Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu

ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU, Aylin

Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu

Aylin ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi

11 1

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 133 - 160 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu

Öz:

Dünyada kalkınma, gelişme ve refah çalışmalarına yön veren yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde geliştirilmiş yeni bakış açıları, beraberinde, yeni kavram ve tanımlamaların da ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Bu kavramların bir kısmı, birçok farklı disiplin tarafından araştırma konusu ya da argümanı olarak kullanılmakta ve bu özelliği nedeniyle de günümüzün bilim çevrelerinde popüler hâle gelmektedir. Söz konusu kavramların, son yıllarda en çok kullanılanlarının başında yaşam kalitesi ve mutluluk kavramları yer almaktadır. Fakat, bu kavramlar standart bir tanımı olmamasına rağmen, çok boyutlu olduğu konusunda fikir bilirliği söz konusudur. Bu nedenle, kavramlar araştırmada kullanıldıkları zaman tanımlanmaları gerekir. Bu çalışmada; yaşam kalitesi, hem nesnel hem de öznel göstergeleri birleştirdiği için maddi yaşam koşullarını, sosyal ilişkileri, toplum kalitesini ve yabancılaşmayı içeren Allardt'ın (1993) modeli kullanılarak tanımlanmış ve ölçülmüştür. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise yaşam kalitesi ve mutluluk ilişkisi çerçevesinde Türkiye'de kadının durumunu incelemektir. Çalışmada, ulaşılabilinen son Avrupa Yaşam Kalitesi Araştırması (2007) verisi kullanılacaktır. Türkiye'den 18 yaş üzeri toplam 2000 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilen bu araştırma, Allardt'ın modeline dayanan yaşam kalitesi indekslerinin kavramlaştırılmasını ve ölçülmesini sağlayan birçok yaşam alanını içermektedir. Kısaca, bu çalışma yaşam kalitesi ve mutluluk ilişkisi çerçevesinde Türkiye'de kadınların durumunu erkeklerle karşılaştırarak ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır. Böylece, bu çalışma toplumsal cinsiyet meselesinin sosyal eşitsizlik ve sosyal politikalar için büyük önem taşıdığının altını çizmeyi hedeflemektedir

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Sosyal Çalışma Sosyoloji Aile Çalışmaları

The Conditions of Woman in Turkey: The Relationship Between Quality of Life and Happiness

Öz:

In the world, the new perspectives developed in the context of approaches guiding the development, well-being and welfare studies have led to the emergence of the new concepts and definitions. Some of them are used as topics or argument for research by different disciplines and have become popular among contemporary scientific community. In recent years, quality of life and happiness concepts are the most popular ones. Although these do not have standard definitions, there is an agreement on their multidimensional features. Because of that, when they are used for research, they should be clearly defined. In this study, quality of life has been defined and measured via Allardt's (1993) model including having (the material living conditions), loving (the social relations), being (the quality of society) and alienation because it combines both objective and subjective indicators. The aim of this study is to explore the conditions of women in Turkey within the context of the relationship between quality of life and happiness. This will be done by using data provided by the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) completed in 2007 which is the last available data set. The survey was administered on individuals of 18 years and above with 2000 respondents in Turkey. Also included is a measure of various life domains which also served as a measure of quality of life indexes based on Allardt's model. In summary, this study intends to indicate the conditions of women in Turkey within the context of the relationship between quality of life and happiness in comparison to the men. Hence, this study intends to underline the gender issue as paramount importance for social inequality and social policies

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Sosyal Çalışma Sosyoloji Aile Çalışmaları

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Ahuvia A.C. (2002). Individualism/Collectivism and Cultures of Happiness: A Theoretical Conjecture on the Relations Between Consumption, Culture and Subjective Well-Being at the National Level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 23-36.
Allardt E. (1993). Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research. İçinde, Nussbaum M. & Sen A. (Eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 88-94.
Altman J.C. & Goldberg G.S. (2004). The Quality of Life Paradox: A Study of Former Public Assistance Recipients. İnternet adresi: http://www.adelphi.e du/peoplematter/pdfs/Altman.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Anderson, B. (2004). Quality of life (and ISTs) - A Review. İnternet adresi: www.socquit.net/Presentations/2_Ben_QoL-Review.ppt. 1.6.2015. Erişim tarihi:
Anderson R., Mikulic B., Vermeylen G., Yrjanainen M.L. & Zigante V. (2009). Second European Quality of Life Survey-Overview. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for The Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
Andre P. & Bitondo D. (2001). Development of a Conceptual and Methodological Framework. İnternet adresi: http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/ 015/001/015/3_e.htm. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Argyle M. (1994). The Psychology of Happiness. London, New York: Routledge.
Arun Ö. & Arun B.K. (2011). Türkiye'de Yaşlı Kadının En Büyük Sorunu: Dulluk. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(4): 1515 -1527.
Arun Ö. & A. Çakıroğlu-Çevik (2013). Quality of Life in an Ageing Society: A Comparative Analysis of Age Groups in Turkey. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 46: 734-739.
Aslaksen I., Flaatten A. & Koren C. (1999). Introduction: Quality of life Indicators. Feminist Economics, 5(2): 79-82.
Baldwin S., Godfrey C. & Propper C. (1990). Introduction. İçinde Baldwin S. et al. (Eds.), Quality of Life Perspectives and Policies. London, New York: Routledge: 1-6.
Böhnke P. (2005). First European Quality of Life Survey: Life Satisfaction, Happiness and Sense of Belonging. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. İnternet adresi: www.eurofound.eu. int/publications/files/EF0591EN.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Bowling A. & J. Windsor (2001). Towards the Good Life: A Population Survey of Dimensions of Quality of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2: 55-81.
Brülde B. (2007). Happiness Theories of the Good Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8:15-49.
Bruni L. (2004). The Economics of Happiness. Seminar at Centre for Administrative Innovation in the Euro Mediterranean Region. İnternet adresi: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/caimed/unpan01 9404.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Çakıroğlu A. (2007). The Relationship Between Quality of Life and Happiness in Turkey. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
Çakıroğlu A. & Ö. Arun (2009). Is Happy Aging Possible? Determinants of Happy Aging in Turkey. Gerobilim, Journal on Social and Psychological Gerontology, 1: 49-70.
Campbell A. (1976). Subjective Measures of Well-Being. American Psychologist, 31(2): 117-124.
Chekola M. (2007). Happiness, Rationality, Autonomy and the Good Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8: 51-78.
Christoph B. & H.H. Noll (2003). Subjective Well-Being in the European Union During the 90s. Social Indicators Research, 64: 521-546.
Cobb C.W. (2000). Measurement Tools and the Quality of Life. Redefining Progress. İnternet adresi: www.rprogress.org./pubs/pdf/measure_qol.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Cummins R.A. (1997). The Comprehensive Quality of life Scale-Intellectual Disability (5th Ed.) Manual. Toorak: Deakin University School of Psychology.
Cummins R.A. (1998). The Second Approximation to an İnternational Standard for Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43: 307-334.
Delhey J., Böhnke P., Habich R. & Zapf W. (2002). Quality of Life in a European Perspective: The Euromodule As a New Instrument for Comparative Welfare Research. Social Indicators Research, 58: 163-176.
Diener E. & Suh E. (1997). Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social and Subjective Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40: 189-216.
Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E. & Smith H.L. (1999). Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 276-302.
Easterlin R.A. (2001). Income and Happiness: Toward a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111: 465-484.
Easterlin R.A. (2003). Explaining happiness. PNAS, 100(19): 11176-11183.
Erman T. (2002). Money-Earning Activities and Empowerment Experiences of Rural Migrant Women in the City: The Case of Turkey. Women's Studies International Forum, 25: 395-410.
Fahey T., Nolan B. & Whelan C.T. (2003). Monitoring Quality of Life in Europe, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. İnternet adresi: http://www.eurofound.eu.int/publications/files/ EF02108 EN.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. & Frijters P. (2004). How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness. The Economic Journal, 114: 641-659.
Ferrris A.L. (2004). The Quality of Life Concept in Sociology. American Sociologist, 35(3): 37-51.
Flora C.B. (1998). Quality of Life Versus Standard of Living. Winter 1998-99. İnternet adresi: http://www.ncrcrd.iastate.edu/newsletter/Winter%209899 From%20the%20 Director.html. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Frey B. & Stutzer A. (2000). Maximizing Happiness? German Economic Review, 1(2): 145-167.
Fuentes N.& Rojas M. (2001). Economic Theory and Subjective Well-Being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53: 289-314.
Gerson E.M. (1976). On 'Quality of Life'. American Sociological Review, 41(5): 793-806.
Glatzer W. (2000). Happiness: Classic Theory in The Light of Current Research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1: 501-511.
Hajiran H. (2006). Toward A Quality of Life Theory: Net Domestic Product Of Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 75: 31-43.
Haller M. & Hadler M. (2006). How Social Relations and Structures Can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research 75: 169-216.
Haybron D.M. (2000a). Two Philosophical Problems in The Study of Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies 1(2): 207-225.
Haybron D.M. (2000b). Happiness and the Importance of Life Satisfaction". Presented New Jersey Regional Philosophical Association's Fall 2000 Conference. İnternet adresi: http://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/philos/ HappinessAndTheImp.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.6.2015.
Haybron D.M. (2005). Life Satisfaction, Ethical Reflection and the Science Happiness. Konferans Tebliği. New Jersey Regional Philosophical Association's Fall 2000 Conference, Kasım 2000.
Heady B., Veenhoven R. & Wearing A. (1991). Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 24: 81-100.
Inkeles A. (1993). Industrialization, Modernization and The Quality of Life. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 34(1/2): 1-23.
Kağıtçıbaşı Ç. (2010). Giriş: Türkiye'de Kadın ve Eğitim. İçinde Durudoğan H., Gökşen F., Oder B.E., Yükseker D. (Eds.), Türkiye'de Toplumsal Cinsiyet Çalışmaları: Eşitsizlikler, Mücadeleler, Kazanımlar. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları: 9-22
Kajanoja J. (2002). Theoretical Bases for the Measurement of Quality of Life. İçinde Gullone E. & Cummins R.A. (Eds.),The University of Subjective Wellbeing Indicators. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 63-80.
Kashdan T.B. (2004). The Assessment of Subjective Well-being (issue raired by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire). Personality and Individual Differences, 36:1225-1232.
Kim B. (1998). Socioeconomic Status and Perception of the Quality of Life in Korea. Development and Society, 27(2): 1-15.
Kovac D. (2004). Quality of Life: A Megaconcept of Coming Époque. Psychology Science, 46(1): 167-186.
Liu B. (1975). Quality of Life Indicators in the U.S. Metropolitan Areas, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Luer R.H. (1978). Social Problems and the Quality of Life. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown Co. Publishers.
Matutinovic I. (1998). Quality of Life in Transition Countries: Central East Europe with Special Reference to Croatia. Social Indicators Research 43: 97-119.
Megone C. (1990). The Quality of Life: Starting from Aristotle. İçinde Baldwin S. et al.Quality of Life Perspectives and Policies. London, New York: Routledge: 28-41.
Myers D.G. & Diener E. (1995). Who is Happy? Psychological Science, 6(1): 10-19.
Narlı N. (2000). The Profile of Woman in Turkey. Yayınlanmamış Konferans Tebliği. Mediterranean Conference XXII. 11-16 Temmuz, İstanbul.
Nesse R.M. (2004). Natural Selection and the Elusiveness of Happiness. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B, 359:1333-1347.
Noll H. (2002). Towards A European System of Social Indicators: Theoretical Framework and System Architecture". Social Indicators Research, 58: 47-87.
Noll H. (2004). Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research: Background, Achievement and Current Trends. İçinde Genov N. (Ed.), Advances in Sociological Knowledge Over Half a Century. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 151-182.
Ott J. (2005). Level and Inequality of Happiness in Nations: Does Greater Happiness of a Greater Number Imply Greater Inequality in Happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6: 397-420.
Özcan Y.Z., Ayata S., Akçay A., Arun Ö.& Erciyes C. (2003). Toplumsal Yapı, Refah Göstergeleri ve Toplumsal Raporlama. Ankara: TÜBİTAK Raporları.
Phillips D.(2006). Quality of Life: Concept, Policy and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Rankin B. & Aytaç I. (2008). Religiosity, the Headscarf and Education in Turkey: An Analyis of 1988 Data and Current Implicaitons. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 29(3): 273-287.
Rapley M. (2003). Quality of Life Research-A Critical İntroduction. London: Sage Publications.
Rojas M. (2005). A Conceptual-Referent Theory of Happiness: Heterogeneity and its Consequences. Social Indicators Research, 74: 261-294.
Saraceno C. (2004). Introduction. Quality of Life in Europe, First Results of a New Pan-European Survey 2003. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions:1-3. İnternet adresi: www.eurofound.eu.in t/publications/files/EF04105EN.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.5.2015.
Schuessler K.F. & Fisher G.A. (1985). Quality of Life Research and Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 11: 129-149.
Schyns P. (1998). Crossnational Differences in Happiness: Economic and Cultural Factors Explored. Social Indicators Research, 43: 3-26.
Sen A. (1998). Development as Freedom, NY: Anchor Books.
Sen A. (2003). Development as Capability Expansion. İçinde Parr S.F. & Shiva Kumar A.K. (Eds.), Readings in Human Development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Shackman G., Liu Y. & Wang X. (2005). Measuring Quality of Life Using Free and Public Domain Data. Social Research Update, 47(online). İnternet adresi: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU47.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 1.5.2015.
Shmotkin D. (2005). Happiness in the Face of Adversity: Reformulating the Dynamic and Modular Bases of Subjective Well-Being. Review of General Psychology, 9(4): 291-325.
Sirgy M.J. (2001). Handbook of Quality of Life Research: An Ethical Marketing Perspective. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sirgy M.J., Michalos A.C., Ferriss A., Easterlin R.A., Patrick D. & Pavot W. (2006). The Quality-Of-Life (QOL) Research Movement: Past, Present and Future. Social Indicators Research, 76: 343-466.
Slottje D.J. (1991). Measuring the Quality of Life Across Countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4): 684-693.
Smith D.(1973). The Geography of Social Well-Being in the United States: An Introduction of Territorial Social Indicators. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tekeli İ., Güler Ç., Vaizoğlu S., Algan N.& Dündar A.K. (2004). Yaşam Kalitesi Göstergeleri: Türkiye İçin Bir Veri Sistemi Önerisi. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları, Sayı: 6. Ankara: TÜBA.
TÜİK (2011). Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması 2011. Ankara: TUİK.
Uchida Y., Norasakkunkit V. & Kıtayama S. (2004). Cultural Constructions of Happiness: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies 5: 223-239.
Veenhoven R. (1989a). National Wealth and Individual Happiness. İçinde Grunert K. & Oelander F. (Eds.), Understanding Economic Behaviour. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Veenhoven, R.(1989b). Introduction. Veenhoven R. Ed.), How Harmful is Happiness? Consequence of Enjoying Life or Not. The Netherlands Universitaire Pers Rotterdam: 1-6.
Veenhoven R. (1991a). Is Happiness Relative? Social Indicators Research, 24: 1-34.
Veenhoven R. (1991b). Cross-National Differences in Happiness-Cultural Bias or Societal Quality? İçinde Bleichrodt N. and Drenth P.J. (Ed.), Contemporary Issues In Cross-cultural Psychology. Amsterdam: Sewts&Zeitlinger: 168-184.
Veenhoven R. (1991c). Questions on Happiness- Classical Topics, Modern Answers, Blind Spots. İçinde Strack F., Argyle M. & Schwarz N. (Eds.), Subjective Wellbeing: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. London: Pergamon Press: 7-26.
Veenhoven R. (1993). Happiness as an Indicator in Social Policy Evaluations- Some Objections Considered. İçinde Messman Schulz K., Koster J.T.A., Leeuw F.L. & Wolters B. (Eds.), Between Sociology and Social Practice Essays on Social Policy Research: Nijmegen: ITS Institute For Applied Social Sciences.
Veenhoven R. (1994). Is Happiness a Trait? Social Indicators Research, 32: 101- 160.
Veenhoven R. (1996). Happy Life-Expectancy- A Comprehensive Measure of Quality of Life in Nations. Social Indicators Research, 39: 1-58.
Veenhoven R.(1997). Advances in Understanding Happiness. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 18: 29-74.
Veenhoven R. (2000a). Wellbeing in The Welfare State- Level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2: 91-125.
Veenhoven R. (2000b). The Four Qualities of Life- Ordering Concepts and Measures of the Good Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1: 1-39.
Veenhoven R. (2001a). What We Know About Happiness. Konferans Tebliği Gross National Happiness Dialogue. Woudschoten, Zeist, The Netherlands, January 14-15, 2001.
Veenhoven R. (2001b). Happiness in Society. Jutta Allmendiger (Hrsg), Gute Gesellshaft? Verhandlungen des 300 Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellscaft für Soziologie, Leske+Budrich: 1265-1314.
Veenhoven R.(2001c). Quality of Life and Happiness : Not Quite The Same. İçinde DeGirolamo G. et al (Eds.), Salute e Qualita Dell Vida. Torino: Centro Scientifico: 67-95.
Veenhoven R. (2002). Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58: 33-45.
Veenhoven R. (2003). Happiness. The Psychologist, 16(3): 128-9.
Veenhoven R. (2004a). World Database of Happiness-Continuous Register of Research on Subjective Appreciation of Life. İçinde Glatzer W., VonBelow S., Stoffregen M. (Eds.), Challenges for Quality of Life in The Contemporary world: Advances in Quality of Life Studies, Theory and Research. Dordrecht The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pulishers: 75-90.
Veenhoven R. (2004b). Happiness As An Aim in Public Policy-The Greatest Happiness Principle. İçinde Linley A., Joseph S. & Hoboken, N.J. (Eds.), Positive Psychology in Practice. USA: John Wiley and Sons: 658-678.
Veenhoven R. (2004c). Is Life Getting Better? Konferans tebliği. 2nd European Conference on Positive Psychology, July 2004, Pallanza, Italy.
Veenhoven R. (2005). Apparent Quality of Life in Nations. Social Indicators Research, 71: 61-68.
Yetim Ü.(2001). Toplumdan Bireye Mutluluk Resimleri. İstanbul: Bağlam.
Zhao B., Heath C.J. & Forgue R.E. (2005). Quality of Life and Use of Human Services among Households. Consumer Interest Annual, 51: 83-106.

APA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A (2016). Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. , 133 - 160.
Chicago	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU Aylin Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. (2016): 133 - 160.
MLA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU Aylin Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. , 2016, ss.133 - 160.
AMA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. . 2016; 133 - 160.
Vancouver	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. . 2016; 133 - 160.
IEEE	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A "Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu." , ss.133 - 160, 2016.
ISNAD	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU, Aylin. "Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu". (2016), 133-160.

APA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A (2016). Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(2), 133 - 160.
Chicago	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU Aylin Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi 17, no.2 (2016): 133 - 160.
MLA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU Aylin Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.17, no.2, 2016, ss.133 - 160.
AMA	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2016; 17(2): 133 - 160.
Vancouver	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2016; 17(2): 133 - 160.
IEEE	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU A "Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu." Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, ss.133 - 160, 2016.
ISNAD	ÇEVİK ÇAKIROĞLU, Aylin. "Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk İlişkisi Çerçevesinde Türkiye'de Kadının Durumu". Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi 17/2 (2016), 133-160.