri gösterdi (p < 0.05).Sonuçlar: Kendinden bağlanabilen akışkan kompozitlerin her ikisi de mine yüzeyinde üç basamaklı asitlenen ve yıkanan adeziv/akışkan kompozitle benzer mikrosızıntı değeri göstermiştir. Dentin yüzeyinde ise kendinden bağlanabilen akışkan kompozitler, üç basamaklı asitlenen ve yıkanan adeziv/akışkan kompozit ve iki basamaklı kendinden asitli adeziv /akışkan kompozit gruplarına göre daha fazla mikrosızıntı oluşturmuştur.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Sınıf V Kavitelerde Kendinden Bağlanabilen AkışkanKompozitlerinMikrosızıntılarınınKarşılaştırılması

Öz:

Objective: The aim of this in-vitro study was to compare the microleakage of self-adhesive flowable composites to their counterparts applied with three different adhesive systems (3-step etch & rinse adhesive, 2-step self-etch adhesive, and 1-step self-etch adhesive) in Class V cavities.Materials and Methods: Seventy-five standardized Class V cavities were prepared on both buccal and lingual/palatinal surfaces of extracted non-carious human molar teeth. The occlusal margins were located on the enamel where the gingival margins were extended 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. Following preparation, all specimens were randomly divided into five groups: (1) self-adhesive flowable composite (Fusio Liquid Dentin, FLD), (2) selfadhesive flowable composite (Vertise Flow, VF), (3) 3-step etch & rinse adhesive/Flowable c omposite (Optibond FL/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 3ER-AK), (4) 2-step self-etch adhesive/Flowable composite (Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 2SE-AK), (5) 1-step self-etch adhesive/Flowable composite (Clearfil S3 Bond Plus/Clearfil Majesty Flowable, 1SE-AK). After thermocycling and immersion in a 0.5% basic fuchsin, the restorations were sectioned and dye penetration was evaluated under a stereomicroscope (n=30). The data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests (?=0.05).Results: At the enamel interface, no significant differences were observed between the microleakage scores of VF, FLD and 3ER-AK, while they showed significantly lower leakage scores than 2SE-AK and 1SE-AK (p < 0.05). At the dentin interface, 3ER-AK and 2SE-AK exhibited lower leakage scores than VF, FLD and 1SE-AK (p < 0.05). VF, FLD, 1SE-AK had higher leakage scores at the gingival margins (p < 0.05), while higher scores were detected at the enamel margins in 2SE-AK (p<0.05).Conclusions: Both self-adhesive flowable composites showed similar microleakage scores to the 3-step etch & rinse adhesive/flowable composite in enamel, whereas their performance in dentin was worse than 3-step etch & rinse adhesive/flowable composite and 2-step self-etch adhesive/flowable composite.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001;6:119-144.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235
Geurtsen W, Schoeler J. 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and II composite fillings J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
Miyasaka T, Okamura H. Dimensional change measurements of conventional and flowable composite resins using a laser displacemen t sensor. Dent Mater J 2009;28:544-551.
Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:516-521.
Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:1150-1157.
Qin M, Liu H. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:580-587.
Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. Dentin adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites. Am J Dent 1992;5:240-244.
Retief DH, Denys FR. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1989;2:133-144.
Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1992;5:50-61.
Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Oper Dent 2000;25:512-519.
http://www.kerrdental. com/kerrdental-composites- vertiseflow-2; access date: 20/06/2014.
http://www.pentron.com/index. php/products/product_detail/ fusio_liquid_dentin; access date: 20/06/2014.
Ulker M, Ozcan M, Sengün A, Ozer F, Belli S. Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self- etching adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;93:175- 184.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond- strength tests and clinical outcomes Dent Mater 2010;26:100-121.
Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2010;2:220-226.
Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, Akin H. Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;271: 541-546.
Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, Bedran-Russo AK. The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of self- adhesive resin cements J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:258-264.
Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-258. Hosseini MH, Namvar F, Chalipa J, Saber K, Chiniforush N, Sarmadi S, Mirhashemi AH. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared by Er:YAG laser and conventional acid-etching. J Dent (Tehran) 2012;9:20-26
Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:19-24.
Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994;10:253-258.
Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2013;29:221-230.
Heintze S, Blunck U, Göhring T, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:605-620.
Van Meerbeek B, Kanumili P, Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phospho-ric- acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005;21:375-383.
Nilgun Ozturk A, Usumez A, Ozturk B, Usumez S. Influence of different light sources on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:500-504.
Crim GA, Sarartz ML, Philipps RW. Comparison of four thermocycling Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636- 1639.
Jang KT, Chung DH, Shin D, Garcia- Godoy F. Effect of eccentric load cycling on microleakage of Class V flowable and packable composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2001;26:603-608.
Fu J, Kakuda S, Pan F, Hoshika S, Ting S, Fukuoka A, Bao Y, Ikeda T, Nakaoki Y, Selimovic D, Sano H, Sidhu SK. Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in- one system on dentin. Dent Mater J 2013;32:203-211.
Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G. Self-adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: a comparative laboratory study. Dent Mater 2013;29:752-762. Tuloglu N, Sen Tunc E, Ozer S, Bayrak S. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite on dentin with and without application of an adhesive system. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014;12:97-101.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:65-72. Arisu HD, Eliguzeloglu E, Uctasli MB, Omurlu H, Turkoz E. Effect of multiple consecutive adhesive coatings on microleakage of class v cavities. Eur J Dent 2009;3:178-184.
Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:481-488.
Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RG, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:448-453

APA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E, UZER ÇELİK E, SAVAŞ S, BÖLÜKBAŞI B (2015). Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. , 116 - 127.
Chicago	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ EBRU,UZER ÇELİK ESRA,SAVAŞ Selçuk,BÖLÜKBAŞI Başak Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. (2015): 116 - 127.
MLA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ EBRU,UZER ÇELİK ESRA,SAVAŞ Selçuk,BÖLÜKBAŞI Başak Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. , 2015, ss.116 - 127.
AMA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. . 2015; 116 - 127.
Vancouver	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. . 2015; 116 - 127.
IEEE	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B "Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities." , ss.116 - 127, 2015.
ISNAD	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, EBRU vd. "Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities". (2015), 116-127.

APA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E, UZER ÇELİK E, SAVAŞ S, BÖLÜKBAŞI B (2015). Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 18(2), 116 - 127.
Chicago	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ EBRU,UZER ÇELİK ESRA,SAVAŞ Selçuk,BÖLÜKBAŞI Başak Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18, no.2 (2015): 116 - 127.
MLA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ EBRU,UZER ÇELİK ESRA,SAVAŞ Selçuk,BÖLÜKBAŞI Başak Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.18, no.2, 2015, ss.116 - 127.
AMA	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2015; 18(2): 116 - 127.
Vancouver	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2015; 18(2): 116 - 127.
IEEE	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ E,UZER ÇELİK E,SAVAŞ S,BÖLÜKBAŞI B "Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 18, ss.116 - 127, 2015.
ISNAD	KÜÇÜKYILMAZ, EBRU vd. "Comparison of Microleakage of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites in Class V Cavities". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18/2 (2015), 116-127.