Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 42 - 56 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları
Öz: Hayvanların doğru ve kalıcı olarak tanımlanması, izleme sistemlerinin temeldir. Radyo frekansları ile çalışan pasif transponderler kullanılarak hayvanların elektronik olarak tanımlanması, küçükbaş hayvanların daha kolay izlenmesini sağlamaktadır. Bu durum, hayvan hareketlerini ve bilgi yönetimini daha kolay hale getirebilir. Koyun-keçiler için rumen bolüsleri, elektronik kulak numaraları ve enjekte edilebilen transponderlerin de bulunduğu farklı tanımlama aygıtlarının etkinliği araştırılmaktadır. Bazı çalışmalarda kullanılan düğme şeklindeki plastik kulak numarası ve doğru tasarlanmış bolüsler, koyun-keçi ırklarına bağlı olarak hayvanın performansını ve yasal tanımlamaları yerine getirememektedir. Bununla birlikle, yetiştiricilere bu konuda bazı öneriler yapabilmek için daha büyük koyun-keçi sürülerinde farklı tanımlama aygıtlarının performanslarını karşılaştıran çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. Sonuç olarak işletmenin üretim sistemi ve izleme yönteminin maliyeti, tanımlama sisteminin seçiminde daha önemli nedenlerdir
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Importance and Using Possibilities of Electronic Identification Systems in Small Ruminant Production
Öz: Accurate and permanent identification of animals is basis of traceability systems. Electronic identification using radio frequency passive transponders improves traceability of small ruminants. This makes easier to manage databases for breeding stocks and animal movements. Efficiency of different electronic identification devices have been investigated for sheep-goats, including injected transponders, electronic ear tags, and rumen boluses. Correctly designed boluses and the visual flag-button plastic ear tags used in sheep and goats hasn't fulfilled the identification and performance depending on breeds. On the other hand there is a need to make comparison between different animal identification devices in larger flocks in order to be able to make suggestions for breeders. As a conclusion, production system and cost of tracebility methods are important factors choosing the identification method
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Abecia JA, Torras J. 2009. Aplicación de la pulsera electrónica Patu-flex: Identificación de corderas y cabritas de reposición. Albéitar 129:54-55.
- Ait-Saidi A, Caja G, Carné S, Salama AAK, Ghirardi JJ. 2008b. Comparison of manual vs. semi-automatic milk recording systems in dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 91:1438-1442.
- Ait-Saidi A, Caja G,. Carné S, AAK, Salama AAK, Ghirardi JJ. 2008a. Performance of using electronic identification (e-ID) for milk recording in dairy goat. Innovations environmentally Research Group, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. 59th Meeting EAAP, 24-27 August 2008, Vilnius, Lithuania. and friendly Ruminant
- Ait-Saidi A, Caja G, Mocket JH. 2013. Eficacia de lectura dinámica detranspondedores de distintas tecnologías en ganado ovino en condiciones de granja. In: XV Jornadas sobre Producción Animal. Asociación Interprofesional para el Desarrollo Agrario (AIDA), Zaragoza, Spain, pp.91-93.
- Allen A, Golden B, Taylor M, Patterson D, Henriksen D, Skuce R. 2008. Evaluation of retinal imaging technology for the biometric identification of bovine animals in Northern Ireland Livestock Science 116(1-3): 42-52.
- Anon 2006. RFID and UHF: A Prescription for RFID Success in the Pharmaceutical Industry. White paper representing a collaborative effort by ADT/Tyco Fire & Security, Alien, Impinj, Intel, Symbol and Xterprise. content/uploads/2011/02/2006-WP-RFID- andUHF_ApPrescription-for-RFID-Success-in-the- Pharmaceutifcal-Industry.pdf. (20.11.2015).
- Balvay B. 2010. Identification électronique: Présentation du projet «RFId Caprine». Institut de l'Élevage.http://www.inst- elevage.asso.fr/html1/IMG/pdf_Actualites_de_la_fil iere.pdf (23 Nisan 2010).
- Barry B, Gonzales-Barron UA, McDonnell K, Butler F, Ward S. 2007. Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric Transactions of the ASABE 50(3):1073-1080, ISSN 0001-2351. cattle identification.
- Barry B, Corkery G, Gonzales-Barron U, McDonnell K, Butler F, Ward S. 2008. A longitudinal study of the effect of time on the matching performance of a retinal recognition system for lambs. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 64: 202-211.
