Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 2193 - 2216 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to discuss student and school factors, including cross level interaction, that cause inequalities in seven and eighth grade students' achievement in Turkish context by using national achievement test scores with a multi-level statistical approach. Our results are in line with most other studies with similar purpose. Our results show that approximately 17% of the variation in student test scores is explained by differences between schools, while the remainder of the variation is accounted for by within-school factors. Our results highlight that student-level variables alone explain nearly 73% of the between-school variance and approximately 19% of the within-school variance in student achievement scores. Our school-level variables explain a relatively small amount of the variation, approximately 5%. This has demonstrated that between- and within-school differences in student achievement are largely accounted for by the socio-demographic background of students. This is in line with the Coleman Study findings; the effect of school characteristics on student achievement was modest compared to the effect of students' socio demographic characteristics. Our results also show that average parent education and income, full-day schooling, attending an urban school and the percentage of female students in the classroom mediate the relationship between student-level variables and student test scores.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 182-192.
  • Anıl, D., Özer-Özkan, Y., & Demir, E. (2015). PISA 2012 araştırması ulusal nihai rapor [PISA 2012 research national final report] Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/ d/0B2wxMX5xMcnhaGtn V2x6YWsyY2c/view
  • Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & Letendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the "Heyneman Loxley Effect" on Mathematics and Science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46, 291-312.
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  • Bauer, D. J., & Cai, L. (2009). Consequences of unmodeled nonlinear effects in multilevel models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 97-114.
  • Bezerra, M. E., Kassouf, A. L., & Arends-Kuenning, M. (2009). The impact of child labor and school quality on academic achievement in Brazil (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4062). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract =1369808
  • Binder, A. J. (1999). Community effects and desired schooling of parents and children in Mexico. Economics of Education Review, 18, 311-325.
  • Blanden, J., & Gregg, P. (2004). Family income and educational attainment: A review of approaches and evidence for Britain. CMPO Working Paper Series No. 04/101. Retrieved from http://www. bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications /papers/2004/wp101.pdf
  • Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150-197). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Carvalho, M., Gamboa, L. F., & Waltenberg, F. D. (2012). Equality of educational opportunity employing PISA data: Taking both achievement and access into account. Retrieved from http:// www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-277.pdf
  • Chevalier, A., Harmon, C., O'Sullivan, V., & Walker, I. (2005). The impact of parental income and education on the schooling of their children (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1496). Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/49018/1/Document.pdf
  • Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, 10(2), 165-181.
  • Chingos, M. M. (2012). Class size and student outcomes: Research and policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 411-438.
  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, F., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York. R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294-304.
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (2006). Dokuzuncu kalkınma planı 2007-2013 [Ninth development plan 2007-2013]. Retrieved from http://www.metu.edu.tr/system/files/kalkinma.pdf
  • Dinçer, M. A., & Uysal, G. (2010). 30 The determinants of student achievement in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(6), 592-598.
  • Doris, A., O'Neill, D., & Sweetman, O. (2013). Gender, single-sex schooling and maths achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35, 104-119.
  • Downey, D. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children's educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746-61.
  • Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development. The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56(6), 497-504.
  • Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. (2015). Education Monitoring Report 2014-15. Retrieved from http:// erg.sabanciuniv.edu/tr/node/1474
  • Eğitimi Araştırma Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı. (2010). PISA 2006 projesi ulusal nihai rapor [PISA 2012 research national final report]. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127.
  • Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17-29.
  • Ferreira, F. H. G., & Gignoux, J. (2010). Inequality of opportunity for education: The case of Turkey. (Working Paper Number: 4). State Planning Organization of the Republic of Turkey and World Bank. Retrieved from http://02b47e1.netsolhost.com/IGED-TR_Documents/4-Inequality%20 of%20Opportunity%20in%20Education.pdf
  • Ferreira, F., & Gignoux, J. (2011). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity, iza discussion papers 6161. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp6161.pdf
  • Filmer, D. (2005). Gender and wealth disparities in schooling: Evidence from 44 Countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 351-369.
  • Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2004). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ preschoolandschool/programme forinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33680685.pdf
  • Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions, and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119-157.
  • Gamboa, L. F., & Waltenberg, F. D. (2012). Inequality of opportunity in educational achievement in Latin America: Evidence from PISA 2006-2009. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 694-708.
  • Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gottfried, M. A. (2009). Excused versus unexcused: How student absences in elementary school affect academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 215-229.
  • Grimm, M. (2011). Does household income matter for children's schooling? Evidence for rural sub-Saharan Africa. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 740-754.
  • Günçer, B., & Köse, M. R. (1993). Effects of family and school on Turkish students' academic performance. Education and Society, 10, 105-118.
  • Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P. F., & Sánchez, M. A. (2006). Child labor and school achievement in latin america. World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), 31-54.
  • Gürsel, S., Uysal, G., & Kökkızıl, M. (2015). 15-19 yaşında 950 bin genç ne eğitimde ne işgücünde [950 thousand 15-19 years old are not in neither schools or workforce]. Retrieved from http:// betam.bahcesehir.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ArastirmaNotu1822.pdf
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22, 481-502.
  • Heady, C. (2003). The Effect of child labor on learning achievement. World Development, 31(2), 385-398.
  • Hertzman, C. (1994). The lifelong impact of childhood experiences: A population health perspective. Daedalus, 123(4), 167-180.
