Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 151 - 158 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler
Öz: Son yıllarda, çürüklü süt dişlerinin restorasyonunda kullanılan materyallerde yeni gelişmeler elde edilmiştir. Süt ve karışık dişlenme döneminde estetik özellikleri nedeniyle sıklıkla tercih edilen cam iyonomer siman, rezin modifiye cam iyonomer, poliasit modifiye kompozit rezin (kompomer) ve kompozit rezin gibi materyaller günden güne geliştirilmektedir. Süt dişlenmede diş renginde restoratif materyallerin kullanımı, düşük başarısızlık oranlarıyla birlikte konservatif kavite preperasyonları için oldukça avantajlıdır. Ancak, yüksek çürük riskli hastaların ve pulpa tedavili dişlerin restorasyonunda estetik olmayan preforme metal kronlar tercih edilmelidir. Bu derlemede amacımız; süt dişi restorasyonlarında kullanılan restoratif materyaller hakkında bilgilerimizin güncellenmesi ve bu materyallerin avantaj ve dezavantajlarının tartışılmasıdır.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
The choices of restorative materials in primary teeth and influencing factors
Öz: New developments in the materials used for restorations of carious primary molars have obtained in recent years. The materials which are preferred due to esthetic features frequently such as conventional glass ionomer cements, resin-modified glass ionomer cements, polyacid modified composites (compomers) and composite resins are being developed day to day. Tooth coloured restorative materials allow conservative cavity preparation and have low failure rate which are advantageous when used restorations in primary teeth. However, preformed metal crowns should be preferred for restoration of high caries risk patient' and pulp therapied teeth. The purpose of this review is to update our informations about dental restorative materials used in primary tooth restorations and to discuss advantages and disadvantages of these materials.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Al-Harbi SD, Farsi N, 2007. Microleakage of Ormocer- based restorative material in primary teeth: an in vivo study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32,13-17.
- American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs, 2008. Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 30,163-169.
- American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs, 2014. Clinical guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatric dentistry,37, 232-243.
- Atieh M, 2008. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2- year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent, ,325-332.
- Bağlar S, Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Mutluay AT, Şengün A, The challenge of MDP monomer containing adhesive systems: Comparison of shear bond strengths. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek Fak Derg, 25,258-265.
- Beazoglou T, Eklund S, Heffley D, et al, 2007.Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations. Public Health Rep, 122,657-663.
- Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al, 2007. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138,775-783.
- Bonifacio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, et al, 2009. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J, 54,233-237.
- Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM, 2002. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent, 24,465-479.
- Cardoso AC, Arcari GM, Zendron MV, Magini Rde S, The use of natural teeth to make removable partial prostheses and complete prostheses: case reports. Quintessence Int, 25,239-243.
- Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, et al, 2013. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Am J Dent, 26,351- 355.
- Chadwick BL, Evans DJ, 2007. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 8,14-21.
- Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ, 2001. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc, 132,1110-1116.
- Dhar V, Hsu KL, Coll JA, et al, 2015. Evidencebased Update of Pediatric Dental Restorative Procedures: Dental Materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39,303-310.
- Donly KJ, Garcia-Godoy F, 2002. The use of resinbased composite in children. Pediatr Dent, 24,480- 488.
- Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U, Sindel J, 1997. Compomers--a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics? J Orofac Orthop, 58,62-69. Exterkate RA, Damen JJ, Ten Cate JM, 2005.
- Effect of fluoride-releasing filling materials on underlying dentinal lesions in vitro. Caries Res, 39,509-513.
- Figueiredo De Magalhaes M, Neto Ferreira RA, Grossi PA, De Andrade RM, 2008. Measurement of thermophysical properties of human dentin: effect of open porosity. J Dent, 36,588-594.
- Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Watson DJ, Owen FJ, 2001. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: I. Conventional materials and early glass ionomers. Dent Update, 28,486-491.
- Food, Drug Administration HHS, 2010. Dental devices: classification of dental amalgam, reclassification of dental mercury, designation of special controls for dental amalgam, mercury, and amalgam alloy; technical amendment. Final rule; technical amendment. Fed Regist, 75,33169-33170.
- Forsten L, 1998. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials, 19,503-508.
- Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, 1996. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 56:135-140; discussion 161-133.
- Fuks AB, 2015. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry: new insights and reappraising the tradition. Pediatr Dent, 37,125-132.
- Garcia-Godoy F, 2000. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am, 44,541-570.
- Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, 1997. Comparative physicomechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glassionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res, 76,883-894.
- Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS, 2001. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent, 23,24-27.
- Guelmann M, Mjor IA, 2002. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida. Pediatr Dent, 24,326-331.
- Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP, 1998. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials, 19,479-483.
- Hatrick CD, Eakle WS, 2016. Dental Materials-Clinical applications for dental asistants and dental hygienists. rd ed. Elsevier, St. Louis. s: 19-27.