- Bass PD, Pendell DL, Morris DL, Scanga JA, Belk KE, Field TG, Sofos JN, Tatum JD, Smith GC. 2008. Review: selectedcountries Professional Animal Scientist 24(4): 302-330. in outside of North America
- Bauer U, Kilian M, Harms J, Wendl G. 2009. First results of a large field trial regarding electronic tagging of sheep in Germany. In: Lokhorst C, Groot Koerkamp PWG. (Eds.), Precision Livestock Farming'09. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 237-242.
- Bechini A, Cimino MGCA, Marcelloni F, Tomasi A. 2008. Patterns and technologies for enabling supply chain traceability through collaborative e-business. Information and Software Technology 50(4):342-
- Besbes B, Hoffmann I. 2011. Animal identification for traceability and performance recording: FAO's multipurpose and integrated approach FAO-ICAR- FEPALE Workshop on animal identification and recording systems for traceability and livestock development in LAC region, December Santiago, Chile.
- Blancou J. 2001. A history of the traceability of animals and animal products. Technique-Offıce International Des Epizooties. 20(2):420-425.
- Revue Scıentıfıque Et
- Caja G, Barillet F, Nehring R, Marie C, Ribó O, Ricard E, Lagriffoul G, Conill C, Aurel MR, Jacquin M. 1996. Comparison of different devices for electronic identification in dairy sheep. In: Renaud, J., van Gelder, J. (Eds.) Performance Recording of Animals. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 349-353, EAAP Publ. No. 87.
- Caja G, Conill C, Nehring R, Ribó O. 1999a. Development of a ceramic bolus for the permanent electronic identification of sheep, goat and cattle. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 24:45-63.
- Caja G, Conill C, Ribó O, Nehring R, Salama AAK, Ayadi M. 2013. Readability and migration of glass encapsulated transponders injected in different body sites of adult goats for electronic identification. Animal (submitted for publication). traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line. Journal of Animal Science 83:2215-2224.
- Caja G, Ghirardi J, Hernández-Jover M, Garí D. 2004. Diversity of animal identification techniques: from fire-age to electronic-age. ICAR Technical Series No.9. http://minnie.uab.es/~veteri/40300/23_Caja_etal04_I carTS9_animal%20identification.pdf.(12.05.2016).
- Caja G, Hernandez-Jover M, Conill C, Garin D, Alabern X, Farriol B, Ghirardi JJ. 2005a. Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to end of the slaughter line. Journal of Animal Science 83:2215-224.
- Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Garin D, Viseca JF. 2005b. Capsule for the electronic identification of ruminants of any weight anda ge. Inventors; Rumitag S.L. Assigne. International Patent WO/2005/002329.
- Caja G, Luini M, Fonseca PD. 1994. Electronic identification of farm animals using implantable transponders. (Contract CCAM 93-342), Final Report, Vol. I-II, December European Commission, Brussels. Project
- Caja G, Peris S, Conill C, Nehring R, Roca R, Ribó O, Milán MJ. 1999b. Implementation of a system based on electronic identification for the official milk recording of dairy goats in Catalonia. In: Barillet F, Zervas NP. (Eds.), Milking and Milk Production of Dairy Sheep and Goats. Wageningen Pers, EAAP Publ. No. 95, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 406-411.
- Caja G, Ribó O, Nehring R, Conill C, Peris S, Solanes D, Montardit JL, Milán MJ, Farriol B, Vilaseca JF, Alvarez, JM, Díez A, Aguilar O. 1998a. Contract AIR 3 PL 93 2304 (1995-1997): Coupling Active and Passive Telemetric (CAPT) Data Collection for Monitoring, Control and Management of Animal Production at Farm and Sectorial Level. Final Report, Partner P10. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
- Caja G, Vilaseca JF, Korn C. 1998b. The European Union, assignee, 1998b. Ruminal bolus for electronic identification of a ruminant. Patent WO 98/01025 (01.15.1998).
- Caja G, Carné S, Salama AAK, Ait-Saidi A, Rojas- Olivares MA, Rovai M, Capote J, Castro N, Argüello A, Ayadi M, Aljumaah R, Alshaikh MA. 2014. State-of-the-art of electronic identification techniques and applications in goats. Small Ruminant Research 121:42-50.
