COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY

Volkan KUKUL, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Şahin GÖKÇEARSLAN, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Enformatik Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Mustafa Serkan GÜNBATAR (Van 100. yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Türkiye)
Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama
7 1
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 158 - 179 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY

Öz:
Bilgisayar programlama, son yıllarda tüm dünyada K-12 eğitim müfredatlarında yer almaya başlamıştır ve programlama öz-yeterliğinin ölçülmesi için bir araç geliştirilmesine ihtiyaç duyulmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı bu ihtiyacı gidermek adına alana katkı sağlamaktır. Aracın geliştirilmesinde klasik ölçme teorisinin basamakları kullanılmıştır. Çalışma 2014-2015 eğitim öğretim yılının bahar döneminde bir devlet okulunda yaşları 12-14 arasında değişen 233 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın sonucunda 31 maddeden oluşan tek faktörlü ölçme aracı ortaya çıkmıştır. Ölçme aracındaki maddelerin madde yükleri 0.47 ile 0.71 arasında değişmektedir ve ölçeğin açıkladığı toplam varyans %41.15'tir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığını belirlemek amacıyla yapılan analizlere göre Cronbach alfa katsayısı 0.95, iki yarı metodu sonuçları ise 0.96 çıkmıştır ve bu sonuçlar ölçme aracının iç tutarlılığının yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini belirlemek amacıyla açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri uygulanmış ve analiz sonuçlarına göre ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

ORTAOKUL ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN PROGRAMLAMA ÖZYETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİ: GELİŞTİRME, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK

Öz:
Computer programming has been included in the curriculum of K12 education around the world and this has necessitated a tool for the assessment of the computer programming selfefficacy. Thus, this study aims to suggest the necessary scale for the field. In the scale development, the steps of classical measurement theory were applied. Following the expert review, the item pool was conducted with 233 students in a public secondary school which provides education to the age group of 12-14 in the school year 2014-2015. As a result of the study, a unidimensional 5-point Likert scale of 31 items was obtained. The factor loads varied between 0.47 and 0.71 and the explained variance rate was 41.15%. In the analysis of the internal consistency, sufficient values were found; the Cronbach alpha as 0.95 and the equivalent halves method result as 0.96. For the construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were applied and the result showed that the scale is valid and reliable.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. Encyclopedia for Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 792-795.
  • Altun, A., & Mazman, S. G. (2012). Programlamaya ilişkin öz yeterlilik algısı ölçeğinin Türkçe formumun geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3(2), 297-308.
  • Anastasiadou, S.D., & Karakos, A.S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1), 37-51.
  • Armoni, M. (2011). The nature of CS in K-12 curricula: the roots of confusion. ACM Inroads, 2(4), 19-20. doi:10.1145/2038876.2038883
  • Askar, P., & Davenport, D. (2009). .An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for java Programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology TOJET, 8(1): 26-32.
  • Austin, H.S. (1987). Predictors of pascal programming achievement for community college students. Proceedings of the eighteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Missouri, United States, 161-164. doi: 10.1145/31726.31752
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48 doi:10.1145/1929887.1929905
  • Black, T.R. (2006). Helping novice programming students succeed. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(2), 109-114.
  • Booth, S. (1992). Learning to program: A phenomenographic perspective. University of Gothenburg Publication, http://hdl.handle.net/2077/16224
  • Brichacek, A. (2014). Computational thinking boosts students' higher-order skills. Retrieved May 21, 2015 from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=232&category=Featured- videos&article=Computational%20thinking%20boosts%20students%E2%80%99%20higher -order%20skills.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences], Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with lisrel, prelis and simplis: basic concepts, applications, and programmings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocatiates, Publishers.
  • Caspersen, M. E., & Kolling M. (2009). STREAM: A first programming process. ACT Transaction on Computing Education, 9, 1-29. doi:10.1145/1513593.1513597
  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211, http://www.jstor.org/stable/249688
  • Çerezci, E.T. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri ve kullanılan uyum iyiliği indekslerinin karşılaştırılması. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü: Ankara.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., &Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). London: Sage publications.
  • Ellez, A. M. (2011). Ölçme araçlarında bulunması gereken özellikler. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (In Second Edition), 165-190. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
  • Fessakis, G., & Serafeim, K. (2009). Influence of the familiarization with scratch on future teachers' opinions and attitudes about programming and ICT in education. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 258-262). ACM. Doi: 10.1145/1595496.1562957
  • Feurzeig, W., & Papert, S. A. (2011). Programming-languages as a conceptual framework for teaching mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 487-501.doi: 10.1080/10494820903520040
  • Gökçearslan, Ş., & Alper, A. (2015). The effect of locus of control on learners' sense of community and academic success in the context of online learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 64-73. Doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.003
  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12 A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. doi: 10.3102/0013189X12463051
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. PrenticeHall International, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • ISTE. (2007). ISTE standards students. International Society for Technology in Education: Retrieved, August, 2015 from https://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards- S_PDF.pdf
  • Jones, S. P. (2011). Computing at School International comparisons. Retrieved Ağustos 5, 2015 from http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/index.php?id=documents adresinden.
  • Kafai, Y., & Burke, Q. (2013). Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 61-65.
  • Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code. org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200-210. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.047
  • Kan, A., & Akbaş. A. (2005). Lise öğrencilerinin kimya dersine yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1 (2), 227-237.
  • Kay, R. H., & Knaack, L. (2005). A case for ubiquitous, integrated computing in teacher education. doi:10.1080/14759390500200213 Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 391-412.
  • Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: A case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education, 73, 26-39. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010
  • Kelleher, C., & Pausch, R. (2007). Using storytelling to motivate programming. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 58-64. Doi: 10.1145/1272516.1272540
  • Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1455-1464). ACM. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240844
  • Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge
  • Korkmaz, Ö., & Altun, H. (2014). Adapting computer programming self-efficacy scale and engineering students' self-efficacy perceptions. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 1(1), 20-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.14.02.1.1
  • Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Computational http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 Scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior,
  • Lee, J., Park, J. G., & Hwang, Y. (2013). A study on general and specific programming self- efficacy with antecedents from the social cognitive theory. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 4(8), 423-432.
  • Lewis, C. M. (2010). How programming environment shapes perception, learning and goals: logo vs. scratch. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 346-350). ACM. doi: 10.1145/1734263.1734383
  • Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  • Maheshwari, P. (1997, July). Teaching programming paradigms and languages for qualitative learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian conference on Computer science education (pp. 32-39). ACM. doi:10.1145/299359.299365
  • Mazman, S. G., & Altun, A. (2013). Programlama-I dersinin böte bölümü öğrencilerinin programlamaya ilişkin öz yeterlilik algıları üzerine etkisi. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 2(3), 24-29.
  • Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological measurement, 49(4), 893-899. doi: 10.1177/001316448904900412
  • Nilsen H., & Larsen A. (2011). Using the personalized system of instruction in an introductory programming course. NOKOBIT, 27-38. November 21-23.
  • Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • Özel, M., Timur, B., Timur, S. & Bilen, K. (2013). Öğretim elemanlarının pedagojik alan bilgilerini değerlendirme anketinin Türkçeye uyarlanması çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 14 (1), 407-428.
  • Pallant, J. (2010). A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. Australia: Allen and Unwin Books.
  • Phillips, P. (2009). Computational thinking a problem solving tool for every classroom. Computer http://csta.acm.org/Resources/sub/ResourceFiles/CompThinking.pdf. Teacher Association. Retrieved August 2015 from
  • Plucker, J. A. (2003). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in gifted education: Examples with self-concept data. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 20-35.
  • Ramalingam, V., & Wiedenbeck, S. (1998). Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analyses of novice programmer self- efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(4), 367-381. Doi: 10.2190/C670- Y3C8-LTJ1-CT3P
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., ... & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67. doi: 10.1145/1592761.1592779
  • Seehorn, D., Carey, S., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., Moix, D., O'Grady-Cunniff, D., ... & Verno, A. (2011). CSTA K--12 Computer Science Standards: Revised 2011. ACM.
  • Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Yeh, S. C., Yang, S. J., Wang, J. L., Han, L., & Hsu, G. L. (2014). Effects of unidirectional vs. reciprocal teaching strategies on web-based computer programming learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(1), 67-95. doi:10.2190/EC.50.1.d
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L.v S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3. Ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
  • Uysal, M. P., & Yalın, H. İ. (2012). Öğretim etkinlikleri kuramına göre tasarlanan öğretim yazılımının akademik başarıya etkisi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1), 185- 204.
  • Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van Der Kloot, W. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 777-792.
  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner's guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
  • Weinberg, A. E. (2013). Computational thinking: An investigation of the existing scholarship and research. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Colorado State University, School of Education, Colorado.
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 3717-3725. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  • Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and Why? Center for Computational Thinking https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/papers/TheLinkWing.pdf Mellon: Retrieved, May 2014 Retreived from
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
APA kukul v, Gökçearslan Ş, Günbatar M (2017). COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. , 158 - 179.
Chicago kukul volkan,Gökçearslan Şahin,Günbatar Mustafa Serkan COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. (2017): 158 - 179.
MLA kukul volkan,Gökçearslan Şahin,Günbatar Mustafa Serkan COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. , 2017, ss.158 - 179.
AMA kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. . 2017; 158 - 179.
Vancouver kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. . 2017; 158 - 179.
IEEE kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M "COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY." , ss.158 - 179, 2017.
ISNAD kukul, volkan vd. "COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY". (2017), 158-179.
APA kukul v, Gökçearslan Ş, Günbatar M (2017). COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7(1), 158 - 179.
Chicago kukul volkan,Gökçearslan Şahin,Günbatar Mustafa Serkan COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 7, no.1 (2017): 158 - 179.
MLA kukul volkan,Gökçearslan Şahin,Günbatar Mustafa Serkan COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, vol.7, no.1, 2017, ss.158 - 179.
AMA kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2017; 7(1): 158 - 179.
Vancouver kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2017; 7(1): 158 - 179.
IEEE kukul v,Gökçearslan Ş,Günbatar M "COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY." Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7, ss.158 - 179, 2017.
ISNAD kukul, volkan vd. "COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SELF-EFFICACY SCALE (CPSES) FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND RELIABILITY". Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 7/1 (2017), 158-179.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 19:25

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları