Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 1485 - 1502 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries

Öz:
Learning strategies, such as memorization and elaboration strategies, have received both support and repudiation. The 2009 international PISA reading, science, and mathematics achievement test and survey of 15 year-olds in 65 countries was used. The findings indicated that self-reported use of learning strategies, which involve compensatory approaches like memorization, across a global sample was not strongly associated with higher achievement. However, metacognitive strategies which involve an awareness of thinking, as measured by the appropriate use of strategies within a context, were related to greater achievement. Although there were differences across gender and student SES, metacognitive strategies remained a significant predictor of achievement when controlling for SES and gender, and were on par with SES in predicting achievement. This study provides insight that may be particularly beneficial for males and lower SES students who underachieve in reading.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Ablard, K., & Lipschultz, R. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 94-101.
  • Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students' science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 1-21.
  • Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2014). Self-regulated learning (SRL) microanalysis for mathematical problem solving: A comparison of a SRL event measure, questionnaires, and a teacher rating scale. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10789).
  • Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., Malatesta, J., & Adams, T. (2015). Examining the level of convergence among self-regulated learning microanalytic processes, achievement, and a self-report questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(5), 439-450. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/073428915594739
  • Ben-David, A., & Zohar, A. (2009). Contributions of meta-strategic knowledge to scientific inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1657-1682. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/09500690802162762
  • Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(4), 586-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-553
  • Boss, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Rintamaa, M., Carter, J. C., Pennington, J., & Buckman, D. M. (2014). The impact of supplemental instruction on low-achieving adolescents' reading engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(1), 36-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.753859
  • Cavanagh, S. (2007, December). Poverty's effect on U.S. scores greater than for other nations. Education Week, 27(15), 1, 13. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ articles/2007/12/12/15pisa.h27.html
  • Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 579-592.
  • Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W., & Mcbride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 344-365.
  • Cho, S., & Ahn, D. (2003). Strategy acquisition and maintenance of gifted and non-gifted young children. Council for Exceptional Children, 69(4), 497-505.
  • Chuy, M., & Nitulescu, R. (2013). PISA 2009: Explaining the gender gap in reading through reading engagement and approaches to learning. Research paper. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC) and Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC).
  • Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2010). Developing reading fluency and comprehension using repeated reading: Evidence from longitudinal student reports. Language Teaching Research, 14, 27-59.
  • Gardner, R., Brown, R., Sanders, S., & Menke, D. (1992). "Seductive details" and learning from text. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 239-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students' self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.477
  • Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • Lipina, S. J., & Colombo, J. A. (2009). Poverty and brain development during childhood: An approach from cognitive psychology and neuroscience (Human Brain Development Series). Washington, DC: APA Books.
  • Marchant, G. J., & Finch, W. H. (2016). Student, school, and country: The relationship of SES and inequality to achievement. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 6(4), 187-196.
  • Mevarech, Z. R., & Amrany, C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of meta-cognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 147-157.
  • Onu, V. C., Eskay, M., & Igbo, J. N. (2012). Effects of training in math metacognitive strategy on fractional achievement of Nigerian schoolchildren. US-China Education Review, 3, 316-325.
  • Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., & Mercer, L. K. (2000, April). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. In N. E., Perry (Chair), Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students' content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self-regulatory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110(8), 382-396.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  • Pressley, M., & Harris, K. A. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Davis, H. L., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do -- Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.
  • Sezgin Selcuk, G. (2010). Correlational study of physics achievement, learning strategies, attitude and gender in an introductory physics course. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Teaching and Learning, 11. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue2_files/selcuk.pdf
  • Sperling, R. A., Richmond, A. S., Ramsay, C. M., & Klapp, M. (2012). The measurement and predictive ability of metacognition in middle school learners. Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 1-7.
  • Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97-116.
  • Tang, M., & Neber, H. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 103-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598130802503959
  • Throndsen, I. (2011). Self-regulated learning of basic arithmetic skills: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 558-578.
  • Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition Learning, 30, 123-146.
  • Ward, L., & Traweek, D. (1993). Application of a metacognitive strategy to assessment, intervention,
  • and consultation: A think-aloud technique. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 469-485. Woolfolk, A. (2014). Educational psychology: Active learning edition (12nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Yang, K. (2012). Structures of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategy use for reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(3), 307-326.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (Vol. 2, pp. 1-27). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.
APA CALLAN G, FİNCH W, GERMAN R (2016). Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. , 1485 - 1502.
Chicago CALLAN Gregory L,FİNCH W Holmes,GERMAN Rachel L Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. (2016): 1485 - 1502.
MLA CALLAN Gregory L,FİNCH W Holmes,GERMAN Rachel L Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. , 2016, ss.1485 - 1502.
AMA CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. . 2016; 1485 - 1502.
Vancouver CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. . 2016; 1485 - 1502.
IEEE CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R "Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries." , ss.1485 - 1502, 2016.
ISNAD CALLAN, Gregory L vd. "Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries". (2016), 1485-1502.
APA CALLAN G, FİNCH W, GERMAN R (2016). Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(5), 1485 - 1502.
Chicago CALLAN Gregory L,FİNCH W Holmes,GERMAN Rachel L Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.5 (2016): 1485 - 1502.
MLA CALLAN Gregory L,FİNCH W Holmes,GERMAN Rachel L Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.5, 2016, ss.1485 - 1502.
AMA CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(5): 1485 - 1502.
Vancouver CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(5): 1485 - 1502.
IEEE CALLAN G,FİNCH W,GERMAN R "Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.1485 - 1502, 2016.
ISNAD CALLAN, Gregory L vd. "Metacognition, Strategies, Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships Across Countries". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/5 (2016), 1485-1502.