- Capote J, Martín D, Castro N, Muñoz E, Lozano J, Carné S, Ghirardi JJ, Caja G. 2005. Retención de bolos ruminales para identificación electrónica en distintas razas de cabras españolas. ITEA Production Animal 26:297-299 (Vol. extra).
- Cappai MG, Picciau M, Nieddu G, Bitti MPL, Pinna W. 2014. Long term performance of RFID technology in the large scale identification of small ruminants through electronic ceramic boluses: Implications for animal welfare and regulation compliance. Small Ruminant Research 117:169-175.
- Carlberg J. 2010. Development and Implementation of a Mandatory Animal Identification System: The Canadian Experience. Journal of Agricultural and Applied http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~carlberg/bio/Carlberg %20JAAE%20Animal%20Identification.pdf (12.05.2016). 42(3):559-570.
- Carne S. 2010. Electronic identification of goats: comparasion of different types of radio-frequency and visual devices. PhD. Thesis. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. 140 p.
- Carné S, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Salama AAK. 2009a. Long-term performance of visual and electronic identification devices in dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 92:1500-1511.
- Carné S, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Salama AAK. 2011. Modeling the retention of rumen boluses for the electronic identification of goats. Journal of Dairy Science 94:716-726.
- Carné S, Caja G, Rojas-Olivares MA, Salama AAK. 2010. Readability of visual and electronic leg tags versus rumen boluses and electronic ear tags for the permanent identification of dairy goats Journal of Dairy Science 93(11):5157-5166.
- Carné S, Gipson TA, Rovai M, Merkel RC, Caja G. 2009b. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States. Journal of Animal Science 87:2419-2427.
- Carné S, Gipson TA, Rovai M, Merkel RC, Caja G. 2009c. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States. Journal of Animal Science 87:2419-2427
- Castro A, Martín D, López JL, Montesdeoca MC, Capote J. 2004. Efecto de la identificación electrónica con bolo ruminal en los parámetros histológicos de los estómagos de cabritos. Pages 88- 90 in XXIX Jornadas Científicas de la SEOC, Lleida, Spain.
- Ching S, Tai A. 2009. HF RFID versus UHF RFID -- Technology for Library Service Transformation at City University of Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35(4):347-359.
- Conill C, Caja G, Nehring R, Ribo O. 2002. The use of passive injectable transponders in fattening lambs from birth to slaughter: Effects of injection position, age and breed. Journal of Animal Science 80:919- 925.
- Cooke A, Diprose BB, Brier B. 2010. Use of UHF Tags in Deer & Sheep. Rezare Systems Limited, New Zealand. pathfinder.org.nz/images/pdf/uhf_tag_assessment_re port_2010-02-09.pdf (12.05.2016).
- http://www.rfid- v.8, April 2003.
- EC, 2005. Report from the Commission to the Council and The European Parliament on the possibility of introduction of electronic identification for bovine animals Brussels, 25.01.2005 COM(2005) 9 final. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?u ri=COM:2005:0009:FIN:EN:PDF (28 July 2004)
- EC, 2004. Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003. establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 64/432/EEC. J.Eur. Union L5: 8-17. 92/102/EEC and
- Edwards DS, Johnston AM, Pfeiffer DU. 2001. A comparison of commonly used ear tags on the ear damage of sheep. Animal Welfare 10:141-151.
- Fallon RJ. 2001. The development and use of electronic ruminal identification. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 20:480-490.
- FCEC, 2009. Study on the introduction of electronic identification (EID) as official method to identify bovine animals within the European Union. Final Report by the Food Chain Evaluation Consortium (FCEC) under Framework Contract for evaluation and evaluation related services - Lot 3: Food Chain (awarded through tender no 2004/S 243-208899). European Commission, Directorate General for Health http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/identification/bovine /docs/EID_Bovine_Final_Report_en.pdf (10.05.2016). Consumers.
- Ferrer G, Dew G, Apte U. 2010. When is RFID right for your service? International Journal of Production Economics 124:414-425.
- Fonseca MS, Kenworthy WJ, Courtney FX, Hall MO. 1994. Seagrass planting in the southeastern United States: development. Restoration Ecology 2:198-212. accelerating habitat
- Geers R, Puers B, Goedgeels V, Wouters P. 1997. Electronic Identification, Monitoring and Tracking of Animals. CAB International, Oxford.
- Hobo J. 1998. The necessity for identification and registration of bovine animals from birth to consumer. Performance Recording of Animals: State of the Art, 1998. EAAP Publication No. 91: 53-58.