- Hesse D, Bonifacio CC, Guglielmi Cde A, et al, 2015. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res, 29.
- Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, et al, 2005. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent, 18,198-211.
- Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, et al, 2015. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD005512.
- Itota T, Al-Naimi OT, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, Mccabe JF, 2005. Fluoride release and neutralizing effect by resin-based materials. Oper Dent, 30,522
- Kan KC, Messer LB, Messer HH, 1997. Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res, 76,1502-1507.
- Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I, 2012. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure. Eur J Oral Sci, ,539-548.
- Kotsanos N, Arizos S, 2011. Evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer serving both as indirect pulp therapy and as restorative material for primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 12,170-175.
- Kramer N, Frankenberger R, 2007. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent, 17,2-9.
- Loomans B, Hilton T, 2016. Extended Resin Composite Restorations: Techniques and Procedures. Oper Dent, 41, 58-67.
- Luglie PF, Campus G, Chessa G, et al, 2009. Literature Review: Dental Amalgam Fillings and Health Effects, American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs, Access: [http://www.ada.org/en/~/media/ADA/ Member%20Center/FIles/amalgam_literature_review_ 0907].
- Mata AF, Bebermeyer RD, 2006. Stainless steel crowns versus amalgams in the primary dentition and decision-making in clinical practice. Gen Dent, 54,347-350; quiz 351, 367-348.
- Metz I, Rothmaier K, Pitchika V, et al, 2015. Risk factors for secondary caries in direct composite restorations in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent, ,451-461.
- Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A, 2010. Pulp response to resin-modified glass ionomer and calcium hydroxide cements in deep cavities: A quantitative systematic review. Dent Mater, 26,761-770.
- Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT, 2004. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand, 62,37-45.
- Ramires-Romito AC, Wanderley MT, Oliveira MD, Imparato JC, Correa MS, 2000. Biologic restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence Int, 31,405-411.
- Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Charlton DG, 2009. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time. J Esthet Restor Dent, 21,262-272.
- Santos RL, Moura Mde F, Carvalho FG, et al, 2014. Histological analysis of biocompatibility of ionomer cements with an acid-base reaction. Braz Oral Res, 28.
- Sengul F, Gurbuz T, 2015. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39,315-321.
- Somani R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ, Sibal GK, 2016. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 9,192-196.
- Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C, 2007. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138,763-772.
- Tedesco TK, Bonifacio CC, Calvo AF, et al, 2016. Caries lesion prevention and arrestment in approximal surfaces in contact with glass ionomer cement restorations - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent, 26,161-172.
- Tran LA, Messer LB, 2003. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children. Aust Dent J, 48,221-232. Waggoner WF, 2015. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent, 37,163-170.
- White JM, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, 1994. Sterilization of teeth by gamma radiation. J Dent Res, 73,1560-1567.
- Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V, 2012. A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 5,101-107.
- Yang ZP, Chang CS, 1990. A 3-year follow-up of a homotransplanted tooth from a tooth bank. J Endod, 16,34-37.
- Yeolekar TS, Chowdhary NR, Mukunda KS, Kiran NK, 2015. Evaluation of Microleakage and Marginal Ridge Fracture Resistance of Primary Molars Restored with Three Restorative Materials: A Comparative in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 8,108-113.
- Yildiz E, Simsek M, Pamir Z, 2015. Fracture strength of restorations in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scanning.
| APA | mutluay m, Mutluay A (2016). Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. , 151 - 158. |
| Chicago | mutluay merve safa,Mutluay Abidin Talha Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. (2016): 151 - 158. |
| MLA | mutluay merve safa,Mutluay Abidin Talha Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. , 2016, ss.151 - 158. |
| AMA | mutluay m,Mutluay A Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. . 2016; 151 - 158. |
| Vancouver | mutluay m,Mutluay A Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. . 2016; 151 - 158. |
| IEEE | mutluay m,Mutluay A "Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler." , ss.151 - 158, 2016. |
| ISNAD | mutluay, merve safa - Mutluay, Abidin Talha. "Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler". (2016), 151-158. |
| APA | mutluay m, Mutluay A (2016). Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dental Journal, 3(3), 151 - 158. |
| Chicago | mutluay merve safa,Mutluay Abidin Talha Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dental Journal 3, no.3 (2016): 151 - 158. |
| MLA | mutluay merve safa,Mutluay Abidin Talha Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol.3, no.3, 2016, ss.151 - 158. |
| AMA | mutluay m,Mutluay A Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2016; 3(3): 151 - 158. |
| Vancouver | mutluay m,Mutluay A Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2016; 3(3): 151 - 158. |
| IEEE | mutluay m,Mutluay A "Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler." Selcuk Dental Journal, 3, ss.151 - 158, 2016. |
| ISNAD | mutluay, merve safa - Mutluay, Abidin Talha. "Süt dişlerinde restoratif materyal seçimi ve etkileyen faktörler". Selcuk Dental Journal 3/3 (2016), 151-158. |
