The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey

Zafer ÖZTÜRK, (Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler, Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Zonguldak, Türkiye)
Damla ÖZ (Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler, Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Zonguldak, Türkiye)
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
17 4
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 269 - 288 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'de enerji tüketimi, gelir, doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) girişi ve CO2 emisyonu arasındaki ilişkiyi 1974-2011 dönemi için araştırmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Maki (2012) kointegrasyon yöntemi ve Granger nedensellik analizi kullanılmıştır. Kointegrasyon metodu sonuçları değişkenler arasında uzun dönem ilişkinin varlığını göstermiştir. Sonuçlar aynı zamanda Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezinin Türkiye için geçerli olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna ek olarak, karbon emisyonu ve DYY girişi arasında çift taraflı nedensellik ilişkisi bulunduğundan ve DYY'nin negatif katsayılarından dolayı, DYY'nin çevre üzerinde pozitif etkiye sahip olduğunu savunan kirlilik hale hipotezi Türkiye için hem kısa hem de uzun dönemde geçerlidir. Granger nedensellik testine göre, enerji tüketiminden ekonomik büyümeye doğru tek taraflı nedensellik ilişkisini savunan büyüme hipotezi de Türkiye için geçerlidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Enerji Tüketimi, Gelir, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım ve CO2 Emisyonu Arasındaki İlişki:Türkiye Örneği+

