Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 50 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı fen öğretiminde katılımlı ve motive edici bir sınıf ortamının oluşturulmasına yönelik mobil teknoloji kullanımını incelemektir. Bu amaçla Mobil Sınıf İçi Etkileşim Sistemi (MSES) tasarlanmıştır. Sistem, Eğitim Fakültesi'nin Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği programına kayıtlı 71 üniversite öğrencisi tarafından bir laboratuvar dersinde kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri, bir motivasyon ölçeği ve açık uçlu soru formu kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler SPSS ve NVIVO paket programlarıyla analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler, ders sonucunda öğrencilerin motivasyonlarında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğunu ve öğrencilerin geliştirilen sistemin fen öğretimde kullanılmasına dönük olumlu görüşleri olduğunu göstermiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik Eğitim, Özel

Engaging and Motivating Classroom Environment in Science Instruction: Mobile Technology Use

Öz:
Introduction The motivation of the student is affective inresulting a certain study, making new attempts for selffulfilling and using new strategies. Besides it is being an essential element for learning to form an motivating and participating classroom environmental seems difficult to keep student"s motivation high and providing an active participation in the present class seating order. The classroom environment"s being suitable for learning creates a positive effect on student"s motivation. This also affects their successes positively. The student who is not inactive during the class affects the motivation of the teacher. The active participation of the student in the class depends on the active classroom environment. But classrooms" being mostly crowded forms an important handicap to form a suitable classroom environment. It is seen that students are more active in the labs than they are in the classrooms or in the lecture hall. This activeness can change according to the activities done. Student may have to carry out an experiment on his own or work in pairs. It is difficult in crowded classrooms for students to discuss one another, contact directly with the teacher and ask questions to him and have information about the other experiments. This is an important problem which is needs to be solved in science lecture. Using various theories used in science teaching in the right time and the right place can increase the success in the science lecture. But we need to use various technologies in order to reach the desired learning aims. The aim on the classroom communication technologies that have been used recently is to get easiness in learning construction and success by increasing the interaction between teacher and student which is mostly needed in learning environment. Employability situation of m-CIS (Mobile Classroom Interaction System) which is designed to make students participate more and increase their lecture motivation is researched. Method The practice was done in two different classrooms including 35 and 36 students. The study was done with registered 71 first grade students of the science teaching department. The motivation scale items used to determine the changes in student motivation were prepared by researching related literature. Prepared items were researched by an expert group. The items which are thought to be the most convenient was selected and researched in the sense of language efficiency. The 16 items scale was prepared at the result of the solidity analyses. The calculated solidity coefficient of this scale is (Cronbach"s Alpha) ? = 0,87. The data taken from the study, in which qualitative and quantitative methods were used based on the research questions, was evaluated separately. To determine the motivational change based on m-CIS usage of students, Paired-Samples "t" test was used. The opinions of the students oriented at the system usage were gathered written from the students and the themes which the opinions form with NVIVO were determined. The result of motivation test and the situation of taking participation and motivational change of students based on opinions were evaluated.ResultPaired-Samples "t" test was applied to define whether there is a certain difference on motivational changes of the students in m-SES based classes. According to the test result, it is seen that there is a considerable difference between the averages of the pre-test and post-test. It is seen that the usage of m-CIS causes a positive effect on students" motivation. The ideas of the students on system usage were collected in three different themes. These are the usage of system and positive tendency to the lesson, positive opinions to learning teaching phase and the ideas on system and its usage. Discussion An interaction environment in classroom needs to be created in order to form a motivating and participant classroom environment. When m-CIS based change on student motivation is studied, it is seen that the usage of this system has a positive effect on student"s motivation. Designed m-CIS is thought to be useful to deal with the problem when it is considered that high motivation to a lesson is required. It can be thought to give a significant contribution that the students are in the process system usage and having positive tendency to the lesson. But the situation should be evaluated in the attitude aspect to make that tendency have longer effect on student. It is out of the question to talk about attitude change with a short period of study. Students should personally are in the system usage and connect with the teacher directly so then we can say system has positive effect on students. It is seen that students" opinions on system usage are gathered in three different places. According to this, if an evaluation is done about the usage of the system on science lesson; o Students are in positive tendency on using the system. New studies for its using classroom environment can be done in order to make an evaluation of the system in using science labs. o Students say that system is useful for their learning. New studies can be done on what problems this system can be used. But when the students" expectations are considered, a teaching pedagogy can be formed by making different activities for different lessons. o Students give opinions about the usage of the system individually and in group. The lab activities that have important role in science teaching should be done individually and in group. Individual usage and group usage situation in new m-CIS applications, that will be done in the future, can be evaluated so the contribution of the system to science teaching can be better evaluated.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik Eğitim, Özel
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Addison, S., Wright, A., ve Milner, R. (2009). Using Clickers to Improve Student Engagement and Performance in an Introductory Biochemistry Class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84-91. doi: Doi 10.1002/Bmb.20264
  • Aydın, A. (2008). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernandez-Ortega, B., ve Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102-110. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., ve Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn : brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Cano, F. (2006). An in-depth analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 1023-1038. doi: Doi 10.1177/0013164406288167
  • Çelik, V. (2002). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Crossgrove, K., ve Curran, K. L. (2008). Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors- level biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 7(1), 146-154.
  • Efstathiou, N., ve Bailey, C. (2012). Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes. Nurse Educ Today, 32(1), 91-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.017
  • Fies, C., ve Marshall, J. (2008). The C(3) Framework: Evaluating Classroom Response System Interactions in University Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 483-499. doi: DOI 10.1007/s10956-008-9116-4
  • Gould, J. E. (2002). Concise handbook of experimental methods for the behavioral and biological sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Gray, K., Owens, K., Liang, X., ve Steer, D. (2012). Assessing Multimedia Influences on Student Responses Using a Personal Response System. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 392-402. doi: DOI 10.1007/s10956-011-9332-1
  • Gürbüz, S., ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin yayıncılık.
  • Hanrahan, M. (1998). The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737-753. doi: Doi 10.1080/0950069980200609
  • Hoekstra, A. (2008). Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses. Learning Media and Technology, 33(4), 329-341. doi: Doi 10.1080/17439880802497081
  • Judson, E., Sawada, ve Daiyo. (2002). Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
  • Kenwright, K. (2009). Clickers in the Classroom. TechTrends, 53(1), 74-77.
  • MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Jr, J. B. D., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., . . . Geddes, B. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Education Tech Research Dev, 56, 125-145. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9053-6
  • MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Jr., J. B. D., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., . . . Lichti, S. M. (2008). The Influence of Learning Characteristics on Evaluation of Audience Response Technology Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(2), 25-46.
  • Mareno, N., Bremner, M., ve Emerson, C. (2010). The use of audience response systems in nursing education: best practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 7, Article32. doi: 10.2202/1548- 923X.2049
  • Oigara, J., ve Keengwe, J. (2013). Students" perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 15-28. doi: 10.1007/s10639-011- 9173-9
  • ÖSYM. (2015). 2015-ÖSYS Yerleştirme Sonuçlarına İlişkin Sayısal Bilgiler: En Küçük ve En Büyük Puanlar (TABLO-4). Erişim: 18-11-2015, http://www.osym.gov.tr/belge/1-23595/2015-osys- yerlestirme-sonuclarina-iliskin-sayisal-bilgi-.html
  • Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K., ve Crawford, V. M. (2007). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Education Tech Research Dev, 55, 315-346. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4
  • Perry, R. P., ve Smart, J. C. (1997). Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. New York: Agathon Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R., ve Groot, E. V. D. (1990). Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
  • Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., ve Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE Life Sci Educ, 6(1), 29-41. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190
  • Sönmez, V., ve Alacapınar, F. G. (2011). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Üredi, I. (2005). Algılanan Anne Baba Tumtularının İlköğretim 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öz -Düzenleme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel İnançları Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Woolfolk, A., Hughes, M., ve Walkup, V. (2008). Psychology in Education. Madrid: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Yılmaz, Ö., ve Sanalan, V. A. (2011). M-learning: M-learning Applications, Students Input for M- learning in Science Instruction. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 172-180.
  • Yılmaz, Ö., Sanalan, V. A., ve Koç, A. (2009, 6-8 May). An Evaluation Of M-learning Applications. Paper presented at the 9th International Educational Technology Conference Ankara-Turkey.
  • Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching with clickers. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, 22.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
APA YILMAZ Ö, SANALAN V (2015). Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. , 37 - 50.
Chicago YILMAZ Özkan,SANALAN V. Aytekin Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. (2015): 37 - 50.
MLA YILMAZ Özkan,SANALAN V. Aytekin Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. , 2015, ss.37 - 50.
AMA YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. . 2015; 37 - 50.
Vancouver YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. . 2015; 37 - 50.
IEEE YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V "Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı." , ss.37 - 50, 2015.
ISNAD YILMAZ, Özkan - SANALAN, V. Aytekin. "Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı". (2015), 37-50.
APA YILMAZ Ö, SANALAN V (2015). Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 37 - 50.
Chicago YILMAZ Özkan,SANALAN V. Aytekin Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 34, no.2 (2015): 37 - 50.
MLA YILMAZ Özkan,SANALAN V. Aytekin Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.34, no.2, 2015, ss.37 - 50.
AMA YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 34(2): 37 - 50.
Vancouver YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 34(2): 37 - 50.
IEEE YILMAZ Ö,SANALAN V "Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı." Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, ss.37 - 50, 2015.
ISNAD YILMAZ, Özkan - SANALAN, V. Aytekin. "Fen Öğretiminde Katılımlı ve Motive Edici Sınıf Ortamı: Mobil Teknoloji Kullanımı". Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 34/2 (2015), 37-50.