- Ghirardi JJ, Caja G, Flores C, Garín D, Hernández- Jover M, Bocquier F. 2007. Suitability of electronic mini-boluses for early identification of lambs. Journal of Animal Science 85:248-257.
- Golden BL, Rollin BE, Switzer RV, Comstock CR. Retinal vasculature image acquisition apparatus and method. Colorado State University Research Foundation, assignee. US Pat. 6:766, 041.
- Gonzales Barron U, Butler F, Mc Donnell K, Ward S. 2009. The end of the identity crisis? Advances in biometric markers for animal identification. Irish Veterinary http://www.veterinaryirelandjournal.com/Links/PDF s/CE-Large/CELA_March_2009.pdf (12.05.2016).
- Gonzales-Barron U, Corkery G, Barry B, Butler F, McDonnell K, Ward S. 2008. Assessment of retinal recognition technology as a biometric method for sheep identification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 60:156-166.
- Gruys E, Schakenraad JM, Kruit LK, Bolsher JM. 1993. Biocompatibility of glass-encapsulated electronic chips (transponders) used for the identification of pigs. Veterinary Record 133:385-388.
- Hanton JP. 1976. Rumen-implantable method of electronic Proceedings: Symposium on Cow Identification System and Their Applications. April 8 and 9, IMAG, Wageningen, The Netherlands. In:
- Hanton John P. 1974. Electronic identification of livestock. I.F.A.C. Symposium on Automatic Control for Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon) Paper E2.
- Hartley G, Sundermann E. 2010. The efficacy of using the EPC global network for livestock traceability: A Proof http://www.gs1nz.org/documents/Final%20POC%2 0Document.pdf (17.12.2015). New Zealand.
- Hartley G. 2008. UHF RFID for livestock traceability: Findings from New Zealand . New Zealand. GS1 http://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/News_Centre/Even ts/Events_Listing/Garry%20Hartley.pdf (11.05.2016).
- Heeres JJ, Hogerwerf PH. 2003. Ear tag transponders studied in sheep and goats. Page 190 in Book of Abstracts of the 54th Annu. Mtg. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod. Rome, Italy.
- Hess E. 2006. The Great Debate: HF or UHF RFID. Field http://www.fieldtechnologiesonline.com/article.mvc/ The-Great-Debate-HF-Or-UHF-RFID-0001 (09.05.2016). Online. August 2006
- Hosie B. 1995. Problems with the use of ear tags in sheep. Veterinary Record 137:571-576.
- ICAR-International Committee for Animal Recording. 2007. International agreement of recording practices. Guidelines approved by the General Assembly held in Kuopio, Finland, June 2006. ICAR, Rome, Italy.
- ICAR-International Committee for Animal Recording, , 2012. International Agreement of Recording Practices. Guidelines approved by the Gen- eral Assembly held in Cork, Ireland on June 2012. In: International Committee for Animal Recording, Rome, Italy, p. 578.
- ICAR, 2009. International Agreement of Recording Practices. Guidelines approved by the General Assembly, Niagara Falls, NY, June. International Committee for Animal Recording, Rome, Italy. ICAR, 2010. Animal
- identification: List of manufacturer
- icar.com/Manufacturers_DB/manufacturer_codes_m
- ain.asp (08.05.2016). http://www.service
- ICAR-International Committee for Animal Recording, 2005. Animal identification: List of manufacturer codes. Available:http://www.icar.org/manufacturer_codes.h tm (11.05.2016). [Online]
- ICAR-International Committee for Animal Recording, 2014. Complete List of the ICAR Approved RFID Devices and Corresponding Manufacturers' Codes, Last http://www.service-icar.com/manufacturer complete.php (10.05.2016). Available at:
- ISO-International Organization for Standardization, 2006. Code for the Representation Names of Countries and their Subdivisions - Part 1: Country codes. ISO 3166-1:2006 2009-10-15.
- Jain AK, Ross A, Prabhakar S. 2004. An introduction to biometric recognition. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions 14(1):4-20.
- Karakus F, Demir AÖ, Akkol S, Düzgün A, Karakus M. 2015. Performance of electronic and visual ear tags in lambs under extensive conditions in Turkey. Archives Animal Breeding 58:287-292.
- Leng NM, Kin SL, Hall DM, Cole PH. 2005. A small passive UHF RFID tag for livestock identification. Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Interational Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for wireless Communication, Beijing, China.
- Leong KS, Leng NM, Cole PH. 2007. Investigation on the deployment of HF and UHF RFID tag in livestock identification. Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, Honolulu, HI.
- Macrae AI, Barnes DF, Hunter HA, Sargison ND, Scott PR, Blis-Sitt KJ, Booth TM, Pirie RS. 2003. Diagnosis and treatment of retropharyngeal injuries in lambs associated with the administration of intraruminal boluses. Veterinary Record 153:489- 492. MAPA, 2007.
- Identificación electrónica animal:
- Experiencias del MAPA. MAPA, Madrid, Spain.
- Mingxiu Z, Chunchang F, Minggen Y. 2012. The application used RFID in third party logistics. Physics Procedia 25:2045-2049.
- Pinna W, Sedda P, Moniello G, Ribó O. 2006. Electronic identification of Sarda goats under extensive conditions in the island of Sardinia. Small Ruminant Research 66:286-290.
- Pugh G. 2004. The Basics of RFID. An Introduction to the Technology and Terms. Transcient Technology White pathfinder.org.nz/images/pdf/pfg_0705011.pdf (19.12.2015). http://www.rfid
- Queiroga MC, Fonseca PD, Roquete CR, Castro JL, Condec OAG, Lage M. 1994. Subcutaneous tissue reaction to the implanted electronic identification transponders in caprine. In: Electronic Identification of Farm Animals Using Implantable Transponders. UE DG VI-FEOGA, Research Project, Final Report, vol. II, Exp. UE-03/2.3, European Commission, Brussels.
- Reiners K, Hegger A, Hessel EF, Bo CKS, Wendl G, van den Weghe HFA. 2009. Application of RFID technology using passive HF transponders for the individual identification of weaned piglets at he feed trough. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 68:178-184.
- Reinholz A, Vaselaar D, Owen G, Freeman D, Glower J, Ringwall K, Riesinger MMcCarthy, 2006. Learning from Animal Identification with UHF RFID Technology. North Dakota State University. http://autoidlabs.mit.edu/cs/convocation/2006_05_0 1_LasVegas/presentations%5CMcCarthy.pdf (15.11.2015).
- Ribó O, Korn C, Meloni U, Cropper M, De Winne P, Cuypers M. 2001. IDEA:a large-scale projecton electronic Scientifique Et Technique-Offıce International Des Epizooties 20:246-436. of livestock. Revue
- Rojas-Olivares MA, Caja G, Carne S, Salama AAK. 2009. Retinal image recognition of identifying and tracing live and harvested lambs. 60th Annual Meeting of European Association for Animal Production. 24-27 August Barcelona-Spain.
- Rojas-Olivares MA, Caja G, Carne S, Salama AAK, Adell N, Puig P. 2011. Retinal image recognition for verifying the identity of fattening and replacement lambs. Journal of Animal Science 89:2603-2613.
- Rojas-Olivares MA, Caja G, Carne S, Salama AAK, Adell N, Puig P. 2012. Determining the optimal age for recording the retinal vascular pattern image of lams. Journal of Animal Science 90:1040-1046.
- Roquete CR, Castro JL, Condec O, Fernandes JV. 1994. Evaluation of the body reaction of electronic identification transponders implanted in four different sites in adult goats. In:Electronic Identification of Farm Animals Using Implantable Transponders.UEDG VI-FEOGA, Research Project, Final Report, vol.II, Exp.UE-03/2.1.
- Rusk CP, Blomeke CR, Balschweid MA, Elliott SJ, Baker D. 2006. An evaluation of retinal imaging technology for 4-H beef and sheep identification. Journal of Extension [On-line], 44(5) Article 5FEA7. http://www.joe.org/joe/2006october/a7.shtml (10.05.2016). at:
- Saa C, Mila MJ, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ. 2005. Cost evaluation of the use of conventional and electronic identification and registration systems for the national sheep and goat populations in Spain. Journal of Animal Science 83:1215-1225.
- San Miguel O, Caja G, Nehring R, Miranda F, Merino JA, Almansa V, Lueso MJ. 2005. Results of the IDEA projecton cattle, sheep and goats in Spain. In: Guellouz, M., Dimitriadou, A., Mosconi, C. (Eds.) Performance Recording of Farm Animals: State of the Art, EAAP Publ. No.113. Wageningen Academic Netherlands, pp. 357-359. Wageningen, The SANCO,
- Commission of the European
- Communities. Commıssıon Regulatıon of Amending
- the Annex to Regulation (Ec) No 21/2008, Brussels.
- Sasloglou K, Glover IA, Goh HG, Kwong KH, Gilroy MP, Tachtatzis C, Michie C, Andonovic I. 2009. Antenna and Base-station Diversity for WSN Livestock Monitoring Wireless Sensor Network, Scientific http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/14826/1/Antenna_and _BaseStation_Diversity_for_WSN_Livestock_Moni toring.pdf (11.05.2016). Publishing
- Schuiling HJ, Verkaik J, Binnendijk G, Hogewerf P, Smits D, van der Fels B. 2004. Elektronische oormerken voor I&R bij schapen en geiten. Praktijk Rapport Schapen 02. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
- Thurner S, Wendl G. 2007. Identification reliability of moving HF-transponders with simultaneous reading. Landtechnik 62:106-107.
- Torras X, Vilaseca JF, Caja G. 2006. Process and machine for recovering capsules from inside slaughtered animals. Patent WO2006/050835A8. USDA (UnitedStates Department of Agriculture). Animal Disease Traceability Framework. Official Ear tags-Criteria and Options, Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/traceability/downloads/A DT eartags criteria.pdf (09.05.2016).
- Trevharten A, Michael K. 2008. The RFID-enabled dairy farm: towards total farm management. In: 7th International Conference on Mobile Business, Barcelona, Spain.
- Voulodimos AS, Patrikakis CZ, Sideridis AB, Ntafis VA, Xylouri EM. 2009. A complete farm management system based on animal identification using RFID technology. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 70:380-388.
- Walton TE. 2002. National Animal Health Monitoring System. Part I: Reference of sheep management in the United States. USDA APHIS: VS, CEAH, Fort Collins, CO.
- Whittier JC, Doubet J, Henrickson D, Cobb J, Shadduck J, Golden BL. 2003. Biological considerations pertaining to use of the retinal vascular pattern for permanent identification of livestock in Proc. Western Section, American Society of Animal Science. (11.06.2016).
| APA | TASKIN T, Akbas Y, Koyuncu M, KANDEMIR Ç, TEKİN A, KOŞUM N (2016). Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. , 42 - 56. |
| Chicago | TASKIN TURGAY,Akbas Yavuz,Koyuncu Mehmet,KANDEMIR ÇAGRI,TEKİN A Behiç,KOŞUM NEDİM Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. (2016): 42 - 56. |
| MLA | TASKIN TURGAY,Akbas Yavuz,Koyuncu Mehmet,KANDEMIR ÇAGRI,TEKİN A Behiç,KOŞUM NEDİM Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. , 2016, ss.42 - 56. |
| AMA | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. . 2016; 42 - 56. |
| Vancouver | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. . 2016; 42 - 56. |
| IEEE | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N "Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları." , ss.42 - 56, 2016. |
| ISNAD | TASKIN, TURGAY vd. "Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları". (2016), 42-56. |
| APA | TASKIN T, Akbas Y, Koyuncu M, KANDEMIR Ç, TEKİN A, KOŞUM N (2016). Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim, 57(2), 42 - 56. |
| Chicago | TASKIN TURGAY,Akbas Yavuz,Koyuncu Mehmet,KANDEMIR ÇAGRI,TEKİN A Behiç,KOŞUM NEDİM Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim 57, no.2 (2016): 42 - 56. |
| MLA | TASKIN TURGAY,Akbas Yavuz,Koyuncu Mehmet,KANDEMIR ÇAGRI,TEKİN A Behiç,KOŞUM NEDİM Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim, vol.57, no.2, 2016, ss.42 - 56. |
| AMA | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim. 2016; 57(2): 42 - 56. |
| Vancouver | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları. Hayvansal Üretim. 2016; 57(2): 42 - 56. |
| IEEE | TASKIN T,Akbas Y,Koyuncu M,KANDEMIR Ç,TEKİN A,KOŞUM N "Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları." Hayvansal Üretim, 57, ss.42 - 56, 2016. |
| ISNAD | TASKIN, TURGAY vd. "Küçükbaş Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Elektronik Tanımlama Sistemlerinin Önemi ve Kullanımı Olanakları". Hayvansal Üretim 57/2 (2016), 42-56. |