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between the energy consumption, income, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, and CO2 emission in Turkey, for the period 1974-2011. For this purpose, Maki (2012) cointegration method and Granger causality analysis have been used. The cointegration method results indicate that there is a long term relationship among the variables. Results also show that, both in the short and long run, Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is supported in Turkey. In addition, the pollution halo hypothesis, meaning that FDI has positive effects on environment, is valid for Turkey in the short and long run since there is bilateral causality relationship between CO2 emission and FDI inflows, and also negative coefficients of FDI. According to Granger causality test, the growth hypothesis, which means there is a unilateral causality relation from energy consumption to economic growth, is also valid for Turkey.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acaravcı, A, & Öztürk, I. (2010). On the Relationship between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Europe. Energy, 35(12). 5412-5420.
  • Akın, C.S. (2014). The Impact of Foreign Trade, Energy Consumption and Income on CO2 Emissions. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 4(3), 465­475.
  • Al-mulali, U. (2012). Factors Affecting CO2 Emission in The Middle East: A Panel Data Analysis. Energy, 44(1), 564-569.
  • Apergis, N. & Payne J. E. (2009). CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage, and Output in Central America. Energy Policy, 37, 3282-3286.
  • Bai, J. & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (1), 1-22.
  • Belke, A., Dreger, C. & Haan, F. (2010). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth -New Insights into the Cointegration Relationship. RUHR Economic Papers 190.
  • Binboğa, G. (2014). Topoloji ve Cebirin Günlük Hayatta Kullanımı. Journal of Yaşar University. 9(34), 5732-5759.
  • Bouttabba, M.A. (2014). The Impact of Financial Development, Income, Energy and Trade on Carbon Emissions: Evidence From the Indian Economy. Economic Modelling, 40, 33-41.
  • Carrion-i-Silvestre, J.L., Kim, D. & Perron, P. (2009). GLS-based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks under Both the Null and Alternative Hypotheses. Econometric Theory, 25, 1754-1792.
  • Chandran, V.G.R. & Tang, C.F. (2013). The Impacts of Transport Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment and Income on CO2 Emissions in ASEAN-5 Economies.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445-453.
  • Chebbi, H.E., Olarreaga, M., & Zitouna H. (2010). Trade Openness and CO2 Emissions in Tunisia. Economic Research Forum. Working Paper Series.
  • Chen, J. & Huang, Y. (2013). The Study of the Relationship between Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emission and Economic Growth. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 6(2), 45-61.
  • Çelikkol, H. & Özkan, N. (2011). Karbon Piyasaları ve Türkiye Perspektifi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31, 203-221.
  • Dam, M.M. (2014). Sera Gazı Emisyonlarının Makro Ekonomik Değişkenlerle İlişkisi: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi. Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Social Sciences, Doctoral Thesis.
  • Engle, R. & Granger, C. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction Representation: Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
  • Eskeland, G. & Harrison, A.E. (1997). Moving to Greener Pastures: Multinationals and the Pollution-Haven Hypothesis. Policy Research Working Paper Series 1744, The World Bank.
  • Gregory, A.W. & Hansen, B.E. (1996), Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend Shifts, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58, 555-559.
  • Grossman, G.M. & Krueger, A.B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914.
  • Halıcıoğlu, F. (2009). An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37, 1156-64.
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for Cointegration with Two Unknown Regime Shifts with an Application to Financial Market Integration. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 497-505.
  • Hoffmann, R., Lee, C., Ramasamy, B. & Yeung, M. (2005). FDI and Pollution: A Granger Causality Test Using Panel Data. Journal of International Development, 17, 311-317.
  • IPPC, (2008). Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ed. by Bryson Bates, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Shaohong Wu, Jean Palutikof. June 2008, Geneva.
  • Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma R. & Liu Y. (2012). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Trade and Income: A Comparative Analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450-460.
  • Johansen, S., Mosconi, R. & Nielsen, B. (2000). Cointegration Analysis in the Presence of Structural Breaks in the Deterministic Trend. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 216-249.
  • Khachoo, Q. & Sofi, I. (2014). The Emissions, Growth, Energy Use and FDI Nexus: Evidence from BRICSAM. International Journal of IT, Engineering and Applied Sciences Research, 3(8), 1-9.
  • Kivyiro, P. & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Foreign Direct Investment: Causality Analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595-606.
  • Kohler, M. (2013). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade: A South African Perspective. Economic Research Southern Africa, ERSA Working Paper 356.
  • Kuznets S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.
  • Küçükaksoy, İ., Çifçi, İ. & Özbek, R.İ. (2015). İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezi: Türkiye Uygulaması. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, http://dx.doi.org/10.18074/cnuiibf.226.
  • Lau, L., Choong C. & Eng, K. (2014). Investigation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Carbon Emissions in Malaysia: Do Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Matter?. Energy Policy, 68, 490-497.
  • Lee, J.W. (2013). The Contribution of Foreign Direct Investment to Clean Energy Use, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth. Energy Policy, 55, 483-489.
  • Linh, D.H. & Lin, S. (2014). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and FDI in Vietnam. Managing Global Transitions, 12(3), 219-232.
  • Maji, I.K. & Habibullaha, M.S. (2015). Impact of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Foreign Direct Investment on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Nigeria. World Applied Sciences Journal, 33(4), 640-645.
  • Maki, D. (2012). Tests for Cointegration Allowing for an Unknown Number of Breaks, Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015.
  • Masih, R. & Masih, A. M.M. (1996). Stock-Watson Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and Error-correction Modelling Approaches to Estimating Long- and Short-run Elasticities in a Demand Function: New Evidence and Methodological Implications from an Application to the Demand for Coal in Mainland China. Energy Economics, 18(4), 315-334.
  • Pao, H. & Tsai, C. (2011). Multivariate Granger Causality between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) and GDP (Gross Domestic Product): Evidence from a Panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) Countries. Energy, 36, 685-93.
  • Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
  • Perron, P. (1997). Further Evidence from Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80, 355-385.
  • Rodriguez, G. (2007). Finite Sample Behaviour of the Level Shift Model Using Quasi-Differenced Data, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77(10), 889-905.
  • Sbia, R., Shahbaz, M., & Hamdi H. (2014). A Contribution of Foreign Direct Investment, Clean Energy, Trade Openness, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth to Energy Demand in UAE. Economic Modelling, 36, 191-197.
  • Shahbaz, M., Lean H.H., & Shabbir M. (2011). Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Role of Energy Consumption in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2947-2953.
  • Stock, J.H. & Watson, M. (1993). A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820.
  • Tang, C.F. & Tan, B.W. (2015). The Impact of Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Direct Investment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447-454.
  • Westerlund, J. & Edgerton, D. (2006). New Improved Tests for Cointegration with Structural Breaks. Working Papers 2006:3, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  • Yıldırım, E. (2014).Energy Use, CO2 Emission and Foreign Direct Investment: Is There Any Inconsistence Between Causal Relations?. Frontiers in Energy, 8(3), 269-278.
  • You, K. & Sarantis, N. (2012). Structural Breaks and the Equilibrium Real Effective Exchange Rate of China: A NATREX Approach. China Economic Review, 23(4), 1146-1163.
  • Zarsky, L. (1999). Havens, Halos and Spaghetti: Untangling the Evidence about Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment. Conference on Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, The Hague, Netherlands, 28-29 January 1999.
  • Zeren, F. (2015). Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların CO2 Emisyonuna Etkisi: Kirlilik Hale Hipotezi mi Kirlilik Cenneti Hipotezi mi?, Journal of Yasar University, 10(37), 6381-6477.
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10 (10), 251-70.
  • http://www.data.worldbank.com
APA ÖZTÜRK Z, ÖZ D (2016). The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. , 269 - 288.
Chicago ÖZTÜRK ZAFER,ÖZ Damla The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. (2016): 269 - 288.
MLA ÖZTÜRK ZAFER,ÖZ Damla The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. , 2016, ss.269 - 288.
AMA ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. . 2016; 269 - 288.
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. . 2016; 269 - 288.
IEEE ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D "The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey." , ss.269 - 288, 2016.
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, ZAFER - ÖZ, Damla. "The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey". (2016), 269-288.
APA ÖZTÜRK Z, ÖZ D (2016). The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 269 - 288.
Chicago ÖZTÜRK ZAFER,ÖZ Damla The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no.2 (2016): 269 - 288.
MLA ÖZTÜRK ZAFER,ÖZ Damla The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.6, no.2, 2016, ss.269 - 288.
AMA ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 6(2): 269 - 288.
Vancouver ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 6(2): 269 - 288.
IEEE ÖZTÜRK Z,ÖZ D "The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey." Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, ss.269 - 288, 2016.
ISNAD ÖZTÜRK, ZAFER - ÖZ, Damla. "The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Income, Foreign Direct Investment, and CO2 Emissions: The Case of Turkey". Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 6/2 (2016), 269-288.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
13-05-2024 6:2

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları