TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ

AYDIN, Betül; Demirer, Veysel

TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Betül AYDIN, (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Burdur, Türkiye)

Veysel DEMİRER (Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Burdur, Türkiye)

Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama

29 12

Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 82 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Öz:

Ters yüz sınıf modeli, sınıf içinde geçen zamanı verimli hale getirmeyi hedefleyen pedagojik bir modeldir. Bu modelde öğrenenler, bilgi edinme gibi temel düzeyde beceri gerektiren görevleri okul dışında gerçekleştirirler. Uygulama, problem çözme, yaratıcılık gibi üst düzey becerileri gerektiren görevleri ise sınıfta, öğretmen rehberliğinde gerçekleştirirler. Bu çalışma kapsamında, ters yüz sınıf modelinin odak alındığı, 2011-2015 yılları arasında çeşitli veri tabanları üzerinde taranan çalışmalar, içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda 29 adet tez, 61 adet makale araştırmacılar tarafından belirlenen 7 kategori altında analiz edilmiştir. Bu kategoriler; kuramsal boyut, örneklem, disiplin, araştırma yöntemi, uygulama sürecinde kullanılan araçlar, değişkenler ve pedagojik çıktılar şeklindedir. Analiz sonucunda ters yüz sınıf modeline yönelik çalışmaların en çok yapılandırmacı yaklaşımı temel aldığı belirlenmiştir. Çalışmaların en çok üniversite öğrencileri ile matematik ve yabancıl dil eğitimi disiplinlerinde gerçekleştikleri görülmüştür. İncelenen çalışmalarda ağırlıklı olarak nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin tercih edildiği belirlenmiştir. Çalışmalarda akademik başarı, öğrenci katılımı, öğrenci/öğretmen görüşleri değişkenlerinin sıklıkla incelendiği görülmüştür. Ayrıca, modelin en çok akademik başarı, öğrenci katılımı, motivasyon, öz yeterlilik algısı gibi pedagojik çıktılarının olduğu görülürken modelin üst düzey becerilere etkisine ilişkin yeterince kanıt bulunamamıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulguların, ters yüz sınıf modelini temel alan çalışmalara çeşitli boyutlarda ışık tutması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik

A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE STUDIES CONDUCTED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL

Öz:

Flipped classroom model is an instructional and pedagogical strategy which aims to make the time spent in the classroom productive. Learners in this model are engaged in basic level activities such as getting information at home, and they do the other high level tasks such as practice, problem solving and creativity in the classroom thanks to teacher's guidance. In this study, the studies focusing on flipped classroom model and conducted in the period between 2011 and 2015 were analyzed through content analysis method by means of various databases. In this regard, 29 theses and 61 articles were analyzed by the researchers under 7 different categories which are theoretical dimension, sampling, discipline, research method, tools used in the implementation process, variables, and pedagogical outcomes. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that the studies conducted on flipped classroom model are mainly based upon constructivist approach. These studies also basically focused more on university students and the discipline of mathematics and foreign language, and most of the studies adopted qualitative research methods. Additionally, the variables of academic achievement, student participation, and student/teacher opinions were frequently researched. Moreover, while it was found out that the model has the pedagogical outcomes of academic achievement, student participation, motivation, and self-sufficiency perception, no enough evidence could be found regarding the effects of this model on high level skills. The findings obtained from the study are expected to contribute to the studies conducted on flipped classroom model in different aspects.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: Impact on grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 419-424.
Aydın, B., & Demirer, V. (2016). Flipping the drawbacks of flipped classroom: Effective tools and reccomendations. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World. 6(1).
Baker, J. W., & Mentch, M. W. (2000). IMOWA curriculum materials. http://www.imowa.org/curricula/flip/ adresinden 13 Mart 2016 tarihinde alınmıştır.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA.
Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied linguistics, 1(2), 89-112.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). Learning and transfer. In How people learn: brain, mind experience, and school. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press
Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. John Wiley & Sons.
Burke, D. D. (2015). Scale-Up! Classroom design and use can facilitate learning. The Law Teacher, 49(2), 189-205.
Butzler, K. B. (2014). The Effects of Motivation on Achievement and Satisfaction in a Flipped Classroom. Published doctoral thesis, Northcentral University Prescott Valley, Arizona.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Deneysel desenler: Öntest sontest kontrol gruplu desen ve veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
Cohen, M. E. (2016). The flipped classroom as a tool for engaging discipline faculty in collaboration: A case study in library-business collaboration. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 5-23.
Correa, M. (2015). Flipping the foreign language classroom and critical pedagogies a (new) old trend. Higher Education for the Future, 2(2), 114-125.
Datig, I., & Ruswick, C. (2013). Four quick flips activities for the information literacy classroom. College & Research Libraries News, 74(5), 249-257.
Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
Fraga, L. M., & Harmon, J. (2014). The flipped classroom model of learning in higher education: an investigation of preservice teachers' perspectives and achievement. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(1).
Fulton, K. P. (2013). Grassroots gains: Byron's flipped classrooms. School Administrator, 70(3), 26-32.
Garver, M. S., & Roberts, B. A. (2013). Flipping & clicking your way to higher-order learning. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 17-22.
Green, T. (2015). Flipped classrooms: An agenda for innovative marketing education in the digital era. Marketing Education Review, 25(3), 179-191.
Goodwin, B., & Miller, A. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78-80.
Göktaş, Y., Hasançebi, F., Varısoğlu, B., Akcay, A., Bayrak, N., Baran, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Trends in educational research in Turkey: A content analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 443-460.
Hertz, M. B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Pro and con. www. edutopia. org/ blog/ flipped classroom-pro-and-con-mary-beth-hertz adresinden 2 Nisan 2016 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
Howell, D. (2013). Effects of an inverted ınstructional delivery model on achievement of ninth-grade physical science honors students. Doktora tezi, Gardner-Webb University, Technology, 46(4), 508-520.
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Lemmer, C. (2013). 'A view from the flip side: 'Using the'ınverted classroom'to enhance the legal ınformation literacy of the ınternational.
Lin, T.C., Lin, T.J. & Tsai, C.C. (2014). Research trends in science education from 2008 to: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346-1372, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction. Upper saddle river, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2th ed.). California: Sage Publications.
Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC medical education, 15(1), 1-10.
Morgan, H. (2014). Focus on technology: Flip your classroom to increase academic achievement. Childhood Education, 90(3), 239-241.
Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W., (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Pinto, C., & Little, G. (2014). Flipped librarians: Assessing our own need to understand our users. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2(40), 192-193.
Rivera, E. (2015). Using the flipped classroom model in your library instruction course. The Reference Librarian, 56(1), 34-41.
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Talbert, R. (2014). Inverting the linear algebra classroom. Primus, 24(5), 361-374.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
Pearson, G. (2012). Students, parents give thumbs-up to flipped classroom. Education Canada, 52(5), 5.
Prashar, A. (2015). Assessing the flipped classroom in operations management: A pilot study. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 126-138.
Rivero, V. (2013). A new model to reach all students all ways. Internet@Schools, 20(1), 14- 16.
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44.
Siegle, D. (2014). Technology differentiating instruction by flipping the classroom. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 51-55.
Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. In Proceedings from 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching with clickers. Center for research on learning and teaching occasional papers, 22, 1-8.
Ek 1. İncelenen makalelere ait kaynakça listesi
Alan Eager, E., Peirce, J., & Barlow, P. (2014). Math Bio or Biomath? Flipping the mathematical biology classroom. Letters in Biomathematics, 1(2), 139-155.
Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: Impact on grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 419-424.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
Baggaley, J. (2015). Flips and flops. Distance Education, 36(3), 437-447.
Becker, B. W. (2013). Start flipping out with guide on the side. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32(4), 257-260.
Blair, E., Maharaj, C., & Primus, S. (2015). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18.
Bliemel, M. J. (2014). Lessons learned from an inside-out flip in entrepreneurship education. Small Enterprise Research, 21(1), 117-128.
Bristol, T. (2014). Flipping the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43-46.
Bösner, S., Pickert, J., & Stibane, T. (2015). Teaching differential diagnosis in primary care using an inverted classroom approach: student satisfaction and gain in skills and knowledge. BMC medical education, 15(1), 1.
Burke, D. D.(2015). Scale-Up! Classroom design and use can facilitate learning. The Law Teacher, 49(2),189-205.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
Cohen, M. E. (2015). The flipped classroom as a tool for engaging discipline faculty in collaboration: A case study in library-business collaboration. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1-19.
Correa, M. (2015). Flipping the foreign language classroom and critical pedagogies a (new) old trend. Higher Education for the Future, 2(2), 114-125.
Das, B., & Sarkar, C. (2015). An innovative flipped class intervention to improve dose calculation skills of phase I medical students: A preliminary study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 67-74.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Eager, A. E., Peirce, J., & Barlow, P. (2014). Math Bio or Biomath? Flipping the mathematical biology classroom. Letters in Biomathematics, 1(2), 139-155. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC medical education, 14(1), 1.
Garver, M. S., & Roberts, B. A. (2013). Flipping & clicking your way to higher-order learning. Marketing Education Review, 23(1), 17-22.
Green, T. (2015). Flipped classrooms: an agenda for innovative marketing education in the digital era. Marketing Education Review, 25(3), 179-191.
Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 471-485.
Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip: A southern Minnesota school district flipped its math classrooms and raised achievement and student engagement. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20.
Hodges, T. S., & Weber, N. D. (2015). Making heads or tails of classroom flipping. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(2), 57-63.
Holmes, M. R., Tracy, E. M., Painter, L. L., Oestreich, T., & Park, H. (2015). Moving from flipcharts to the flipped classroom: using technology driven teaching methods to promote active learning in foundation and advanced masters social work courses. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 215-224.
Howland, K., & Good, J. (2015). Learning to communicate computationally with Flip: A bi- modal programming language for game creation. Computers & Education, 80, 224-240.
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96.
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology- enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473.
James, A. J., Chin, C. K., & Williams, B. R. (2014). Using the flipped classroom to improve student engagement and to prepare graduates to meet maritime industry requirements: a focus on maritime education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(2), 331-343.
Jungic, V., Kaur, H., Mulholland, J., & Xin, C. (2015). On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 508-520.
Kakosimos, K. E. (2015). Example of a micro-adaptive instruction methodology for the improvement of flipped-classrooms and adaptive-learning based on advanced blended-learning tools. Education for Chemical Engineers, 12, 1-11.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317-324.
Mattis, K. V. (2015). Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 231-248.
McEvoy, C. S., Cantore, K. M., Denlinger, L. N., Schleich, M. A., Stevens, N. M., Swavely, S. C., & Novick, M. B. (2014). Use of medical students in a flipped classroom programme in nutrition education for fourth-grade school students. Health Education Journal, 0017896914561879.
McLaughlin, J. E., & Rhoney, D. H. (2015). Comparison of an interactive e-learning preparatory tool and a conventional downloadable handout used within a flipped neurologic pharmacotherapy lecture. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 7(1), 12-19.
Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC medical education, 15(1),1.
Morgan, H. (2014). Focus on technology: flip your classroom to increase academic achievement. Childhood Education, 90(3), 239-241.
Mzoughi, T. (2015). An investigation of student web activity in a "flipped" introductory physics class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 235-240.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. TheInternet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Pannabecker, V., Barroso, C. S., & Lehmann, J. (2014). The flipped classroom: student-driven library research sessions for nutrition education. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3-4), 139-162.
Pinto, C., & Little, G. (2014). Flipped librarians: Assessing our own need to understand our users. The Journal of academic librarianship, 40(2), 192-193.
Prashar, A. (2015). Assessing the flipped classroom in operations management: A pilot study. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 126-138.
Rivera, E. (2015). Using the flipped classroom model in your library instruction course. The Reference Librarian, 56(1), 34-41.
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84.
Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2011). Flipping the classroom. Educ Horizons, 90, 5-7.
Siegle, D. (2014). Technology differentiating instruction by flipping the classroom. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 51-55.
Simpson, V., & Richards, E. (2015). Flipping the classroom to teach population health: increasing the relevance. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(3), 162-167.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research,15(2), 171-193.
Street, S. E., Gilliland, K. O., McNeil, C., & Royal, K. (2015). The flipped classroom improved medical student performance and satisfaction in a pre-clinical physiology course. Medical Science Educator, 25(1), 35-43.
Talbert, R. (2014). Inverting the linear algebra classroom. Primus, 24(5), 361-374.
Tomory, A., & Watson, S. L. (2015). Flipped classrooms for advanced science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 875-887.
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369.
Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class a method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 0098628313487461.
Yestrebsky, C. L. (2015). Flipping the classroom in a large chemistry class-research university environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,191, 1113-1118.
Youngkin, C. A. (2014). The flipped classroom: practices and opportunities for health sciences librarians. Medical reference services quarterly, 33(4), 367-374.