  • Hertzman, C., & Weins, M. (1996). Child development and long-term outcomes: A population health perspective and summary of successful interventions. Social Science and Medicine, 43(7), 1083-1095.
  • Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high and low income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1162-1194. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495.
  • Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2009). An assessment of factors related to science achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1379-1394.
  • Lamdin, D. J. (1996). Evidence of student attendance as an independent variable in education production functions. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 155-162.
  • Lewin, K. M. (2007). Improving access, equity and transitions in education: Creating a research agenda (Project report). Falmer, UK: Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE). Retrieved from http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/1828/
  • Lindskog, A. (2013). The effect of siblings' education on school-entry in the Ethiopian highlands. Economics of Education Review, 34, 45-68.
  • Martins, P., & Veiga, L. (2010). Do inequalities in parents' education play an important role in PISA students' mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29, 1016-1033.
  • McCoach, D. B. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part II): A gentle introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 252-256.
  • Ministry of Education. (2012). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2011-2012. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
  • Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49-68.
  • Nguyen, P. L. (2006). Effects of social class and school conditions on educational enrollment and achievement of boys and girls. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 153-175.
  • O'Connell, A. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Multilevel modeling of educational data. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world first results from PISA 2003. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ pisaproducts/pisa2006/39703267.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/oecd%20pisa%202009%20 exec%20summary.pdf
  • R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
  • Schiller, K. S., Khmelkov, V. T., & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Economic development and the effects of family characteristics on mathematics achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family,Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high and low income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1162-1194. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495. Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2009). An assessment of factors related to science achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1379-1394. Lamdin, D. J. (1996). Evidence of student attendance as an independent variable in education production functions. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 155-162. Lewin, K. M. (2007). Improving access, equity and transitions in education: Creating a research agenda (Project report). Falmer, UK: Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE). Retrieved from http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/1828/ Lindskog, A. (2013). The effect of siblings' education on school-entry in the Ethiopian highlands. Economics of Education Review, 34, 45-68. Martins, P., & Veiga, L. (2010). Do inequalities in parents' education play an important role in PISA students' mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29, 1016-1033. McCoach, D. B. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part II): A gentle introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 252-256. Ministry of Education. (2012). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2011-2012. Ankara, Turkey: Author. Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49-68. Nguyen, P. L. (2006). Effects of social class and school conditions on educational enrollment and achievement of boys and girls. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 153-175. O'Connell, A. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2008). Multilevel modeling of educational data. Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world first results from PISA 2003. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ pisaproducts/pisa2006/39703267.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/oecd%20pisa%202009%20 exec%20summary.pdf R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. Schiller, K. S., Khmelkov, V. T., & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Economic development and the effects of family characteristics on mathematics achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 730-742. 64, 730-742. Schiller, K. S., Khmelkov, V. T., & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Economic development and the effects of family characteristics on mathematics achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 730-742.
  • Smits, J., & Gündüz-Hoşgör, A. (2006). Effects of family background characteristics on educational participation in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Research, 26, 545-560.
  • Strulik, H. (2008). The role of poverty and community norms in child labor and schooling decisions (Discussion Paper No. 383). Retrieved from http://www3.wiwi.uni-hannover.de/Forschung/ Diskussionspapiere/dp-383.pdf
  • Tansel, A. (1998). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey. Center Discussion Paper. 789. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2085213##
  • Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21, 455-70.
  • Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 483-504.
  • Tombul, E., & Savascı, H. S. (2010). Socioeconomic determinants of academic achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), 175-187.
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Birleşmiş Milletler İnsani Gelişme Raporu: Türkiye'de Gençlik [United Nations human development rapport: Youth in Turkey]. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org.tr/publications Documents/ NHDR_Tr.pdf
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Birleşmiş Milletler İnsani Gelişim Endeksi [United Nations human development rapport: Youth in Turkey]. Retrieved from http://www. undp.org.tr/publicationsDocuments/Table%20H_HDR_2009_EN_Indicators.pdf
  • Wößmann, L., & West, M. (2006). Class-size effects in school systems around the world: Evidence from between-grade variation in TIMSS. European Economic Review 50(3), 695-736.
  • Zhao, N., Valcke, M., Desoete, A., & Verhaeghe, J. (2012). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 412-422.
APA Börkan B, Bakis O (2016). Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. , 2193 - 2216.
Chicago Börkan Bengü,Bakis Ozan Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. (2016): 2193 - 2216.
MLA Börkan Bengü,Bakis Ozan Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. , 2016, ss.2193 - 2216.
AMA Börkan B,Bakis O Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. . 2016; 2193 - 2216.
Vancouver Börkan B,Bakis O Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. . 2016; 2193 - 2216.
IEEE Börkan B,Bakis O "Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*." , ss.2193 - 2216, 2016.
ISNAD Börkan, Bengü - Bakis, Ozan. "Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*". (2016), 2193-2216.
APA Börkan B, Bakis O (2016). Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(6), 2193 - 2216.
Chicago Börkan Bengü,Bakis Ozan Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.6 (2016): 2193 - 2216.
MLA Börkan Bengü,Bakis Ozan Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.6, 2016, ss.2193 - 2216.
AMA Börkan B,Bakis O Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(6): 2193 - 2216.
Vancouver Börkan B,Bakis O Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(6): 2193 - 2216.
IEEE Börkan B,Bakis O "Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.2193 - 2216, 2016.
ISNAD Börkan, Bengü - Bakis, Ozan. "Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/6 (2016), 2193-2216.