Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 1711 - 1735 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish

Öz:
Due to the requirement of a current, valid, and reliable assessment instrument for determining usage frequencies of technology-based media and the attitudes towards these, this study intends to determine the validity and reliability of the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale, developed by researchers from California State University, under the conditions of Turkey. After testing the scale's Turkish-version equivalence score, it was applied to 913 university students who were studying in various departments and grades. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the 15 factor structure of the scale. In order to determine the reliability of the scale, Cronbach's alpha-internal consistency coefficient, corrected itemtotal correlation, and significance of the differences between the average scores of the top and bottom 27% of participants were examined through the t-test. Cronbach's alpha values for the sub-factors of the scale varied between .71 and .89, and the split-half test correlations related to the sub-factors varied between .71 and .86. The results obtained from the t-test showed that all the differences between the item averages for the top and bottom 27% were significant, that the 60-item scale was consistent with the structure of the original 15 factors, and that it conformed with the data.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Akın, A., & Çetin, B. (2007). The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS): The study of validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 241-268.
  • Aksayan, S., & Gözüm, S. (2002). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber I: Ölçek uyarlama aşaması ve dil uyarlamaları [A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale]. Hemşirelik Araştırma Dergisi, 4(1), 9-14.
  • Alloway, T., & Alloway, R. (2011). Attentional control and engagement with digital technology. Nature Proceedings, Nature Publishing Group. Retrieved from http://precedings.nature. com/documents/5603/version/1/html
  • Anderson, C. A., Gentile, D. A., & Buckley, K. (2007). Violent video game effects on children and adolescents: Theory, research, and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2015). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of ICT integration in teacher education in Turkey. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 97-110.
  • Aydın, F., Karaa, F. N. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının teknolojiye yönelik tutumları: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Pre-service teachers' attitudes toward technology: Scale development study]. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(4), 103-118.
  • Balduini, M., Celino, I., Dell'Aglio, D., Della, E. V., Huang, Y., Lee, T., ...Tresp, V. (2012). BOTTARI: An augmented reality mobile application to deliver personalized and location- based recommendations by continuous analysis of social media streams. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 16, 33-41.
  • Baran, B. (2013). Çoklu görev(ler)'in öğretim elemanlarının akademik işlerine etkisi [The effect of multitasking to faculty members' academic works]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 2337-2353. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1718
  • Baron, N. S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies (pp. 177-194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baş, T. (2006). Anket [Survey]. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Benbunan-Fich, R., Adler, R. F., & Mavlanova, T. (2011). Measuring multitasking behavior with activity-based metrics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2), 1-22.
  • Berigel, M., Kokoç, M., & Karal, H. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers' level of social networking sites addictive tendencies. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49(A), 215-228.
  • Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 527-534.
  • Burak, L. (2012). Multitasking in the university classroom. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://vc.bridgew.edu/mahpls_fac/74/
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences] (11st ed.). Ankara, Turkey: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (16th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
  • Cades, D. M., Werner, N. E., Boehm-Davis, D. A., & Arshad, Z. (2010). Interruptions are disruptive in the real world: Evidence from an office setting. In Proceedings of the 54th annual human factors and ergonomics society conference. San Francisco, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
  • Cakir, R. (2015). Pre-service and in-service teachers' perceptions about using Web 2.0 in education. Participatory Educational Research, 2(2), 70-83. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.17275/per.15.10.2.2.
  • Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483-489.
  • Carrier, L. M., Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Lim, A. F. (2015). Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, 64-78. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.005
  • Clayton, R. B., Osborne, R. E., Miller, B. K., & Oberle, C. D. (2013). Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 687-693.
  • Council of Higher Education (CoHE, Turkey). (2015). Öğrenci sayıları istatistikleri [The statistics of students]. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ yuksekogretimIstatistikleri/2015/2015_T17.pdf
  • Çam, E., & İşbulan, O. (2012). Addiction for teacher candidates: Social networks. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 14-19.
  • Çepni, O., Palaz, T., & Ablak, S. (2015). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının medya ve televizyon okuryazarlık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Examining prospective social sciences teachers' level of media and television literacy according to different variables]. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 431-446. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8464 Çetin, B. (2015). Determinatıon of media and television literacy levels of classroom teacher candidates. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(1), 171-190.
  • Çoklar, A. N. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenliği öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi yeterliklerinin cinsiyet ve BİT kullanım aşamaları bağlamında incelenmesi [Primary school preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge competency in terms of gender and ICT use phase]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 103-122. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3464
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for the social sciences SPSS and LISREL applications]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi Yayınevi.
  • Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri ile teknopedagojik eğitim yeterlikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers]. İlköğretim Online, 12(3), 797-807.
  • Delbridge, K. A. (2000). Individual differences in multi-tasking ability: Exploring a nomological network (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, Department of Psychology.
  • Demirli, C. (2013). ICT usage of pre-service teachers: Cultural comparison for Turkey and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 1095-1105.
  • Deniz, Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama [The adaptation of psychological scales]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
  • D'heer, E., Courtois, C., & Paulussen, S. (2012). The dynamics of multi-screen media consumption in the living room context. Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive TV and video. Berlin, Germany.
  • Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2014). Why do pre-service teachers quit Facebook? An investigation on 'quitters forever' and 'quitters for a while'. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 170- 176. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.007
  • Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2016). Effects of multitasking on retention and topic interest. Learning and Instruction, 41, 94-105. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2015.10.005
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892.
  • Foehr, U. G. (2006). Key Findings: Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. A Kaiser Family Foundation study. Retrieved from http://kff.org/ other/media-multitasking-among-american-youth-prevalence-predictors-2/
  • Gizir, S. (2005). Assessment of factors negatively effecting the communication process in Turkish state universities (Doctoral dissertation). Thesis no. 161941 retrieved from https:// tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Golbeck, J. (2013). Analyzing the social web. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google. (2013). Our mobile planet: Turkey. Understanding the mobile consumer. Retrieved from http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/omp-2013-tr-local.pdf
  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534-537.
  • Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, F. P., & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
  • Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Darowski, E. S., Rench, T. A., & Brou, R. (2010). Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic work paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1149-1167. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1624
  • Hampton, K. L., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http:// www.pewinternet.org/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives
  • Han, I., Eom, M., & Shin, W. S. (2013). Multimedia case-based learning to enhance pre-service teachers' knowledge integration for teaching with Technologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 122-129. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.006
  • Hao, Y. (2016). The development of pre-service teachers' knowledge: A contemplative approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 155-164. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.054
  • Holmes, M. E., Papper, R. A., Popovich, M. N., & Bloxham, M. (2005). Middletown media studies II: Concurrent media exposure. Muncie, IN: Ball State Univ. Center for Media Design. Retrieved from http://cms.bsu.edu/academics/centersandinstitutes/cmd/insightandresearch/ capabilities/projectgallery/middletownmediastudies/middletownmediastudiesii
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Hughes, J. E., Ko, Y., Lim, M., & Liu, S. (2015). Preservice teachers' social networking use, concerns, and educational possibilities: Trends from 2008-2012. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(2), 185-212.
  • Hwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S. H. (2014). Why do media users multitask? Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542-548.
  • International Data Corperation (IDC). (2013). Always connected: How smartphones and social media keep us engaged. IDC Research. Retrieved from http://tr.scribd.com/doc/133393152/ IDC-Facebook-Always-Connected
  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). National educational standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-tstandards. pdf?sfvrsn=2
  • İşçitürk, B., & Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2014). Examining pre-service teachers> use and acceptance of information and communication technologies in terms of certain variables. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education, 10(3), 684-702.
  • Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B. (2013a). Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 38-50. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030277
  • Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Johnson, B. (2013b). The interrelationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(2), 117-131. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030946 Jeong, S., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364-384.
  • Jiménez, J. E., & O'Shanahan, I. (2016). Effects of web-based training on Spanish pre-service and in-service teacher knowledge and implicit beliefs on learning to read. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 175-187. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.006
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70(2014), 194-202.
  • Junco, R. (2012a). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187-198.
  • Junco, R. (2012b). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162-171.
  • Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 626-631.
  • Junco, R. (2014). iSpy: Seeing what students really do online. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 75-89.
  • Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education, 56(2), 370-378.
  • Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No a 4u: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59(2), 505-514.
  • Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2010). A five-year study of on-campus internet use by undergraduate biomedical students. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1564-1571.
  • Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının teknopedagojik eğitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımları açısından incelenmesi [Examining technopedagogical knowledge competencies of preservice teachers based on ICT usage]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
  • Kahveci, N. G. (2015). Pre-service teachers' conceptions on use of social media in social studies education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1), 82-100.
  • Kaleli Yılmaz, G. (2015). Türkiye'deki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi çalışmalarının analizi: Bir meta-sentez çalışması [Analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge studies in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 130-122.
  • Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189.
  • Kamibeppu, K., & Sugiura, H. (2005). Impact of the moblie phone on junior high-school students' friendships in the Tokyo metropolitan area. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(2), 121-130.
  • Karaman, M. K. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının TV ve internet teknolojilerini kullanma amaç ve beklentilerinin medya okuryazarlığı bağlamında değerlendirilmesi [Evaluating preservice teachers' usage purposes and expectations of TV and Internet technologies in media literacy context]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 51-62.
  • Kaya, S., & Dağ, F. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerine yönelik teknolojik pedagojik içerik bilgisi ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması [Turkish adaptation of technological pedagogical content knowledge survey for elementary teachers]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 291-306.
  • Kessler, S. (2011). 38% of college students can't go 10 minutes without tech [STATS]. Mashable Tech. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2011/05/31/college-tech-device-stats/ Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241-251.
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
  • Kuzu, E. B., & Akbulut, Y. (2013). Use of online social networking sites among pre-service information technology teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology, 5(3), 358-370. Küçükturan, G. (2005). Anne baba tutum ölçeği [Parents attitude scale]. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19, 238-250.
  • Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 329-347.
  • Lawson, D. R. (2013). The effects of text messaging on memory recall in college (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/wcu/f/Lawson2013.pdf
  • Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121-128. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001
  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, L., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure models. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
  • Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2010.02.008
  • McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 23-27. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.020
  • Media Metrix. (1999). Simultaneous use of PC and television growing rapidly. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mediametrix.com/usa/press/releases/19990712.jsp
  • Ministry of National Education in Turkey (MoNE). (2013). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı öğretmen yeterlikleri [The Ministry of National Education teacher qualifications]. Retrieved from http://otmg.meb.gov.tr/YetGenel.html
  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134-140.
  • Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers In Human Behavior, 28(1), 267-274. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009
  • Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L., Koff, R., & Eikoff, J. (2012a). Depression and Internet use among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Psychology, 3, 743-748.
  • Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L., Koff, R., Eikoff, J., Diermyer, C., & Christakis, D. A. (2012b). Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1097-1102.
  • Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPAC) in the context of case development. J. Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127-152.
  • Nielsen. (2013). Action figures: How second screens are transforming TV viewing. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2013/action-figures--how-second-screensare-transforming-tv-viewing.html
  • Nielsen Media Research. (1999). TV viewing in Internet households. New York. NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nielsenmedia.com
  • Nielsen, W., Moll, R., Farrell, T., McDaid, N., & Hoban, G. (2013). Social media use among pre-service primary teachers. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 10(8), 3-13.
  • Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15,583-15,587.
  • Öner, N. (1987). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlamasında bir yöntembilim modeli [Cross-cultural adaptation of the scale model of a methodology]. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(21), 80-83.
  • Özçelik, D. A. (2010). Test hazırlama kılavuzu [Test preparation guide]. Ankara, Turkey: PEGEM A Yayıncılık.
  • Özgür, H. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal ağ bağımlılığı, etkileşim kaygısı ve yalnızlık düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Analyzing the relationship between social networking addiction, interaction anxiousness and levels of loneliness of pre-service teachers]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 667-690.
  • Papper, R. A., Holmes, M. E., & Popovich, M. N. (2004). Middletown media studies: Media multitasking and how much people really use the media. The International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal, 1, 9-50.
  • Pashler, H., Kang, S. H., & Ip, R. Y. (2013). Does multitasking ımpair studying? Depends on timing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 593-599.
  • Piotrowski, C. (2015). Emerging research on social media use in education: A study of dissertations. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 1-12.
  • Poposki, E. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2010). The multitasking preference inventory: Toward an improved measure of individual differences in polychronicity. Human Performance, 23, 247-264.
  • Ravizza, S. M., Hambrick, D. Z., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109-114.
  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., Roberts, D. F., & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media at the new millennium: A comprehensive national analysis of children's media use. Palo Alto, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Mediainduced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948-958.
  • Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013a). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2501-2511. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006
  • Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013b). Is Facebook creating ''iDisorders''? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxisety. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1243-1254.
  • Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
  • Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24-31.
  • Sarsar, F, & Engin, G. (2015). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının medya okur-yazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the media literacy level of primary school teacher candidates]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 1(16), 165-176.
  • Sendurur, P., Sendurur, E., & Yilmaz, R. (2015). Examination of the social network sites usage patterns of pre-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(A), 188-194. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.052
  • Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 7-30.
  • Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2010). The multitasking mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Savaşır, I. (1994). Ölçek uyarlamasındaki bazı sorunlar ve çözüm yolları [Problems and some solutions in scale adaptation]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 33(9), 27-32.
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and sample applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Teo, T. (2015). Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers' acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers & Education, 83, 22-31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015
  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51-66.
  • Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers and Education, 65, 12-33.
  • Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1-9. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.604802
  • Tokmak Sancar, H., Yelken Yanpar, T., & Konokman Yavuz, G. (2013). Pre-service teachers' perceptions on development of their IMD competencies through TPACK-based activities. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 243-256.
  • Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134-150. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
  • Tosun, A., & Irak, M. (2008). Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessivecompulsive symptoms. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19(1), 67-80.
  • Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1102-1112.
  • Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2015). An examination of gender effect on preservice teachers' behavioural intentions to use ICT. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(1), 68-88.
  • Ursavaş, Ö. F., Şahin, S, & McIlroy, D. (2014). Türkiye'deki öğretmen adaylarının BİT kullanımına yönelik davranışsal niyetlerinin belirlenmesinde branşlarının rolü [The role of discipline in determining Turkish pre-service teachers' behavioral intentions to use ICT]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(175), 136-153.
  • Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers' intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49-58. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.008
  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(3), 107-114.
  • Wang, N., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., & Rust, J. (2014). Can well-being be measured using Facebook status updates? Validation of Facebook's gross national happiness index. Social Indicators Research, 115(1), 483-491.
  • Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The "myth" of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493-513.
  • We Are Social. (2014). Social, digital & mobile worldwide in 2014. Retrieved from http:// wearesocial.net/blog/2014/01/social-digital-mobile-worldwide-2014/
  • Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751.
  • Yakushev, A., & Mityagin, S. (2014). Social Networks mining for analysis and modeling drugs usage. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 2462-2471.
  • Yavuz, S. (2005). Developing a technology attitude scale for pre-service chemistry teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 4(1), 17-25.
  • Yuan, E. (2011). News consumption across multiple media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 14(7), 998-1016.
  • Zhong, B., Hardin, M., & Sun, T. (2011). Less effortful thinking leads to more social networking? The associations between the use of social network sites and personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1265-1271.
APA OZGÜR H (2016). Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. , 1711 - 1735.
Chicago OZGÜR HASAN Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. (2016): 1711 - 1735.
MLA OZGÜR HASAN Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. , 2016, ss.1711 - 1735.
AMA OZGÜR H Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. . 2016; 1711 - 1735.
Vancouver OZGÜR H Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. . 2016; 1711 - 1735.
IEEE OZGÜR H "Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish." , ss.1711 - 1735, 2016.
ISNAD OZGÜR, HASAN. "Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish". (2016), 1711-1735.
APA OZGÜR H (2016). Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(5), 1711 - 1735.
Chicago OZGÜR HASAN Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.5 (2016): 1711 - 1735.
MLA OZGÜR HASAN Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.5, 2016, ss.1711 - 1735.
AMA OZGÜR H Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(5): 1711 - 1735.
Vancouver OZGÜR H Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(5): 1711 - 1735.
IEEE OZGÜR H "Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.1711 - 1735, 2016.
ISNAD OZGÜR, HASAN. "Adapting the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale to Turkish". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/5 (2016), 1711-1735.