APA	AYDIN B, Demirer V (2017). TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. , 57 - 82.
Chicago	AYDIN Betül,Demirer Veysel TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. (2017): 57 - 82.
MLA	AYDIN Betül,Demirer Veysel TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. , 2017, ss.57 - 82.
AMA	AYDIN B,Demirer V TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. . 2017; 57 - 82.
Vancouver	AYDIN B,Demirer V TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. . 2017; 57 - 82.
IEEE	AYDIN B,Demirer V "TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ." , ss.57 - 82, 2017.
ISNAD	AYDIN, Betül - Demirer, Veysel. "TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ". (2017), 57-82.

APA	AYDIN B, Demirer V (2017). TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7(1), 57 - 82.
Chicago	AYDIN Betül,Demirer Veysel TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 7, no.1 (2017): 57 - 82.
MLA	AYDIN Betül,Demirer Veysel TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, vol.7, no.1, 2017, ss.57 - 82.
AMA	AYDIN B,Demirer V TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2017; 7(1): 57 - 82.
Vancouver	AYDIN B,Demirer V TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2017; 7(1): 57 - 82.
IEEE	AYDIN B,Demirer V "TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ." Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7, ss.57 - 82, 2017.
ISNAD	AYDIN, Betül - Demirer, Veysel. "TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMİŞ ÇALIŞMALARA BİR BAKIŞ: İÇERİK ANALİZİ". Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 7/1 (2017), 57-82.