Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 88 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 30 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta

Öz:
Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de bulunan bir doğal deltada hayvanların ekstansif olarak beslenmesinde kullanılan doğal bitki türlerinin besleyicilik değerlerinin yıl içindeki aylık değişiminin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Delta içinde dört farklı noktadan toplanan bitkilerin Trifolium campestre (T.campestre), Tamus communis (T. communis), Salvia verbenaca (S. verbanaca), Plantago lanceolate (P. lanceolata), Agropyron repens (A. repens), Juncus acutus (J. acutus) ve Carum carvi (C. carvi) türlerinine ait olduğu belirlenmiştir. J. acutus türünün deltadaki doğal merada en sık (%34.62) rastlanan sulak alan bitkisi olduğu ve toprak alanda ise P.lanceolata'nın en yüksek değerde (%18.27) olduğu görülmüştür. Aylık olarak toplanan bitkilerde ham kül, ham protein, asit detejan fiber, nötral deterjan fiber ve metabolize olabilir enerji değerleri arasında istatistiksel farka rastlanmamıştır (P>0.05). Ortalama çinko, bakır, demir, magnezyum ve kalsiyum değerlerinde istatistiksel anlamda farklı olmadığı (P>0.05) Se değerinde ise anlamlı fark olduğu görülmüştür (P<0.05). Sonuç olarak ruminantların ekstansif olarak beslendiği Nisan-Ekim ayları arasında deltadaki yem olarak tüketilen bitki türlerinde Se hariç besin maddeleri değerliğinin önemli oranda değişmediği (P>0.05) saptanmıştır. Ancak özellikle Anadolu Mandalarının doğal beslenme alanı olan deltada enerji ve protein yönünden katkı yapılmasının ve Se toksisitesinin araştırılması gerektiği ve bu uygulamanın manda ve ürünlerinin üretiminin artırılmasını varılmıştır. destekleyeceği kanısına varılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Kızılırmak Deltası meralarında yetişen bazı bitki türlerinin besin madde değerleri

Öz:
The aim of this study was to determine the monthly changes of nutritive values of plant species of natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta listed under the Ramsar Convention which is natural habitat of Anatolian buffalos. Collected plant species from four different points were Smilax excelsa (S.excelsa), Trifolium campestre (T.campestre), Tamus communis (T. communis), Salvia verbenaca (S. verbanaca), Plantago lanceolate (P. lanceolata), Agropyron repens (A. repens), Juncus acutus (J. acutus) and Carum carvi (C. carvi). Nutritive values of monthly collected plant species were determined. The percentage of availability of J. acutus which is the most common wetland plant was higher (34.62%) than other plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. However, P.lanceolata was the highest as herb species (18.27%). There were no differences among mean values of ash, crude protein, acid detergent fibre, neutral detergent fibre and metabolizable energy of monthly collected plant species (P>0.05). Moreover, mean zinc, copper, iron, magnesium and calcium levels were not significantly different in monthly collected and combined plant species (P>0.05). Se levels were found significantly (P<0.05) and toxic. As a result, monthly nutrient supplies of plant species on natural grassland have not been fuctuated from April to October. However, energy and protein supplementation and Se toxicity tests may be required for reaching potential productivity for Anatolian bufalo during grazing season on natural grassland of Kızılırmak Delta.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agrifert (2014): Animal health. available at Accessed October 2014.
  • Akgun A, Yazici F (2012): In Traditional bufalo yougurt. Samsun Symposium. Vol III, P.255-262. Ceylan offset, Samsun, Turkey. (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • Akyildiz R, Atay D, Erdem A (1974): Researches on macro and micro-elements of pasture and other forage crops grown in different conditions. The scientific and Technological ResearchCouncil of Turkey TOAG-41, Ankara.
  • Al Mamun M, Abe D, Kofujita H, Tamura Y, Sano H. (2008): Comparison of the bioactive components of the ecotypes and cultivars of plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) herbs. Animal Science Journal, 79, 83-88.
  • AOAC (1990): Official methods of analysis 15th ed. Association of official analytical of official chemicals. Washington, DC, USA.
  • Comakli B, Dasci M, Koc A (2008): The Effects of traditional grazing practices on upland rangeland vegetation and forage quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Sciences, 32, 259-265.
  • DAFF (2014): Feed requirements and forage quality. Available at: http://www. daff.qld.gov.au/animal-industries/dairy/feed- and-nutrition/feed-requirements-and-forage- quality Accessed November 2014.
  • Edmeades DC, Perrott KW (2004): The calcium requirements of pastures in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 47, 11-21.
  • Erdem F (2014): Determination the digestibility of Juncus acutus by in-vitro gas production and its effect on ruminal cellulolytic bacteria by real-time PCR methods. PhD. Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey. (article in Turkish with an English abstract).
  • Ergun A, Tuncer SD, Colpan I, Yalcin S, Yildiz G, Kucukersan MK, Kucukersan S, Sehu A, Sacakli P (2013): Feeds, feed hygiene and technology. Pozitif Mat. Ankara, Turkey.
  • Garmo TH, Froslie A, Hoie R (1986): Levels of copper, molybdenum, sulphur, zinc, selenium, iron and manganese in native pasture plants from a mountain area in southern Norway. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 36(2): 147-161.
  • Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970): Apparatus, applications. In forage fiber analyses. USDA Agricalture Handbook no. 379.
  • Hedtcke JL, Undersander DJ, Casler MD, Combs DK (2002): Quality oforage stockpiled in Wisconsin. Journal of Range Management, 55, 33-42.
  • Holmes C.W, Wılson GF, Mackenz IE, Flux DS, Brookes IM, Davey AWF (2007): Milk production from pasture. Palmerston North, New Zealand. Massey University.
  • Martins D, Barros L, Carvallo AM, Ferreira IFCR (2011): Nutritional and in vitro antioxidant properties of edible wild greens in Iberian Peninsula traditional diet. Food Chemistry, 125(2): 488-494.
  • Naser MS, Afshar MA, Amir RS, Ali MA, Ghassem MB (2008): Quack grass (Agropyron repens L.): As ruminant feed. Reseach Journal Environmental Sciences, 2, 228-233.
  • Ozbucak TB, Akcin OE, Yalcin S (2007): Nutrition contents of the some wild edible plants in Central Black Sea Region of Turkey. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 1, 11-13.
  • Pullanagari RR, Yule IJ, Tuohy MP, Hedley MJ, Dynes RA, King WM (2012):
  • Proximal sensing of the seasonal variability of pasture nutritive value using multispectral radiometry. Grass and Forage Science, 68(1):110-119.
  • Sano H, Tamura Y, Shiga A (2008): Tissue responsiveness and sensitivity to insulin in sheep led plantain and orchard grass and exposed to cold. New Zeal Journal of Agricultural Research, 46, 169-173.
  • SAS 9.2 (2006): SAS Institute Inc. SAS Campus Drive, Cary NC, 27513.
  • Sekeroglu N, Ozkutlu F, Deveci M, Dede O, Yilmaz N (2006): Evaluation of some wild plants aspect of their nutritional values used as vegetable in Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. Asian Journal Plant Science, 5(2): 185-189.
  • Stewart AV (1996): Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) - a potential pasture species. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 58, 77-86.
  • TR MFWA (2013): Turkey's important wetlands, Ramsar sites. Republic of Turkey. Book issued by Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (TR MFWA). T Meric and SS. Cagirankaya (Ed.). Press: Kayıhan Ajans Ankara, Turkey.
  • TSI (1991): Animal feeds-metabolic (convertible) energy determination (chemical method). TSI No: 9610. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
  • TUBITAK (2010): Bulletein August, 104. 26. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1979): Systems of analyses for evaluation of fibrous feed. In, W.J. Pigden, C.C. Balch, M. Graham (Eds) Proceeing International Workshop on Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds. 49-60. International Development and Reseach Center, Ottowa, Canada.
  • Wilkinson JM, Allen JD, Tunnicliffe R, Smith M, Garnsworthy PC (2014): Variation in composition of pre-grazed pasture herbage in the United Kingdom, 2006-2012. Animal Feed Sciences and Technology, 196, 139-144.
APA Genc B, ÇETİNKAYA N, SELÇUK Z, SALMAN M (2017). Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. , 21 - 30.
Chicago Genc Bugra,ÇETİNKAYA Nurcan,SELÇUK Zehra,SALMAN Mustafa Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. (2017): 21 - 30.
MLA Genc Bugra,ÇETİNKAYA Nurcan,SELÇUK Zehra,SALMAN Mustafa Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. , 2017, ss.21 - 30.
AMA Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. . 2017; 21 - 30.
Vancouver Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. . 2017; 21 - 30.
IEEE Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M "Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta." , ss.21 - 30, 2017.
ISNAD Genc, Bugra vd. "Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta". (2017), 21-30.
APA Genc B, ÇETİNKAYA N, SELÇUK Z, SALMAN M (2017). Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 88(1), 21 - 30.
Chicago Genc Bugra,ÇETİNKAYA Nurcan,SELÇUK Zehra,SALMAN Mustafa Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 88, no.1 (2017): 21 - 30.
MLA Genc Bugra,ÇETİNKAYA Nurcan,SELÇUK Zehra,SALMAN Mustafa Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, vol.88, no.1, 2017, ss.21 - 30.
AMA Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 2017; 88(1): 21 - 30.
Vancouver Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 2017; 88(1): 21 - 30.
IEEE Genc B,ÇETİNKAYA N,SELÇUK Z,SALMAN M "Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta." Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 88, ss.21 - 30, 2017.
ISNAD Genc, Bugra vd. "Nutritive values of common plant species on natural grassland in Kızılırmak Delta". Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 88/1 (2017), 21-30.